Congenital myasthenic syndrome: Correlation between clinical features and molecular diagnosis

Objectives To present phenotype features of a large cohort of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and correlate them with their molecular diagnosis. Methods Suspected CMS patients were divided into three groups: group A (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and all th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of neurology 2022-03, Vol.29 (3), p.833-842
Hauptverfasser: Estephan, Eduardo P., Zambon, Antonio A., Thompson, Rachel, Polavarapu, Kiran, Jomaa, Danny, Töpf, Ana, Helito, Paulo V. P., Heise, Carlos O., Moreno, Cristiane A. M., Silva, André M. S., Kouyoumdjian, Joao A., Morita, Maria da Penha, Reed, Umbertina C., Lochmüller, Hanns, Zanoteli, Edmar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 842
container_issue 3
container_start_page 833
container_title European journal of neurology
container_volume 29
creator Estephan, Eduardo P.
Zambon, Antonio A.
Thompson, Rachel
Polavarapu, Kiran
Jomaa, Danny
Töpf, Ana
Helito, Paulo V. P.
Heise, Carlos O.
Moreno, Cristiane A. M.
Silva, André M. S.
Kouyoumdjian, Joao A.
Morita, Maria da Penha
Reed, Umbertina C.
Lochmüller, Hanns
Zanoteli, Edmar
description Objectives To present phenotype features of a large cohort of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and correlate them with their molecular diagnosis. Methods Suspected CMS patients were divided into three groups: group A (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and all the following: clinical fatigability, electrophysiology compatible with neuromuscular junction involvement and anticholinesterase agents response), group B (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and at least one of additional characteristics noted in group A) and group C (pure ocular syndrome). Individual clinical findings and the clinical groups were compared between the group with a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS and the group without molecular diagnosis or with a non‐CMS molecular diagnosis. Results Seventy‐nine patients (68 families) were included in the cohort: 48 in group A, 23 in group B and 8 in group C. Fifty‐one were considered confirmed CMS (30 CHRNE, 5 RAPSN, 4 COL13A1, 3 DOK7, 3 COLQ, 2 GFPT1, 1 CHAT, 1 SCN4A, 1 GMPPB, 1 CHRNA1), 7 probable CMS, 5 non‐CMS and 16 unsolved. The chance of a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS was significantly higher for group A and lower for group C. Some individual clinical features, alterations on biopsy and electrophysiology enhanced specificity for CMS. Muscle imaging showed at least mild alterations in the majority of confirmed cases, with preferential involvement of soleus, especially in CHRNE CMS. Conclusions Stricter clinical criteria increase the chance of confirming a CMS diagnosis, but may lose sensitivity, especially for some specific genes. Seventy‐nine patients with clinically suspected congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) underwent high‐throughput molecular screening. Fluctuating symptoms not restricted to ocular muscles and myasthenic electrophysiological alterations were the phenotypic characteristics with the greatest chance of reaching the molecular diagnosis of CMS. Interestingly, muscle alterations, on biopsy and on resonance imaging, were prevalent in confirmed cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ene.15173
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2595558137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2627019923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-f87944a6e2ffb262bd7089f8a3534e4aee5030ec28ceae15a8564a47bf077e3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACl700C2vS-tNxnyBoRc9Skjbp7MjTWbSMvbtjW56EMwlCfzyf8IfoXOCxySuCVgYE0EkO0BDwqdZShgjh_HMBEkFwWSATkJYYYyppPgYDRiXPOc0H6K3mbNLsE2nTdJudeje46VMwtZW3rVwk8yc92B01zibFNBtAGxSmiai-KIG3fUeQqJtlbTOQNkb7ZOq0UvrQhNO0VGtTYCz_T5Cr3fzl9lDuni-f5zdLtKSk5yldSZzzvUUaF0XdEqLSuIsrzPNBOPANYDADENJsxI0EKEzMeWay6LGUgKr2Ahd7XLX3n30EDrVNqEEY7QF1wdFRS6EyAiTkV7-oSvXext_p-JkiUmeUxbV9U6V3oXgoVZr37TabxXB6qtzFTtX351He7FP7IsWql_5U3IEkx3YNAa2_yep-dN8F_kJT0mLrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627019923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Congenital myasthenic syndrome: Correlation between clinical features and molecular diagnosis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Estephan, Eduardo P. ; Zambon, Antonio A. ; Thompson, Rachel ; Polavarapu, Kiran ; Jomaa, Danny ; Töpf, Ana ; Helito, Paulo V. P. ; Heise, Carlos O. ; Moreno, Cristiane A. M. ; Silva, André M. S. ; Kouyoumdjian, Joao A. ; Morita, Maria da Penha ; Reed, Umbertina C. ; Lochmüller, Hanns ; Zanoteli, Edmar</creator><creatorcontrib>Estephan, Eduardo P. ; Zambon, Antonio A. ; Thompson, Rachel ; Polavarapu, Kiran ; Jomaa, Danny ; Töpf, Ana ; Helito, Paulo V. P. ; Heise, Carlos O. ; Moreno, Cristiane A. M. ; Silva, André