An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting

BACKGROUND Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pest management science 2022-02, Vol.78 (2), p.711-721
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Rujing, Li, Rui, Chen, Tianjiao, Zhang, Jie, Xie, Chengjun, Qiu, Kun, Chen, Peng, Du, Jianming, Chen, Hongbo, Shao, FangRong, Hu, Haiying, Liu, Haiyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 721
container_issue 2
container_start_page 711
container_title Pest management science
container_volume 78
creator Wang, Rujing
Li, Rui
Chen, Tianjiao
Zhang, Jie
Xie, Chengjun
Qiu, Kun
Chen, Peng
Du, Jianming
Chen, Hongbo
Shao, FangRong
Hu, Haiying
Liu, Haiyun
description BACKGROUND Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system. RESULTS Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision. CONCLUSION The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ps.6684
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2585411446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618046145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAYBeAgiptT_AdS8EJBOvPVJL0cwy8YKKjgXUiTdHS0TU1aZP_ezM1dCF7lhTwcDgeAcwSnCEJ824UpY4IegDHKMEtpnovD_S0-RuAkhBWEMM9zfAxGhDKOIadjIGZtoobeNaqvdBLWobdNUjqfdDb0ibfaLduqr1xUrdl8WK1CX7XLU3BUqjrYs907Ae_3d2_zx3Tx_PA0ny1STWhGU5KTgmiutDGGkZJrZIpCCA05ZxDlmBQi9mDCWlNAITKroS6MLRkmXFGIyARcb3M77z6HWEo2VdC2rlVr3RAkzkRGEaKURXr5h67c4NvYTmKGBKQM0Syqq63S3oXgbSk7XzXKryWCcjOm7ILcjBnlxS5vKBpr9u53vQhutuCrqu36vxz58voT9w1D43tz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618046145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wang, Rujing ; Li, Rui ; Chen, Tianjiao ; Zhang, Jie ; Xie, Chengjun ; Qiu, Kun ; Chen, Peng ; Du, Jianming ; Chen, Hongbo ; Shao, FangRong ; Hu, Haiying ; Liu, Haiyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rujing ; Li, Rui ; Chen, Tianjiao ; Zhang, Jie ; Xie, Chengjun ; Qiu, Kun ; Chen, Peng ; Du, Jianming ; Chen, Hongbo ; Shao, FangRong ; Hu, Haiying ; Liu, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system. RESULTS Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision. CONCLUSION The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.6684</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34672074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Automation ; Computer vision ; Computers ; Counting ; Counting methods ; Crop damage ; Crop yield ; Crops, Agricultural ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; deep learning ; Forecasting ; Integrated pest management ; Monitoring ; Pest Control ; pest counting ; Pests ; Statistics ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2022-02, Vol.78 (2), p.711-721</ispartof><rights>2021 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2885-1216</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.6684$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.6684$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34672074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rujing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tianjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Chengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, FangRong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Haiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><title>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system. RESULTS Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision. CONCLUSION The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Counting methods</subject><subject>Crop damage</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>deep learning</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Integrated pest management</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>pest counting</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAYBeAgiptT_AdS8EJBOvPVJL0cwy8YKKjgXUiTdHS0TU1aZP_ezM1dCF7lhTwcDgeAcwSnCEJ824UpY4IegDHKMEtpnovD_S0-RuAkhBWEMM9zfAxGhDKOIadjIGZtoobeNaqvdBLWobdNUjqfdDb0ibfaLduqr1xUrdl8WK1CX7XLU3BUqjrYs907Ae_3d2_zx3Tx_PA0ny1STWhGU5KTgmiutDGGkZJrZIpCCA05ZxDlmBQi9mDCWlNAITKroS6MLRkmXFGIyARcb3M77z6HWEo2VdC2rlVr3RAkzkRGEaKURXr5h67c4NvYTmKGBKQM0Syqq63S3oXgbSk7XzXKryWCcjOm7ILcjBnlxS5vKBpr9u53vQhutuCrqu36vxz58voT9w1D43tz</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Wang, Rujing</creator><creator>Li, Rui</creator><creator>Chen, Tianjiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Jie</creator><creator>Xie, Chengjun</creator><creator>Qiu, Kun</creator><creator>Chen, Peng</creator><creator>Du, Jianming</creator><creator>Chen, Hongbo</creator><creator>Shao, FangRong</creator><creator>Hu, Haiying</creator><creator>Liu, Haiyun</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2885-1216</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</title><author>Wang, Rujing ; Li, Rui ; Chen, Tianjiao ; Zhang, Jie ; Xie, Chengjun ; Qiu, Kun ; Chen, Peng ; Du, Jianming ; Chen, Hongbo ; Shao, FangRong ; Hu, Haiying ; Liu, Haiyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Counting methods</topic><topic>Crop damage</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>deep learning</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Integrated pest management</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>pest counting</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rujing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tianjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Chengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, FangRong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Haiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Rujing</au><au>Li, Rui</au><au>Chen, Tianjiao</au><au>Zhang, Jie</au><au>Xie, Chengjun</au><au>Qiu, Kun</au><au>Chen, Peng</au><au>Du, Jianming</au><au>Chen, Hongbo</au><au>Shao, FangRong</au><au>Hu, Haiying</au><au>Liu, Haiyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>711-721</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system. RESULTS Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision. CONCLUSION The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry. The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>34672074</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.6684</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2885-1216</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-498X
ispartof Pest management science, 2022-02, Vol.78 (2), p.711-721
issn 1526-498X
1526-4998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2585411446
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agricultural practices
Agriculture
Automation
Computer vision
Computers
Counting
Counting methods
Crop damage
Crop yield
Crops, Agricultural
Data Interpretation, Statistical
deep learning
Forecasting
Integrated pest management
Monitoring
Pest Control
pest counting
Pests
Statistics
Trends
title An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A11%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20automatic%20system%20for%20pest%20recognition%20and%20forecasting&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Wang,%20Rujing&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=711-721&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.6684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2618046145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618046145&rft_id=info:pmid/34672074&rfr_iscdi=true