Clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: First report from a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial

Objectives To verify the efficacy and safety of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who receiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive endoscopy 2022-01, Vol.34 (2), p.379-390
Hauptverfasser: Fujimoto, Ai, Saito, Yutaka, Abe, Seiichiro, Hoteya, Syu, Nomura, Kosuke, Yasuda, Hiroshi, Matsuo, Yasumasa, Uraoka, Toshio, Kuribayashi, Shiko, Tsuji, Yosuke, Ohki, Daisuke, Maehata, Tadateru, Kato, Motohiko, Yahagi, Naohisa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 390
container_issue 2
container_start_page 379
container_title Digestive endoscopy
container_volume 34
creator Fujimoto, Ai
Saito, Yutaka
Abe, Seiichiro
Hoteya, Syu
Nomura, Kosuke
Yasuda, Hiroshi
Matsuo, Yasumasa
Uraoka, Toshio
Kuribayashi, Shiko
Tsuji, Yosuke
Ohki, Daisuke
Maehata, Tadateru
Kato, Motohiko
Yahagi, Naohisa
description Objectives To verify the efficacy and safety of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who received hemostatic treatments by RDI during ESD were defined as the RDI group (n = 204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (WLI) were defined as the WLI group (n = 200). The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time. The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non‐inferior perforation rate, in RDI versus WLI. Results The mean hemostasis time in RDI (n = 860) was not significantly shorter than that in WLI (n = 1049) (62.3 ± 108.1 vs. 56.2 ± 74.6 s; P = 0.921). The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in RDI than in WLI (36.0 [18.0–71.0] vs. 28.0 [14.0–66.0] s; P = 0.001) in a sensitivity analysis. The psychological stress was significantly lower in RDI than in WLI (1.71 ± 0.935 vs. 2.03 ± 1.038; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/den.14191
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2597799453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2597799453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-c81032c5ae56b22f341e0d1508fe8e21780e941395e7ffb3f49ab0b12e62f5193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFu1TAQhi1ERR-FBRdAXoLUtJ7ETmJ21WsLlSrYwDpynHFr5NjBdoTKiiP0PByHk-D2tew6G488nz6N5ifkDbAjKHU8oT8CDhKekQ1w3lTQtvCcbJgEUYm2EfvkZUrfGYNacv6C7De860TL-w35s3XWW60cXROa1XlMiQZDI050svo6hlllq6md1ZX1V9R6eo1zSPn-N0dUeUaf6bTGuzH6KSQdljJL6zivOqSinmxKqLMN_gM9tzHlol9CzNQUPVV0Xl2xFQ3GQxoW9H9_3zo1ojukURXjbH-VdXTwOQbnSpujVe4V2TPKJXz98B6Qb-dnX7efqssvHy-2J5eV5oJBpXtgTa2FQtGOdW0aDsgmEKw32GMNXc9QcmikwM6YsTFcqpGNUGNbGwGyOSDvdt4lhh8rpjzMNml0TnkMaxpqIbtOSi6agr7foTqGlCKaYYnlcvFmADbcRTWUqIb7qAr79kFbDoXTf_IxmwIc74Cf1uHN06bh9OzzTvkPsK6jcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597799453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: First report from a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fujimoto, Ai ; Saito, Yutaka ; Abe, Seiichiro ; Hoteya, Syu ; Nomura, Kosuke ; Yasuda, Hiroshi ; Matsuo, Yasumasa ; Uraoka, Toshio ; Kuribayashi, Shiko ; Tsuji, Yosuke ; Ohki, Daisuke ; Maehata, Tadateru ; Kato, Motohiko ; Yahagi, Naohisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Ai ; Saito, Yutaka ; Abe, Seiichiro ; Hoteya, Syu ; Nomura, Kosuke ; Yasuda, Hiroshi ; Matsuo, Yasumasa ; Uraoka, Toshio ; Kuribayashi, Shiko ; Tsuji, Yosuke ; Ohki, Daisuke ; Maehata, Tadateru ; Kato, Motohiko ; Yahagi, Naohisa</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To verify the efficacy and safety of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who received hemostatic treatments by RDI during ESD were defined as the RDI group (n = 204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (WLI) were defined as the WLI group (n = 200). The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time. The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non‐inferior perforation rate, in RDI versus WLI. Results The mean hemostasis time in RDI (n = 860) was not significantly shorter than that in WLI (n = 1049) (62.3 ± 108.1 vs. 56.2 ± 74.6 s; P = 0.921). The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in RDI than in WLI (36.0 [18.0–71.0] vs. 28.0 [14.0–66.0] s; P = 0.001) in a sensitivity analysis. The psychological stress was significantly lower in RDI than in WLI (1.71 ± 0.935 vs. 2.03 ± 1.038; P &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ESD treatment time between RDI (n = 161) and WLI (n = 168) (58.0 [35.0–86.0] vs. 60.0 [38.0–88.5] min; P = 0.855). Four perforations were observed, but none of them took place during the hemostatic treatment. Conclusions Hemostatic treatment using RDI does not shorten the hemostasis time. RDI, however, is safe to use for hemostatic procedures and reduces the psychological stress experienced by endoscopists when they perform hemostatic treatment during ESD. UMIN000025134.