Low risk of contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis

Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are at increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). Although Hymenoptera venoms are the predominant triggers, cases of contrast media-induced HR (CMIHR) have also been reported and prophylactic premedication is often performed. However, data from large...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology asthma, & immunology, 2022-03, Vol.128 (3), p.314-318
Hauptverfasser: Schwaab, Juliana, Brockow, Knut, Riffel, Philipp, Lübke, Johannes, Naumann, Nicole, Jawhar, Mohamad, Reiter, Lukas, Fabarius, Alice, Metzgeroth, Georgia, Schoenberg, Stefan O., Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten, Reiter, Andreas, Riffel, Julia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 3
container_start_page 314
container_title Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology
container_volume 128
creator Schwaab, Juliana
Brockow, Knut
Riffel, Philipp
Lübke, Johannes
Naumann, Nicole
Jawhar, Mohamad
Reiter, Lukas
Fabarius, Alice
Metzgeroth, Georgia
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten
Reiter, Andreas
Riffel, Julia
description Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are at increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). Although Hymenoptera venoms are the predominant triggers, cases of contrast media-induced HR (CMIHR) have also been reported and prophylactic premedication is often performed. However, data from larger series are limited and differences between indolent and advanced SM have not yet been investigated. To determine the incidence and severity of CMIHR in all subtypes of SM. We analyzed 162 adult patients with SM (indolent systemic mastocytosis [ISM], n = 65; advanced systemic mastocytosis [advSM], n = 97). First, the cumulative incidence of CMIHR was retrospectively assessed in the patient's history. Second, at our institution, patients underwent 332 contrast media (CM)-enhanced imaging including 80 computed tomography (CT) scans with iodine-based contrast agent and 252 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a gadolinium-based contrast agent, and tolerance was assessed. Previous CMIHRs to CT (vomiting, n = 1, erythema, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1), and MRI (dyspnea, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1) had been reported by 4 out of 162 (2.5%) patients (ISM, n = 3; advSM, n = 1). In contrast, during or after 332 CM-enhanced CT or MRI examinations at our institution, no CMIHRs were reported. Premedication was solely given to 3 patients before CT scans, including 1 with previous CMIHR, who tolerated the imaging well. We conclude that: (1) there is a substantial discrepancy between the perception and prevalence of HRs to CM in SM; (2) reactions are scarce in ISM and even rarer in advSM; and (3) in SM patients without previous history of CM hypersensitivity, prophylactic premedication before CM-enhanced CT or MRI is dispensable.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581807689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1081120621011340</els_id><sourcerecordid>2581807689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-10986756f2809a05ef3a7fb6552f242635ea33016849a698fdd758c22ff56f4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaD6aP9BD0bEXb_RtGXIJIUkDC7mkZ6GVJaqtbW00cor_fWQ26bGnGYbnfWEehL5RsqGEqqv9xk42bhhhtB42hIhP6IxKLhohuPpcd6JpQxlRp-gcYE8IoVrxL-iUC8XbjokzFLbpL84R_uAUsEtTyRYKHn0fbROnfna-x7-Xg8_gJ4glvsay4OytKzFNgOOE7TBgmHelQrCWwALFj9HhsTYlt5QEEb6ik2AH8Jfv8wL9ur97vv3ZbJ8eHm9vto3jUpWGkk6rVqrANOkskT5w24adkpIFJpji0lvO6-9adFZ1OvR9K7VjLIQaEpZfoB_H3kNOL7OHYsYIzg-DnXyawTCpqSat0l1F2RF1OQFkH8whx9HmxVBiVr9mb1a_ZvW73qrfGvr-3j_vqqR_kQ-hFbg-Ar5--Rp9NuCin6rGmL0rpk_xf_1v6Q6NJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581807689</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low risk of contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Schwaab, Juliana ; Brockow, Knut ; Riffel, Philipp ; Lübke, Johannes ; Naumann, Nicole ; Jawhar, Mohamad ; Reiter, Lukas ; Fabarius, Alice ; Metzgeroth, Georgia ; Schoenberg, Stefan O. ; Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten ; Reiter, Andreas ; Riffel, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwaab, Juliana ; Brockow, Knut ; Riffel, Philipp ; Lübke, Johannes ; Naumann, Nicole ; Jawhar, Mohamad ; Reiter, Lukas ; Fabarius, Alice ; Metzgeroth, Georgia ; Schoenberg, Stefan O. ; Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten ; Reiter, Andreas ; Riffel, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are at increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). Although Hymenoptera venoms are the predominant triggers, cases of contrast media-induced HR (CMIHR) have also been reported and prophylactic premedication is often performed. However, data from larger series are limited and differences between indolent and advanced SM have not yet been investigated. To determine the incidence and severity of CMIHR in all subtypes of SM. We analyzed 162 adult patients with SM (indolent systemic mastocytosis [ISM], n = 65; advanced systemic mastocytosis [advSM], n = 97). First, the cumulative incidence of CMIHR was retrospectively assessed in the patient's history. Second, at our institution, patients underwent 332 contrast media (CM)-enhanced imaging including 80 computed