The Combiome Hypothesis: Selecting Optimal Treatment for Cancer Patients
Existing approaches for cancer diagnosis are inefficient in the use of diagnostic tissue, and decision-making is often sequential, typically resulting in delayed treatment initiation. Future diagnostic testing needs to be faster and optimize increasingly complex treatment decisions. We envision a fu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical lung cancer 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.1-13 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Clinical lung cancer |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Hirsch, Fred R. Walker, Jill Higgs, Brandon W. Cooper, Zachary A. Raja, Rajiv G. Wistuba, Ignacio I. |
description | Existing approaches for cancer diagnosis are inefficient in the use of diagnostic tissue, and decision-making is often sequential, typically resulting in delayed treatment initiation. Future diagnostic testing needs to be faster and optimize increasingly complex treatment decisions. We envision a future where comprehensive testing is routine. Our approach, termed the “combiome,” combines holistic information from the tumor, and the patient's immune system. The combiome model proposed here advocates synchronized up-front testing with a panel of sensitive assays, revealing a more complete understanding of the patient phenotype and improved targeting and sequencing of treatments. Development and eventual adoption of the combiome model for diagnostic testing may provide better outcomes for all cancer patients, but will require significant changes in workflows, technology, regulations, and administration. In this review, we discuss the current and future testing landscape, targeting of personalized treatments, and technological and regulatory advances necessary to achieve the combiome.
Diagnosing cancer is not always an efficient process and this can cause delays in starting treatment. A more efficient approach to cancer diagnosis is proposed, called the “combiome.” The “combiome” characterizes the patients’ tumor and immune system to inform the diagnosis of cancer so that patients can be given the best treatment in a timelier manner. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.08.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2582109315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525730421002151</els_id><sourcerecordid>2582109315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c3129e60fe6201ea3f160c5ee3e592fcdd6ec8a566cc82425022987b0c9e089b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotla_gAfZo5ddJ9lNmhUvsqgVChWs57CbnbUp-6cmqdBvb0qrR08zDO895v0IuaaQUKDibp3ottUJA0YTkAlQekLGNE9lDCKH07BzxuNpCtmIXDi3BmAipeycjNJMZJxLOiaz5QqjYugqM3QYzXabwa_QGXcfvWOL2pv-M1psvOnKNlpaLH2HvY-awUZF2Wu00VvpTTi5S3LWlK3Dq-OckI_np2Uxi-eLl9ficR7rTAgf6_BAjgIaFAwolmlDBWiOmCLPWaPrWqCWJRdCa8kyxoGxXE4r0DmCzKt0Qm4PuRs7fG3RedUZp7Ftyx6HrVOMS0YhTykPUnaQajs4Z7FRGxuK2J2ioPYE1VrtCao9QQVSBYLBdHPM31Yd1n-WX2RB8HAQYGj5bdAqpwMBjbWxAZiqB_Nf_g8uaoEy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582109315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Combiome Hypothesis: Selecting Optimal Treatment for Cancer Patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hirsch, Fred R. ; Walker, Jill ; Higgs, Brandon W. ; Cooper, Zachary A. ; Raja, Rajiv G. ; Wistuba, Ignacio I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Fred R. ; Walker, Jill ; Higgs, Brandon W. ; Cooper, Zachary A. ; Raja, Rajiv G. ; Wistuba, Ignacio I.</creatorcontrib><description>Existing approaches for cancer diagnosis are inefficient in the use of diagnostic tissue, and decision-making is often sequential, typically resulting in delayed treatment initiation. Future diagnostic testing needs to be faster and optimize increasingly complex treatment decisions. We envision a future where comprehensive testing is routine. Our approach, termed the “combiome,” combines holistic information from the tumor, and the patient's immune system. The combiome model proposed here advocates synchronized up-front testing with a panel of sensitive assays, revealing a more complete understanding of the patient phenotype and improved targeting and sequencing of treatments. Development and eventual adoption of the combiome model for diagnostic testing may provide better outcomes for all cancer patients, but will require significant changes in workflows, technology, regulations, and administration. In this review, we discuss the current and future testing landscape, targeting of personalized treatments, and technological and regulatory advances necessary to achieve the combiome.
Diagnosing cancer is not always an efficient process and this can cause delays in starting treatment. A more efficient approach to cancer diagnosis is proposed, called the “combiome.” The “combiome” characterizes the patients’ tumor and immune system to inform the diagnosis of cancer so that patients can be given the best treatment in a timelier manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-7304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.08.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34645581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antigenicity ; Co-stimulation ; Humans ; Immune activation ; Immune checkpoint ; Immunotherapy ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - therapy ; Microbiota ; Models, Theoretical ; Proteogenomics ; Targeted therapies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical lung cancer, 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c3129e60fe6201ea3f160c5ee3e592fcdd6ec8a566cc82425022987b0c9e089b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c3129e60fe6201ea3f160c5ee3e592fcdd6ec8a566cc82425022987b0c9e089b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1059-0940 ; 0000-0002-4663-0951</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2021.08.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Fred R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgs, Brandon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Zachary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rajiv G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wistuba, Ignacio I.</creatorcontrib><title>The Combiome Hypothesis: Selecting Optimal Treatment for Cancer Patients</title><title>Clinical lung cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><description>Existing approaches for cancer diagnosis are inefficient in the use of diagnostic tissue, and decision-making is often sequential, typically resulting in delayed treatment initiation. Future diagnostic testing needs to be faster and optimize increasingly complex treatment decisions. We envision a future where comprehensive testing is routine. Our approach, termed the “combiome,” combines holistic information from the tumor, and the patient's immune system. The combiome model proposed here advocates synchronized up-front testing with a panel of sensitive assays, revealing a more complete understanding of the patient phenotype and improved targeting and sequencing of treatments. Development and eventual adoption of the combiome model for diagnostic testing may provide better outcomes for all cancer patients, but will require significant changes in workflows, technology, regulations, and administration. In this review, we discuss the current and future testing landscape, targeting of personalized treatments, and technological and regulatory advances necessary to achieve the combiome.
