Challenges and practical solutions for managing secondary genomic findings in primary care
Primary care providers will increasingly be tasked with managing most secondary findings from genomic sequencing, but literature exploring their capacity to manage findings beyond conventional genetic testing is limited. This study aimed to explore primary care providers’ challenges and potential so...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of medical genetics 2022-01, Vol.65 (1), p.104384-104384, Article 104384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 104384 |
container_title | European journal of medical genetics |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Sebastian, Agnes Carroll, June C. Vanstone, Meredith Clausen, Marc Kodida, Rita Reble, Emma Mighton, Chloe Shickh, Salma Aronson, Melyssa Eisen, Andrea Elser, Christine Lerner-Ellis, Jordan Kim, Raymond H. Bombard, Yvonne |
description | Primary care providers will increasingly be tasked with managing most secondary findings from genomic sequencing, but literature exploring their capacity to manage findings beyond conventional genetic testing is limited. This study aimed to explore primary care providers’ challenges and potential solutions for managing secondary findings. Providers were recruited in two groups. Group 1 providers had a patient in their practice who received secondary findings and all potential group 1 providers were invited to participate. Group 2 providers were provided with the secondary findings of a hypothetical patient and were purposefully sampled for maximal variation in sex, practice setting, and geographic location. Providers were interviewed about their challenges and solutions managing secondary findings from a patient in their practice or a hypothetical patient. Using interpretive description methodology, transcripts were analysed thematically complemented by constant comparison. Out of the fifty-five providers invited, 15 family physicians participated across community and academic settings in Ontario, Canada (range 6–40 years in practice; 10/15 female). Providers described a responsibility to manage secondary findings, but limited capacity for this, describing practice, knowledge, and technical challenges. Providers expressed concern that compared to other incidental findings, secondary genomic findings might be reported directly to patients and result in longer-term anxiety. Potential solutions were a structured letter with categorized results and summary tables highlighting key secondary findings with follow-up recommendations and resources, as well as electronic medical records (EMRs) that store and integrate genomic information for prescribing or referrals. These solutions were deemed essential to address knowledge and technical challenges faced by primary care physicians and ultimately promote clinical utility of secondary findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104384 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2597491544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1769721221002500</els_id><sourcerecordid>2597491544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f5c7a3cd7a157de79eda629dfcd551d6cea7d85bb430e2c4bca231860d06a6d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMofv8BD5Kjl65JmiYteJHFL1jwohcvITuZ1ixtoklX8N_bZVePnmaYed-XmYeQC85mnHF1vZrhauhmggk-DWRZyz1yzGtdF6yWzf7Ua9UUWnBxRE5yXjFW1lw0h-SolFrVjMtj8jZ_t32PocNMbXD0I1kYPdie5tivRx9Dpm1MdLDBdj50NCPE4Gz6ph2GOHigrQ9u2mTqw2T3w2YHNuEZOWhtn_F8V0_J6_3dy_yxWDw_PM1vFwWUlRqLtgJtS3Da8ko71A06q0TjWnBVxZ0CtNrV1XIpS4YC5BKsKHmtmGPKKifKU3K1zf1I8XONeTSDz4B9bwPGdTaiarRseCXlJBVbKaSYc8LW7A42nJkNU7MyG6Zmw9RsmU6my13-ejmg-7P8QpwEN1sBTl9-eUwmg8cA6HxCGI2L_r_8H2vxibY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597491544</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges and practical solutions for managing secondary genomic findings in primary care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sebastian, Agnes ; Carroll, June C. ; Vanstone, Meredith ; Clausen, Marc ; Kodida, Rita ; Reble, Emma ; Mighton, Chloe ; Shickh, Salma ; Aronson, Melyssa ; Eisen, Andrea ; Elser, Christine ; Lerner-Ellis, Jordan ; Kim, Raymond H. ; Bombard, Yvonne</creator><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Agnes ; Carroll, June C. ; Vanstone, Meredith ; Clausen, Marc ; Kodida, Rita ; Reble, Emma ; Mighton, Chloe ; Shickh, Salma ; Aronson, Melyssa ; Eisen, Andrea ; Elser, Christine ; Lerner-Ellis, Jordan ; Kim, Raymond H. ; Bombard, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><description>Primary care providers will increasingly be tasked with managing most secondary findings from genomic sequencing, but literature exploring their capacity to manage findings beyond conventional genetic testing is limited. This study aimed to explore primary care providers’ challenges and potential solutions for managing secondary findings. Providers were recruited in two groups. Group 1 providers had a patient in their practice who received secondary findings and all potential group 1 providers were invited to participate. Group 2 providers were provided with the secondary findings of a hypothetical patient and were purposefully sampled for maximal variation in sex, practice setting, and geographic location. Providers were interviewed about their challenges and solutions managing secondary findings from a patient in their practice or a hypothetical patient. Using interpretive description methodology, transcripts were analysed thematically complemented by constant comparison. Out of the fifty-five providers invited, 15 family physicians participated across community and academic settings in Ontario, Canada (range 6–40 years in practice; 10/15 female). Providers described a responsibility to manage secondary findings, but limited capacity for this, describing practice, knowledge, and technical challenges. Providers expressed concern that compared to other incidental findings, secondary genomic findings might be reported directly to patients and result in longer-term anxiety. Potential solutions were a structured letter with categorized results and