Identifying priority regions and territorial planning strategies for conserving native vegetation in the Cerrado (Brazil) under different scenarios of land use changes
The Cerrado biome covers approximately 20% of Brazil and it is crucial for the Water, Food, Energy, and Ecosystems (WFEE) nexus. Thus, in recent years, large areas of the undisturbed Cerrado have been converted into farmland. In this biome, according to the Brazilian Forest Code, farmers need to kee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2022-02, Vol.807 (Pt 3), p.150998-150998, Article 150998 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 150998 |
---|---|
container_issue | Pt 3 |
container_start_page | 150998 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 807 |
creator | Colman, Carina Barbosa Guerra, Angélica Roque, Fabio de Oliveira Rosa, Isabel M.D. Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de |
description | The Cerrado biome covers approximately 20% of Brazil and it is crucial for the Water, Food, Energy, and Ecosystems (WFEE) nexus. Thus, in recent years, large areas of the undisturbed Cerrado have been converted into farmland. In this biome, according to the Brazilian Forest Code, farmers need to keep 20% of native vegetation (Legal Reserves – LRs). By exploring combined and isolated impacts of different scenarios of LR and Protected area (PA) arrangements, this study evaluated the importance of complementarity between LR compliance and the amount of PAs (including Conservation Units - CUs and Indigenous Lands - ILs) to reduce deforestation and conserve native vegetation in the Cerrado. Seven scenarios were investigated: a scenario that considers the current PA and the LR values foreseen in the Native Vegetation Protection Law – NVPL; three scenarios focused on production; and three focused on conservation. Considering the trend of the current scenario, the estimated loss of native vegetation will be 30% (30.6 million ha) by 2070. According to the model simulations, for two periods (2050 and 2070), the LR Elimination scenario (LRE) would cause a greater loss of native vegetation than the PA Elimination (PAE), and as expected, the exclusion of both (PALRE) would provide a greater loss of native vegetation. Native vegetation is concentrated mainly on agricultural properties. Taking our conservation-oriented scenarios as an example of conservation strategies, if there were no financial, practical, political, social or personal constraints, there is no doubt that the CPALRI scenario (Creation of Protected Areas and Legal Reserve Increase) is the best trajectory for conserving biodiversity. Therefore, private properties, through LRs, are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover as they ensure security in the WFEE nexus. The resulting projected scenarios are important to help decision makers in territorial planning and how to arbitrate territorial demands aiming at the rational use of the natural resources of the Cerrado.
[Display omitted]
•We assess whether private properties protect Cerrado's native vegetation.•We designed scenarios on production and conservation.•Creating Protected Areas protects native vegetation more than increasing the Legal Reserve.•To eliminate the Legal Reserve would cause greater loss of vegetation than to eliminate Protected Areas.•Private properties are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150998 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2583326351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969721060769</els_id><sourcerecordid>2583326351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-704e18a8fa05ee112e4dd7da37198c91084a17717110ad5616a937dea94003383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-OFCEQxonRuOPqKyjH9dAj1XQDfVwn_tlkEy96JgjVs0x6YAS6k_GFfE3pzLpXuUCqflX1FR8h74BtgYH4cNhm60ssGJZty1rYQs-GQT0jG1ByaIC14jnZMNapZhCDvCKvcj6weqSCl-SKd6IXvRQb8ufOYSh-PPuwp6fkY_LlTBPufQyZmuBowVRjNW4meppMCCuZSzKlQpjpGBO1Fca0rJlgil-QLrjHUp8xUB9oeUC6q32Mi_TmYzK__fSezsFhos6PI6aqgWaLwVQFmcaRTuvoOSO1DybsMb8mL0YzZXzzeF-TH58_fd99be6_fbnb3d43lksojWQdgjJqNKxHBGixc046U5ODsgMw1RmQEiQAM64XIMzApUMzdIxxrvg1ubn0PaX4a8Zc9NFXYVPVg3HOuu0V563gPVRUXlCbYs4JR13_72jSWQPTq0v6oJ9c0qtL-uJSrXz7OGT-eUT3VPfPlgrcXgCsqy4e09oIg0XnE9qiXfT_HfIXxZaruA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583326351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying priority regions and territorial planning strategies for conserving native vegetation in the Cerrado (Brazil) under different scenarios of land use changes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Colman, Carina Barbosa ; Guerra, Angélica ; Roque, Fabio de Oliveira ; Rosa, Isabel M.D. ; Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de</creator><creatorcontrib>Colman, Carina Barbosa ; Guerra, Angélica ; Roque, Fabio de Oliveira ; Rosa, Isabel M.D. ; Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de</creatorcontrib><description>The Cerrado biome covers approximately 20% of Brazil and it is crucial for the Water, Food, Energy, and Ecosystems (WFEE) nexus. Thus, in recent years, large areas of the undisturbed Cerrado have been converted into farmland. In this biome, according to the Brazilian Forest Code, farmers need to keep 20% of native vegetation (Legal Reserves – LRs). By exploring combined and isolated impacts of different scenarios of LR and Protected area (PA) arrangements, this study evaluated the importance of complementarity between LR compliance and the amount of PAs (including Conservation Units - CUs and Indigenous Lands - ILs) to reduce deforestation and conserve native vegetation in the Cerrado. Seven scenarios were investigated: a scenario that considers the current PA and the LR values foreseen in the Native Vegetation Protection Law – NVPL; three scenarios focused on production; and three focused on conservation. Considering the trend of the current scenario, the estimated loss of native vegetation will be 30% (30.6 million ha) by 2070. According to the model simulations, for two periods (2050 and 2070), the LR Elimination scenario (LRE) would cause a greater loss of native vegetation than the PA Elimination (PAE), and as expected, the exclusion of both (PALRE) would provide a greater loss of native vegetation. Native vegetation is concentrated mainly on agricultural properties. Taking our conservation-oriented scenarios as an example of conservation strategies, if there were no financial, practical, political, social or personal constraints, there is no doubt that the CPALRI scenario (Creation of Protected Areas and Legal Reserve Increase) is the best trajectory for conserving biodiversity. Therefore, private properties, through LRs, are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover as they ensure security in the WFEE nexus. The resulting projected scenarios are important to help decision makers in territorial planning and how to arbitrate territorial demands aiming at the rational use of the natural resources of the Cerrado.
