The impact of rainfall distribution methods on streamflow throughout multiple elevations in the Rocky Mountains using the APEX model—Price River watershed, Utah

The hydrology of mountainous watersheds in the western United States is significantly influenced by snow year‐round. It is widely known that topography affects precipitation; however, the knowledge of how watershed rainfall designation methods affect streamflow is not well understood for high‐relief...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental quality 2021-11, Vol.50 (6), p.1395-1407
Hauptverfasser: Worqlul, Abeyou W., Jeong, Jaehak, Green, Colleen H. M., Abitew, Tadesse A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1407
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1395
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 50
creator Worqlul, Abeyou W.
Jeong, Jaehak
Green, Colleen H. M.
Abitew, Tadesse A.
description The hydrology of mountainous watersheds in the western United States is significantly influenced by snow year‐round. It is widely known that topography affects precipitation; however, the knowledge of how watershed rainfall designation methods affect streamflow is not well understood for high‐relief areas. The objectives of this study were to assess the predictive capability of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to simulate streamflow in a snowmelt‐dominated watershed with high spatial rainfall variability through (a) allocating weather stations to sub‐basins based on a conventional Thiessen polygon method (CM) or a rainfall‐elevation–based input (RE) and using an areal average Parameter‐Elevation Regression on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) rainfall designation and (b) improving the snowmelt processes in the Price River watershed, Utah. The updated APEX model with snowmelt parameters significantly improved spring flood simulation. The RE was the most robust method in snowmelt and seasonal streamflow simulations compared with the CM and PRISM rainfall designations. Adapting the APEX model to simulate snow‐dominant complex terrains will provide crucial water quantity and quality predictions for reliable environmental and watershed management assessment. Core Ideas Rainfall designation methods were evaluated for streamflow simulation in a mountain watershed. Snowmelt simulation in APEX was revised to adjust the timing of snowmelt. APEX performed better with the elevation‐based rainfall designation method than other methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jeq2.20298
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2583442797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2583442797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-af412052c19fa1c8e6221046a7a77f7ef07275469bf7eafec2ea082dd04307c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhq2qVQnQTR-g8rJChNqei2eWCIVLFcRFILEbOZ5jxuAZB1-IsuMheAIerU9SJ6Esu7B9bH_-5KMfoe-UHFBC2K8HeGIHjLC6-oRGtMj4mKXpMxoRkqc6Z8UW2vb-gRDKCC-_oq0sL8sijRF6u-kA634uZMBWYSf0oIQxuNU-OD2LQdsB9xA623qcynQKolfGLnDonI33nY0B99EEPTeAwcCzWL3xWA-JAHxt5eMSn9s4hOT2OHo93K9vDi8nd7i3LZg_L6-XTssE62dweCECON9Bu49vg-h20Zf0JQ_f3tcddHs8uTk6HU8vTs6ODqdjmZVFNRYqT-0VTNJaCSorKBmjJC8FF5wrDopwxlPT9SxthALJQJCKtS3JM8Jlne2gnxvv3NmnCD40vfYSjBED2OgbVlRZnjNe84TubVDprPcOVDN3uhdu2VDSrDJpVpk060wS_OPdG2c9tB_ovxASQDfAQhtY_kfV_J5csY30L8cxmqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583442797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of rainfall distribution methods on streamflow throughout multiple elevations in the Rocky Mountains using the APEX model—Price River watershed, Utah</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Worqlul, Abeyou W. ; Jeong, Jaehak ; Green, Colleen H. M. ; Abitew, Tadesse A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Worqlul, Abeyou W. ; Jeong, Jaehak ; Green, Colleen H. M. ; Abitew, Tadesse A.</creatorcontrib><description>The hydrology of mountainous watersheds in the western United States is significantly influenced by snow year‐round. It is widely known that topography affects precipitation; however, the knowledge of how watershed rainfall designation methods affect streamflow is not well understood for high‐relief areas. The objectives of this study were to assess the predictive capability of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to simulate streamflow in a snowmelt‐dominated watershed with high spatial rainfall variability through (a) allocating weather stations to sub‐basins based on a conventional Thiessen polygon method (CM) or a rainfall‐elevation–based input (RE) and using an areal average Parameter‐Elevation Regression on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) rainfall designation and (b) improving the snowmelt processes in the Price River watershed, Utah. The updated APEX model with snowmelt parameters significantly improved spring flood simulation. The RE was the most robust method in snowmelt and seasonal streamflow simulations compared with the CM and PRISM rainfall designations. Adapting the APEX model to simulate snow‐dominant complex terrains will provide crucial water quantity and quality predictions for reliable environmental and watershed management assessment. Core Ideas Rainfall designation methods were evaluated for streamflow simulation in a mountain watershed. Snowmelt simulation in APEX was revised to adjust the timing of snowmelt. APEX performed better with the elevation‐based rainfall designation method than other methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20298</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34665466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Environmental Monitoring ; Hydrology ; Policy ; Rivers ; Utah</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2021-11, Vol.50 (6), p.1395-1407</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Environmental Quality © 2021 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Environmental Quality © 2021 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-af412052c19fa1c8e6221046a7a77f7ef07275469bf7eafec2ea082dd04307c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-af412052c19fa1c8e6221046a7a77f7ef07275469bf7eafec2ea082dd04307c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0807-9871</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjeq2.20298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjeq2.20298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34665466$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worqlul, Abeyou W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Jaehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Colleen H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abitew, Tadesse A.