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0915-5635</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1443-1661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/den.14191</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34775648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects ; endoscopic submucosal dissection ; Hemostasis ; Hemostatics ; Humans ; multicenter randomized controlled trial ; red dichromatic imaging ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Digestive endoscopy, 2022-01, Vol.34 (2), p.379-390</ispartof><rights>2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society</rights><rights>2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-c81032c5ae56b22f341e0d1508fe8e21780e941395e7ffb3f49ab0b12e62f5193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-c81032c5ae56b22f341e0d1508fe8e21780e941395e7ffb3f49ab0b12e62f5193</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4547-5213 ; 0000-0003-3489-3356 ; 0000-0003-0186-3599 ; 0000-0002-4425-4331 ; 0000-0002-9574-7451 ; 0000-0003-4279-0138 ; 0000-0001-7891-9795 ; 0000-0002-7579-1316 ; 0000-0002-2736-6921 ; 0000-0002-5067-552X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fden.14191$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fden.14191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Seiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoteya, Syu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Yasumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuribayashi, Shiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohki, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maehata, Tadateru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Motohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahagi, Naohisa</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: First report from a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial</title><title>Digestive endoscopy</title><addtitle>Dig Endosc</addtitle><description>Objectives To verify the efficacy and safety of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who received hemostatic treatments by RDI during ESD were defined as the RDI group (n = 204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (WLI) were defined as the WLI group (n = 200). The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time. The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non‐inferior perforation rate, in RDI versus WLI. Results The mean hemostasis time in RDI (n = 860) was not significantly shorter than that in WLI (n = 1049) (62.3 ± 108.1 vs. 56.2 ± 74.6 s; P = 0.921). The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in RDI than in WLI (36.0 [18.0–71.0] vs. 28.0 [14.0–66.0] s; P = 0.001) in a sensitivity analysis. The psychological stress was significantly lower in RDI than in WLI (1.71 ± 0.935 vs. 2.03 ± 1.038; P &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ESD treatment time between RDI (n = 161) and WLI (n = 168) (58.0 [35.0–86.0] vs. 60.0 [38.0–88.5] min; P = 0.855). Four perforations were observed, but none of them took place during the hemostatic treatment. Conclusions Hemostatic treatment using RDI does not shorten the hemostasis time. RDI, however, is safe to use for hemostatic procedures and reduces the psychological stress experienced by endoscopists when they perform hemostatic treatment during ESD. UMIN000025134.</description><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects</subject><subject>endoscopic submucosal dissection</subject><subject>Hemostasis</subject><subject>Hemostatics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>multicenter randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>red dichromatic imaging</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0915-5635</issn><issn>1443-1661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFu1TAQhi1ERR-FBRdAXoLUtJ7ETmJ21WsLlSrYwDpynHFr5NjBdoTKiiP0PByHk-D2tew6G488nz6N5ifkDbAjKHU8oT8CDhKekQ1w3lTQtvCcbJgEUYm2EfvkZUrfGYNacv6C7De860TL-w35s3XWW60cXROa1XlMiQZDI050svo6hlllq6md1ZX1V9R6eo1zSPn-N0dUeUaf6bTGuzH6KSQdljJL6zivOqSinmxKqLMN_gM9tzHlol9CzNQUPVV0Xl2xFQ3GQxoW9H9_3zo1ojukURXjbH-VdXTwOQbnSpujVe4V2TPKJXz98B6Qb-dnX7efqssvHy-2J5eV5oJBpXtgTa2FQtGOdW0aDsgmEKw32GMNXc9QcmikwM6YsTFcqpGNUGNbGwGyOSDvdt4lhh8rpjzMNml0TnkMaxpqIbtOSi6agr7foTqGlCKaYYnlcvFmADbcRTWUqIb7qAr79kFbDoXTf_IxmwIc74Cf1uHN06bh9OzzTvkPsK6jcA</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Fujimoto, Ai</creator><creator>Saito, Yutaka</creator><creator>Abe, Seiichiro</creator><creator>Hoteya, Syu</creator><creator>Nomura, Kosuke</creator><creator>Yasuda, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Matsuo, Yasumasa</creator><creator>Uraoka, Toshio</creator><creator>Kuribayashi, Shiko</creator><creator>Tsuji, Yosuke</creator><creator>Ohki, Daisuke</creator><creator>Maehata, Tadateru</creator><creator>Kato, Motohiko</creator><creator>Yahagi, Naohisa</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4547-5213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-3599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-4331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9574-7451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-0138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-9795</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-1316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-6921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-552X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: First report from a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial</title><author>Fujimoto, Ai ; Saito, Yutaka ; Abe, Seiichiro ; Hoteya, Syu ; Nomura, Kosuke ; Yasuda, Hiroshi ; Matsuo, Yasumasa ; Uraoka, Toshio ; Kuribayashi, Shiko ; Tsuji, Yosuke ; Ohki, Daisuke ; Maehata, Tadateru ; Kato, Motohiko ; Yahagi, Naohisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4501-c81032c5ae56b22f341e0d1508fe8e21780e941395e7ffb3f49ab0b12e62f5193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects</topic><topic>endoscopic