Return to Sports Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Possible but Remains Questionable: A Systematic Review

To evaluate the return to sports rate and time following meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched in December 2020. Eligibility criteria included clinical studies reporting the return to sport rate following MAT with ≥12-month follow-up. A total of 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2022-04, Vol.38 (4), p.1351-1361
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Abdulaziz F., Rinaldi, Joseph, Noorzad, Ali S., Zikria, Bashir A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1361
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1351
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 38
creator Ahmed, Abdulaziz F.
Rinaldi, Joseph
Noorzad, Ali S.
Zikria, Bashir A.
description To evaluate the return to sports rate and time following meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched in December 2020. Eligibility criteria included clinical studies reporting the return to sport rate following MAT with ≥12-month follow-up. A total of 14 case series were included with 670 patients. The bone bridge technique was used for all transplantations in 5 studies, and suture fixations with bone tunnels were used for all transplantations in 5 studies. In 2 studies, bone plugs were used for medial menisci and bone bridge for lateral menisci. In 1 study, suture fixation was used for medial menisci, and bone bridge for lateral menisci. The return to sports rate ranged from 20% to 91.7%, with 2 studies reporting low return to sport rates. The return to sport time ranged between 7.6 and 16.9 months. The return to preinjury level had a rate of 7% to 100%. Return to a higher level of sports was reported in only 2 studies (28.5% to 86%). Return to a lower level of sports was reported in low proportions in most studies. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, the Lysholm knee and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) had significant improvements after MAT. The KOOS quality of life subscore did not change significantly in 1 study. The total reoperation rate after MAT ranged between 3.1% and 80%, whereas the total failure ranged between 1.1% and 30.1%. Despite that most studies reporting high return to sports rates, the current level of evidence is low, with all studies being case series. There is significant variability in the reported return to sports rate, time, and level. Therefore, high-quality comparative studies are mandated to elucidate whether MAT is associated with higher return to sports rates and levels. IV, systematic review.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598538520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806321009786</els_id><sourcerecordid>2598538520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2fec5c769d3ae78f7a271cb6eae826697a56addf6547e0f84c27b9e0b6d24863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtu2zAQRYmgQew4-YOi4LIbqXxIpNRFASNoUgMO8vKeoKiRS0MWXZKKkb8vBaddZjUA53Bm7kHoMyU5JVR82-Xax9_e5YwwmlOaE8LP0JyWTGSccfoJzYks6qwigs_QZQg7kghe8Qs044WsSlaXc3R8hjj6AUeHXw7Ox4BvXd-7ox22-B4GG4zu8TK9bL3uIt54PYRDr4eoo3UDXgX86EKwTQ-4GSN-hr22Q8BPI4QJ0KnxHS_xy1uIqRWtScirheMVOu90H-D6vS7Q5vbn5uZXtn64W90s15nhgsWMdWBKI0Xdcg2y6qRmkppGgIaKCVFLXQrdtp0oCwmkqwrDZFMDaUTLikrwBfp6Gnvw7s90k9qnSNCnBODGoFhZVyVPLkhCixNqfErkoVMHb_favylK1GRc7dTJuJqMK0rV5HOBvrxvGJs9tP8__VOcgB8nAFLMFN2rYCwMBlrrwUTVOvvxhr-3ipZS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2598538520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to Sports Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Possible but Remains Questionable: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ahmed, Abdulaziz F. ; Rinaldi, Joseph ; Noorzad, Ali S. ; Zikria, Bashir A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Abdulaziz F. ; Rinaldi, Joseph ; Noorzad, Ali S. ; Zikria, Bashir A.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the return to sports rate and time following meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched in December 2020. Eligibility criteria included clinical studies reporting the return to sport rate following MAT with ≥12-month follow-up. A total of 14 case series were included with 670 patients. The bone bridge technique was used for all transplantations in 5 studies, and suture fixations with bone tunnels were used for all transplantations in 5 studies. In 2 studies, bone plugs were used for medial menisci and bone bridge for lateral menisci. In 1 study, suture fixation was used for medial menisci, and bone bridge for lateral menisci. The return to sports rate ranged from 20% to 91.7%, with 2 studies reporting low return to sport rates. The return to sport time ranged between 7.6 and 16.9 months. The return to preinjury level had a rate of 7% to 100%. Return to a higher level of sports was reported in only 2 studies (28.5% to 86%). Return to a lower level of sports was reported in low proportions in most studies. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, the Lysholm knee and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) had significant improvements after MAT. The KOOS quality of life subscore did not change significantly in 1 study. The total reoperation rate after MAT ranged between 3.1% and 80%, whereas the total failure ranged between 1.1% and 30.1%. Despite that most studies reporting high return to sports rates, the current level of evidence is low, with all studies being case series. There is significant variability in the reported return to sports rate, time, and level. Therefore, high-quality comparative studies are mandated to elucidate whether MAT is associated with higher return to sports rates and levels. IV, systematic review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34785295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Allografts ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Menisci, Tibial - transplantation ; Quality of Life ; Return to Sport ; Transplantation, Homologous</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2022-04, Vol.38 (4), p.1351-1361</ispartof><rights>2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2fec5c769d3ae78f7a271cb6eae826697a56addf6547e0f84c27b9e0b6d24863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2fec5c769d3ae78f7a271cb6eae826697a56addf6547e0f84c27b9e0b6d24863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34785295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Abdulaziz F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorzad, Ali S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zikria, Bashir A.