summary tables highlighting key secondary findings with follow-up recommendations and resources, as well as electronic medical records (EMRs) that store and integrate genomic information for prescribing or referrals. These solutions were deemed essential to address knowledge and technical challenges faced by primary care physicians and ultimately promote clinical utility of secondary findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1769-7212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0849</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104384</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34768014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Clinical utility ; Female ; Genetic testing ; Genomics ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physician's Role ; Physicians, Primary Care ; Primary care physicians ; Primary Health Care ; Whole exome sequencing ; Whole Genome Sequencing</subject><ispartof>European journal of medical genetics, 2022-01, Vol.65 (1), p.104384-104384, Article 104384</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f5c7a3cd7a157de79eda629dfcd551d6cea7d85bb430e2c4bca231860d06a6d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f5c7a3cd7a157de79eda629dfcd551d6cea7d85bb430e2c4bca231860d06a6d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3685-5679 ; 0000-0002-9516-4539 ; 0000-0002-7503-5799 ; 0000-0002-7347-6259 ; 0000-0001-5531-4670</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1769721221002500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34768014$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, June C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanstone, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodida, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reble, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mighton, Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shickh, Salma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, Melyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisen, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elser, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner-Ellis, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Raymond H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombard, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges and practical solutions for managing secondary genomic findings in primary care</title><title>European journal of medical genetics</title><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><description>Primary care providers will increasingly be tasked with managing most secondary findings from genomic sequencing, but literature exploring their capacity to manage findings beyond conventional genetic testing is limited. This study aimed to explore primary care providers’ challenges and potential solutions for managing secondary findings. Providers were recruited in two groups. Group 1 providers had a patient in their practice who received secondary findings and all potential group 1 providers were invited to participate. Group 2 providers were provided with the secondary findings of a hypothetical patient and were purposefully sampled for maximal variation in sex, practice setting, and geographic location. Providers were interviewed about their challenges and solutions managing secondary findings from a patient in their practice or a hypothetical patient. Using interpretive description methodology, transcripts were analysed thematically complemented by constant comparison. Out of the fifty-five providers invited, 15 family physicians participated across community and academic settings in Ontario, Canada (range 6–40 years in practice; 10/15 female). Providers described a responsibility to manage secondary findings, but limited capacity for this, describing practice, knowledge, and technical challenges. Providers expressed concern that compared to other incidental findings, secondary genomic findings might be reported directly to patients and result in longer-term anxiety. Potential solutions were a structured letter with categorized results and summary tables highlighting key secondary findings with follow-up recommendations and resources, as well as electronic medical records (EMRs) that store and integrate genomic information for prescribing or referrals. These solutions were deemed essential to address knowledge and technical challenges faced by primary care physicians and ultimately promote clinical utility of secondary findings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical utility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidental Findings</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physicians, Primary Care</subject><subject>Primary care physicians</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Whole exome sequencing</subject><subject>Whole Genome Sequencing</subject><issn>1769-7212</issn><issn>1878-0849</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMofv8BD5Kjl65JmiYteJHFL1jwohcvITuZ1ixtoklX8N_bZVePnmaYed-XmYeQC85mnHF1vZrhauhmggk-DWRZyz1yzGtdF6yWzf7Ua9UUWnBxRE5yXjFW1lw0h-SolFrVjMtj8jZ_t32PocNMbXD0I1kYPdie5tivRx9Dpm1MdLDBdj50NCPE4Gz6ph2GOHigrQ9u2mTqw2T3w2YHNuEZOWhtn_F8V0_J6_3dy_yxWDw_PM1vFwWUlRqLtgJtS3Da8ko71A06q0TjWnBVxZ0CtNrV1XIpS4YC5BKsKHmtmGPKKifKU3K1zf1I8XONeTSDz4B9bwPGdTaiarRseCXlJBVbKaSYc8LW7A42nJkNU7MyG6Zmw9RsmU6my13-ejmg-7P8QpwEN1sBTl9-eUwmg8cA6HxCGI2L_r_8H2vxibY</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Sebastian, Agnes</creator><creator>Carroll, June C.</creator><creator>Vanstone, Meredith</creator><creator>Clausen, Marc</creator><creator>Kodida, Rita</creator><creator>Reble, Emma</creator><creator>Mighton, Chloe</creator><creator>Shickh, Salma</creator><creator>Aronson, Melyssa</creator><creator>Eisen, Andrea</creator><creator>Elser, Christine</creator><creator>Lerner-Ellis, Jordan</creator><creator>Kim, Raymond H.