Predicting Effluent PCBs from Superfund Site Dredged Material

The Corps of Engineers and EPA conducted a feasibility study of using dredges to remove PCBs from the highly contaminated sediments of the New Bedford, Mass., harbor, a Superfund site. Three types of dredges were tested. Also, a confined disposal facility (CDF) was constructed to test the feasibilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1992-09, Vol.118 (5), p.657-665
Hauptverfasser: Thackston, Edward L, Palermo, Michael R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 665
container_issue 5
container_start_page 657
container_title Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 118
creator Thackston, Edward L
Palermo, Michael R
description The Corps of Engineers and EPA conducted a feasibility study of using dredges to remove PCBs from the highly contaminated sediments of the New Bedford, Mass., harbor, a Superfund site. Three types of dredges were tested. Also, a confined disposal facility (CDF) was constructed to test the feasibility of onshore containment of the dredged material. Laboratory settling tests and modified elutriate tests were conducted prior to dredging to predict the release of PCBs in the effluent. Comparisons and predictions with field measurements showed that the prediction method was valid and useful for PCBs. The average concentration of dissolved PCB of 4.8 g L was close to the prediction of 7.5 g L. The average total concentration of 28 g L was less than the predicted value of 65 g L, because the average effluent suspended solids (SS) of 67 mg L was less than the predicted 120 mg L, due to dredge operating problems. Other data showed that dredging is a feasible remediation method.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:5(657)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25816057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>25816057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-7584eefccc863b5e4ca31db63d549fff604ddd1989c903ce79589c17919d53873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUQIMoOKf_oU-6PVRzl6ZpBIXZ1S8mG8yBb6HLx6h07UzaB_-96TZ81EDIJRzOhYPQFeBrwDHcDMaLNBtiRkjICRsNgPPRECC5pYOYsuER6gGPSMgSho9R75c7RWfOfWIMUcxZD93NrVaFbIpqHWTGlK2ummCePrjA2HoTLNqttqatVLAoGh1MPLzWKnjLG22LvDxHJyYvnb44vH20fMze0-dwOnt6ScfTMI8AmpDRJNLaSCmTmKyojmROQK1iomjEjTExjpRSwBMuOSZSM079CIwDV5QkjPTR5d67tfVXq10jNoWTuizzStetEyOaQIzp_yD4NDji4MH7PSht7ZzVRmxtscnttwAsur5CdH1F10103UTXV_i-gop4t-ljL8i9X3zWra18AfE6y7LJEvu-kODuUH-7pXj3d3D_rf4BF6WF3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16570491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Effluent PCBs from Superfund Site Dredged Material</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Thackston, Edward L ; Palermo, Michael R</creator><creatorcontrib>Thackston, Edward L ; Palermo, Michael R</creatorcontrib><description>The Corps of Engineers and EPA conducted a feasibility study of using dredges to remove PCBs from the highly contaminated sediments of the New Bedford, Mass., harbor, a Superfund site. Three types of dredges were tested. Also, a confined disposal facility (CDF) was constructed to test the feasibility of onshore containment of the dredged material. Laboratory settling tests and modified elutriate tests were conducted prior to dredging to predict the release of PCBs in the effluent. Comparisons and predictions with field measurements showed that the prediction method was valid and useful for PCBs. The average concentration of dissolved PCB of 4.8 g L was close to the prediction of 7.5 g L. The average total concentration of 28 g L was less than the predicted value of 65 g L, because the average effluent suspended solids (SS) of 67 mg L was less than the predicted 120 mg L, due to dredge operating problems. Other data showed that dredging is a feasible remediation method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9372</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:5(657)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.), 1992-09, Vol.118 (5), p.657-665</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1992 ASCE</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-7584eefccc863b5e4ca31db63d549fff604ddd1989c903ce79589c17919d53873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-7584eefccc863b5e4ca31db63d549fff604ddd1989c903ce79589c17919d53873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:5(657)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:5(657)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thackston, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Michael R</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Effluent