Robotic‐arm assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Durable results up to 7‐year follow‐up
Background The purpose of our study was to investigate the mid‐term clinical and functional outcomes of robotic‐arm assisted Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA). Methods This study reviewed a single‐centre prospectively maintained cohort of 50 patients (53 knees) who underwent BiKA (patellofemo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery 2022-02, Vol.18 (1), p.e2338-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e2338 |
container_title | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Gaudiani, Michael A. Samuel, Linsen T. Diana, John N. DeBattista, Jennifer L. Coon, Thomas M. Moore, Ryan E. Kamath, Atul F. |
description | Background
The purpose of our study was to investigate the mid‐term clinical and functional outcomes of robotic‐arm assisted Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA).
Methods
This study reviewed a single‐centre prospectively maintained cohort of 50 patients (53 knees) who underwent BiKA (patellofemoral and medial compartment) at 5‐ and 7‐year postoperative follow‐up.
Results
Mean follow‐up was 7.1 ± 0.1 years (range, 7.0–7.3). Kaplan‐Meier survivorship rates at 5 and 7 years were 96% and 93%, respectively. At 7‐year follow‐up, patient satisfaction was 76% satisfied, 13% neutral, and 11% not satisfied. Mean KSS‐FS was 80.5 ± 15.8 (range, 30–100) with 82% of patients reporting walking more than 10 blocks, 89% reporting walking without support, and 100% able to go up and down stairs with 61% requiring use of a rail. Three patients (four knees) underwent revision surgery.
Conclusions
Our study reported excellent survivorship and functional outcomes, and good‐excellent satisfaction at mid‐term follow‐up for robotic‐arm assisted BiKA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rcs.2338 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2583443367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2583443367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3498-649e689a16782fb30b26301917b7853fb6fd5887c52abfd4d780e859819552e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNtKHTEUQENR6qWFfoEEfOnLaDK5960cqxYEQVvoW0hm9uDYzMmYzHA4b_0Ev9EvMd6h4NPeGxaLzULoCyUHlJD6MDX5oGZMf0DblCtdCSP_bLzugm6hnZyvCeGCS_4RbTEupeBabKP2Ivo49c3dv1uXBuxy7vMELfZ9E4fRpWmA5eQC_rsEwOW8SnEMLk_rb_hoTs4HwAnyHKaM5xFPEatiWoNLuIshxFW55vET2uxcyPD5ee6i38c_fi1Oq7Pzk5-L72dVw7jRleQGpDaOSqXrzjPia8kINVR5pQXrvOxaobVqRO181_JWaQJaGE2NEDUYtou-PnnHFG9myJMd-txACG4Jcc62FppxzphUBd3_D72Oc1qW72wtqS59lOFvwibFnBN0dkz94NLaUmIfyttS3j6UL-jes3D2A7Sv4EvqAlRPwKoPsH5XZC8Wl4_Ce7D8jzc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618466794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic‐arm assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Durable results up to 7‐year follow‐up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Gaudiani, Michael A. ; Samuel, Linsen T. ; Diana, John N. ; DeBattista, Jennifer L. ; Coon, Thomas M. ; Moore, Ryan E. ; Kamath, Atul F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaudiani, Michael A. ; Samuel, Linsen T. ; Diana, John N. ; DeBattista, Jennifer L. ; Coon, Thomas M. ; Moore, Ryan E. ; Kamath, Atul F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The purpose of our study was to investigate the mid‐term clinical and functional outcomes of robotic‐arm assisted Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA).
Methods
This study reviewed a single‐centre prospectively maintained cohort of 50 patients (53 knees) who underwent BiKA (patellofemoral and medial compartment) at 5‐ and 7‐year postoperative follow‐up.
Results
Mean follow‐up was 7.1 ± 0.1 years (range, 7.0–7.3). Kaplan‐Meier survivorship rates at 5 and 7 years were 96% and 93%, respectively. At 7‐year follow‐up, patient satisfaction was 76% satisfied, 13% neutral, and 11% not satisfied. Mean KSS‐FS was 80.5 ± 15.8 (range, 30–100) with 82% of patients reporting walking more than 10 blocks, 89% reporting walking without support, and 100% able to go up and down stairs with 61% requiring use of a rail. Three patients (four knees) underwent revision surgery.
Conclusions
Our study reported excellent survivorship and functional outcomes, and good‐excellent satisfaction at mid‐term follow‐up for robotic‐arm assisted BiKA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-5951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34665485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (replacement) ; complications ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; outcomes ; partial knee arthroplasty ; Patient satisfaction ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Robotics ; robotic‐assisted surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Walking</subject><ispartof>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery, 2022-02, Vol.18 (1), p.e2338-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3498-649e689a16782fb30b26301917b7853fb6fd5887c52abfd4d780e859819552e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3498-649e689a16782fb30b26301917b7853fb6fd5887c52abfd4d780e859819552e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9214-2756 ; 0000-0002-3366-1708</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcs.2338$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcs.2338$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34665485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaudiani, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Linsen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeBattista, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coon, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamath, Atul F.</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic‐arm assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Durable results up to 7‐year follow‐up</title><title>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Med Robot</addtitle><description>Background
The purpose of our study was to investigate the mid‐term clinical and functional outcomes of robotic‐arm assisted Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA).
Methods
This study reviewed a single‐centre prospectively maintained cohort of 50 patients (53 knees) who underwent BiKA (patellofemoral and medial compartment) at 5‐ and 7‐year postoperative follow‐up.
