Experimental validation of taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton

Metabarcoding to determine the species composition and diversity of marine zooplankton communities is a fast‐developing field in which the standardization of methods is yet to be fully achieved. The selection of genetic markers and primer choice are particularly important because they substantially...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2022-01, Vol.32 (1), p.e02469-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Govender, Ashrenee, Singh, Sohana, Groeneveld, Johan, Pillay, Sureshnee, Willows‐Munro, Sandi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e02469
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 32
creator Govender, Ashrenee
Singh, Sohana
Groeneveld, Johan
Pillay, Sureshnee
Willows‐Munro, Sandi
description Metabarcoding to determine the species composition and diversity of marine zooplankton communities is a fast‐developing field in which the standardization of methods is yet to be fully achieved. The selection of genetic markers and primer choice are particularly important because they substantially influence species detection rates and accuracy. Validation is therefore an important step in the design of metabarcoding protocols. We developed taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region and used an experimental approach to test species detection rates and primer accuracy of the newly designed primers for prawns, shrimps and crabs and published primers for marine lobsters and fish. Artificially assembled mock communities (with known species ratios) and unsorted coastal tow‐net zooplankton samples were sequenced and the detected species were compared with those seeded in mock communities to test detection rates. Taxon‐specific primers increased detection rates of target taxa compared with a universal primer set. Primer cocktails (multiple primer sets) significantly increased species detection rates compared with single primer pairs and could detect up to 100% of underrepresented target taxa in mock communities. Taxon‐specific primers recovered fewer false‐positive or false‐negative results than the universal primer. The methods used to design taxon‐specific mini‐barcodes and the experimental mock community validation protocols shown here can easily be applied to studies on other groups and will allow for a level of standardization among studies undertaken in different ecosystems or geographic locations.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eap.2469
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580693161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580693161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-1a72246b5d96f2a84472b8dd560365639259652d4d3763ef2c96c30aae5e26103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KwzAUx4Mobk7BJ5CCN9505qNJm8sx5gcM9EKvQ5qmktk2Nel088pH8Bl9ElM3FQRzk5zwOz_O-QNwjOAYQYjPtWzHOGF8BwwRJzymNMO74Q0pimHK0AAceL-A4WCM98GAJAwzitAQqNmq1c7UuulkFT3LyhSyM7aJbBl1cmWbj7d332plSqOi2jQm1Ll0yhY6avs-56PSuqjWndz8m-ahb361tq1k89jZ5hDslbLy-mh7j8D9xexuehXPby6vp5N5rEjCeYxkisMSOS04K7HMkiTFeVYUlEHCKCMcU84oLpKCpIzoEivOFIFSaqoxQ5CMwNnG2zr7tNS-E7XxSldhDG2XXmCaQcYJYiigp3_QhV26JkwngirLYEYw-xUqZ713uhT9ytKtBYKiD16E4EUffEBPtsJlXuviB_xOOgDxBngxlV7_KxKzye2X8BO51Y2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618808326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental validation of taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Govender, Ashrenee ; Singh, Sohana ; Groeneveld, Johan ; Pillay, Sureshnee ; Willows‐Munro, Sandi</creator><creatorcontrib>Govender, Ashrenee ; Singh, Sohana ; Groeneveld, Johan ; Pillay, Sureshnee ; Willows‐Munro, Sandi</creatorcontrib><description>Metabarcoding to determine the species composition and diversity of marine zooplankton communities is a fast‐developing field in which the standardization of methods is yet to be fully achieved. The selection of genetic markers and primer choice are particularly important because they substantially influence species detection rates and accuracy. Validation is therefore an important step in the design of metabarcoding protocols. We developed taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region and used an experimental approach to test species detection rates and primer accuracy of the newly designed primers for prawns, shrimps and crabs and published primers for marine lobsters and fish. Artificially assembled mock communities (with known species ratios) and unsorted coastal tow‐net zooplankton samples were sequenced and the detected species were compared with those seeded in mock communities to test detection rates. Taxon‐specific primers increased detection rates of target taxa compared with a universal primer set. Primer cocktails (multiple primer sets) significantly increased species detection rates compared with single primer pairs and could detect up to 100% of underrepresented target taxa in mock communities. Taxon‐specific primers recovered fewer false‐positive or false‐negative results than the universal primer. The methods used to design taxon‐specific mini‐barcodes and the experimental mock community validation protocols shown here can easily be applied to studies on other groups and will allow for a level of standardization among studies undertaken in different