PCBs from Superfund Site Dredged Material</title><title>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>The Corps of Engineers and EPA conducted a feasibility study of using dredges to remove PCBs from the highly contaminated sediments of the New Bedford, Mass., harbor, a Superfund site. Three types of dredges were tested. Also, a confined disposal facility (CDF) was constructed to test the feasibility of onshore containment of the dredged material. Laboratory settling tests and modified elutriate tests were conducted prior to dredging to predict the release of PCBs in the effluent. Comparisons and predictions with field measurements showed that the prediction method was valid and useful for PCBs. The average concentration of dissolved PCB of 4.8 g L was close to the prediction of 7.5 g L. The average total concentration of 28 g L was less than the predicted value of 65 g L, because the average effluent suspended solids (SS) of 67 mg L was less than the predicted 120 mg L, due to dredge operating problems. Other data showed that dredging is a feasible remediation method.</description><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9372</issn><issn>1943-7870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUQIMoOKf_oU-6PVRzl6ZpBIXZ1S8mG8yBb6HLx6h07UzaB_-96TZ81EDIJRzOhYPQFeBrwDHcDMaLNBtiRkjICRsNgPPRECC5pYOYsuER6gGPSMgSho9R75c7RWfOfWIMUcxZD93NrVaFbIpqHWTGlK2ummCePrjA2HoTLNqttqatVLAoGh1MPLzWKnjLG22LvDxHJyYvnb44vH20fMze0-dwOnt6ScfTMI8AmpDRJNLaSCmTmKyojmROQK1iomjEjTExjpRSwBMuOSZSM079CIwDV5QkjPTR5d67tfVXq10jNoWTuizzStetEyOaQIzp_yD4NDji4MH7PSht7ZzVRmxtscnttwAsur5CdH1F10103UTXV_i-gop4t-ljL8i9X3zWra18AfE6y7LJEvu-kODuUH-7pXj3d3D_rf4BF6WF3Q</recordid><startdate>19920901</startdate><enddate>19920901</enddate><creator>Thackston, Edward L</creator><creator>Palermo, Michael R</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920901</creationdate><title>Predicting Effluent PCBs from Superfund Site Dredged Material</title><author>Thackston, Edward L ; Palermo, Michael R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a411t-7584eefccc863b5e4ca31db63d549fff604ddd1989c903ce79589c17919d53873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thackston, Edward L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palermo, Michael R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thackston, Edward L</au><au>Palermo, Michael R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Effluent PCBs from Superfund Site Dredged Material</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>1992-09-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>665</epage><pages>657-665</pages><issn>0733-9372</issn><eissn>1943-7870</eissn><abstract>The Corps of Engineers and EPA conducted a feasibility study of using dredges to remove PCBs from the highly contaminated sediments of the New Bedford, Mass., harbor, a Superfund site. Three types of dredges were tested. Also, a confined disposal facility (CDF) was constructed to test the feasibility of onshore containment of the dredged material. Laboratory settling tests and modified elutriate tests were conducted prior to dredging to predict the release of PCBs in the effluent. Comparisons and predictions with field measurements showed that the prediction method was valid and useful for PCBs. The average concentration of dissolved PCB of 4.8 g L was close to the prediction of 7.5 g L. The average total concentration of 28 g L was less than the predicted value of 65 g L, because the average effluent suspended solids (SS) of 67 mg L was less than the predicted 120 mg L, due to dredge operating problems. Other data showed that dredging is a feasible remediation method.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:5(657)</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9372
ispartof Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.), 1992-09, Vol.118 (5), p.657-665
issn 0733-9372
1943-7870
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25816057
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Predicting Effluent PCBs from Superfund Site Dredged Material
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Effluent%20PCBs%20from%20Superfund%20Site%20Dredged%20Material&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Thackston,%20Edward%20L&rft.date=1992-09-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=665&rft.pages=657-665&rft.issn=0733-9372&rft.eissn=1943-7870&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1992)118:5(657)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E25816057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16570491&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true