M. S. ; Kouyoumdjian, Joao A. ; Morita, Maria da Penha ; Reed, Umbertina C. ; Lochmüller, Hanns ; Zanoteli, Edmar</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To present phenotype features of a large cohort of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and correlate them with their molecular diagnosis. Methods Suspected CMS patients were divided into three groups: group A (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and all the following: clinical fatigability, electrophysiology compatible with neuromuscular junction involvement and anticholinesterase agents response), group B (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and at least one of additional characteristics noted in group A) and group C (pure ocular syndrome). Individual clinical findings and the clinical groups were compared between the group with a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS and the group without molecular diagnosis or with a non‐CMS molecular diagnosis. Results Seventy‐nine patients (68 families) were included in the cohort: 48 in group A, 23 in group B and 8 in group C. Fifty‐one were considered confirmed CMS (30 CHRNE, 5 RAPSN, 4 COL13A1, 3 DOK7, 3 COLQ, 2 GFPT1, 1 CHAT, 1 SCN4A, 1 GMPPB, 1 CHRNA1), 7 probable CMS, 5 non‐CMS and 16 unsolved. The chance of a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS was significantly higher for group A and lower for group C. Some individual clinical features, alterations on biopsy and electrophysiology enhanced specificity for CMS. Muscle imaging showed at least mild alterations in the majority of confirmed cases, with preferential involvement of soleus, especially in CHRNE CMS. Conclusions Stricter clinical criteria increase the chance of confirming a CMS diagnosis, but may lose sensitivity, especially for some specific genes. Seventy‐nine patients with clinically suspected congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) underwent high‐throughput molecular screening. Fluctuating symptoms not restricted to ocular muscles and myasthenic electrophysiological alterations were the phenotypic characteristics with the greatest chance of reaching the molecular diagnosis of CMS. Interestingly, muscle alterations, on biopsy and on resonance imaging, were prevalent in confirmed cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-5101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-1331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ene.15173</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34749429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Congenital defects ; congenital myasthenic syndromes ; Diagnosis ; Electrophysiology ; Impairment ; muscle MRI ; Myasthenia ; neuromuscular disorders ; neuromuscular junction ; Neuromuscular junctions ; Patients ; phenotype/genotype correlation ; Phenotypes ; Sodium channels</subject><ispartof>European journal of neurology, 2022-03, Vol.29 (3), p.833-842</ispartof><rights>2021 European Academy of Neurology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 European Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-f87944a6e2ffb262bd7089f8a3534e4aee5030ec28ceae15a8564a47bf077e3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-f87944a6e2ffb262bd7089f8a3534e4aee5030ec28ceae15a8564a47bf077e3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6807-1951</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fene.15173$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fene.15173$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Estephan, Eduardo P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zambon, Antonio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polavarapu, Kiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jomaa, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töpf, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helito, Paulo V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heise, Carlos O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Cristiane A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, André M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouyoumdjian, Joao A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, Maria da Penha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Umbertina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochmüller, Hanns</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanoteli, Edmar</creatorcontrib><title>Congenital myasthenic syndrome: Correlation between clinical features and molecular diagnosis</title><title>European journal of neurology</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><description>Objectives To present phenotype features of a large cohort of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and correlate them with their molecular diagnosis. Methods Suspected CMS patients were divided into three groups: group A (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and all the following: clinical