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of rainfall distribution methods on streamflow throughout multiple elevations in the Rocky Mountains using the APEX model—Price River watershed, Utah</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>The hydrology of mountainous watersheds in the western United States is significantly influenced by snow year‐round. It is widely known that topography affects precipitation; however, the knowledge of how watershed rainfall designation methods affect streamflow is not well understood for high‐relief areas. The objectives of this study were to assess the predictive capability of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to simulate streamflow in a snowmelt‐dominated watershed with high spatial rainfall variability through (a) allocating weather stations to sub‐basins based on a conventional Thiessen polygon method (CM) or a rainfall‐elevation–based input (RE) and using an areal average Parameter‐Elevation Regression on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) rainfall designation and (b) improving the snowmelt processes in the Price River watershed, Utah. The updated APEX model with snowmelt parameters significantly improved spring flood simulation. The RE was the most robust method in snowmelt and seasonal streamflow simulations compared with the CM and PRISM rainfall designations. Adapting the APEX model to simulate snow‐dominant complex terrains will provide crucial water quantity and quality predictions for reliable environmental and watershed management assessment. Core Ideas Rainfall designation methods were evaluated for streamflow simulation in a mountain watershed. Snowmelt simulation in APEX was revised to adjust the timing of snowmelt. APEX performed better with the elevation‐based rainfall designation method than other methods.</description><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Utah</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOGzEUhq2qVQnQTR-g8rJChNqei2eWCIVLFcRFILEbOZ5jxuAZB1-IsuMheAIerU9SJ6Esu7B9bH_-5KMfoe-UHFBC2K8HeGIHjLC6-oRGtMj4mKXpMxoRkqc6Z8UW2vb-gRDKCC-_oq0sL8sijRF6u-kA634uZMBWYSf0oIQxuNU-OD2LQdsB9xA623qcynQKolfGLnDonI33nY0B99EEPTeAwcCzWL3xWA-JAHxt5eMSn9s4hOT2OHo93K9vDi8nd7i3LZg_L6-XTssE62dweCECON9Bu49vg-h20Zf0JQ_f3tcddHs8uTk6HU8vTs6ODqdjmZVFNRYqT-0VTNJaCSorKBmjJC8FF5wrDopwxlPT9SxthALJQJCKtS3JM8Jlne2gnxvv3NmnCD40vfYSjBED2OgbVlRZnjNe84TubVDprPcOVDN3uhdu2VDSrDJpVpk060wS_OPdG2c9tB_ovxASQDfAQhtY_kfV_J5csY30L8cxmqA</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Worqlul, Abeyou W.</creator><creator>Jeong, Jaehak</creator><creator>Green, Colleen H. M.</creator><creator>Abitew, Tadesse A.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-9871</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>The impact of rainfall distribution methods on streamflow throughout multiple elevations in the Rocky Mountains using the APEX model—Price River watershed, Utah</title><author>Worqlul, Abeyou W. ; Jeong, Jaehak ; Green, Colleen H. M. ; Abitew, Tadesse A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3658-af412052c19fa1c8e6221046a7a77f7ef07275469bf7eafec2ea082dd04307c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Utah</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worqlul, Abeyou W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Jaehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Colleen H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abitew, Tadesse A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worqlul, Abeyou W.</au><au>Jeong, Jaehak</au><au>Green, Colleen H. M.</au><au>Abitew, Tadesse A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of rainfall distribution methods on streamflow throughout multiple elevations in the Rocky Mountains using the APEX model—Price River watershed, Utah</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1395</spage><epage>1407</epage><pages>1395-1407</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><abstract>The hydrology of mountainous watersheds in the western United States is significantly influenced by snow year‐round. It is widely known that topography affects precipitation; however, the knowledge of how watershed rainfall designation methods affect streamflow is not well understood for high‐relief areas. The objectives of this study were to assess the predictive capability of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model to simulate streamflow in a snowmelt‐dominated watershed with high spatial rainfall variability through (a) allocating weather stations to sub‐basins based on a conventional Thiessen polygon method (CM) or a rainfall‐elevation–based input (RE) and using an areal average Parameter‐Elevation Regression on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) rainfall designation and (b) improving the snowmelt processes in the Price River watershed, Utah. The updated APEX model with snowmelt parameters significantly improved spring flood simulation. The RE was the most robust method in snowmelt and seasonal streamflow simulations compared with the CM and PRISM rainfall designations. Adapting the APEX model to simulate snow‐dominant complex terrains will provide crucial water quantity and quality predictions for reliable environmental and watershed management assessment. Core Ideas Rainfall designation methods were evaluated for streamflow simulation in a mountain watershed. Snowmelt simulation in APEX was revised to adjust the timing of snowmelt. APEX performed better with the elevation‐based rainfall designation method than other methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34665466</pmid><doi>10.1002/jeq2.20298</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-9871</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2021-11, Vol.50 (6), p.1395-1407
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2583442797
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Environmental Monitoring
Hydrology
Policy
Rivers
Utah
title The impact of rainfall distribution methods on streamflow throughout multiple elevations in the Rocky Mountains using the APEX model—Price River watershed, Utah
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20rainfall%20distribution%20methods%20on%20streamflow%20throughout%20multiple%20elevations%20in%20the%20Rocky%20Mountains%20using%20the%20APEX%20model%E2%80%94Price%20River%20watershed,%20Utah&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Worqlul,%20Abeyou%20W.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1395&rft.epage=1407&rft.pages=1395-1407&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jeq2.20298&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2583442797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583442797&rft_id=info:pmid/34665466&rfr_iscdi=true