Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?
Objective The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.577-586 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 586 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 577 |
container_title | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Giesler, Juergen M. Weis, Joachim Caspari, Reiner Dauelsberg, Timm Hoffmann, Wilfried Körber, Jürgen Bartsch, Hans‐Helge |
description | Objective
The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond.
Methods
N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed.
Results
Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up.
Conclusions
This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pon.5839 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2584436648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2584436648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1KwzAYhoMo_oNXIAVPPFhnkmbp4onI_AVxO9DjkKZft0iX1KZFerZL8Bq9ErM5FQSPkvf7njwEXoSOCO4TjOlZ5Wx_MEzEBtolWIiYcEI2l_dBGgvKxA7a8_4F4wALvo12EsZTzhO-ixYT1RiwTaTdvIIGrDbgeyFVxk4jD2XxsXiHojBa6a4XKZuvd-fRlYuaGXSRnik7hShv6-UTZ7Ur3TTwZWRstbbXMFOZKU0TsrMrTQads_nFAdoqVOnhcH3uo-eb66fRXfwwvr0fXT7EmiWpiLnIoBA4o4qlIkshVZxQocM0x4xrAQWQXCR6mHGeJ4qyIqeYMKY40xmmkOyj0y9vVbvXFnwj58ZrKEtlwbVe0sGQsYRzNgzoyR_0xbW1Db-TNKUcUzIg_Feoa-d9DYWsajNXdScJlstWZGhFLlsJ6PFa2GZzyH_A7xoCEH8Bb6aE7l-RnIwfV8JPJdKYlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726021516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Giesler, Juergen M. ; Weis, Joachim ; Caspari, Reiner ; Dauelsberg, Timm ; Hoffmann, Wilfried ; Körber, Jürgen ; Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creator><creatorcontrib>Giesler, Juergen M. ; Weis, Joachim ; Caspari, Reiner ; Dauelsberg, Timm ; Hoffmann, Wilfried ; Körber, Jürgen ; Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond.
Methods
N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed.
Results
Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up.
Conclusions
This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.5839</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34676636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Competence ; Coping ; Efficacy ; Emotions ; Health psychology ; Humans ; Information sources ; Inpatient care ; Inpatients ; Intervention ; Male ; Measurement ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical Oncology ; Oncology ; patient competence ; Patients ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Psychological distress ; Rehabilitation ; Self control ; Self Efficacy ; self‐management ; Social services ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.577-586</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8646-6607 ; 0000-0001-8591-1679</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.5839$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.5839$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,30980,33755,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34676636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giesler, Juergen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caspari, Reiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauelsberg, Timm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körber, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creatorcontrib><title>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><description>Objective
The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond.
Methods
N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed.
Results
Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up.
Conclusions
This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Health psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>patient competence</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>self‐management</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1KwzAYhoMo_oNXIAVPPFhnkmbp4onI_AVxO9DjkKZft0iX1KZFerZL8Bq9ErM5FQSPkvf7njwEXoSOCO4TjOlZ5Wx_MEzEBtolWIiYcEI2l_dBGgvKxA7a8_4F4wALvo12EsZTzhO-ixYT1RiwTaTdvIIGrDbgeyFVxk4jD2XxsXiHojBa6a4XKZuvd-fRlYuaGXSRnik7hShv6-UTZ7Ur3TTwZWRstbbXMFOZKU0TsrMrTQads_nFAdoqVOnhcH3uo-eb66fRXfwwvr0fXT7EmiWpiLnIoBA4o4qlIkshVZxQocM0x4xrAQWQXCR6mHGeJ4qyIqeYMKY40xmmkOyj0y9vVbvXFnwj58ZrKEtlwbVe0sGQsYRzNgzoyR_0xbW1Db-TNKUcUzIg_Feoa-d9DYWsajNXdScJlstWZGhFLlsJ6PFa2GZzyH_A7xoCEH8Bb6aE7l-RnIwfV8JPJdKYlQ</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Giesler, Juergen M.</creator><creator>Weis, Joachim</creator><creator>Caspari, Reiner</creator><creator>Dauelsberg, Timm</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Wilfried</creator><creator>Körber, Jürgen</creator><creator>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-6607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-1679</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</title><author>Giesler, Juergen M. ; Weis, Joachim ; Caspari, Reiner ; Dauelsberg, Timm ; Hoffmann, Wilfried ; Körber, Jürgen ; Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4379-69bef90b2a479b7e7a6129c9bed046c9efe1d93c8b66d3a24fd20144a64cb02e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Health psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>patient competence</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>self‐management</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giesler, Juergen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caspari, Reiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauelsberg, Timm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körber, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giesler, Juergen M.</au><au>Weis, Joachim</au><au>Caspari, Reiner</au><au>Dauelsberg, Timm</au><au>Hoffmann, Wilfried</au><au>Körber, Jürgen</au><au>Bartsch, Hans‐Helge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>577</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>577-586</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><abstract>Objective
The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion‐ and problem‐focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond.
Methods
N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self‐report measures of PC, coping and self‐efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed.
Results
Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self‐efficacy and coping. The PCs of self‐regulation and managing distress and coping self‐efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow‐up.
Conclusions
This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem‐ and emotion‐focused PCs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34676636</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.5839</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-6607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8591-1679</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1057-9249 |
ispartof | Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.577-586 |
issn | 1057-9249 1099-1611 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2584436648 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Breast cancer Cancer Competence Coping Efficacy Emotions Health psychology Humans Information sources Inpatient care Inpatients Intervention Male Measurement Medical diagnosis Medical Oncology Oncology patient competence Patients Prostate Prostate cancer Psychological distress Rehabilitation Self control Self Efficacy self‐management Social services Tumors |
title | Patient competencies, coping self‐efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20competencies,%20coping%20self%E2%80%90efficacy,%20and%20coping:%20Do%20they%20change%20during%20oncological%20inpatient%20rehabilitation%20and%20beyond?&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Giesler,%20Juergen%20M.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=577&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=577-586&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.5839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2584436648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726021516&rft_id=info:pmid/34676636&rfr_iscdi=true |