fatigability, electrophysiology compatible with neuromuscular junction involvement and anticholinesterase agents response), group B (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and at least one of additional characteristics noted in group A) and group C (pure ocular syndrome). Individual clinical findings and the clinical groups were compared between the group with a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS and the group without molecular diagnosis or with a non‐CMS molecular diagnosis. Results Seventy‐nine patients (68 families) were included in the cohort: 48 in group A, 23 in group B and 8 in group C. Fifty‐one were considered confirmed CMS (30 CHRNE, 5 RAPSN, 4 COL13A1, 3 DOK7, 3 COLQ, 2 GFPT1, 1 CHAT, 1 SCN4A, 1 GMPPB, 1 CHRNA1), 7 probable CMS, 5 non‐CMS and 16 unsolved. The chance of a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS was significantly higher for group A and lower for group C. Some individual clinical features, alterations on biopsy and electrophysiology enhanced specificity for CMS. Muscle imaging showed at least mild alterations in the majority of confirmed cases, with preferential involvement of soleus, especially in CHRNE CMS. Conclusions Stricter clinical criteria increase the chance of confirming a CMS diagnosis, but may lose sensitivity, especially for some specific genes. Seventy‐nine patients with clinically suspected congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) underwent high‐throughput molecular screening. Fluctuating symptoms not restricted to ocular muscles and myasthenic electrophysiological alterations were the phenotypic characteristics with the greatest chance of reaching the molecular diagnosis of CMS. Interestingly, muscle alterations, on biopsy and on resonance imaging, were prevalent in confirmed cases.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Congenital defects</subject><subject>congenital myasthenic syndromes</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Impairment</subject><subject>muscle MRI</subject><subject>Myasthenia</subject><subject>neuromuscular disorders</subject><subject>neuromuscular junction</subject><subject>Neuromuscular junctions</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>phenotype/genotype correlation</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Sodium channels</subject><issn>1351-5101</issn><issn>1468-1331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAYB_AgipvTg19ACl700C2vS-tNxnyBoRc9Skjbp7MjTWbSMvbtjW56EMwlCfzyf8IfoXOCxySuCVgYE0EkO0BDwqdZShgjh_HMBEkFwWSATkJYYYyppPgYDRiXPOc0H6K3mbNLsE2nTdJudeje46VMwtZW3rVwk8yc92B01zibFNBtAGxSmiai-KIG3fUeQqJtlbTOQNkb7ZOq0UvrQhNO0VGtTYCz_T5Cr3fzl9lDuni-f5zdLtKSk5yldSZzzvUUaF0XdEqLSuIsrzPNBOPANYDADENJsxI0EKEzMeWay6LGUgKr2Ahd7XLX3n30EDrVNqEEY7QF1wdFRS6EyAiTkV7-oSvXext_p-JkiUmeUxbV9U6V3oXgoVZr37TabxXB6qtzFTtX351He7FP7IsWql_5U3IEkx3YNAa2_yep-dN8F_kJT0mLrA</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Estephan, Eduardo P.</creator><creator>Zambon, Antonio A.</creator><creator>Thompson, Rachel</creator><creator>Polavarapu, Kiran</creator><creator>Jomaa, Danny</creator><creator>Töpf, Ana</creator><creator>Helito, Paulo V. P.</creator><creator>Heise, Carlos O.</creator><creator>Moreno, Cristiane A. M.</creator><creator>Silva, André M. S.</creator><creator>Kouyoumdjian, Joao A.</creator><creator>Morita, Maria da Penha</creator><creator>Reed, Umbertina C.</creator><creator>Lochmüller, Hanns</creator><creator>Zanoteli, Edmar</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-1951</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Congenital myasthenic syndrome: Correlation between clinical features and molecular diagnosis</title><author>Estephan, Eduardo P. ; Zambon, Antonio A. ; Thompson, Rachel ; Polavarapu, Kiran ; Jomaa, Danny ; Töpf, Ana ; Helito, Paulo V. P. ; Heise, Carlos O. ; Moreno, Cristiane A. M. ; Silva, André M. S. ; Kouyoumdjian, Joao A. ; Morita, Maria da Penha ; Reed, Umbertina C. ; Lochmüller, Hanns ; Zanoteli, Edmar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4193-f87944a6e2ffb262bd7089f8a3534e4aee5030ec28ceae15a8564a47bf077e3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Congenital defects</topic><topic>congenital myasthenic syndromes</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Impairment</topic><topic>muscle MRI</topic><topic>Myasthenia</topic><topic>neuromuscular disorders</topic><topic>neuromuscular junction</topic><topic>Neuromuscular junctions</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>phenotype/genotype correlation</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Sodium channels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Estephan, Eduardo P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zambon, Antonio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polavarapu, Kiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jomaa, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Töpf, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helito, Paulo V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heise, Carlos O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Cristiane A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, André M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouyoumdjian, Joao A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morita, Maria da Penha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Umbertina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lochmüller, Hanns</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanoteli, Edmar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Estephan, Eduardo P.