Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study

As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of empirical research on human research ethics 2022-02, Vol.17 (1-2), p.70-83
Hauptverfasser: Taplin, Stephanie, Chalmers, Jenny, Brown, Judith, Moore, Tim, Graham, Anne, McArthur, Morag
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 70
container_title Journal of empirical research on human research ethics
container_volume 17
creator Taplin, Stephanie
Chalmers, Jenny
Brown, Judith
Moore, Tim
Graham, Anne
McArthur, Morag
description As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/15562646211048294
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581280375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15562646211048294</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2614690363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOGzEUhi0EIkB5gG6QJTbdJPj4NpnuUBQIEoiqadmOHM-ZxtFcUtujkl1eg9frk3RG4SKBuvIv6zufj_UT8hnYCCBJLkApzbXUHIDJMU_lHjnq74ZcK7n_mqUekOMQVoxJJUAekoGQWuiEySOynbWVqel3DGi8XdJpXDob6KSpKhcjIp0-rtE7rC0GauqcPjj8E-jlomkjnSxdmXus_26fAv1mfHTWrU10TU3dm_Nrn9oyBnrlm4rGJdK76Xx-Q-exzTefyEFhyoCnz-cJ-Xk1_TGZDW_vr28ml7dDKwHi0BbKFoXSOtXKMpUbqxfSCMkloLEc-lQoMClPC2a673GOBscyF4XmCQhxQr7svGvf_G4xxKxywWJZmhqbNmRcjYGPmUhUh56_Q1dN6-tuu4xrkDplQvdC2FHWNyF4LLK1d5XxmwxY1teTfainmzl7NreLCvPXiZc-OmC0A4L5hW_P_t_4D6hIl6Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614690363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Taplin, Stephanie ; Chalmers, Jenny ; Brown, Judith ; Moore, Tim ; Graham, Anne ; McArthur, Morag</creator><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Stephanie ; Chalmers, Jenny ; Brown, Judith ; Moore, Tim ; Graham, Anne ; McArthur, Morag</creatorcontrib><description>As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-2646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-2654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15562646211048294</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34636704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Australia ; Child ; Ethical Review ; Ethics ; Ethics Committees, Research ; Humans ; Research ethics ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2022-02, Vol.17 (1-2), p.70-83</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8752-009X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/15562646211048294$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15562646211048294$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Morag</creatorcontrib><title>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</title><title>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</title><addtitle>Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics</addtitle><description>As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Ethical Review</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics Committees, Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Research ethics</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1556-2646</issn><issn>1556-2654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctOGzEUhi0EIkB5gG6QJTbdJPj4NpnuUBQIEoiqadmOHM-ZxtFcUtujkl1eg9frk3RG4SKBuvIv6zufj_UT8hnYCCBJLkApzbXUHIDJMU_lHjnq74ZcK7n_mqUekOMQVoxJJUAekoGQWuiEySOynbWVqel3DGi8XdJpXDob6KSpKhcjIp0-rtE7rC0GauqcPjj8E-jlomkjnSxdmXus_26fAv1mfHTWrU10TU3dm_Nrn9oyBnrlm4rGJdK76Xx-Q-exzTefyEFhyoCnz-cJ-Xk1_TGZDW_vr28ml7dDKwHi0BbKFoXSOtXKMpUbqxfSCMkloLEc-lQoMClPC2a673GOBscyF4XmCQhxQr7svGvf_G4xxKxywWJZmhqbNmRcjYGPmUhUh56_Q1dN6-tuu4xrkDplQvdC2FHWNyF4LLK1d5XxmwxY1teTfainmzl7NreLCvPXiZc-OmC0A4L5hW_P_t_4D6hIl6Y</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Taplin, Stephanie</creator><creator>Chalmers, Jenny</creator><creator>Brown, Judith</creator><creator>Moore, Tim</creator><creator>Graham, Anne</creator><creator>McArthur, Morag</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8752-009X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</title><author>Taplin, Stephanie ; Chalmers, Jenny ; Brown, Judith ; Moore, Tim ; Graham, Anne ; McArthur, Morag</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-cf5cff566965c05dac6b4a34241eac213424f51a929f0a46322eae84d3f627133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Ethical Review</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics Committees, Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Research ethics</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taplin, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Morag</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taplin, Stephanie</au><au>Chalmers, Jenny</au><au>Brown, Judith</au><au>Moore, Tim</au><au>Graham, Anne</au><au>McArthur, Morag</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>70-83</pages><issn>1556-2646</issn><eissn>1556-2654</eissn><abstract>As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34636704</pmid><doi>10.1177/15562646211048294</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8752-009X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1556-2646
ispartof Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 2022-02, Vol.17 (1-2), p.70-83
issn 1556-2646
1556-2654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2581280375
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Australia
Child
Ethical Review
Ethics
Ethics Committees, Research
Humans
Research ethics
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Human Research Ethics Committee Experiences and Views About Children’s Participation in Research: Results From the MESSI Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Research%20Ethics%20Committee%20Experiences%20and%20Views%20About%20Children%E2%80%99s%20Participation%20in%20Research:%20Results%20From%20the%20MESSI%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20empirical%20research%20on%20human%20research%20ethics&rft.au=Taplin,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=70-83&rft.issn=1556-2646&rft.eissn=1556-2654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15562646211048294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614690363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614690363&rft_id=info:pmid/34636704&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15562646211048294&rfr_iscdi=true