Results
Mean follow‐up was 7.1 ± 0.1 years (range, 7.0–7.3). Kaplan‐Meier survivorship rates at 5 and 7 years were 96% and 93%, respectively. At 7‐year follow‐up, patient satisfaction was 76% satisfied, 13% neutral, and 11% not satisfied. Mean KSS‐FS was 80.5 ± 15.8 (range, 30–100) with 82% of patients reporting walking more than 10 blocks, 89% reporting walking without support, and 100% able to go up and down stairs with 61% requiring use of a rail. Three patients (four knees) underwent revision surgery.
Conclusions
Our study reported excellent survivorship and functional outcomes, and good‐excellent satisfaction at mid‐term follow‐up for robotic‐arm assisted BiKA.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</subject><subject>bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (replacement)</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>partial knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>robotic‐assisted surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1478-5951</issn><issn>1478-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNtKHTEUQENR6qWFfoEEfOnLaDK5960cqxYEQVvoW0hm9uDYzMmYzHA4b_0Ev9EvMd6h4NPeGxaLzULoCyUHlJD6MDX5oGZMf0DblCtdCSP_bLzugm6hnZyvCeGCS_4RbTEupeBabKP2Ivo49c3dv1uXBuxy7vMELfZ9E4fRpWmA5eQC_rsEwOW8SnEMLk_rb_hoTs4HwAnyHKaM5xFPEatiWoNLuIshxFW55vET2uxcyPD5ee6i38c_fi1Oq7Pzk5-L72dVw7jRleQGpDaOSqXrzjPia8kINVR5pQXrvOxaobVqRO181_JWaQJaGE2NEDUYtou-PnnHFG9myJMd-txACG4Jcc62FppxzphUBd3_D72Oc1qW72wtqS59lOFvwibFnBN0dkz94NLaUmIfyttS3j6UL-jes3D2A7Sv4EvqAlRPwKoPsH5XZC8Wl4_Ce7D8jzc</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Gaudiani, Michael A.</creator><creator>Samuel, Linsen T.</creator><creator>Diana, John N.</creator><creator>DeBattista, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Coon, Thomas M.</creator><creator>Moore, Ryan E.</creator><creator>Kamath, Atul F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9214-2756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3366-1708</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Robotic‐arm assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Durable results up to 7‐year follow‐up</title><author>Gaudiani, Michael A. ; Samuel, Linsen T. ; Diana, John N. ; DeBattista, Jennifer L. ; Coon, Thomas M. ; Moore, Ryan E. ; Kamath, Atul F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3498-649e689a16782fb30b26301917b7853fb6fd5887c52abfd4d780e859819552e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee</topic><topic>bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (replacement)</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>partial knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>robotic‐assisted surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaudiani, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, Linsen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeBattista, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coon, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ryan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamath, Atul F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaudiani, Michael A.</au><au>Samuel, Linsen T.</au><au>Diana, John N.</au><au>DeBattista, Jennifer L.</au><au>Coon, Thomas M.</au><au>Moore, Ryan E.</au><au>Kamath, Atul F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic‐arm assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Durable results up to 7‐year follow‐up</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Robot</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e2338</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2338-n/a</pages><issn>1478-5951</issn><eissn>1478-596X</eissn><abstract>Background
The purpose of our study was to investigate the mid‐term clinical and functional outcomes of robotic‐arm assisted Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA).
Methods
This study reviewed a single‐centre prospectively maintained cohort of 50 patients (53 knees) who underwent BiKA (patellofemoral and medial compartment) at 5‐ and 7‐year postoperative follow‐up.
Results
Mean follow‐up was 7.1 ± 0.1 years (range, 7.0–7.3). Kaplan‐Meier survivorship rates at 5 and 7 years were 96% and 93%, respectively. At 7‐year follow‐up, patient satisfaction was 76% satisfied, 13% neutral, and 11% not satisfied. Mean KSS‐FS was 80.5 ± 15.8 (range, 30–100) with 82% of patients reporting walking more than 10 blocks, 89% reporting walking without support, and 100% able to go up and down stairs with 61% requiring use of a rail. Three patients (four knees) underwent revision surgery.
Conclusions
Our study reported excellent survivorship and functional outcomes, and good‐excellent satisfaction at mid‐term follow‐up for robotic‐arm assisted BiKA.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34665485</pmid><doi>10.1002/rcs.2338</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9214-2756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3366-1708</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-5951 |
ispartof | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery, 2022-02, Vol.18 (1), p.e2338-n/a |
issn | 1478-5951 1478-596X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2583443367 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (replacement) complications Follow-Up Studies Humans Joint replacement surgery Joint surgery Knee Knee Joint - surgery Knee Prosthesis Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery outcomes partial knee arthroplasty Patient satisfaction Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotics robotic‐assisted surgery Treatment Outcome Walking |
title | Robotic‐arm assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Durable results up to 7‐year follow‐up |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A11%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%E2%80%90arm%20assisted%20bicompartmental%20knee%20arthroplasty:%20Durable%20results%20up%20to%207%E2%80%90year%20follow%E2%80%90up&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20medical%20robotics%20+%20computer%20assisted%20surgery&rft.au=Gaudiani,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e2338&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2338-n/a&rft.issn=1478-5951&rft.eissn=1478-596X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcs.2338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2583443367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618466794&rft_id=info:pmid/34665485&rfr_iscdi=true |