Diagnosing cancer is not always an efficient process and this can cause delays in starting treatment. A more efficient approach to cancer diagnosis is proposed, called the “combiome.” The “combiome” characterizes the patients’ tumor and immune system to inform the diagnosis of cancer so that patients can be given the best treatment in a timelier manner.</description><subject>Antigenicity</subject><subject>Co-stimulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune activation</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Proteogenomics</subject><subject>Targeted therapies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1525-7304</issn><issn>1938-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotla_gAfZo5ddJ9lNmhUvsqgVChWs57CbnbUp-6cmqdBvb0qrR08zDO895v0IuaaQUKDibp3ottUJA0YTkAlQekLGNE9lDCKH07BzxuNpCtmIXDi3BmAipeycjNJMZJxLOiaz5QqjYugqM3QYzXabwa_QGXcfvWOL2pv-M1psvOnKNlpaLH2HvY-awUZF2Wu00VvpTTi5S3LWlK3Dq-OckI_np2Uxi-eLl9ficR7rTAgf6_BAjgIaFAwolmlDBWiOmCLPWaPrWqCWJRdCa8kyxoGxXE4r0DmCzKt0Qm4PuRs7fG3RedUZp7Ftyx6HrVOMS0YhTykPUnaQajs4Z7FRGxuK2J2ioPYE1VrtCao9QQVSBYLBdHPM31Yd1n-WX2RB8HAQYGj5bdAqpwMBjbWxAZiqB_Nf_g8uaoEy</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Hirsch, Fred R.</creator><creator>Walker, Jill</creator><creator>Higgs, Brandon W.</creator><creator>Cooper, Zachary A.</creator><creator>Raja, Rajiv G.</creator><creator>Wistuba, Ignacio I.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1059-0940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4663-0951</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>The Combiome Hypothesis: Selecting Optimal Treatment for Cancer Patients</title><author>Hirsch, Fred R. ; Walker, Jill ; Higgs, Brandon W. ; Cooper, Zachary A. ; Raja, Rajiv G. ; Wistuba, Ignacio I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c3129e60fe6201ea3f160c5ee3e592fcdd6ec8a566cc82425022987b0c9e089b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antigenicity</topic><topic>Co-stimulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune activation</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Proteogenomics</topic><topic>Targeted therapies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Fred R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgs, Brandon W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Zachary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raja, Rajiv G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wistuba, Ignacio I.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirsch, Fred R.</au><au>Walker, Jill</au><au>Higgs, Brandon W.</au><au>Cooper, Zachary A.</au><au>Raja, Rajiv G.</au><au>Wistuba, Ignacio I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Combiome Hypothesis: Selecting Optimal Treatment for Cancer Patients</atitle><jtitle>Clinical lung cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Lung Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>1525-7304</issn><eissn>1938-0690</eissn><abstract>Existing approaches for cancer diagnosis are inefficient in the use of diagnostic tissue, and decision-making is often sequential, typically resulting in delayed treatment initiation. Future diagnostic testing needs to be faster and optimize increasingly complex treatment decisions. We envision a future where comprehensive testing is routine. Our approach, termed the “combiome,” combines holistic information from the tumor, and the patient's immune system. The combiome model proposed here advocates synchronized up-front testing with a panel of sensitive assays, revealing a more complete understanding of the patient phenotype and improved targeting and sequencing of treatments. Development and eventual adoption of the combiome model for diagnostic testing may provide better outcomes for all cancer patients, but will require significant changes in workflows, technology, regulations, and administration. In this review, we discuss the current and future testing landscape, targeting of personalized treatments, and technological and regulatory advances necessary to achieve the combiome.
Diagnosing cancer is not always an efficient process and this can cause delays in starting treatment. A more efficient approach to cancer diagnosis is proposed, called the “combiome.” The “combiome” characterizes the patients’ tumor and immune system to inform the diagnosis of cancer so that patients can be given the best treatment in a timelier manner.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34645581</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cllc.2021.08.011</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1059-0940</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4663-0951</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-7304 |
ispartof | Clinical lung cancer, 2022-01, Vol.23 (1), p.1-13 |
issn | 1525-7304 1938-0690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2582109315 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Antigenicity Co-stimulation Humans Immune activation Immune checkpoint Immunotherapy Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - therapy Microbiota Models, Theoretical Proteogenomics Targeted therapies Treatment Outcome |
title | The Combiome Hypothesis: Selecting Optimal Treatment for Cancer Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A49%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Combiome%20Hypothesis:%20Selecting%20Optimal%20Treatment%20for%20Cancer%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20lung%20cancer&rft.au=Hirsch,%20Fred%20R.&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=1525-7304&rft.eissn=1938-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cllc.2021.08.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2582109315%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582109315&rft_id=info:pmid/34645581&rft_els_id=S1525730421002151&rfr_iscdi=true |