Seroprevalence of Leptospira Among Selected Mammals on a Wildlife Management Area in Louisiana, USA
From August to December 2018, we collected blood samples from 98 individuals of 11 mammal species to examine seroprevalence of leptospirosis at the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area in central Louisiana, US. Overall, 21.4% of individuals tested positive for antibodies of at least one Leptospira int...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of wildlife diseases 2022-01, Vol.58 (1), p.183-187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 187 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | Journal of wildlife diseases |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Anderson, A. Nikki Long, Ashley M LaCour, James M Bresnan, Alessandra M Bushaw, Jacob D Gerrits, Alaina P Hunt, Jay D Moscicki, David J Raginski, Nancy M Stafford, Brandon Ulrey, Erin E Randel, Charles J |
description | From August to December 2018, we collected blood samples from 98 individuals of 11 mammal species to examine seroprevalence of leptospirosis at the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area in central Louisiana, US. Overall, 21.4% of individuals tested positive for antibodies of at least one Leptospira interrogans serovar and six individuals were reactive for two or more serovars. The most prevalent serovar we detected was serovar Bratislava (19.4%), followed by serovar Grippotyphosa (6.1%), serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae and serovar Pomona (2.0%), and serovar Canicola and serovar Hardjo (1.0%). We detected the highest prevalence in fox squirrels (Sciurus niger), hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus), and feral swine (Sus scrofa), with serovar Bratislava being the most reactive for these three species. Positive samples returned titer results of 100–400 for all species and serovars, with the exception of one feral swine that returned a titer of 1,600 to serovar Bratislava, indicating an active infection. Although the potential effects of leptospirosis on our study species remains unclear, our data contribute information necessary to understand and manage potential risks of Leptospira exposure to wildlife, domestic animals, and humans. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7589/JWD-D-20-00192 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2587006314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2587006314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-35c7cfad957bdd8899d2fa7d36ef6df06c89fbb1da35c9ff842f9d864da74e3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMiKPDE1x4nzYY9XyqSKGUnW0nPhcGSVxsBMk_j2GFlam052e99XpQegyJrMiY_zmabuMllFCIkJinhyhccxTGtGCkGM0JoSTiGYZG6Ez798ISbKwnKIRTXPOM8bGqFqDs52DD1lDWwG2Gq-g663vjJN43th2h9dQQ9WDws-yaWTtsW2xxFtTq9poCNdW7qCBtsdzBxKbFq_sYLwJ9ynerOfn6ESHGFwc5gRt7m5fFw_R6uX-cTFfRSWlSR8erYpKS8WzolSKMc5VomWhaA46V5rkFeO6LGMlA8m1ZmmiuWJ5qmSRAtV0gq73vZ2z7wP4XjTGV1DXsgU7eJFkLHjJaZwGdLZHK2e9d6BF50wj3aeIifgWK4JYsRQJET9iQ-Dq0D2UDag__NdkAKZ7oDTWtvBf3xeoLoKI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2587006314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seroprevalence of Leptospira Among Selected Mammals on a Wildlife Management Area in Louisiana, USA</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Anderson, A. Nikki ; Long, Ashley M ; LaCour, James M ; Bresnan, Alessandra M ; Bushaw, Jacob D ; Gerrits, Alaina P ; Hunt, Jay D ; Moscicki, David J ; Raginski, Nancy M ; Stafford, Brandon ; Ulrey, Erin E ; Randel, Charles J</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, A. Nikki ; Long, Ashley M ; LaCour, James M ; Bresnan, Alessandra M ; Bushaw, Jacob D ; Gerrits, Alaina P ; Hunt, Jay D ; Moscicki, David J ; Raginski, Nancy M ; Stafford, Brandon ; Ulrey, Erin E ; Randel, Charles J</creatorcontrib><description>From August to December 2018, we collected blood samples from 98 individuals of 11 mammal species to examine seroprevalence of leptospirosis at the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area in central Louisiana, US. Overall, 21.4% of individuals tested positive for antibodies of at least one Leptospira interrogans serovar and six individuals were reactive for two or more serovars. The most prevalent serovar we detected was serovar Bratislava (19.4%), followed by serovar Grippotyphosa (6.1%), serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae and serovar Pomona (2.0%), and serovar Canicola and serovar Hardjo (1.0%). We detected the highest prevalence in fox squirrels (Sciurus niger), hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus), and feral swine (Sus scrofa), with serovar Bratislava being the most reactive for these three species. Positive samples returned titer results of 100–400 for all species and serovars, with the exception of one feral swine that returned a titer of 1,600 to serovar Bratislava, indicating an active infection. Although the potential effects of leptospirosis on our study species remains unclear, our data contribute information necessary to