ecosystems or geographic locations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2469</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34626511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Crustaceans ; Cytochrome ; Cytochrome-c oxidase ; Cytochromes ; Decapoda ; DNA barcoding ; DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods ; Ecosystem ; Fishes ; Genetic Markers ; Geographical locations ; Lobsters ; Marine fish ; metabarcoding ; mini‐barcode ; mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) ; mock communities ; Plankton ; Prawns ; primer cocktails ; Primers ; Shellfish ; Shrimps ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Standardization ; Target detection ; Taxa ; Zooplankton ; Zooplankton - genetics</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2022-01, Vol.32 (1), p.e02469-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-1a72246b5d96f2a84472b8dd560365639259652d4d3763ef2c96c30aae5e26103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-1a72246b5d96f2a84472b8dd560365639259652d4d3763ef2c96c30aae5e26103</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3484-7800 ; 0000-0002-9831-9073 ; 0000-0002-2860-4610 ; 0000-0003-0572-369X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feap.2469$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feap.2469$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34626511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Govender, Ashrenee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sohana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Sureshnee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willows‐Munro, Sandi</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental validation of taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Metabarcoding to determine the species composition and diversity of marine zooplankton communities is a fast‐developing field in which the standardization of methods is yet to be fully achieved. The selection of genetic markers and primer choice are particularly important because they substantially influence species detection rates and accuracy. Validation is therefore an important step in the design of metabarcoding protocols. We developed taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region and used an experimental approach to test species detection rates and primer accuracy of the newly designed primers for prawns, shrimps and crabs and published primers for marine lobsters and fish. Artificially assembled mock communities (with known species ratios) and unsorted coastal tow‐net zooplankton samples were sequenced and the detected species were compared with those seeded in mock communities to test detection rates. Taxon‐specific primers increased detection rates of target taxa compared with a universal primer set. Primer cocktails (multiple primer sets) significantly increased species detection rates compared with single primer pairs and could detect up to 100% of underrepresented target taxa in mock communities. Taxon‐specific primers recovered fewer false‐positive or false‐negative results than the universal primer. The methods used to design taxon‐specific mini‐barcodes and the experimental mock community validation protocols shown here can easily be applied to studies on other groups and will allow for a level of standardization among studies undertaken in different ecosystems or geographic locations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Cytochrome</subject><subject>Cytochrome-c oxidase</subject><subject>Cytochromes</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>DNA barcoding</subject><subject>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Genetic Markers</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>Lobsters</subject><subject>Marine fish</subject><subject>metabarcoding</subject><subject>mini‐barcode</subject><subject>mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI)</subject><subject>mock communities</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Prawns</subject><subject>primer cocktails</subject><subject>Primers</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Shrimps</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Target detection</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><subject>Zooplankton - genetics</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1KwzAUx4Mobk7BJ5CCN9505qNJm8sx5gcM9EKvQ5qmktk2Nel088pH8Bl9ElM3FQRzk5zwOz_O-QNwjOAYQYjPtWzHOGF8BwwRJzymNMO74Q0pimHK0AAceL-A4WCM98GAJAwzitAQqNmq1c7UuulkFT3LyhSyM7aJbBl1cmWbj7d332plSqOi2jQm1Ll0yhY6avs-56PSuqjWndz8m-ahb361tq1k89jZ5hDslbLy-mh7j8D9xexuehXPby6vp5N5rEjCeYxkisMSOS04K7HMkiTFeVYUlEHCKCMcU84oLpKCpIzoEivOFIFSaqoxQ5CMwNnG2zr7tNS-E7XxSldhDG2XXmCaQcYJYiigp3_QhV26JkwngirLYEYw-xUqZ713uhT9ytKtBYKiD16E4EUffEBPtsJlXuviB_xOOgDxBngxlV7_KxKzye2X8BO51Y2o</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Govender, Ashrenee</creator><creator>Singh, Sohana</creator><creator>Groeneveld, Johan</creator><creator>Pillay, Sureshnee</creator><creator>Willows‐Munro, Sandi</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-7800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9831-9073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-4610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-369X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Experimental