Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment

Purpose The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic & physiological optics 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.133-139
Hauptverfasser: Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena, Valverde‐Megias, Alicia, Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz, Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena, Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue 1
container_start_page 133
container_title Ophthalmic & physiological optics
container_volume 42
creator Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena
Valverde‐Megias, Alicia
Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz
Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena
Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario
description Purpose The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change. Methods A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated. Results Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences. Conclusions The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/opo.12897
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580693343</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580693343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWi8LX0ACbnTRNplkJpOlFG9QqYKuQ5qc2JHppCYzSnc-gs_okxhtdSF4NufA-fj5-RA6pGRA0wz9wg9oVkqxgXqUi7xPGWWbqEeydOeclDtoN8YnQogQotxGO4wXWSYL1kN3N1VTzXWNLbRgWj2tAZuZbh4Be4fbGWBbRfPx9u78C2icHglwPmBvuloH3PoQK99gHSPEOIem3UdbTtcRDtZ7Dz1cnN-PrvrjyeX16GzcNyxnoi9YagzGSuMstVpbbTkXgk9zZ4xxLJPcgSGFMVwKJqm01gjCgVg2LanTbA-drHIXwT93EFs1T02hrnUDvosqy0tSSMY4S-jxH_TJd6FJ7VRWkILJnLAiUacrygQfYwCnFiGpCUtFifryrJJn9e05sUfrxG46B_tL_ohNwHAFvFY1LP9PUpPbySryE_MziKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2606395036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena ; Valverde‐Megias, Alicia ; Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz ; Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena ; Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creator><creatorcontrib>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena ; Valverde‐Megias, Alicia ; Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz ; Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena ; Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change. Methods A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated. Results Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences. Conclusions The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-1313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/opo.12897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34622963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; cycloposition ; disc‐fovea angle ; disc‐fovea axis ; Eye ; Female ; Fovea Centralis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; minimal detectable change ; ocular torsion ; Patients ; Photography ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retina ; Strabismus ; Strabismus - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics, 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.133-139</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics © 2021 The College of Optometrists</rights><rights>2021 The Authors Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics © 2021 The College of Optometrists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The College of Optometrists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9496-8925</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fopo.12897$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fopo.12897$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34622963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creatorcontrib><title>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</title><title>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</title><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><description>Purpose The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change. Methods A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated. Results Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences. Conclusions The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>cycloposition</subject><subject>disc‐fovea angle</subject><subject>disc‐fovea axis</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fovea Centralis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>minimal detectable change</subject><subject>ocular torsion</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Strabismus</subject><subject>Strabismus - diagnosis</subject><issn>0275-5408</issn><issn>1475-1313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWi8LX0ACbnTRNplkJpOlFG9QqYKuQ5qc2JHppCYzSnc-gs_okxhtdSF4NufA-fj5-RA6pGRA0wz9wg9oVkqxgXqUi7xPGWWbqEeydOeclDtoN8YnQogQotxGO4wXWSYL1kN3N1VTzXWNLbRgWj2tAZuZbh4Be4fbGWBbRfPx9u78C2icHglwPmBvuloH3PoQK99gHSPEOIem3UdbTtcRDtZ7Dz1cnN-PrvrjyeX16GzcNyxnoi9YagzGSuMstVpbbTkXgk9zZ4xxLJPcgSGFMVwKJqm01gjCgVg2LanTbA-drHIXwT93EFs1T02hrnUDvosqy0tSSMY4S-jxH_TJd6FJ7VRWkILJnLAiUacrygQfYwCnFiGpCUtFifryrJJn9e05sUfrxG46B_tL_ohNwHAFvFY1LP9PUpPbySryE_MziKg</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</creator><creator>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</creator><creator>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</creator><creator>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</creator><creator>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-8925</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</title><author>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena ; Valverde‐Megias, Alicia ; Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz ; Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena ; Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3537-73128ecd9cfd1daadad44774b5fcccf3294fec06cc4973919ddc704e0d3b81fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>cycloposition</topic><topic>disc‐fovea angle</topic><topic>disc‐fovea axis</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fovea Centralis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>minimal detectable change</topic><topic>ocular torsion</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Strabismus</topic><topic>Strabismus - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piedrahita‐Alonso, Elena</au><au>Valverde‐Megias, Alicia</au><au>Martin‐Garcia, Beatriz</au><au>Hernandez‐Garcia, Elena</au><au>Gomez‐de‐Liano, Rosario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>133</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>133-139</pages><issn>0275-5408</issn><eissn>1475-1313</eissn><abstract>Purpose The disc‐fovea angle (DFA) is used as a relevant indicator of ocular torsion change in cyclovertical strabismus. However, interpretation of the variation in time must differentiate whether a real change has occurred or if the disparity is due to random measurement error. The aim of the study was to obtain the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the DFA. It represents the minimal variation between two measurements that may be considered a real ocular torsion change. Methods A prospective cross‐sectional study was conducted in San Carlos Clinical Hospital of Madrid, Spain. Sixty healthy right eyes from 60 patients (31 men and 29 women) were recruited. Three digital fundus photographs were obtained, and between measurements, the patient moved their head away from the head support and then returned. Two observers quantified the DFA with software designed with MATLAB. Test‐retest and interrater reliability were calculated. Results Mean participant age was 56.1 years (SD 16.6, range 25–85). Mean DFA was 8.1° (SD 3.5, range 1.3–18.5). Test‐retest reliability for Observer 1 (Ob1), Observer 2 (Ob2) and interrater reliability were excellent (ICC 0.80, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively). Precision was 2.9° (Ob1) and 3.0° (Ob2), and the MDC95 was 4.1° (Ob1) and 4.2° (Ob2). Bland‐Altman analysis revealed an absence of bias and a homoscedastic distribution of the differences. Conclusions The MDC of the DFA in fundus photography was 4°, which represents the minimal change that may be considered a real change in ocular torsion. This result may improve the interpretation of ocular torsion changes in surgery and clinical scenarios.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34622963</pmid><doi>10.1111/opo.12897</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-8925</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5408
ispartof Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2022-01, Vol.42 (1), p.133-139
issn 0275-5408
1475-1313
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580693343
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Cross-Sectional Studies
cycloposition
disc‐fovea angle
disc‐fovea axis
Eye
Female
Fovea Centralis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
minimal detectable change
ocular torsion
Patients
Photography
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Retina
Strabismus
Strabismus - diagnosis
title Minimal detectable change of the disc‐fovea angle for ocular torsion assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T02%3A25%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimal%20detectable%20change%20of%20the%20disc%E2%80%90fovea%20angle%20for%20ocular%20torsion%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic%20&%20physiological%20optics&rft.au=Piedrahita%E2%80%90Alonso,%20Elena&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=133&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=133-139&rft.issn=0275-5408&rft.eissn=1475-1313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/opo.12897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580693343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2606395036&rft_id=info:pmid/34622963&rfr_iscdi=true