understand and manage potential risks of Leptospira exposure to wildlife, domestic animals, and humans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3558</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7589/JWD-D-20-00192</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34699588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wildlife Disease Association</publisher><subject>Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Antibodies, Bacterial ; Disease ; Leptospira ; leptospirosis ; Leptospirosis - epidemiology ; Leptospirosis - veterinary ; Louisiana ; Louisiana - epidemiology ; mammal ; Mammals ; Seroepidemiologic Studies ; seroprevalence ; SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ; wildlife</subject><ispartof>Journal of wildlife diseases, 2022-01, Vol.58 (1), p.183-187</ispartof><rights>Wildlife Disease Association 2022</rights><rights>Wildlife Disease Association 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-35c7cfad957bdd8899d2fa7d36ef6df06c89fbb1da35c9ff842f9d864da74e3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-35c7cfad957bdd8899d2fa7d36ef6df06c89fbb1da35c9ff842f9d864da74e3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34699588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, A. Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ashley M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaCour, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresnan, Alessandra M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bushaw, Jacob D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, Alaina P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscicki, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raginski, Nancy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrey, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randel, Charles J</creatorcontrib><title>Seroprevalence of Leptospira Among Selected Mammals on a Wildlife Management Area in Louisiana, USA</title><title>Journal of wildlife diseases</title><addtitle>J Wildl Dis</addtitle><description>From August to December 2018, we collected blood samples from 98 individuals of 11 mammal species to examine seroprevalence of leptospirosis at the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area in central Louisiana, US. Overall, 21.4% of individuals tested positive for antibodies of at least one Leptospira interrogans serovar and six individuals were reactive for two or more serovars. The most prevalent serovar we detected was serovar Bratislava (19.4%), followed by serovar Grippotyphosa (6.1%), serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae and serovar Pomona (2.0%), and serovar Canicola and serovar Hardjo (1.0%). We detected the highest prevalence in fox squirrels (Sciurus niger), hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus), and feral swine (Sus scrofa), with serovar Bratislava being the most reactive for these three species. Positive samples returned titer results of 100–400 for all species and serovars, with the exception of one feral swine that returned a titer of 1,600 to serovar Bratislava, indicating an active infection. Although the potential effects of leptospirosis on our study species remains unclear, our data contribute information necessary to understand and manage potential risks of Leptospira exposure to wildlife, domestic animals, and humans.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Leptospira</subject><subject>leptospirosis</subject><subject>Leptospirosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Leptospirosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Louisiana</subject><subject>Louisiana - epidemiology</subject><subject>mammal</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Seroepidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>seroprevalence</subject><subject>SHORT COMMUNICATIONS</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><issn>0090-3558</issn><issn>1943-3700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMiKPDE1x4nzYY9XyqSKGUnW0nPhcGSVxsBMk_j2GFlam052e99XpQegyJrMiY_zmabuMllFCIkJinhyhccxTGtGCkGM0JoSTiGYZG6Ez798ISbKwnKIRTXPOM8bGqFqDs52DD1lDWwG2Gq-g663vjJN43th2h9dQQ9WDws-yaWTtsW2xxFtTq9poCNdW7qCBtsdzBxKbFq_sYLwJ9ynerOfn6ESHGFwc5gRt7m5fFw_R6uX-cTFfRSWlSR8erYpKS8WzolSKMc5VomWhaA46V5rkFeO6LGMlA8m1ZmmiuWJ5qmSRAtV0gq73vZ2z7wP4XjTGV1DXsgU7eJFkLHjJaZwGdLZHK2e9d6BF50wj3aeIifgWK4JYsRQJET9iQ-Dq0D2UDag__NdkAKZ7oDTWtvBf3xeoLoKI</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Anderson, A. Nikki</creator><creator>Long, Ashley M</creator><creator>LaCour, James M</creator><creator>Bresnan, Alessandra M</creator><creator>Bushaw, Jacob D</creator><creator>Gerrits, Alaina P</creator><creator>Hunt, Jay D</creator><creator>Moscicki, David J</creator><creator>Raginski, Nancy M</creator><creator>Stafford, Brandon</creator><creator>Ulrey, Erin E</creator><creator>Randel, Charles J</creator><general>Wildlife Disease Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Seroprevalence of Leptospira Among Selected Mammals on a Wildlife Management