tomography (CT) scans with iodine-based contrast agent and 252 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a gadolinium-based contrast agent, and tolerance was assessed. Previous CMIHRs to CT (vomiting, n = 1, erythema, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1), and MRI (dyspnea, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1) had been reported by 4 out of 162 (2.5%) patients (ISM, n = 3; advSM, n = 1). In contrast, during or after 332 CM-enhanced CT or MRI examinations at our institution, no CMIHRs were reported. Premedication was solely given to 3 patients before CT scans, including 1 with previous CMIHR, who tolerated the imaging well. We conclude that: (1) there is a substantial discrepancy between the perception and prevalence of HRs to CM in SM; (2) reactions are scarce in ISM and even rarer in advSM; and (3) in SM patients without previous history of CM hypersensitivity, prophylactic premedication before CM-enhanced CT or MRI is dispensable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-1206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34637924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arthropod Venoms ; Contrast Media - adverse effects ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mastocytosis ; Mastocytosis, Systemic ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology, 2022-03, Vol.128 (3), p.314-318</ispartof><rights>2021 American College of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American College of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-10986756f2809a05ef3a7fb6552f242635ea33016849a698fdd758c22ff56f4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-10986756f2809a05ef3a7fb6552f242635ea33016849a698fdd758c22ff56f4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34637924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwaab, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockow, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riffel, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lübke, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naumann, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jawhar, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabarius, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzgeroth, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riffel, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Low risk of contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis</title><title>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</title><addtitle>Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol</addtitle><description>Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are at increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). Although Hymenoptera venoms are the predominant triggers, cases of contrast media-induced HR (CMIHR) have also been reported and prophylactic premedication is often performed. However, data from larger series are limited and differences between indolent and advanced SM have not yet been investigated. To determine the incidence and severity of CMIHR in all subtypes of SM. We analyzed 162 adult patients with SM (indolent systemic mastocytosis [ISM], n = 65; advanced systemic mastocytosis [advSM], n = 97). First, the cumulative incidence of CMIHR was retrospectively assessed in the patient's history. Second, at our institution, patients underwent 332 contrast media (CM)-enhanced imaging including 80 computed tomography (CT) scans with iodine-based contrast agent and 252 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a gadolinium-based contrast agent, and tolerance was assessed. Previous CMIHRs to CT (vomiting, n = 1, erythema, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1), and MRI (dyspnea, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1) had been reported by 4 out of 162 (2.5%) patients (ISM, n = 3; advSM, n = 1). In contrast, during or after 332 CM-enhanced CT or MRI examinations at our institution, no CMIHRs were reported. Premedication was solely given to 3 patients before CT scans, including 1 with previous CMIHR, who tolerated the imaging well. We conclude that: (1) there is a substantial discrepancy between the perception and prevalence of HRs to CM in SM; (2) reactions are scarce in ISM and even rarer in advSM; and (3) in SM patients without previous history of CM hypersensitivity, prophylactic premedication before CM-enhanced CT or MRI is dispensable.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arthropod Venoms</subject><subject>Contrast Media - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mastocytosis</subject><subject>Mastocytosis, Systemic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1081-1206</issn><issn>1534-4436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaD6aP9BD0bEXb_RtGXIJIUkDC7mkZ6GVJaqtbW00cor_fWQ26bGnGYbnfWEehL5RsqGEqqv9xk42bhhhtB42hIhP6IxKLhohuPpcd6JpQxlRp-gcYE8IoVrxL-iUC8XbjokzFLbpL84R_uAUsEtTyRYKHn0fbROnfna-x7-Xg8_gJ4glvsay4OytKzFNgOOE7TBgmHelQrCWwALFj9HhsTYlt5QEEb6ik2AH8Jfv8wL9ur97vv3ZbJ8eHm9vto3jUpWGkk6rVqrANOkskT5w24adkpIFJpji0lvO6-9adFZ1OvR9K7VjLIQaEpZfoB_H3kNOL7OHYsYIzg-DnXyawTCpqSat0l1F2RF1OQFkH8whx9HmxVBiVr9mb1a_ZvW73qrfGvr-3j_vqqR_kQ-hFbg-Ar5--Rp9NuCin6rGmL0rpk_xf_1v6Q6NJQ</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Schwaab, Juliana</creator><creator>Brockow, Knut</creator><creator>Riffel, Philipp</creator><creator>Lübke, Johannes</creator><creator>Naumann, Nicole</creator><creator>Jawhar, Mohamad</creator><creator>Reiter, Lukas</creator><creator>Fabarius, Alice</creator><creator>Metzgeroth, Georgia</creator><creator>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creator><creator>Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten</creator><creator>Reiter, Andreas</creator><creator>Riffel, Julia</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Low