Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient‐reported outcome measures

Misconceptions about visible skin diseases are widespread, and patients often face discrimination and stigmatization due to their condition. The associated negative health and psychosocial consequences of stigmatization in skin diseases have prompted an increase in research activity in recent times,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2022-04, Vol.36 (4), p.499-525
Hauptverfasser: Luck‐Sikorski, C., Roßmann, P., Topp, J., Augustin, M., Sommer, R., Weinberger, N.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 525
container_issue 4
container_start_page 499
container_title Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
container_volume 36
creator Luck‐Sikorski, C.
Roßmann, P.
Topp, J.
Augustin, M.
Sommer, R.
Weinberger, N.A.
description Misconceptions about visible skin diseases are widespread, and patients often face discrimination and stigmatization due to their condition. The associated negative health and psychosocial consequences of stigmatization in skin diseases have prompted an increase in research activity in recent times, resulting in a wide variety of assessment measures. This study aimed at aggregating and evaluating evidence of psychometric properties and methodological quality of published measures to assess stigma in visible skin diseases. Studies assessing stigmatization in visible skin diseases were searched in four databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Embase) until February 2021. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Papers regarding development and/or validation of measures were identified by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (i) quantitative studies in (ii) populations with skin diseases using (iii) questionnaires explicitly assessing (iv) perceived or public stigmatization or discrimination available in (iv) English or German language. The COnsensus‐based Standards of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate their psychometric properties and risk of bias. 35 studies using 21 instruments were identified. Twenty instruments focused on assessing the perceived reality of those affected by visible skin diseases, while public stigma was only assessed by two instruments. Twelve scales could be recommended for use, while nine instruments had the potential to be recommended after further studies have assessed their quality. Some limitations are to be noted. Only studies in English and German were included. Research on self‐constructed instruments can lead to new validated instruments, but they were not included in the review at this point. Several validated instruments could be recommended for use. Future research is needed regarding the assessment of stigma across different visible skin diseases, in children and adolescents, and in the general public.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jdv.17833
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2601973795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2601973795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3793-91738d0561597fa3f8d13a11bfc5e6e4bec03a1b243238bc6cb803aa348c14253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtOxDAURS0EguFTsAHkEoqAHedj06HhLyQaoI0c5wUZknjwSwZNBztgCayFpbASPAzQ4cb21dF5epeQbc72eTgHD9V0n-dSiCUy4kkmI8GkWCYjpuIsUipVa2Qd8YExxnkqV8maSGTgpRqR1yNEQGyh66mrKfb2vtXUQ6N7qGjv6NSiLRug-Gg7WlkEHfhDqj_ecYY9tLq3JvBTC89UdxWFqW6GELpu7puEV1B_vrx5mDg_d7qhN64F2gbT4AE3yUqtG4Stn3uD3J6e3IzPo6vrs4vx0VVkRK5EpHguZMXSjKcqr7WoZcWF5rysTQoZJCUYFv5lnIhYyNJkppQh0GFVw5M4FRtkd-GdePc0APZFa9FA0-gO3IBFnDGu8jBrju4tUOMdooe6mHjbaj8rOCvmjReh8eK78cDu_GiHsoXqj_ytOAAHC-DZNjD731RcHt8tlF9pYI78</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2601973795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient‐reported outcome measures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Luck‐Sikorski, C. ; Roßmann, P. ; Topp, J. ; Augustin, M. ; Sommer, R. ; Weinberger, N.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luck‐Sikorski, C. ; Roßmann, P. ; Topp, J. ; Augustin, M. ; Sommer, R. ; Weinberger, N.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Misconceptions about visible skin diseases are widespread, and patients often face discrimination and stigmatization due to their condition. The associated negative health and psychosocial consequences of stigmatization in skin diseases have prompted an increase in research activity in recent times, resulting in a wide variety of assessment measures. This study aimed at aggregating and evaluating evidence of psychometric properties and methodological quality of published measures to assess stigma in visible skin diseases. Studies assessing stigmatization in visible skin diseases were searched in four databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Embase) until February 2021. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Papers regarding development and/or validation of measures were identified by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (i) quantitative studies in (ii) populations with skin diseases using (iii) questionnaires explicitly assessing (iv) perceived or public stigmatization or discrimination available in (iv) English or German language. The COnsensus‐based Standards of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate their psychometric properties and risk of bias. 35 studies using 21 instruments were identified. Twenty instruments focused on assessing the perceived reality of those affected by visible skin diseases, while public stigma was only assessed by two instruments. Twelve scales could be recommended for use, while nine instruments had the potential to be recommended after further studies have assessed their quality. Some limitations are to be noted. Only studies in English and German were included. Research on self‐constructed instruments can lead to new validated instruments, but they were not included in the review at this point. Several validated instruments could be recommended for use. Future research is needed regarding the assessment of stigma across different visible skin diseases, in children and adolescents, and in the general public.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-9959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3083</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17833</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34817889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Consensus ; Humans ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Psychometrics ; Skin Diseases ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2022-04, Vol.36 (4), p.499-525</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3793-91738d0561597fa3f8d13a11bfc5e6e4bec03a1b243238bc6cb803aa348c14253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3793-91738d0561597fa3f8d13a11bfc5e6e4bec03a1b243238bc6cb803aa348c14253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7105-3244 ; 0000-0001-9791-3911 ; 0000-0002-3080-497X ; 0000-0002-4026-8728</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjdv.17833$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjdv.17833$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34817889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luck‐Sikorski, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roßmann, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topp, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, N.