Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences
Assessment of clinical competence of nursing students is an essential requirement in professional nursing education. This article summarizes the current published evidence indicating the nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences on benefits of OSCE over TCE. A systematic review...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education today 2022-01, Vol.108, p.105170-105170, Article 105170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 105170 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105170 |
container_title | Nurse education today |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Vincent, Sophia Cyril Arulappan, Judie Amirtharaj, Anandhi Matua, Gerald Amandu Al Hashmi, Iman |
description | Assessment of clinical competence of nursing students is an essential requirement in professional nursing education. This article summarizes the current published evidence indicating the nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences on benefits of OSCE over TCE.
A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Electronic databases including Scopus, Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, EBSCO, PsychINFO, and Pubmed Central were used to identify relevant articles. The studies published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020 and fourteen full-text articles that met all the inclusion criteria were included in the review.
The review identified five themes namely: a) Student's perception of OSCE; b) student's satisfaction regarding OSCE as an examination approach; c) students' perception of TCE as an examination approach; d) student's level of stress and anxiety towards OSCE vs TCE; and e) faculty member's perception and experience of OSCE.
We conclude that OSCE is a more credible assessment format to evaluate the clinical competence of undergraduate nursing students compared to the TCE method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105170 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2584801429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0260691721004275</els_id><sourcerecordid>2623039025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-14ba94681b24cd9ee0b50a182a5ef11f4c7cc4f072d988d5aebc88a36372e8fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVuL1TAUhYMoznH0D_ggAR_0pcdc2jQVX4bBGwzMiz6HNNmVlDatuRzn_ET_lemc8YKITyF7f2ttWAuhp5TsKaHi1bj3YNOeEUbLoKEtuYd2tOGsYm3H76MdYYJUoqPtGXoU40gIkS3jD9EZr0UrhWh36Pt1P4JJ7gA4ppBNygEsNpPzzugJw42endfJLR4fIk5BW7d9yuqfTFowHPSUddr8sgWf4ovfqFnmFRJ4A6_xBY7HmGAuQoMDHBx8w8uAfQ7R-S940CZP6Yi1t384rRAMrNupeLuBmzJxm2F8jB4Meorw5O49R5_fvf10-aG6un7_8fLiqjJc1qmida-7Wkjas9rYDoD0DdFUMt3AQOlQm9aYeiAts52UttHQGyk1F7xlIAfLz9HLk-8alq8ZYlKziwamSXtYclSskbUktGZdQZ__hY5LDiW8QgnGCe8IawrFTpQJS4wBBrUGN-twVJSorWg1qq1otRWtTkUX0bM769zPYH9JfjZbgDcnAEoWJdygorkNyrpQCld2cf_z_wFBhb_n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2623039025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Vincent, Sophia Cyril ; Arulappan, Judie ; Amirtharaj, Anandhi ; Matua, Gerald Amandu ; Al Hashmi, Iman</creator><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Sophia Cyril ; Arulappan, Judie ; Amirtharaj, Anandhi ; Matua, Gerald Amandu ; Al Hashmi, Iman</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment of clinical competence of nursing students is an essential requirement in professional nursing education. This article summarizes the current published evidence indicating the nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences on benefits of OSCE over TCE.
A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Electronic databases including Scopus, Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, EBSCO, PsychINFO, and Pubmed Central were used to identify relevant articles. The studies published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020 and fourteen full-text articles that met all the inclusion criteria were included in the review.
The review identified five themes namely: a) Student's perception of OSCE; b) student's satisfaction regarding OSCE as an examination approach; c) students' perception of TCE as an examination approach; d) student's level of stress and anxiety towards OSCE vs TCE; and e) faculty member's perception and experience of OSCE.
We conclude that OSCE is a more credible assessment format to evaluate the clinical competence of undergraduate nursing students compared to the TCE method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-6917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105170</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34678667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical assessment ; Clinical Competence ; Clinical nursing ; Clinical skills ; Competence ; Education, Nursing ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate ; Faculty, Nursing ; Humans ; Medical education ; Meta Analysis ; Nursing education ; Nursing faculty ; Nursing Students ; OSCE ; Perceptions ; Student attitudes ; Student Evaluation ; Students ; Students, Nursing ; Systematic review ; Traditional clinical examination ; Undergraduate nursing students</subject><ispartof>Nurse education today, 2022-01, Vol.108, p.105170-105170, Article 105170</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-14ba94681b24cd9ee0b50a182a5ef11f4c7cc4f072d988d5aebc88a36372e8fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-14ba94681b24cd9ee0b50a182a5ef11f4c7cc4f072d988d5aebc88a36372e8fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27913,27914,30988,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Sophia Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arulappan, Judie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirtharaj, Anandhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matua, Gerald Amandu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Hashmi, Iman</creatorcontrib><title>Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences</title><title>Nurse education today</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><description>Assessment of clinical competence of nursing students is an essential requirement in professional nursing education. This article summarizes the current published evidence indicating the nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences on benefits of OSCE over TCE.
A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Electronic databases including Scopus, Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, EBSCO, PsychINFO, and Pubmed Central were used to identify relevant articles. The studies published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020 and fourteen full-text articles that met all the inclusion criteria were included in the review.