Area in Louisiana, USA</title><author>Anderson, A. Nikki ; Long, Ashley M ; LaCour, James M ; Bresnan, Alessandra M ; Bushaw, Jacob D ; Gerrits, Alaina P ; Hunt, Jay D ; Moscicki, David J ; Raginski, Nancy M ; Stafford, Brandon ; Ulrey, Erin E ; Randel, Charles J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b332t-35c7cfad957bdd8899d2fa7d36ef6df06c89fbb1da35c9ff842f9d864da74e3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Leptospira</topic><topic>leptospirosis</topic><topic>Leptospirosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Leptospirosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Louisiana</topic><topic>Louisiana - epidemiology</topic><topic>mammal</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Seroepidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>seroprevalence</topic><topic>SHORT COMMUNICATIONS</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, A. Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ashley M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaCour, James M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresnan, Alessandra M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bushaw, Jacob D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerrits, Alaina P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscicki, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raginski, Nancy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stafford, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrey, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randel, Charles J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of wildlife diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, A. Nikki</au><au>Long, Ashley M</au><au>LaCour, James M</au><au>Bresnan, Alessandra M</au><au>Bushaw, Jacob D</au><au>Gerrits, Alaina P</au><au>Hunt, Jay D</au><au>Moscicki, David J</au><au>Raginski, Nancy M</au><au>Stafford, Brandon</au><au>Ulrey, Erin E</au><au>Randel, Charles J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seroprevalence of Leptospira Among Selected Mammals on a Wildlife Management Area in Louisiana, USA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of wildlife diseases</jtitle><addtitle>J Wildl Dis</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>183-187</pages><issn>0090-3558</issn><eissn>1943-3700</eissn><abstract>From August to December 2018, we collected blood samples from 98 individuals of 11 mammal species to examine seroprevalence of leptospirosis at the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area in central Louisiana, US. Overall, 21.4% of individuals tested positive for antibodies of at least one Leptospira interrogans serovar and six individuals were reactive for two or more serovars. The most prevalent serovar we detected was serovar Bratislava (19.4%), followed by serovar Grippotyphosa (6.1%), serovar Icterohaemorrhagiae and serovar Pomona (2.0%), and serovar Canicola and serovar Hardjo (1.0%). We detected the highest prevalence in fox squirrels (Sciurus niger), hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus), and feral swine (Sus scrofa), with serovar Bratislava being the most reactive for these three species. Positive samples returned titer results of 100–400 for all species and serovars, with the exception of one feral swine that returned a titer of 1,600 to serovar Bratislava, indicating an active infection. Although the potential effects of leptospirosis on our study species remains unclear, our data contribute information necessary to understand and manage potential risks of Leptospira exposure to wildlife, domestic animals, and humans.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wildlife Disease Association</pub><pmid>34699588</pmid><doi>10.7589/JWD-D-20-00192</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-3558 |
ispartof | Journal of wildlife diseases, 2022-01, Vol.58 (1), p.183-187 |
issn | 0090-3558 1943-3700 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2587006314 |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Animals, Wild Antibodies, Bacterial Disease Leptospira leptospirosis Leptospirosis - epidemiology Leptospirosis - veterinary Louisiana Louisiana - epidemiology mammal Mammals Seroepidemiologic Studies seroprevalence SHORT COMMUNICATIONS wildlife |
title | Seroprevalence of Leptospira Among Selected Mammals on a Wildlife Management Area in Louisiana, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T06%3A56%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seroprevalence%20of%20Leptospira%20Among%20Selected%20Mammals%20on%20a%20Wildlife%20Management%20Area%20in%20Louisiana,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20wildlife%20diseases&rft.au=Anderson,%20A.%20Nikki&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=183-187&rft.issn=0090-3558&rft.eissn=1943-3700&rft_id=info:doi/10.7589/JWD-D-20-00192&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2587006314%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2587006314&rft_id=info:pmid/34699588&rfr_iscdi=true |