Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau

Soil degradation is significantly increased driven by soil nutrient loss and soil erodibility, thus, hampering the sustainable development of the ecological environment and agricultural production. Vegetation restoration has been widely adopted to prevent soil degradation given its role in improving...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2022-01, Vol.302 (Pt A), p.113985-113985, Article 113985
Hauptverfasser: Dong, Lingbo, Li, Jiwei, Zhang, Yu, Bing, Mengyao, Liu, Yulin, Wu, Jianzhao, Hai, Xuying, Li, Ao, Wang, Kaibo, Wu, Puxia, Shangguan, Zhouping, Deng, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113985
container_issue Pt A
container_start_page 113985
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 302
creator Dong, Lingbo
Li, Jiwei
Zhang, Yu
Bing, Mengyao
Liu, Yulin
Wu, Jianzhao
Hai, Xuying
Li, Ao
Wang, Kaibo
Wu, Puxia
Shangguan, Zhouping
Deng, Lei
description Soil degradation is significantly increased driven by soil nutrient loss and soil erodibility, thus, hampering the sustainable development of the ecological environment and agricultural production. Vegetation restoration has been widely adopted to prevent soil degradation given its role in improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. However, it is unclear which vegetation type has the best improving capacity from soil nutrient and soil erodibility perspectives. This study selected three vegetation restoration types of grasslands (GL), shrublands (SL), and forestlands (FL) along the five slope positions (i.e., top, upper, middle, lower, and foot slope), to investigate the effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility. All vegetation restoration types were restored for 20 years from croplands (CL). We used comprehensive soil nutrient index (CSNI) and comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) formed by a weighted summation method to reflect the effect of vegetation restoration on the improving capacity of soil nutrient and erodibility. The results showed the vegetation types with the highest comprehensive soil quality index (CSQI) at the top, upper, middle, lower and foot slope were FL (1.92), FL (1.98), SL (2.15), FL (2.37) and GL (3.93), respectively. When only one vegetation type was considered on the entire slope, SL (0.59) and FL (0.59) had the highest CSNI, the SL had the lowest CSEI (0.34) and the highest CSQI (1.89). The CSNI was mainly influenced by soil structure stability index (SSSI), sand content, silt + clay particles, and CSEI was controlled by soil organic matter (SOM), macroaggregates and microaggregates. Moreover, the CSQI was influenced by pH, silt and clay content, and biome coverage (BC). The study suggested the SL were advised as the best vegetation restoration type on the whole slope from improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. •Vegetation type, slope position and their interaction affected on soil quality.•Soil nutrients strongly affected on the variations of soil erodibility.•Shrublands had the best positive effect on soil quality on the whole slope.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113985
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2587000325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479721020478</els_id><sourcerecordid>2587000325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-54169afac1acd69e0a1b0bbe6676a57c1fc50f9693c3864112562190ffa4ef973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCTwD5yCWLJ46d-IRQ1RaklegBzpbjjItX2TjYzkp746fjbRaunGzPvPdG85mQd8C2wEB-3G_3OB0PZtrWrIYtAFedeEE2wJSoOsnZS7JhnEHVtKq9Jq9T2jPGeA3tK3LNm7Y8OrUhv--cQ5sTDY4e8QmzyT5MNGLKIa73fJqx9Ceagh_ptOTocSoOMw1rCWMYfO9Hn0_F-LSMJuNA-xNNY5iRziH5c9BzRv6JdBcwJfp4lpnlDblyZkz49nLekB_3d99vv1S7bw9fbz_vKsulyJVoQCrjjAVjB6mQGehZ36OUrTSiteCsYE5JxS3vZANQC1mDYs6ZBp1q-Q35sObOMfxaynr64JPFcTQThiXpWnTtMyBRpGKV2hhSiuj0HP3BxJMGps_w9V5f4OszfL3CL773lxFLf8Dhn-sv7SL4tAqwLHr0GHWyhaXFwcfyCXoI_j8j_gADsJsJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2587000325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Dong, Lingbo ; Li, Jiwei ; Zhang, Yu ; Bing, Mengyao ; Liu, Yulin ; Wu, Jianzhao ; Hai, Xuying ; Li, Ao ; Wang, Kaibo ; Wu, Puxia ; Shangguan, Zhouping ; Deng, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lingbo ; Li, Jiwei ; Zhang, Yu ; Bing, Mengyao ; Liu, Yulin ; Wu, Jianzhao ; Hai, Xuying ; Li, Ao ; Wang, Kaibo ; Wu, Puxia ; Shangguan, Zhouping ; Deng, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>Soil degradation is significantly increased driven by soil nutrient loss and soil erodibility, thus, hampering the sustainable development of the ecological environment and agricultural production. Vegetation restoration has been widely adopted to prevent soil degradation given its role in improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. However, it is unclear which vegetation type has the best improving capacity from soil nutrient and soil erodibility perspectives. This study selected three vegetation restoration types of grasslands (GL), shrublands (SL), and forestlands (FL) along the five slope positions (i.e., top, upper, middle, lower, and foot slope), to investigate the effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility. All vegetation restoration types were restored for 20 years from croplands (CL). We used comprehensive soil nutrient index (CSNI) and comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) formed by a weighted summation method to reflect the effect of vegetation restoration on the improving capacity