submucosal dissection</topic><topic>Hemostasis</topic><topic>Hemostatics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>multicenter randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>red dichromatic imaging</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Ai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Seiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoteya, Syu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, Kosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Yasumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uraoka, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuribayashi, Shiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuji, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohki, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maehata, Tadateru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Motohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yahagi, Naohisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Digestive endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujimoto, Ai</au><au>Saito, Yutaka</au><au>Abe, Seiichiro</au><au>Hoteya, Syu</au><au>Nomura, Kosuke</au><au>Yasuda, Hiroshi</au><au>Matsuo, Yasumasa</au><au>Uraoka, Toshio</au><au>Kuribayashi, Shiko</au><au>Tsuji, Yosuke</au><au>Ohki, Daisuke</au><au>Maehata, Tadateru</au><au>Kato, Motohiko</au><au>Yahagi, Naohisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: First report from a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Digestive endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Dig Endosc</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>379-390</pages><issn>0915-5635</issn><eissn>1443-1661</eissn><abstract>Objectives To verify the efficacy and safety of red dichromatic imaging (RDI) in hemostatic procedures during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 404 patients who underwent ESD of the esophagus, stomach, colorectum. Patients who received hemostatic treatments by RDI during ESD were defined as the RDI group (n = 204), and those who received hemostatic treatments by white light imaging (WLI) were defined as the WLI group (n = 200). The primary endpoint was a shortening of the hemostasis time. The secondary endpoints were a reduction of the psychological stress experienced by the endoscopist during the hemostatic treatment, a shortened treatment time, and a non‐inferior perforation rate, in RDI versus WLI. Results The mean hemostasis time in RDI (n = 860) was not significantly shorter than that in WLI (n = 1049) (62.3 ± 108.1 vs. 56.2 ± 74.6 s; P = 0.921). The median hemostasis time was significantly longer in RDI than in WLI (36.0 [18.0–71.0] vs. 28.0 [14.0–66.0] s; P = 0.001) in a sensitivity analysis. The psychological stress was significantly lower in RDI than in WLI (1.71 ± 0.935 vs. 2.03 ± 1.038; P &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the ESD treatment time between RDI (n = 161) and WLI (n = 168) (58.0 [35.0–86.0] vs. 60.0 [38.0–88.5] min; P = 0.855). Four perforations were observed, but none of them took place during the hemostatic treatment. Conclusions Hemostatic treatment using RDI does not shorten the hemostasis time. RDI, however, is safe to use for hemostatic procedures and reduces the psychological stress experienced by endoscopists when they perform hemostatic treatment during ESD. UMIN000025134.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>34775648</pmid><doi>10.1111/den.14191</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4547-5213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-3356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-3599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-4331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9574-7451</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-0138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-9795</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-1316</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-6921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5067-552X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0915-5635
ispartof Digestive endoscopy, 2022-01, Vol.34 (2), p.379-390
issn 0915-5635
1443-1661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2597799453
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - adverse effects
endoscopic submucosal dissection
Hemostasis
Hemostatics
Humans
multicenter randomized controlled trial
red dichromatic imaging
Treatment Outcome
title Clinical usefulness of red dichromatic imaging in hemostatic treatment during endoscopic submucosal dissection: First report from a multicenter, open‐label, randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T09%3A12%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20usefulness%20of%20red%20dichromatic%20imaging%20in%20hemostatic%20treatment%20during%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection:%20First%20report%20from%20a%20multicenter,%20open%E2%80%90label,%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20endoscopy&rft.au=Fujimoto,%20Ai&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=379-390&rft.issn=0915-5635&rft.eissn=1443-1661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/den.14191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2597799453%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597799453&rft_id=info:pmid/34775648&rfr_iscdi=true