Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment
Purpose The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic & physiological optics 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.133-139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 139 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 133 |
container_title | Ophthalmic & physiological optics |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena Valverde‐Megias, Alicia Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario |
description | Purpose
The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change.
Methods
A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated.
Results
Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences.
Conclusions
The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/opo.12897 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580693343</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580693343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWi8LX0ACbnTRNplkJpOlFG9QqYKuQ5qc2JHppCYzSnc-gs_okxhtdSF4NufA-fj5-RA6pGRA0wz9wg9oVkqxgXqUi7xPGWWbqEeydOeclDtoN8YnQogQotxGO4wXWSYL1kN3N1VTzXWNLbRgWj2tAZuZbh4Be4fbGWBbRfPx9u78C2icHglwPmBvuloH3PoQK99gHSPEOIem3UdbTtcRDtZ7Dz1cnN-PrvrjyeX16GzcNyxnoi9YagzGSuMstVpbbTkXgk9zZ4xxLJPcgSGFMVwKJqm01gjCgVg2LanTbA-drHIXwT93EFs1T02hrnUDvosqy0tSSMY4S-jxH_TJd6FJ7VRWkILJnLAiUacrygQfYwCnFiGpCUtFifryrJJn9e05sUfrxG46B_tL_ohNwHAFvFY1LP9PUpPbySryE_MziKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606395036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena ; Valverde‐Megias, Alicia ; Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz ; Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena ; Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creator><creatorcontrib>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena ; Valverde‐Megias, Alicia ; Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz ; Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena ; Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change.
Methods
A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated.
Results
Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences.
Conclusions
The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-1313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/opo.12897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34622963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; cycloposition ; disc‐fovea angle ; disc‐fovea axis ; Eye ; Female ; Fovea Centralis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; minimal detectable change ; ocular torsion ; Patients ; Photography ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retina ; Strabismus ; Strabismus - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.133-139</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics © 2021 The College of Optometrists</rights><rights>2021 The Authors Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics © 2021 The College of Optometrists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The College of Optometrists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9496-8925</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fopo.12897$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fopo.12897$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creatorcontrib><title>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</title><title>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</title><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><description>Purpose
The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change.
Methods
A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated.
Results
Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences.
Conclusions
The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>cycloposition</subject><subject>disc‐fovea angle</subject><subject>disc‐fovea axis</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fovea Centralis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>minimal detectable change</subject><subject>ocular torsion</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Strabismus</subject><subject>Strabismus - diagnosis</subject><issn>0275-5408</issn><issn>1475-1313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWi8LX0ACbnTRNplkJpOlFG9QqYKuQ5qc2JHppCYzSnc-gs_okxhtdSF4NufA-fj5-RA6pGRA0wz9wg9oVkqxgXqUi7xPGWWbqEeydOeclDtoN8YnQogQotxGO4wXWSYL1kN3N1VTzXWNLbRgWj2tAZuZbh4Be4fbGWBbRfPx9u78C2icHglwPmBvuloH3PoQK99gHSPEOIem3UdbTtcRDtZ7Dz1cnN-PrvrjyeX16GzcNyxnoi9YagzGSuMstVpbbTkXgk9zZ4xxLJPcgSGFMVwKJqm01gjCgVg2LanTbA-drHIXwT93EFs1T02hrnUDvosqy0tSSMY4S-jxH_TJd6FJ7VRWkILJnLAiUacrygQfYwCnFiGpCUtFifryrJJn9e05sUfrxG46B_tL_ohNwHAFvFY1LP9PUpPbySryE_MziKg</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</creator><creator>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</creator><creator>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</creator><creator>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</creator><creator>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-8925</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</title><author>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena ; Valverde‐Megias, Alicia ; Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz ; Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena ; Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>cycloposition</topic><topic>disc‐fovea angle</topic><topic>disc‐fovea axis</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fovea Centralis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>minimal detectable change</topic><topic>ocular torsion</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Strabismus</topic><topic>Strabismus - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</au><au>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</au><au>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</au><au>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</au><au>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>133-139</pages><issn>0275-5408</issn><eissn>1475-1313</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change.
Methods
A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated.
Results
Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences.
Conclusions
The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34622963</pmid><doi>10.1111/opo.12897</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-8925</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-5408 |
ispartof | Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.133-139 |
issn | 0275-5408 1475-1313 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580693343 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cross-Sectional Studies cycloposition disc‐fovea angle disc‐fovea axis Eye Female Fovea Centralis Humans Male Middle Aged minimal detectable change ocular torsion Patients Photography Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Retina Strabismus Strabismus - diagnosis |
title | Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T02%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimal%20detectable%20change%20of%20the%20disc%E2%80%90fovea%20angle%20for%20ocular%20torsion%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic%20&%20physiological%20optics&rft.au=Piedrahita%E2%80%90Alonso,%20Elena&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=133-139&rft.issn=0275-5408&rft.eissn=1475-1313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/opo.12897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580693343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606395036&rft_id=info:pmid/34622963&rfr_iscdi=true |