The review identified five themes namely: a) Student's perception of OSCE; b) student's satisfaction regarding OSCE as an examination approach; c) students' perception of TCE as an examination approach; d) student's level of stress and anxiety towards OSCE vs TCE; and e) faculty member's perception and experience of OSCE.
We conclude that OSCE is a more credible assessment format to evaluate the clinical competence of undergraduate nursing students compared to the TCE method.</description><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Clinical skills</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Education, Nursing</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</subject><subject>Faculty, Nursing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing faculty</subject><subject>Nursing Students</subject><subject>OSCE</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Traditional clinical examination</subject><subject>Undergraduate nursing students</subject><issn>0260-6917</issn><issn>1532-2793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVuL1TAUhYMoznH0D_ggAR_0pcdc2jQVX4bBGwzMiz6HNNmVlDatuRzn_ET_lemc8YKITyF7f2ttWAuhp5TsKaHi1bj3YNOeEUbLoKEtuYd2tOGsYm3H76MdYYJUoqPtGXoU40gIkS3jD9EZr0UrhWh36Pt1P4JJ7gA4ppBNygEsNpPzzugJw42endfJLR4fIk5BW7d9yuqfTFowHPSUddr8sgWf4ovfqFnmFRJ4A6_xBY7HmGAuQoMDHBx8w8uAfQ7R-S940CZP6Yi1t384rRAMrNupeLuBmzJxm2F8jB4Meorw5O49R5_fvf10-aG6un7_8fLiqjJc1qmida-7Wkjas9rYDoD0DdFUMt3AQOlQm9aYeiAts52UttHQGyk1F7xlIAfLz9HLk-8alq8ZYlKziwamSXtYclSskbUktGZdQZ__hY5LDiW8QgnGCe8IawrFTpQJS4wBBrUGN-twVJSorWg1qq1otRWtTkUX0bM769zPYH9JfjZbgDcnAEoWJdygorkNyrpQCld2cf_z_wFBhb_n</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Vincent, Sophia Cyril</creator><creator>Arulappan, Judie</creator><creator>Amirtharaj, Anandhi</creator><creator>Matua, Gerald Amandu</creator><creator>Al Hashmi, Iman</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences</title><author>Vincent, Sophia Cyril ; Arulappan, Judie ; Amirtharaj, Anandhi ; Matua, Gerald Amandu ; Al Hashmi, Iman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-14ba94681b24cd9ee0b50a182a5ef11f4c7cc4f072d988d5aebc88a36372e8fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Clinical skills</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Education, Nursing</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</topic><topic>Faculty, Nursing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing faculty</topic><topic>Nursing Students</topic><topic>OSCE</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Traditional clinical examination</topic><topic>Undergraduate nursing students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Sophia Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arulappan, Judie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirtharaj, Anandhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matua, Gerald Amandu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Hashmi, Iman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vincent, Sophia Cyril</au><au>Arulappan, Judie</au><au>Amirtharaj, Anandhi</au><au>Matua, Gerald Amandu</au><au>Al Hashmi, Iman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education today</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Today</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>105170</spage><epage>105170</epage><pages>105170-105170</pages><artnum>105170</artnum><issn>0260-6917</issn><eissn>1532-2793</eissn><abstract>Assessment of clinical competence of nursing students is an essential requirement in professional nursing education. This article summarizes the current published evidence indicating the nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences on benefits of OSCE over TCE.
A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Electronic databases including Scopus, Medline, Science Direct, CINAHL, EBSCO, PsychINFO, and Pubmed Central were used to identify relevant articles. The studies published between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2020 and fourteen full-text articles that met all the inclusion criteria were included in the review.
The review identified five themes namely: a) Student's perception of OSCE; b) student's satisfaction regarding OSCE as an examination approach; c) students' perception of TCE as an examination approach; d) student's level of stress and anxiety towards OSCE vs TCE; and e) faculty member's perception and experience of OSCE.
We conclude that OSCE is a more credible assessment format to evaluate the clinical competence of undergraduate nursing students compared to the TCE method.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34678667</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105170</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0260-6917 |
ispartof | Nurse education today, 2022-01, Vol.108, p.105170-105170, Article 105170 |
issn | 0260-6917 1532-2793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2584801429 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Clinical assessment Clinical Competence Clinical nursing Clinical skills Competence Education, Nursing Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate Faculty, Nursing Humans Medical education Meta Analysis Nursing education Nursing faculty Nursing Students OSCE Perceptions Student attitudes Student Evaluation Students Students, Nursing Systematic review Traditional clinical examination Undergraduate nursing students |
title | Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A46%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Objective%20structured%20clinical%20examination%20vs%20traditional%20clinical%20examination%20to%20evaluate%20students'%20clinical%20competence:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20nursing%20faculty%20and%20students'%20perceptions%20and%20experiences&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20today&rft.au=Vincent,%20Sophia%20Cyril&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=105170&rft.epage=105170&rft.pages=105170-105170&rft.artnum=105170&rft.issn=0260-6917&rft.eissn=1532-2793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105170&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2623039025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2623039025&rft_id=info:pmid/34678667&rft_els_id=S0260691721004275&rfr_iscdi=true |