risk of contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis</title><author>Schwaab, Juliana ; Brockow, Knut ; Riffel, Philipp ; Lübke, Johannes ; Naumann, Nicole ; Jawhar, Mohamad ; Reiter, Lukas ; Fabarius, Alice ; Metzgeroth, Georgia ; Schoenberg, Stefan O. ; Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten ; Reiter, Andreas ; Riffel, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-10986756f2809a05ef3a7fb6552f242635ea33016849a698fdd758c22ff56f4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arthropod Venoms</topic><topic>Contrast Media - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mastocytosis</topic><topic>Mastocytosis, Systemic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwaab, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockow, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riffel, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lübke, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naumann, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jawhar, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabarius, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzgeroth, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riffel, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwaab, Juliana</au><au>Brockow, Knut</au><au>Riffel, Philipp</au><au>Lübke, Johannes</au><au>Naumann, Nicole</au><au>Jawhar, Mohamad</au><au>Reiter, Lukas</au><au>Fabarius, Alice</au><au>Metzgeroth, Georgia</au><au>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</au><au>Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten</au><au>Reiter, Andreas</au><au>Riffel, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low risk of contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of allergy, asthma, &amp; immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>314-318</pages><issn>1081-1206</issn><eissn>1534-4436</eissn><abstract>Patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are at increased risk of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs). Although Hymenoptera venoms are the predominant triggers, cases of contrast media-induced HR (CMIHR) have also been reported and prophylactic premedication is often performed. However, data from larger series are limited and differences between indolent and advanced SM have not yet been investigated. To determine the incidence and severity of CMIHR in all subtypes of SM. We analyzed 162 adult patients with SM (indolent systemic mastocytosis [ISM], n = 65; advanced systemic mastocytosis [advSM], n = 97). First, the cumulative incidence of CMIHR was retrospectively assessed in the patient's history. Second, at our institution, patients underwent 332 contrast media (CM)-enhanced imaging including 80 computed tomography (CT) scans with iodine-based contrast agent and 252 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a gadolinium-based contrast agent, and tolerance was assessed. Previous CMIHRs to CT (vomiting, n = 1, erythema, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1), and MRI (dyspnea, n = 1, cardiovascular shock, n = 1) had been reported by 4 out of 162 (2.5%) patients (ISM, n = 3; advSM, n = 1). In contrast, during or after 332 CM-enhanced CT or MRI examinations at our institution, no CMIHRs were reported. Premedication was solely given to 3 patients before CT scans, including 1 with previous CMIHR, who tolerated the imaging well. We conclude that: (1) there is a substantial discrepancy between the perception and prevalence of HRs to CM in SM; (2) reactions are scarce in ISM and even rarer in advSM; and (3) in SM patients without previous history of CM hypersensitivity, prophylactic premedication before CM-enhanced CT or MRI is dispensable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34637924</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1081-1206
ispartof Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 2022-03, Vol.128 (3), p.314-318
issn 1081-1206
1534-4436
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581807689
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Arthropod Venoms
Contrast Media - adverse effects
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mastocytosis
Mastocytosis, Systemic
Retrospective Studies
title Low risk of contrast media-induced hypersensitivity reactions in all subtypes of systemic mastocytosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A03%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20risk%20of%20contrast%20media-induced%20hypersensitivity%20reactions%20in%20all%20subtypes%20of%20systemic%20mastocytosis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20allergy,%20asthma,%20&%20immunology&rft.au=Schwaab,%20Juliana&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=314-318&rft.issn=1081-1206&rft.eissn=1534-4436&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581807689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581807689&rft_id=info:pmid/34637924&rft_els_id=S1081120621011340&rfr_iscdi=true