An experimental comparison of two adaptation strategies in an adaptive-walls wind-tunnel
In the present work an experimental comparison is made between two adaptation strategies: the Judd's method and the Everhart's method. A NACA 0012 airfoil has been tested at Mach numbers up to 0.4: models with chords up to 200 mm have been tested in a 200 mm x 200 mm test section. The two...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Experiments in fluids 1995-08, Vol.19 (4), p.274-279 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 279 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 274 |
| container_title | Experiments in fluids |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | RUSSO, G. P ZUPPARDI, G BASCIANI, M |
| description | In the present work an experimental comparison is made between two adaptation strategies: the Judd's method and the Everhart's method. A NACA 0012 airfoil has been tested at Mach numbers up to 0.4: models with chords up to 200 mm have been tested in a 200 mm x 200 mm test section. The two strategies, though based on different theoretical approaches, show a fairly good agreement as far as cp distribution on the model, lift, and drag curves and residual interference are concerned and agree, in terms of lift curve slope and drag coefficient at zero lift, with the McCroskey correlation. (Author) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00196476 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25907264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>25907264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-cc539cf3fc157c27284319a6a4f99b2e85813af564c8ef67e4f6be5212a4c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsXP0EO4kFYzb_N7h5rsSoUPOjB2_Kavkgkza5J1uq3d6VFTw_m_WZghpBzzq45Y9XN7YIx3mhV6QMy4UqKgnOuDsmEVUIWqtbqmJyk9D5SZcPqCXmdBYpfPUa3wZDBU9NteogudYF2luZtR2ENfYbsRiXlCBnfHCbqAoWw-7lPLLbgfaJbF9ZFHkJAf0qOLPiEZ_s7Jc-Lu5f5Q7F8un-cz5aFEYrlwphSNsZKa3hZGVGJWknegAZlm2YlsC5rLsGWWpkara5QWb3CUnABarROyeUutY_dx4AptxuXDHoPAbshtWJsWQmtRvBqB5rYpRTRtv1YGeJ3y1n7O137P90IX-xTIRnwNkIwLv05pFaqlEz-AAevbj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>25907264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An experimental comparison of two adaptation strategies in an adaptive-walls wind-tunnel</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>RUSSO, G. P ; ZUPPARDI, G ; BASCIANI, M</creator><creatorcontrib>RUSSO, G. P ; ZUPPARDI, G ; BASCIANI, M</creatorcontrib><description>In the present work an experimental comparison is made between two adaptation strategies: the Judd's method and the Everhart's method. A NACA 0012 airfoil has been tested at Mach numbers up to 0.4: models with chords up to 200 mm have been tested in a 200 mm x 200 mm test section. The two strategies, though based on different theoretical approaches, show a fairly good agreement as far as cp distribution on the model, lift, and drag curves and residual interference are concerned and agree, in terms of lift curve slope and drag coefficient at zero lift, with the McCroskey correlation. (Author)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0723-4864</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00196476</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EXFLDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Instrumentation for fluid dynamics ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Experiments in fluids, 1995-08, Vol.19 (4), p.274-279</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-cc539cf3fc157c27284319a6a4f99b2e85813af564c8ef67e4f6be5212a4c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-cc539cf3fc157c27284319a6a4f99b2e85813af564c8ef67e4f6be5212a4c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3644530$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RUSSO, G. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZUPPARDI, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BASCIANI, M</creatorcontrib><title>An experimental comparison of two adaptation strategies in an adaptive-walls wind-tunnel</title><title>Experiments in fluids</title><description>In the present work an experimental comparison is made between two adaptation strategies: the Judd's method and the Everhart's method. A NACA 0012 airfoil has been tested at Mach numbers up to 0.4: models with chords up to 200 mm have been tested in a 200 mm x 200 mm test section. The two strategies, though based on different theoretical approaches, show a fairly good agreement as far as cp distribution on the model, lift, and drag curves and residual interference are concerned and agree, in terms of lift curve slope and drag coefficient at zero lift, with the McCroskey correlation. (Author)</description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Instrumentation for fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>0723-4864</issn><issn>1432-1114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsXP0EO4kFYzb_N7h5rsSoUPOjB2_Kavkgkza5J1uq3d6VFTw_m_WZghpBzzq45Y9XN7YIx3mhV6QMy4UqKgnOuDsmEVUIWqtbqmJyk9D5SZcPqCXmdBYpfPUa3wZDBU9NteogudYF2luZtR2ENfYbsRiXlCBnfHCbqAoWw-7lPLLbgfaJbF9ZFHkJAf0qOLPiEZ_s7Jc-Lu5f5Q7F8un-cz5aFEYrlwphSNsZKa3hZGVGJWknegAZlm2YlsC5rLsGWWpkara5QWb3CUnABarROyeUutY_dx4AptxuXDHoPAbshtWJsWQmtRvBqB5rYpRTRtv1YGeJ3y1n7O137P90IX-xTIRnwNkIwLv05pFaqlEz-AAevbj8</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>RUSSO, G. P</creator><creator>ZUPPARDI, G</creator><creator>BASCIANI, M</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>An experimental comparison of two adaptation strategies in an adaptive-walls wind-tunnel</title><author>RUSSO, G. P ; ZUPPARDI, G ; BASCIANI, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-cc539cf3fc157c27284319a6a4f99b2e85813af564c8ef67e4f6be5212a4c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Instrumentation for fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RUSSO, G. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZUPPARDI, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BASCIANI, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Experiments in fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RUSSO, G. P</au><au>ZUPPARDI, G</au><au>BASCIANI, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An experimental comparison of two adaptation strategies in an adaptive-walls wind-tunnel</atitle><jtitle>Experiments in fluids</jtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>274-279</pages><issn>0723-4864</issn><eissn>1432-1114</eissn><coden>EXFLDU</coden><abstract>In the present work an experimental comparison is made between two adaptation strategies: the Judd's method and the Everhart's method. A NACA 0012 airfoil has been tested at Mach numbers up to 0.4: models with chords up to 200 mm have been tested in a 200 mm x 200 mm test section. The two strategies, though based on different theoretical approaches, show a fairly good agreement as far as cp distribution on the model, lift, and drag curves and residual interference are concerned and agree, in terms of lift curve slope and drag coefficient at zero lift, with the McCroskey correlation. (Author)</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00196476</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0723-4864 |
| ispartof | Experiments in fluids, 1995-08, Vol.19 (4), p.274-279 |
| issn | 0723-4864 1432-1114 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25907264 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Exact sciences and technology Fluid dynamics Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Instrumentation for fluid dynamics Physics |
| title | An experimental comparison of two adaptation strategies in an adaptive-walls wind-tunnel |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A43%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20experimental%20comparison%20of%20two%20adaptation%20strategies%20in%20an%20adaptive-walls%20wind-tunnel&rft.jtitle=Experiments%20in%20fluids&rft.au=RUSSO,%20G.%20P&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=274-279&rft.issn=0723-4864&rft.eissn=1432-1114&rft.coden=EXFLDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00196476&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E25907264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=25907264&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |