An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting
BACKGROUND Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pest management science 2022-02, Vol.78 (2), p.711-721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 721 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 711 |
container_title | Pest management science |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Wang, Rujing Li, Rui Chen, Tianjiao Zhang, Jie Xie, Chengjun Qiu, Kun Chen, Peng Du, Jianming Chen, Hongbo Shao, FangRong Hu, Haiying Liu, Haiyun |
description | BACKGROUND
Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system.
RESULTS
Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision.
CONCLUSION
The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ps.6684 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2585411446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618046145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAYBeAgiptT_AdS8EJBOvPVJL0cwy8YKKjgXUiTdHS0TU1aZP_ezM1dCF7lhTwcDgeAcwSnCEJ824UpY4IegDHKMEtpnovD_S0-RuAkhBWEMM9zfAxGhDKOIadjIGZtoobeNaqvdBLWobdNUjqfdDb0ibfaLduqr1xUrdl8WK1CX7XLU3BUqjrYs907Ae_3d2_zx3Tx_PA0ny1STWhGU5KTgmiutDGGkZJrZIpCCA05ZxDlmBQi9mDCWlNAITKroS6MLRkmXFGIyARcb3M77z6HWEo2VdC2rlVr3RAkzkRGEaKURXr5h67c4NvYTmKGBKQM0Syqq63S3oXgbSk7XzXKryWCcjOm7ILcjBnlxS5vKBpr9u53vQhutuCrqu36vxz58voT9w1D43tz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618046145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wang, Rujing ; Li, Rui ; Chen, Tianjiao ; Zhang, Jie ; Xie, Chengjun ; Qiu, Kun ; Chen, Peng ; Du, Jianming ; Chen, Hongbo ; Shao, FangRong ; Hu, Haiying ; Liu, Haiyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rujing ; Li, Rui ; Chen, Tianjiao ; Zhang, Jie ; Xie, Chengjun ; Qiu, Kun ; Chen, Peng ; Du, Jianming ; Chen, Hongbo ; Shao, FangRong ; Hu, Haiying ; Liu, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system.
RESULTS
Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision.
CONCLUSION
The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.6684</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34672074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Automation ; Computer vision ; Computers ; Counting ; Counting methods ; Crop damage ; Crop yield ; Crops, Agricultural ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; deep learning ; Forecasting ; Integrated pest management ; Monitoring ; Pest Control ; pest counting ; Pests ; Statistics ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2022-02, Vol.78 (2), p.711-721</ispartof><rights>2021 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2885-1216</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.6684$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.6684$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34672074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rujing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tianjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Chengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, FangRong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Haiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><title>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system.
RESULTS
Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision.
CONCLUSION
The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Computer vision</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Counting</subject><subject>Counting methods</subject><subject>Crop damage</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>deep learning</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Integrated pest management</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>pest counting</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAYBeAgiptT_AdS8EJBOvPVJL0cwy8YKKjgXUiTdHS0TU1aZP_ezM1dCF7lhTwcDgeAcwSnCEJ824UpY4IegDHKMEtpnovD_S0-RuAkhBWEMM9zfAxGhDKOIadjIGZtoobeNaqvdBLWobdNUjqfdDb0ibfaLduqr1xUrdl8WK1CX7XLU3BUqjrYs907Ae_3d2_zx3Tx_PA0ny1STWhGU5KTgmiutDGGkZJrZIpCCA05ZxDlmBQi9mDCWlNAITKroS6MLRkmXFGIyARcb3M77z6HWEo2VdC2rlVr3RAkzkRGEaKURXr5h67c4NvYTmKGBKQM0Syqq63S3oXgbSk7XzXKryWCcjOm7ILcjBnlxS5vKBpr9u53vQhutuCrqu36vxz58voT9w1D43tz</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Wang, Rujing</creator><creator>Li, Rui</creator><creator>Chen, Tianjiao</creator><creator>Zhang, Jie</creator><creator>Xie, Chengjun</creator><creator>Qiu, Kun</creator><creator>Chen, Peng</creator><creator>Du, Jianming</creator><creator>Chen, Hongbo</creator><creator>Shao, FangRong</creator><creator>Hu, Haiying</creator><creator>Liu, Haiyun</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2885-1216</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</title><author>Wang, Rujing ; Li, Rui ; Chen, Tianjiao ; Zhang, Jie ; Xie, Chengjun ; Qiu, Kun ; Chen, Peng ; Du, Jianming ; Chen, Hongbo ; Shao, FangRong ; Hu, Haiying ; Liu, Haiyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3454-393b3c7acddd63f7c1dbb88c077601923b807468eedb0885ec0cbdef6237a4013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Computer vision</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Counting</topic><topic>Counting methods</topic><topic>Crop damage</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>deep learning</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Integrated pest management</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>pest counting</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rujing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tianjiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Chengjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Jianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, FangRong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Haiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haiyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Rujing</au><au>Li, Rui</au><au>Chen, Tianjiao</au><au>Zhang, Jie</au><au>Xie, Chengjun</au><au>Qiu, Kun</au><au>Chen, Peng</au><au>Du, Jianming</au><au>Chen, Hongbo</au><au>Shao, FangRong</au><au>Hu, Haiying</au><au>Liu, Haiyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>721</epage><pages>711-721</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
Pests cause significant damage to agricultural crops and reduce crop yields. Use of manual methods of pest forecasting for integrated pest management is labor‐intensive and time‐consuming. Here, we present an automatic system for monitoring pests in large fields, with the aim of replacing manual forecasting. The system comprises an automatic detection and counting system and a human–computer data statistical fitting system. Image data sets of the target pests from large fields are first input into the system. The number of pests in the image is then counted both manually and using the automatic system. Finally, a mapping relationship between counts obtained using the automated system and by agricultural experts is established using the statistical fitting system.
RESULTS
Trends in the pest‐count curves produced using the manual and automated counting methods were very similar. To sample the number of pests for manual statistics, plants were shaken to transfer the pests from the plant to a plate. Hence, pests hiding within plant crevices were also sampled and included in the count, whereas the automatic method counted only the pests visible in the images. Therefore, the computer index threshold was much lower than the manual index threshold. However, the proposed system correctly reflected trends in pest numbers obtained using computer vision.
CONCLUSION
The experimental results demonstrate that our automatic pest‐monitoring system can generate pest grades and can replace manual forecasting methods in large fields. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry.
The framework of the automatic pest‐monitoring system comprises three subsystems: (i) an automatic detection and counting system based on deep‐learning techniques, (ii) a human–computer data statistical fitting system, and (iii) an integrated pest management system. The experimental results demonstrate that this system can automatically generate pest grades.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>34672074</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.6684</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2885-1216</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-498X |
ispartof | Pest management science, 2022-02, Vol.78 (2), p.711-721 |
issn | 1526-498X 1526-4998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2585411446 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agriculture Automation Computer vision Computers Counting Counting methods Crop damage Crop yield Crops, Agricultural Data Interpretation, Statistical deep learning Forecasting Integrated pest management Monitoring Pest Control pest counting Pests Statistics Trends |
title | An automatic system for pest recognition and forecasting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A11%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20automatic%20system%20for%20pest%20recognition%20and%20forecasting&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Wang,%20Rujing&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=721&rft.pages=711-721&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.6684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2618046145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618046145&rft_id=info:pmid/34672074&rfr_iscdi=true |