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient‐reported outcome measures</title><title>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</title><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><description>Misconceptions about visible skin diseases are widespread, and patients often face discrimination and stigmatization due to their condition. The associated negative health and psychosocial consequences of stigmatization in skin diseases have prompted an increase in research activity in recent times, resulting in a wide variety of assessment measures. This study aimed at aggregating and evaluating evidence of psychometric properties and methodological quality of published measures to assess stigma in visible skin diseases. Studies assessing stigmatization in visible skin diseases were searched in four databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Embase) until February 2021. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Papers regarding development and/or validation of measures were identified by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (i) quantitative studies in (ii) populations with skin diseases using (iii) questionnaires explicitly assessing (iv) perceived or public stigmatization or discrimination available in (iv) English or German language. The COnsensus‐based Standards of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate their psychometric properties and risk of bias. 35 studies using 21 instruments were identified. Twenty instruments focused on assessing the perceived reality of those affected by visible skin diseases, while public stigma was only assessed by two instruments. Twelve scales could be recommended for use, while nine instruments had the potential to be recommended after further studies have assessed their quality. Some limitations are to be noted. Only studies in English and German were included. Research on self‐constructed instruments can lead to new validated instruments, but they were not included in the review at this point. Several validated instruments could be recommended for use. Future research is needed regarding the assessment of stigma across different visible skin diseases, in children and adolescents, and in the general public.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Skin Diseases</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0926-9959</issn><issn>1468-3083</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtOxDAURS0EguFTsAHkEoqAHedj06HhLyQaoI0c5wUZknjwSwZNBztgCayFpbASPAzQ4cb21dF5epeQbc72eTgHD9V0n-dSiCUy4kkmI8GkWCYjpuIsUipVa2Qd8YExxnkqV8maSGTgpRqR1yNEQGyh66mrKfb2vtXUQ6N7qGjv6NSiLRug-Gg7WlkEHfhDqj_ecYY9tLq3JvBTC89UdxWFqW6GELpu7puEV1B_vrx5mDg_d7qhN64F2gbT4AE3yUqtG4Stn3uD3J6e3IzPo6vrs4vx0VVkRK5EpHguZMXSjKcqr7WoZcWF5rysTQoZJCUYFv5lnIhYyNJkppQh0GFVw5M4FRtkd-GdePc0APZFa9FA0-gO3IBFnDGu8jBrju4tUOMdooe6mHjbaj8rOCvmjReh8eK78cDu_GiHsoXqj_ytOAAHC-DZNjD731RcHt8tlF9pYI78</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Luck‐Sikorski, C.</creator><creator>Roßmann, P.</creator><creator>Topp, J.</creator><creator>Augustin, M.</creator><creator>Sommer, R.</creator><creator>Weinberger, N.A.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-3244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-3911</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-497X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-8728</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient‐reported outcome measures</title><author>Luck‐Sikorski, C. ; Roßmann, P. ; Topp, J. ; Augustin, M. ; Sommer, R. ; Weinberger, N.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3793-91738d0561597fa3f8d13a11bfc5e6e4bec03a1b243238bc6cb803aa348c14253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Skin Diseases</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luck‐Sikorski, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roßmann, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topp, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommer, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinberger, N.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luck‐Sikorski, C.</au><au>Roßmann, P.</au><au>Topp, J.</au><au>Augustin, M.</au><au>Sommer, R.</au><au>Weinberger, N.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient‐reported outcome measures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology</jtitle><addtitle>J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>525</epage><pages>499-525</pages><issn>0926-9959</issn><eissn>1468-3083</eissn><abstract>Misconceptions about visible skin diseases are widespread, and patients often face discrimination and stigmatization due to their condition. The associated negative health and psychosocial consequences of stigmatization in skin diseases have prompted an increase in research activity in recent times, resulting in a wide variety of assessment measures. This study aimed at aggregating and evaluating evidence of psychometric properties and methodological quality of published measures to assess stigma in visible skin diseases. Studies assessing stigmatization in visible skin diseases were searched in four databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Embase) until February 2021. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Papers regarding development and/or validation of measures were identified by two independent researchers. Inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (i) quantitative studies in (ii) populations with skin diseases using (iii) questionnaires explicitly assessing (iv) perceived or public stigmatization or discrimination available in (iv) English or German language. The COnsensus‐based Standards of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to evaluate their psychometric properties and risk of bias. 35 studies using 21 instruments were identified. Twenty instruments focused on assessing the perceived reality of those affected by visible skin diseases, while public stigma was only assessed by two instruments. Twelve scales could be recommended for use, while nine instruments had the potential to be recommended after further studies have assessed their quality. Some limitations are to be noted. Only studies in English and German were included. Research on self‐constructed instruments can lead to new validated instruments, but they were not included in the review at this point. Several validated instruments could be recommended for use. Future research is needed regarding the assessment of stigma across different visible skin diseases, in children and adolescents, and in the general public.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>34817889</pmid><doi>10.1111/jdv.17833</doi><tpages>525</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-3244</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9791-3911</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-497X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-8728</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-9959
ispartof Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2022-04, Vol.36 (4), p.499-525
issn 0926-9959
1468-3083
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2601973795
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Child
Consensus
Humans
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Psychometrics
Skin Diseases
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Assessment of stigma related to visible skin diseases: a systematic review and evaluation of patient‐reported outcome measures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A10%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20stigma%20related%20to%20visible%20skin%20diseases:%20a%C2%A0systematic%20review%20and%20evaluation%20of%20patient%E2%80%90reported%20outcome%20measures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20European%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology%20and%20Venereology&rft.au=Luck%E2%80%90Sikorski,%20C.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=525&rft.pages=499-525&rft.issn=0926-9959&rft.eissn=1468-3083&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jdv.17833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2601973795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2601973795&rft_id=info:pmid/34817889&rfr_iscdi=true