Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in nuclear medicine 2022-05, Vol.52 (3), p.302-311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 302 |
container_title | Seminars in nuclear medicine |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | López-Mora, Diego Alfonso Carrió, Ignasi Flotats, Albert |
description | Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent one the introduction of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) as an alternative to standard photomultiplier tubes used in analog PET/CT systems. SiPMs, the basis for the so called digital PET/CT systems, are smaller than standard photomultiplier tubes (enabling higher spatial resolution) and provide up to 100% coverage of the crystal area, as well as high sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution. SiPMs in combination with optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters improve the localization of the annihilation events, provide high definition PET images, and offer higher sensitivity and higher diagnostic performance. This article summarizes the evidence about the superior performance of the state of the art digital PET and highlights its potential clinical implications. Digital PET opens new perspectives in the quantification and characterization of small lesions, which are mostly undetectable using analog PET systems, potentially changing patient management and improving outcomes in oncological and non-oncological diseases. Moreover, digital PET offers the possibility to reduce radiation dose and scan times which may facilitate the implementation of PET to address unmet clinical needs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.10.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604018051</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001299821000805</els_id><sourcerecordid>2604018051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af86acf8958fc748166ca219ffcef94f7b2e74f4413a881be627da49b5833cfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCyhLNgl-x2GDSilQqRIsytpyHLty5SQlTirx9zgqFUtW87h3ZjQHgATBDEFG7ndZMHUzaF-bKsMQo9jOIKRnYIoYEynlmJyDKYQQpbgoxARchbCDEDNWsEswIVQQzlE-BejZbV2vfPKx3CSHkMwb5dvtWD0kC-8ap6O2qvc-Jr1rm_B4DS6s8sHc_MYZ-HxZbhZv6fr9dbWYr1NNctqnygqutBUFE1bnVCDOtcKosFYbW1Cbl9jk1FKKiBIClYbjvFK0KJkgRNuKzMDdce--a78GE3pZu6CN96ox7RAk5pBCJCBD0SqOVt21IXTGyn3natV9SwTlCEzu5B8wOQIblQgsjt7-XhnKUTsNnghFw9PRYOKvB2c6GbQzjTaV64zuZdW6_6_8AJGnf94</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604018051</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>López-Mora, Diego Alfonso ; Carrió, Ignasi ; Flotats, Albert</creator><creatorcontrib>López-Mora, Diego Alfonso ; Carrió, Ignasi ; Flotats, Albert</creatorcontrib><description>Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent one the introduction of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) as an alternative to standard photomultiplier tubes used in analog PET/CT systems. SiPMs, the basis for the so called digital PET/CT systems, are smaller than standard photomultiplier tubes (enabling higher spatial resolution) and provide up to 100% coverage of the crystal area, as well as high sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution. SiPMs in combination with optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters improve the localization of the annihilation events, provide high definition PET images, and offer higher sensitivity and higher diagnostic performance. This article summarizes the evidence about the superior performance of the state of the art digital PET and highlights its potential clinical implications. Digital PET opens new perspectives in the quantification and characterization of small lesions, which are mostly undetectable using analog PET systems, potentially changing patient management and improving outcomes in oncological and non-oncological diseases. Moreover, digital PET offers the possibility to reduce radiation dose and scan times which may facilitate the implementation of PET to address unmet clinical needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34836617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><ispartof>Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2022-05, Vol.52 (3), p.302-311</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af86acf8958fc748166ca219ffcef94f7b2e74f4413a881be627da49b5833cfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af86acf8958fc748166ca219ffcef94f7b2e74f4413a881be627da49b5833cfd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3533-7362</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-Mora, Diego Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrió, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flotats, Albert</creatorcontrib><title>Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?</title><title>Seminars in nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent one the introduction of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) as an alternative to standard photomultiplier tubes used in analog PET/CT systems. SiPMs, the basis for the so called digital PET/CT systems, are smaller than standard photomultiplier tubes (enabling higher spatial resolution) and provide up to 100% coverage of the crystal area, as well as high sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution. SiPMs in combination with optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters improve the localization of the annihilation events, provide high definition PET images, and offer higher sensitivity and higher diagnostic performance. This article summarizes the evidence about the superior performance of the state of the art digital PET and highlights its potential clinical implications. Digital PET opens new perspectives in the quantification and characterization of small lesions, which are mostly undetectable using analog PET systems, potentially changing patient management and improving outcomes in oncological and non-oncological diseases. Moreover, digital PET offers the possibility to reduce radiation dose and scan times which may facilitate the implementation of PET to address unmet clinical needs.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><issn>0001-2998</issn><issn>1558-4623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCyhLNgl-x2GDSilQqRIsytpyHLty5SQlTirx9zgqFUtW87h3ZjQHgATBDEFG7ndZMHUzaF-bKsMQo9jOIKRnYIoYEynlmJyDKYQQpbgoxARchbCDEDNWsEswIVQQzlE-BejZbV2vfPKx3CSHkMwb5dvtWD0kC-8ap6O2qvc-Jr1rm_B4DS6s8sHc_MYZ-HxZbhZv6fr9dbWYr1NNctqnygqutBUFE1bnVCDOtcKosFYbW1Cbl9jk1FKKiBIClYbjvFK0KJkgRNuKzMDdce--a78GE3pZu6CN96ox7RAk5pBCJCBD0SqOVt21IXTGyn3natV9SwTlCEzu5B8wOQIblQgsjt7-XhnKUTsNnghFw9PRYOKvB2c6GbQzjTaV64zuZdW6_6_8AJGnf94</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>López-Mora, Diego Alfonso</creator><creator>Carrió, Ignasi</creator><creator>Flotats, Albert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-7362</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?</title><author>López-Mora, Diego Alfonso ; Carrió, Ignasi ; Flotats, Albert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-af86acf8958fc748166ca219ffcef94f7b2e74f4413a881be627da49b5833cfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-Mora, Diego Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrió, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flotats, Albert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-Mora, Diego Alfonso</au><au>Carrió, Ignasi</au><au>Flotats, Albert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>302-311</pages><issn>0001-2998</issn><eissn>1558-4623</eissn><abstract>Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent one the introduction of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) as an alternative to standard photomultiplier tubes used in analog PET/CT systems. SiPMs, the basis for the so called digital PET/CT systems, are smaller than standard photomultiplier tubes (enabling higher spatial resolution) and provide up to 100% coverage of the crystal area, as well as high sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution. SiPMs in combination with optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters improve the localization of the annihilation events, provide high definition PET images, and offer higher sensitivity and higher diagnostic performance. This article summarizes the evidence about the superior performance of the state of the art digital PET and highlights its potential clinical implications. Digital PET opens new perspectives in the quantification and characterization of small lesions, which are mostly undetectable using analog PET systems, potentially changing patient management and improving outcomes in oncological and non-oncological diseases. Moreover, digital PET offers the possibility to reduce radiation dose and scan times which may facilitate the implementation of PET to address unmet clinical needs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34836617</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.10.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3533-7362</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-2998 |
ispartof | Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2022-05, Vol.52 (3), p.302-311 |
issn | 0001-2998 1558-4623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604018051 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Humans Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods Positron-Emission Tomography - methods |
title | Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T14%3A03%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20PET%20vs%20Analog%20PET:%20Clinical%20Implications?&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-Mora,%20Diego%20Alfonso&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=302-311&rft.issn=0001-2998&rft.eissn=1558-4623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604018051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604018051&rft_id=info:pmid/34836617&rft_els_id=S0001299821000805&rfr_iscdi=true |