validation of taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton</title><author>Govender, Ashrenee ; Singh, Sohana ; Groeneveld, Johan ; Pillay, Sureshnee ; Willows‐Munro, Sandi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3499-1a72246b5d96f2a84472b8dd560365639259652d4d3763ef2c96c30aae5e26103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Cytochrome</topic><topic>Cytochrome-c oxidase</topic><topic>Cytochromes</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>DNA barcoding</topic><topic>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Genetic Markers</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>Lobsters</topic><topic>Marine fish</topic><topic>metabarcoding</topic><topic>mini‐barcode</topic><topic>mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI)</topic><topic>mock communities</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Prawns</topic><topic>primer cocktails</topic><topic>Primers</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Shrimps</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Target detection</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><topic>Zooplankton - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Govender, Ashrenee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sohana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groeneveld, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pillay, Sureshnee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willows‐Munro, Sandi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Govender, Ashrenee</au><au>Singh, Sohana</au><au>Groeneveld, Johan</au><au>Pillay, Sureshnee</au><au>Willows‐Munro, Sandi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental validation of taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e02469</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e02469-n/a</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Metabarcoding to determine the species composition and diversity of marine zooplankton communities is a fast‐developing field in which the standardization of methods is yet to be fully achieved. The selection of genetic markers and primer choice are particularly important because they substantially influence species detection rates and accuracy. Validation is therefore an important step in the design of metabarcoding protocols. We developed taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region and used an experimental approach to test species detection rates and primer accuracy of the newly designed primers for prawns, shrimps and crabs and published primers for marine lobsters and fish. Artificially assembled mock communities (with known species ratios) and unsorted coastal tow‐net zooplankton samples were sequenced and the detected species were compared with those seeded in mock communities to test detection rates. Taxon‐specific primers increased detection rates of target taxa compared with a universal primer set. Primer cocktails (multiple primer sets) significantly increased species detection rates compared with single primer pairs and could detect up to 100% of underrepresented target taxa in mock communities. Taxon‐specific primers recovered fewer false‐positive or false‐negative results than the universal primer. The methods used to design taxon‐specific mini‐barcodes and the experimental mock community validation protocols shown here can easily be applied to studies on other groups and will allow for a level of standardization among studies undertaken in different ecosystems or geographic locations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>34626511</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2469</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3484-7800</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9831-9073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-4610</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0572-369X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2022-01, Vol.32 (1), p.e02469-n/a
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580693161
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animals
Crustaceans
Cytochrome
Cytochrome-c oxidase
Cytochromes
Decapoda
DNA barcoding
DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic - methods
Ecosystem
Fishes
Genetic Markers
Geographical locations
Lobsters
Marine fish
metabarcoding
mini‐barcode
mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI)
mock communities
Plankton
Prawns
primer cocktails
Primers
Shellfish
Shrimps
Species composition
Species diversity
Standardization
Target detection
Taxa
Zooplankton
Zooplankton - genetics
title Experimental validation of taxon‐specific mini‐barcode primers for metabarcoding of zooplankton
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20validation%20of%20taxon%E2%80%90specific%20mini%E2%80%90barcode%20primers%20for%20metabarcoding%20of%20zooplankton&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Govender,%20Ashrenee&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e02469&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e02469-n/a&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2469&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580693161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618808326&rft_id=info:pmid/34626511&rfr_iscdi=true