of soil nutrient and erodibility. The results showed the vegetation types with the highest comprehensive soil quality index (CSQI) at the top, upper, middle, lower and foot slope were FL (1.92), FL (1.98), SL (2.15), FL (2.37) and GL (3.93), respectively. When only one vegetation type was considered on the entire slope, SL (0.59) and FL (0.59) had the highest CSNI, the SL had the lowest CSEI (0.34) and the highest CSQI (1.89). The CSNI was mainly influenced by soil structure stability index (SSSI), sand content, silt + clay particles, and CSEI was controlled by soil organic matter (SOM), macroaggregates and microaggregates. Moreover, the CSQI was influenced by pH, silt and clay content, and biome coverage (BC). The study suggested the SL were advised as the best vegetation restoration type on the whole slope from improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. •Vegetation type, slope position and their interaction affected on soil quality.•Soil nutrients strongly affected on the variations of soil erodibility.•Shrublands had the best positive effect on soil quality on the whole slope.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113985</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34700089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; China ; Ecosystem ; Forests ; Nutrients ; oil degradation ; Slope position ; Soil ; Soil erodibility ; Soil nutrients ; Soil quality ; Vegetation restoration</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-01, Vol.302 (Pt A), p.113985-113985, Article 113985</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-54169afac1acd69e0a1b0bbe6676a57c1fc50f9693c3864112562190ffa4ef973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-54169afac1acd69e0a1b0bbe6676a57c1fc50f9693c3864112562190ffa4ef973</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3912-4564</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113985$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34700089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lingbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bing, Mengyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yulin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jianzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hai, Xuying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kaibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Puxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shangguan, Zhouping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Soil degradation is significantly increased driven by soil nutrient loss and soil erodibility, thus, hampering the sustainable development of the ecological environment and agricultural production. Vegetation restoration has been widely adopted to prevent soil degradation given its role in improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. However, it is unclear which vegetation type has the best improving capacity from soil nutrient and soil erodibility perspectives. This study selected three vegetation restoration types of grasslands (GL), shrublands (SL), and forestlands (FL) along the five slope positions (i.e., top, upper, middle, lower, and foot slope), to investigate the effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility. All vegetation restoration types were restored for 20 years from croplands (CL). We used comprehensive soil nutrient index (CSNI) and comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) formed by a weighted summation method to reflect the effect of vegetation restoration on the improving capacity of soil nutrient and erodibility. The results showed the vegetation types with the highest comprehensive soil quality index (CSQI) at the top, upper, middle, lower and foot slope were FL (1.92), FL (1.98), SL (2.15), FL (2.37) and GL (3.93), respectively. When only one vegetation type was considered on the entire slope, SL (0.59) and FL (0.59) had the highest CSNI, the SL had the lowest CSEI (0.34) and the highest CSQI (1.89). The CSNI was mainly influenced by soil structure stability index (SSSI), sand content, silt + clay particles, and CSEI was controlled by soil organic matter (SOM), macroaggregates and microaggregates. Moreover, the CSQI was influenced by pH, silt and clay content, and biome coverage (BC). The study suggested the SL were advised as the best vegetation restoration type on the whole slope from improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. •Vegetation type, slope position and their interaction affected on soil quality.•Soil nutrients strongly affected on the variations of soil erodibility.•Shrublands had the best positive effect on soil quality on the whole slope.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>oil degradation</subject><subject>Slope position</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil erodibility</subject><subject>Soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Vegetation restoration</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCTwD5yCWLJ46d-IRQ1RaklegBzpbjjItX2TjYzkp746fjbRaunGzPvPdG85mQd8C2wEB-3G_3OB0PZtrWrIYtAFedeEE2wJSoOsnZS7JhnEHVtKq9Jq9T2jPGeA3tK3LNm7Y8OrUhv--cQ5sTDY4e8QmzyT5MNGLKIa73fJqx9Ceagh_ptOTocSoOMw1rCWMYfO9Hn0_F-LSMJuNA-xNNY5iRziH5c9BzRv6JdBcwJfp4lpnlDblyZkz49nLekB_3d99vv1S7bw9fbz_vKsulyJVoQCrjjAVjB6mQGehZ36OUrTSiteCsYE5JxS3vZANQC1mDYs6ZBp1q-Q35sObOMfxaynr64JPFcTQThiXpWnTtMyBRpGKV2hhSiuj0HP3BxJMGps_w9V5f4OszfL3CL773lxFLf8Dhn-sv7SL4tAqwLHr0GHWyhaXFwcfyCXoI_j8j_gADsJsJ</recordid><startdate>20220115</startdate><enddate>20220115</enddate><creator>Dong, Lingbo</creator><creator>Li, Jiwei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yu</creator><creator>Bing, Mengyao</creator><creator>Liu, Yulin</creator><creator>Wu, Jianzhao</creator><creator>Hai, Xuying</creator><creator>Li, Ao</creator><creator>Wang, Kaibo</creator><creator>Wu, Puxia</creator><creator>Shangguan, Zhouping</creator><creator>Deng, Lei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-4564</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220115</creationdate><title>Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau</title><author>Dong, Lingbo ; Li, Jiwei ; Zhang, Yu ; Bing, Mengyao ; Liu, Yulin ; Wu, Jianzhao ; Hai, Xuying ; Li, Ao ; Wang, Kaibo ; Wu, Puxia ; Shangguan, Zhouping ; Deng, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-54169afac1acd69e0a1b0bbe6676a57c1fc50f9693c3864112562190ffa4ef973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>oil degradation</topic><topic>Slope position</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil erodibility</topic><topic>Soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Vegetation restoration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dong, Lingbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bing, Mengyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yulin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jianzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hai, Xuying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Kaibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Puxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shangguan, Zhouping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dong, Lingbo</au><au>Li, Jiwei</au><au>Zhang, Yu</au><au>Bing, Mengyao</au><au>Liu, Yulin</au><au>Wu, Jianzhao</au><au>Hai, Xuying</au><au>Li, Ao</au><au>Wang, Kaibo</au><au>Wu, Puxia</au><au>Shangguan, Zhouping</au><au>Deng, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2022-01-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>302</volume><issue>Pt A</issue><spage>113985</spage><epage>113985</epage><pages>113985-113985</pages><artnum>113985</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Soil degradation is significantly increased driven by soil nutrient loss and soil erodibility, thus, hampering the sustainable development of the ecological environment and agricultural production. Vegetation restoration has been widely adopted to prevent soil degradation given its role in improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. However, it is unclear which vegetation type has the best improving capacity from soil nutrient and soil erodibility perspectives. This study selected three vegetation restoration types of grasslands (GL), shrublands (SL), and forestlands (FL) along the five slope positions (i.e., top, upper, middle, lower, and foot slope), to investigate the effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility. All vegetation restoration types were restored for 20 years from croplands (CL). We used comprehensive soil nutrient index (CSNI) and comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) formed by a weighted summation method to reflect the effect of vegetation restoration on the improving capacity of soil nutrient and erodibility. The results showed the vegetation types with the highest comprehensive soil quality index (CSQI) at the top, upper, middle, lower and foot slope were FL (1.92), FL (1.98), SL (2.15), FL (2.37) and GL (3.93), respectively. When only one vegetation type was considered on the entire slope, SL (0.59) and FL (0.59) had the highest CSNI, the SL had the lowest CSEI (0.34) and the highest CSQI (1.89). The CSNI was mainly influenced by soil structure stability index (SSSI), sand content, silt + clay particles, and CSEI was controlled by soil organic matter (SOM), macroaggregates and microaggregates. Moreover, the CSQI was influenced by pH, silt and clay content, and biome coverage (BC). The study suggested the SL were advised as the best vegetation restoration type on the whole slope from improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. •Vegetation type, slope position and their interaction affected on soil quality.•Soil nutrients strongly affected on the variations of soil erodibility.•Shrublands had the best positive effect on soil quality on the whole slope.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34700089</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113985</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-4564</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2022-01, Vol.302 (Pt A), p.113985-113985, Article 113985
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2587000325
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agriculture
China
Ecosystem
Forests
Nutrients
oil degradation
Slope position
Soil
Soil erodibility
Soil nutrients
Soil quality
Vegetation restoration
title Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A18%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20vegetation%20restoration%20types%20on%20soil%20nutrients%20and%20soil%20erodibility%20regulated%20by%20slope%20positions%20on%20the%20Loess%20Plateau&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Dong,%20Lingbo&rft.date=2022-01-15&rft.volume=302&rft.issue=Pt%20A&rft.spage=113985&rft.epage=113985&rft.pages=113985-113985&rft.artnum=113985&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113985&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2587000325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2587000325&rft_id=info:pmid/34700089&rft_els_id=S0301479721020478&rfr_iscdi=true