</au><au>Zambon, Antonio A.</au><au>Thompson, Rachel</au><au>Polavarapu, Kiran</au><au>Jomaa, Danny</au><au>Töpf, Ana</au><au>Helito, Paulo V. P.</au><au>Heise, Carlos O.</au><au>Moreno, Cristiane A. M.</au><au>Silva, André M. S.</au><au>Kouyoumdjian, Joao A.</au><au>Morita, Maria da Penha</au><au>Reed, Umbertina C.</au><au>Lochmüller, Hanns</au><au>Zanoteli, Edmar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Congenital myasthenic syndrome: Correlation between clinical features and molecular diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>European journal of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurol</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>842</epage><pages>833-842</pages><issn>1351-5101</issn><eissn>1468-1331</eissn><abstract>Objectives To present phenotype features of a large cohort of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and correlate them with their molecular diagnosis. Methods Suspected CMS patients were divided into three groups: group A (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and all the following: clinical fatigability, electrophysiology compatible with neuromuscular junction involvement and anticholinesterase agents response), group B (limb, bulbar or axial weakness, with or without ocular impairment, and at least one of additional characteristics noted in group A) and group C (pure ocular syndrome). Individual clinical findings and the clinical groups were compared between the group with a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS and the group without molecular diagnosis or with a non‐CMS molecular diagnosis. Results Seventy‐nine patients (68 families) were included in the cohort: 48 in group A, 23 in group B and 8 in group C. Fifty‐one were considered confirmed CMS (30 CHRNE, 5 RAPSN, 4 COL13A1, 3 DOK7, 3 COLQ, 2 GFPT1, 1 CHAT, 1 SCN4A, 1 GMPPB, 1 CHRNA1), 7 probable CMS, 5 non‐CMS and 16 unsolved. The chance of a confirmed molecular diagnosis of CMS was significantly higher for group A and lower for group C. Some individual clinical features, alterations on biopsy and electrophysiology enhanced specificity for CMS. Muscle imaging showed at least mild alterations in the majority of confirmed cases, with preferential involvement of soleus, especially in CHRNE CMS. Conclusions Stricter clinical criteria increase the chance of confirming a CMS diagnosis, but may lose sensitivity, especially for some specific genes. Seventy‐nine patients with clinically suspected congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) underwent high‐throughput molecular screening. Fluctuating symptoms not restricted to ocular muscles and myasthenic electrophysiological alterations were the phenotypic characteristics with the greatest chance of reaching the molecular diagnosis of CMS. Interestingly, muscle alterations, on biopsy and on resonance imaging, were prevalent in confirmed cases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34749429</pmid><doi>10.1111/ene.15173</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6807-1951</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-5101
ispartof European journal of neurology, 2022-03, Vol.29 (3), p.833-842
issn 1351-5101
1468-1331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2595558137
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biopsy
Congenital defects
congenital myasthenic syndromes
Diagnosis
Electrophysiology
Impairment
muscle MRI
Myasthenia
neuromuscular disorders
neuromuscular junction
Neuromuscular junctions
Patients
phenotype/genotype correlation
Phenotypes
Sodium channels
title Congenital myasthenic syndrome: Correlation between clinical features and molecular diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T07%3A40%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Congenital%20myasthenic%20syndrome:%20Correlation%20between%20clinical%20features%20and%20molecular%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Estephan,%20Eduardo%20P.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=842&rft.pages=833-842&rft.issn=1351-5101&rft.eissn=1468-1331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ene.15173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627019923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627019923&rft_id=info:pmid/34749429&rfr_iscdi=true