</creatorcontrib><title>Return to Sports Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Possible but Remains Questionable: A Systematic Review</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>To evaluate the return to sports rate and time following meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched in December 2020. Eligibility criteria included clinical studies reporting the return to sport rate following MAT with ≥12-month follow-up. A total of 14 case series were included with 670 patients. The bone bridge technique was used for all transplantations in 5 studies, and suture fixations with bone tunnels were used for all transplantations in 5 studies. In 2 studies, bone plugs were used for medial menisci and bone bridge for lateral menisci. In 1 study, suture fixation was used for medial menisci, and bone bridge for lateral menisci. The return to sports rate ranged from 20% to 91.7%, with 2 studies reporting low return to sport rates. The return to sport time ranged between 7.6 and 16.9 months. The return to preinjury level had a rate of 7% to 100%. Return to a higher level of sports was reported in only 2 studies (28.5% to 86%). Return to a lower level of sports was reported in low proportions in most studies. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, the Lysholm knee and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) had significant improvements after MAT. The KOOS quality of life subscore did not change significantly in 1 study. The total reoperation rate after MAT ranged between 3.1% and 80%, whereas the total failure ranged between 1.1% and 30.1%. Despite that most studies reporting high return to sports rates, the current level of evidence is low, with all studies being case series. There is significant variability in the reported return to sports rate, time, and level. Therefore, high-quality comparative studies are mandated to elucidate whether MAT is associated with higher return to sports rates and levels. IV, systematic review.</description><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Menisci, Tibial - transplantation</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Return to Sport</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtu2zAQRYmgQew4-YOi4LIbqXxIpNRFASNoUgMO8vKeoKiRS0MWXZKKkb8vBaddZjUA53Bm7kHoMyU5JVR82-Xax9_e5YwwmlOaE8LP0JyWTGSccfoJzYks6qwigs_QZQg7kghe8Qs044WsSlaXc3R8hjj6AUeHXw7Ox4BvXd-7ox22-B4GG4zu8TK9bL3uIt54PYRDr4eoo3UDXgX86EKwTQ-4GSN-hr22Q8BPI4QJ0KnxHS_xy1uIqRWtScirheMVOu90H-D6vS7Q5vbn5uZXtn64W90s15nhgsWMdWBKI0Xdcg2y6qRmkppGgIaKCVFLXQrdtp0oCwmkqwrDZFMDaUTLikrwBfp6Gnvw7s90k9qnSNCnBODGoFhZVyVPLkhCixNqfErkoVMHb_favylK1GRc7dTJuJqMK0rV5HOBvrxvGJs9tP8__VOcgB8nAFLMFN2rYCwMBlrrwUTVOvvxhr-3ipZS</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Ahmed, Abdulaziz F.</creator><creator>Rinaldi, Joseph</creator><creator>Noorzad, Ali S.</creator><creator>Zikria, Bashir A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Return to Sports Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Possible but Remains Questionable: A Systematic Review</title><author>Ahmed, Abdulaziz F. ; Rinaldi, Joseph ; Noorzad, Ali S. ; Zikria, Bashir A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-2fec5c769d3ae78f7a271cb6eae826697a56addf6547e0f84c27b9e0b6d24863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Menisci, Tibial - transplantation</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Return to Sport</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Abdulaziz F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorzad, Ali S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zikria, Bashir A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmed, Abdulaziz F.</au><au>Rinaldi, Joseph</au><au>Noorzad, Ali S.</au><au>Zikria, Bashir A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to Sports Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Possible but Remains Questionable: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1351</spage><epage>1361</epage><pages>1351-1361</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the return to sports rate and time following meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched in December 2020. Eligibility criteria included clinical studies reporting the return to sport rate following MAT with ≥12-month follow-up. A total of 14 case series were included with 670 patients. The bone bridge technique was used for all transplantations in 5 studies, and suture fixations with bone tunnels were used for all transplantations in 5 studies. In 2 studies, bone plugs were used for medial menisci and bone bridge for lateral menisci. In 1 study, suture fixation was used for medial menisci, and bone bridge for lateral menisci. The return to sports rate ranged from 20% to 91.7%, with 2 studies reporting low return to sport rates. The return to sport time ranged between 7.6 and 16.9 months. The return to preinjury level had a rate of 7% to 100%. Return to a higher level of sports was reported in only 2 studies (28.5% to 86%). Return to a lower level of sports was reported in low proportions in most studies. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, the Lysholm knee and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) had significant improvements after MAT. The KOOS quality of life subscore did not change significantly in 1 study. The total reoperation rate after MAT ranged between 3.1% and 80%, whereas the total failure ranged between 1.1% and 30.1%. Despite that most studies reporting high return to sports rates, the current level of evidence is low, with all studies being case series. There is significant variability in the reported return to sports rate, time, and level. Therefore, high-quality comparative studies are mandated to elucidate whether MAT is associated with higher return to sports rates and levels. IV, systematic review.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34785295</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2022-04, Vol.38 (4), p.1351-1361
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2598538520
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Allografts
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Menisci, Tibial - transplantation
Quality of Life
Return to Sport
Transplantation, Homologous
title Return to Sports Following Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Possible but Remains Questionable: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A44%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20Sports%20Following%20Meniscal%20Allograft%20Transplantation%20Is%20Possible%20but%20Remains%20Questionable:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Ahmed,%20Abdulaziz%20F.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1351&rft.epage=1361&rft.pages=1351-1361&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2598538520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2598538520&rft_id=info:pmid/34785295&rft_els_id=S0749806321009786&rfr_iscdi=true