Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?

Objective The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.577-586
Hauptverfasser: Giesler, Juergen M., Weis, Joachim, Caspari, Reiner, Dauelsberg, Timm, Hoffmann, Wilfried, Körber, Jürgen, Bartsch, Hans‐Helge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 586
container_issue 4
container_start_page 577
container_title Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)
container_volume 31
creator Giesler, Juergen M.
Weis, Joachim
Caspari, Reiner
Dauelsberg, Timm
Hoffmann, Wilfried
Körber, Jürgen
Bartsch, Hans‐Helge
description Objective The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond. Methods N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed. Results Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up. Conclusions This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pon.5839
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2584436648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2584436648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1KwzAYhoMo_oNXIAVPPFhnkmbp4onI_AVxO9DjkKZft0iX1KZFerZL8Bq9ErM5FQSPkvf7njwEXoSOCO4TjOlZ5Wx_MEzEBtolWIiYcEI2l_dBGgvKxA7a8_4F4wALvo12EsZTzhO-ixYT1RiwTaTdvIIGrDbgeyFVxk4jD2XxsXiHojBa6a4XKZuvd-fRlYuaGXSRnik7hShv6-UTZ7Ur3TTwZWRstbbXMFOZKU0TsrMrTQads_nFAdoqVOnhcH3uo-eb66fRXfwwvr0fXT7EmiWpiLnIoBA4o4qlIkshVZxQocM0x4xrAQWQXCR6mHGeJ4qyIqeYMKY40xmmkOyj0y9vVbvXFnwj58ZrKEtlwbVe0sGQsYRzNgzoyR_0xbW1Db-TNKUcUzIg_Feoa-d9DYWsajNXdScJlstWZGhFLlsJ6PFa2GZzyH_A7xoCEH8Bb6aE7l-RnIwfV8JPJdKYlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726021516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Giesler, Juergen M. ; Weis, Joachim ; Caspari, Reiner ; Dauelsberg, Timm ; Hoffmann, Wilfried ; Körber, Jürgen ; Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creator><creatorcontrib>Giesler, Juergen M. ; Weis, Joachim ; Caspari, Reiner ; Dauelsberg, Timm ; Hoffmann, Wilfried ; Körber, Jürgen ; Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond. Methods N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed. Results Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up. Conclusions This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.5839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34676636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Competence ; Coping ; Efficacy ; Emotions ; Health psychology ; Humans ; Information sources ; Inpatient care ; Inpatients ; Intervention ; Male ; Measurement ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical Oncology ; Oncology ; patient competence ; Patients ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Psychological distress ; Rehabilitation ; Self control ; Self Efficacy ; self‐management ; Social services ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.577-586</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8646-6607 ; 0000-0001-8591-1679</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.5839$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.5839$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30980,33755,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giesler, Juergen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caspari, Reiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauelsberg, Timm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körber, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creatorcontrib><title>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><description>Objective The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond. Methods N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed. Results Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up. Conclusions This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Health psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>patient competence</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>self‐management</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1KwzAYhoMo_oNXIAVPPFhnkmbp4onI_AVxO9DjkKZft0iX1KZFerZL8Bq9ErM5FQSPkvf7njwEXoSOCO4TjOlZ5Wx_MEzEBtolWIiYcEI2l_dBGgvKxA7a8_4F4wALvo12EsZTzhO-ixYT1RiwTaTdvIIGrDbgeyFVxk4jD2XxsXiHojBa6a4XKZuvd-fRlYuaGXSRnik7hShv6-UTZ7Ur3TTwZWRstbbXMFOZKU0TsrMrTQads_nFAdoqVOnhcH3uo-eb66fRXfwwvr0fXT7EmiWpiLnIoBA4o4qlIkshVZxQocM0x4xrAQWQXCR6mHGeJ4qyIqeYMKY40xmmkOyj0y9vVbvXFnwj58ZrKEtlwbVe0sGQsYRzNgzoyR_0xbW1Db-TNKUcUzIg_Feoa-d9DYWsajNXdScJlstWZGhFLlsJ6PFa2GZzyH_A7xoCEH8Bb6aE7l-RnIwfV8JPJdKYlQ</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Giesler, Juergen M.</creator><creator>Weis, Joachim</creator><creator>Caspari, Reiner</creator><creator>Dauelsberg, Timm</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Wilfried</creator><creator>Körber, Jürgen</creator><creator>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-6607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-1679</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</title><author>Giesler, Juergen M. ; Weis, Joachim ; Caspari, Reiner ; Dauelsberg, Timm ; Hoffmann, Wilfried ; Körber, Jürgen ; Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Health psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>patient competence</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>self‐management</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giesler, Juergen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caspari, Reiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauelsberg, Timm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körber, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giesler, Juergen M.</au><au>Weis, Joachim</au><au>Caspari, Reiner</au><au>Dauelsberg, Timm</au><au>Hoffmann, Wilfried</au><au>Körber, Jürgen</au><au>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>577</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>577-586</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><abstract>Objective The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond. Methods N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed. Results Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up. Conclusions This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34676636</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.5839</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-6607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-1679</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9249
ispartof Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.577-586
issn 1057-9249
1099-1611
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2584436648
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Breast cancer
Cancer
Competence
Coping
Efficacy
Emotions
Health psychology
Humans
Information sources
Inpatient care
Inpatients
Intervention
Male
Measurement
Medical diagnosis
Medical Oncology
Oncology
patient competence
Patients
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Psychological distress
Rehabilitation
Self control
Self Efficacy
self‐management
Social services
Tumors
title Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20competencies,%20coping%20self%E2%80%90efficacy,%20and%20coping:%20Do%20they%20change%20during%20oncological%20inpatient%20rehabilitation%20and%20beyond?&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Giesler,%20Juergen%20M.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=577&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=577-586&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.5839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584436648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726021516&rft_id=info:pmid/34676636&rfr_iscdi=true