Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study
As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics 2022-02, Vol.17 (1-2), p.70-83 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 83 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Taplin, Stephanie Chalmers, Jenny Brown, Judith Moore, Tim Graham, Anne McArthur, Morag |
description | As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15562646211048294 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581280375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15562646211048294</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2614690363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOGzEUhi0EIkB5gG6QJTbdJPj4NpnuUBQIEoiqadmOHM-ZxtFcUtujkl1eg9frk3RG4SKBuvIv6zufj_UT8hnYCCBJLkApzbXUHIDJMU_lHjnq74ZcK7n_mqUekOMQVoxJJUAekoGQWuiEySOynbWVqel3DGi8XdJpXDob6KSpKhcjIp0-rtE7rC0GauqcPjj8E-jlomkjnSxdmXus_26fAv1mfHTWrU10TU3dm_Nrn9oyBnrlm4rGJdK76Xx-Q-exzTefyEFhyoCnz-cJ-Xk1_TGZDW_vr28ml7dDKwHi0BbKFoXSOtXKMpUbqxfSCMkloLEc-lQoMClPC2a673GOBscyF4XmCQhxQr7svGvf_G4xxKxywWJZmhqbNmRcjYGPmUhUh56_Q1dN6-tuu4xrkDplQvdC2FHWNyF4LLK1d5XxmwxY1teTfainmzl7NreLCvPXiZc-OmC0A4L5hW_P_t_4D6hIl6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614690363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Taplin, Stephanie ; Chalmers, Jenny ; Brown, Judith ; Moore, Tim ; Graham, Anne ; McArthur, Morag</creator><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Stephanie ; Chalmers, Jenny ; Brown, Judith ; Moore, Tim ; Graham, Anne ; McArthur, Morag</creatorcontrib><description>As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-2646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-2654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15562646211048294</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34636704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Australia ; Child ; Ethical Review ; Ethics ; Ethics Committees, Research ; Humans ; Research ethics ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2022-02, Vol.17 (1-2), p.70-83</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8752-009X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15562646211048294$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15562646211048294$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Morag</creatorcontrib><title>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</title><title>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</title><addtitle>Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics</addtitle><description>As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Ethical Review</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics Committees, Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1556-2646</issn><issn>1556-2654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctOGzEUhi0EIkB5gG6QJTbdJPj4NpnuUBQIEoiqadmOHM-ZxtFcUtujkl1eg9frk3RG4SKBuvIv6zufj_UT8hnYCCBJLkApzbXUHIDJMU_lHjnq74ZcK7n_mqUekOMQVoxJJUAekoGQWuiEySOynbWVqel3DGi8XdJpXDob6KSpKhcjIp0-rtE7rC0GauqcPjj8E-jlomkjnSxdmXus_26fAv1mfHTWrU10TU3dm_Nrn9oyBnrlm4rGJdK76Xx-Q-exzTefyEFhyoCnz-cJ-Xk1_TGZDW_vr28ml7dDKwHi0BbKFoXSOtXKMpUbqxfSCMkloLEc-lQoMClPC2a673GOBscyF4XmCQhxQr7svGvf_G4xxKxywWJZmhqbNmRcjYGPmUhUh56_Q1dN6-tuu4xrkDplQvdC2FHWNyF4LLK1d5XxmwxY1teTfainmzl7NreLCvPXiZc-OmC0A4L5hW_P_t_4D6hIl6Y</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Taplin, Stephanie</creator><creator>Chalmers, Jenny</creator><creator>Brown, Judith</creator><creator>Moore, Tim</creator><creator>Graham, Anne</creator><creator>McArthur, Morag</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8752-009X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</title><author>Taplin, Stephanie ; Chalmers, Jenny ; Brown, Judith ; Moore, Tim ; Graham, Anne ; McArthur, Morag</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Ethical Review</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics Committees, Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Morag</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taplin, Stephanie</au><au>Chalmers, Jenny</au><au>Brown, Judith</au><au>Moore, Tim</au><au>Graham, Anne</au><au>McArthur, Morag</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>70-83</pages><issn>1556-2646</issn><eissn>1556-2654</eissn><abstract>As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34636704</pmid><doi>10.1177/15562646211048294</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8752-009X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1556-2646 |
ispartof | Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2022-02, Vol.17 (1-2), p.70-83 |
issn | 1556-2646 1556-2654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581280375 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Australia Child Ethical Review Ethics Ethics Committees, Research Humans Research ethics Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Research%20Ethics%20Committee%20Experiences%20and%20Views%20About%20Children%E2%80%99s%20Participation%20in%20Research:%20Results%20From%20the%20MESSI%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20empirical%20research%20on%20human%20research%20ethics&rft.au=Taplin,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=70-83&rft.issn=1556-2646&rft.eissn=1556-2654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15562646211048294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614690363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614690363&rft_id=info:pmid/34636704&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15562646211048294&rfr_iscdi=true |