</creator><creator>Bombard, Yvonne</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3685-5679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-4539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-5799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5531-4670</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Challenges and practical solutions for managing secondary genomic findings in primary care</title><author>Sebastian, Agnes ; Carroll, June C. ; Vanstone, Meredith ; Clausen, Marc ; Kodida, Rita ; Reble, Emma ; Mighton, Chloe ; Shickh, Salma ; Aronson, Melyssa ; Eisen, Andrea ; Elser, Christine ; Lerner-Ellis, Jordan ; Kim, Raymond H. ; Bombard, Yvonne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-f5c7a3cd7a157de79eda629dfcd551d6cea7d85bb430e2c4bca231860d06a6d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical utility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidental Findings</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physicians, Primary Care</topic><topic>Primary care physicians</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Whole exome sequencing</topic><topic>Whole Genome Sequencing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Agnes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, June C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanstone, Meredith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodida, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reble, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mighton, Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shickh, Salma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, Melyssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisen, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elser, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerner-Ellis, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Raymond H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombard, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sebastian, Agnes</au><au>Carroll, June C.</au><au>Vanstone, Meredith</au><au>Clausen, Marc</au><au>Kodida, Rita</au><au>Reble, Emma</au><au>Mighton, Chloe</au><au>Shickh, Salma</au><au>Aronson, Melyssa</au><au>Eisen, Andrea</au><au>Elser, Christine</au><au>Lerner-Ellis, Jordan</au><au>Kim, Raymond H.</au><au>Bombard, Yvonne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges and practical solutions for managing secondary genomic findings in primary care</atitle><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104384</spage><epage>104384</epage><pages>104384-104384</pages><artnum>104384</artnum><issn>1769-7212</issn><eissn>1878-0849</eissn><abstract>Primary care providers will increasingly be tasked with managing most secondary findings from genomic sequencing, but literature exploring their capacity to manage findings beyond conventional genetic testing is limited. This study aimed to explore primary care providers’ challenges and potential solutions for managing secondary findings. Providers were recruited in two groups. Group 1 providers had a patient in their practice who received secondary findings and all potential group 1 providers were invited to participate. Group 2 providers were provided with the secondary findings of a hypothetical patient and were purposefully sampled for maximal variation in sex, practice setting, and geographic location. Providers were interviewed about their challenges and solutions managing secondary findings from a patient in their practice or a hypothetical patient. Using interpretive description methodology, transcripts were analysed thematically complemented by constant comparison. Out of the fifty-five providers invited, 15 family physicians participated across community and academic settings in Ontario, Canada (range 6–40 years in practice; 10/15 female). Providers described a responsibility to manage secondary findings, but limited capacity for this, describing practice, knowledge, and technical challenges. Providers expressed concern that compared to other incidental findings, secondary genomic findings might be reported directly to patients and result in longer-term anxiety. Potential solutions were a structured letter with categorized results and summary tables highlighting key secondary findings with follow-up recommendations and resources, as well as electronic medical records (EMRs) that store and integrate genomic information for prescribing or referrals. These solutions were deemed essential to address knowledge and technical challenges faced by primary care physicians and ultimately promote clinical utility of secondary findings.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>34768014</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104384</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3685-5679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-4539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-5799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5531-4670</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1769-7212 |
ispartof | European journal of medical genetics, 2022-01, Vol.65 (1), p.104384-104384, Article 104384 |
issn | 1769-7212 1878-0849 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2597491544 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Clinical utility Female Genetic testing Genomics Humans Incidental Findings Male Middle Aged Physician's Role Physicians, Primary Care Primary care physicians Primary Health Care Whole exome sequencing Whole Genome Sequencing |
title | Challenges and practical solutions for managing secondary genomic findings in primary care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A25%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20and%20practical%20solutions%20for%20managing%20secondary%20genomic%20findings%20in%20primary%20care&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20medical%20genetics&rft.au=Sebastian,%20Agnes&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104384&rft.epage=104384&rft.pages=104384-104384&rft.artnum=104384&rft.issn=1769-7212&rft.eissn=1878-0849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejmg.2021.104384&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2597491544%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597491544&rft_id=info:pmid/34768014&rft_els_id=S1769721221002500&rfr_iscdi=true |