[Display omitted]
•We assess whether private properties protect Cerrado's native vegetation.•We designed scenarios on production and conservation.•Creating Protected Areas protects native vegetation more than increasing the Legal Reserve.•To eliminate the Legal Reserve would cause greater loss of vegetation than to eliminate Protected Areas.•Private properties are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150998</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34656576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Brazil ; Brazilian savanna ; Conservation areas ; Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence ; Conservation unit ; Ecosystem ; Indigenous land ; Land use/cover changes ; Legal reserve</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2022-02, Vol.807 (Pt 3), p.150998-150998, Article 150998</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-704e18a8fa05ee112e4dd7da37198c91084a17717110ad5616a937dea94003383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-704e18a8fa05ee112e4dd7da37198c91084a17717110ad5616a937dea94003383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721060769$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34656576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colman, Carina Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Fabio de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Isabel M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying priority regions and territorial planning strategies for conserving native vegetation in the Cerrado (Brazil) under different scenarios of land use changes</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>The Cerrado biome covers approximately 20% of Brazil and it is crucial for the Water, Food, Energy, and Ecosystems (WFEE) nexus. Thus, in recent years, large areas of the undisturbed Cerrado have been converted into farmland. In this biome, according to the Brazilian Forest Code, farmers need to keep 20% of native vegetation (Legal Reserves – LRs). By exploring combined and isolated impacts of different scenarios of LR and Protected area (PA) arrangements, this study evaluated the importance of complementarity between LR compliance and the amount of PAs (including Conservation Units - CUs and Indigenous Lands - ILs) to reduce deforestation and conserve native vegetation in the Cerrado. Seven scenarios were investigated: a scenario that considers the current PA and the LR values foreseen in the Native Vegetation Protection Law – NVPL; three scenarios focused on production; and three focused on conservation. Considering the trend of the current scenario, the estimated loss of native vegetation will be 30% (30.6 million ha) by 2070. According to the model simulations, for two periods (2050 and 2070), the LR Elimination scenario (LRE) would cause a greater loss of native vegetation than the PA Elimination (PAE), and as expected, the exclusion of both (PALRE) would provide a greater loss of native vegetation. Native vegetation is concentrated mainly on agricultural properties. Taking our conservation-oriented scenarios as an example of conservation strategies, if there were no financial, practical, political, social or personal constraints, there is no doubt that the CPALRI scenario (Creation of Protected Areas and Legal Reserve Increase) is the best trajectory for conserving biodiversity. Therefore, private properties, through LRs, are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover as they ensure security in the WFEE nexus. The resulting projected scenarios are important to help decision makers in territorial planning and how to arbitrate territorial demands aiming at the rational use of the natural resources of the Cerrado.
[Display omitted]
•We assess whether private properties protect Cerrado's native vegetation.•We designed scenarios on production and conservation.•Creating Protected Areas protects native vegetation more than increasing the Legal Reserve.•To eliminate the Legal Reserve would cause greater loss of vegetation than to eliminate Protected Areas.•Private properties are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover.</description><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Brazilian savanna</subject><subject>Conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Conservation unit</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Indigenous land</subject><subject>Land use/cover changes</subject><subject>Legal reserve</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc-OFCEQxonRuOPqKyjH9dAj1XQDfVwn_tlkEy96JgjVs0x6YAS6k_GFfE3pzLpXuUCqflX1FR8h74BtgYH4cNhm60ssGJZty1rYQs-GQT0jG1ByaIC14jnZMNapZhCDvCKvcj6weqSCl-SKd6IXvRQb8ufOYSh-PPuwp6fkY_LlTBPufQyZmuBowVRjNW4meppMCCuZSzKlQpjpGBO1Fca0rJlgil-QLrjHUp8xUB9oeUC6q32Mi_TmYzK__fSezsFhos6PI6aqgWaLwVQFmcaRTuvoOSO1DybsMb8mL0YzZXzzeF-TH58_fd99be6_fbnb3d43lksojWQdgjJqNKxHBGixc046U5ODsgMw1RmQEiQAM64XIMzApUMzdIxxrvg1ubn0PaX4a8Zc9NFXYVPVg3HOuu0V563gPVRUXlCbYs4JR13_72jSWQPTq0v6oJ9c0qtL-uJSrXz7OGT-eUT3VPfPlgrcXgCsqy4e09oIg0XnE9qiXfT_HfIXxZaruA</recordid><startdate>20220210</startdate><enddate>20220210</enddate><creator>Colman, Carina Barbosa</creator><creator>Guerra, Angélica</creator><creator>Roque, Fabio de Oliveira</creator><creator>Rosa, Isabel M.D.</creator><creator>Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220210</creationdate><title>Identifying priority regions and territorial planning strategies for conserving native vegetation in the Cerrado (Brazil) under different scenarios of land use changes</title><author>Colman, Carina Barbosa ; Guerra, Angélica ; Roque, Fabio de Oliveira ; Rosa, Isabel M.D. ; Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-704e18a8fa05ee112e4dd7da37198c91084a17717110ad5616a937dea94003383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Brazilian savanna</topic><topic>Conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Conservation unit</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Indigenous land</topic><topic>Land use/cover changes</topic><topic>Legal reserve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colman, Carina Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Angélica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Fabio de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Isabel M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colman, Carina Barbosa</au><au>Guerra, Angélica</au><au>Roque, Fabio de Oliveira</au><au>Rosa, Isabel M.D.</au><au>Oliveira, Paulo Tarso Sanches de</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying priority regions and territorial planning strategies for conserving native vegetation in the Cerrado (Brazil) under different scenarios of land use changes</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2022-02-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>807</volume><issue>Pt 3</issue><spage>150998</spage><epage>150998</epage><pages>150998-150998</pages><artnum>150998</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>The Cerrado biome covers approximately 20% of Brazil and it is crucial for the Water, Food, Energy, and Ecosystems (WFEE) nexus. Thus, in recent years, large areas of the undisturbed Cerrado have been converted into farmland. In this biome, according to the Brazilian Forest Code, farmers need to keep 20% of native vegetation (Legal Reserves – LRs). By exploring combined and isolated impacts of different scenarios of LR and Protected area (PA) arrangements, this study evaluated the importance of complementarity between LR compliance and the amount of PAs (including Conservation Units - CUs and Indigenous Lands - ILs) to reduce deforestation and conserve native vegetation in the Cerrado. Seven scenarios were investigated: a scenario that considers the current PA and the LR values foreseen in the Native Vegetation Protection Law – NVPL; three scenarios focused on production; and three focused on conservation. Considering the trend of the current scenario, the estimated loss of native vegetation will be 30% (30.6 million ha) by 2070. According to the model simulations, for two periods (2050 and 2070), the LR Elimination scenario (LRE) would cause a greater loss of native vegetation than the PA Elimination (PAE), and as expected, the exclusion of both (PALRE) would provide a greater loss of native vegetation. Native vegetation is concentrated mainly on agricultural properties. Taking our conservation-oriented scenarios as an example of conservation strategies, if there were no financial, practical, political, social or personal constraints, there is no doubt that the CPALRI scenario (Creation of Protected Areas and Legal Reserve Increase) is the best trajectory for conserving biodiversity. Therefore, private properties, through LRs, are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover as they ensure security in the WFEE nexus. The resulting projected scenarios are important to help decision makers in territorial planning and how to arbitrate territorial demands aiming at the rational use of the natural resources of the Cerrado.
[Display omitted]
•We assess whether private properties protect Cerrado's native vegetation.•We designed scenarios on production and conservation.•Creating Protected Areas protects native vegetation more than increasing the Legal Reserve.•To eliminate the Legal Reserve would cause greater loss of vegetation than to eliminate Protected Areas.•Private properties are essential for efficient planning of land use/cover.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34656576</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150998</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2022-02, Vol.807 (Pt 3), p.150998-150998, Article 150998 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2583326351 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Brazil Brazilian savanna Conservation areas Conservation of Natural Resources - legislation & jurisprudence Conservation unit Ecosystem Indigenous land Land use/cover changes Legal reserve |
title | Identifying priority regions and territorial planning strategies for conserving native vegetation in the Cerrado (Brazil) under different scenarios of land use changes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20priority%20regions%20and%20territorial%20planning%20strategies%20for%20conserving%20native%20vegetation%20in%20the%20Cerrado%20(Brazil)%20under%20different%20scenarios%20of%20land%20use%20changes&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Colman,%20Carina%20Barbosa&rft.date=2022-02-10&rft.volume=807&rft.issue=Pt%203&rft.spage=150998&rft.epage=150998&rft.pages=150998-150998&rft.artnum=150998&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2583326351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583326351&rft_id=info:pmid/34656576&rft_els_id=S0048969721060769&rfr_iscdi=true |