Comparison of Apical Root Resorption in Patients Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study

AIM AND OBJECTIVETo carry out comparison of apical root resorption (ARR) in the fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALSThe study was conducted on 576 roots in 110 patients. These patients were divided into tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of contemporary dental practice 2021-07, Vol.22 (7), p.763-768
Hauptverfasser: LNU, Jyotirmay, Gupta, Abhinov R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 768
container_issue 7
container_start_page 763
container_title The journal of contemporary dental practice
container_volume 22
creator LNU, Jyotirmay
Gupta, Abhinov R
description AIM AND OBJECTIVETo carry out comparison of apical root resorption (ARR) in the fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALSThe study was conducted on 576 roots in 110 patients. These patients were divided into two groups such that each group consisted of 55 patients. A total of 288 roots were analyzed in each group. One group consisted of patients treated with the conventional fixed orthodontic appliance. Another group consisted of patients treated with clear aligners. Radiographic images were collected with the help of CBCT for each patient. One image was collected before treatment while another image was collected after treatment. The length of the root of the anterior tooth was measured with the help of CBCT images. The ARR was calculated for each tooth by obtaining the difference between the length of the root measured before orthodontic treatment and after orthodontic treatment. The data were recorded, and statistical analysis was carried out with the help of the paired t test and Chi-square test to compare ARR between the two groups. RESULTSThe ARR was more in patients who were treated with fixed orthodontic treatment than in those patients who were treated with clear aligners. The mean value of ARR in fixed orthodontic appliances was 1.51 ± 1.34 mm, whereas the mean value of ARR in clear aligners was 1.12 ± 1.34 mm. The severity of ARR in the clear aligners group (on average) was significantly less than that in the fixed appliances group (on average). It was found that ARR in each individual's tooth included in the study was more in case of the fixed orthodontic appliance as compared with clear aligners (p
doi_str_mv 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580025744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580025744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2519-8e32bc99bb55cf6342127d4fa787f5199ea8542f6f270ba351583ac1bf4de6c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkVtLxDAQhYsoeP0Lkkdfqk3S9OLbUryBoOj6HNJ04mZpk5ik6P4O_7BZL-DTHJiPM5w5WXaKi3NWFOxi7fK1nb0RY8hxUZAypxi3O9kBZqTKaY3x7j-9nx2GsE4YJXVxkH12dnLC62ANsgotnJZiRE_WRvQEwXoXddpogx5F1GBiQEsPIsKA3nVcoWv9keSDjys7WBO1TA5u1MJIQMIMqBtBeLQY9asBHy7RAnXWQN6DmND28rx1WtrJvnrhVhv0HOdhc5ztqRQGTn7nUfZyfbXsbvP7h5u7bnGfS8JwmzdASS_btu8Zk6qiJcGkHkol6qZWCWhBNKwkqlIpaS8ow6yhQuJelQNUktKj7OzH13n7NkOIfNJBwjgKA3YOnLAm_YnVZZnQ6geV3obgQXHn9ST8huOCb1vga8f_WuDfLfBtC_QLKLuAbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580025744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Apical Root Resorption in Patients Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LNU, Jyotirmay ; Gupta, Abhinov R</creator><creatorcontrib>LNU, Jyotirmay ; Gupta, Abhinov R</creatorcontrib><description>AIM AND OBJECTIVETo carry out comparison of apical root resorption (ARR) in the fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALSThe study was conducted on 576 roots in 110 patients. These patients were divided into two groups such that each group consisted of 55 patients. A total of 288 roots were analyzed in each group. One group consisted of patients treated with the conventional fixed orthodontic appliance. Another group consisted of patients treated with clear aligners. Radiographic images were collected with the help of CBCT for each patient. One image was collected before treatment while another image was collected after treatment. The length of the root of the anterior tooth was measured with the help of CBCT images. The ARR was calculated for each tooth by obtaining the difference between the length of the root measured before orthodontic treatment and after orthodontic treatment. The data were recorded, and statistical analysis was carried out with the help of the paired t test and Chi-square test to compare ARR between the two groups. RESULTSThe ARR was more in patients who were treated with fixed orthodontic treatment than in those patients who were treated with clear aligners. The mean value of ARR in fixed orthodontic appliances was 1.51 ± 1.34 mm, whereas the mean value of ARR in clear aligners was 1.12 ± 1.34 mm. The severity of ARR in the clear aligners group (on average) was significantly less than that in the fixed appliances group (on average). It was found that ARR in each individual's tooth included in the study was more in case of the fixed orthodontic appliance as compared with clear aligners (p &lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONFrom the present study, it can be concluded that the amount of resorption at the root apex is less among patients who undergo treatment using clear aligners as compared with those treated with conventional fixed orthodontics appliances. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEARR found in the orthodontic treatment is a process that causes loss of hard dental tissues such as dentine and cementum at the root apex. Fixed orthodontic appliances are most common method of orthodontic treatment. However, clear aligners are also used commonly for orthodontic treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-3711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3119</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Dentistry</subject><ispartof>The journal of contemporary dental practice, 2021-07, Vol.22 (7), p.763-768</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2519-8e32bc99bb55cf6342127d4fa787f5199ea8542f6f270ba351583ac1bf4de6c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2519-8e32bc99bb55cf6342127d4fa787f5199ea8542f6f270ba351583ac1bf4de6c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>LNU, Jyotirmay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Abhinov R</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Apical Root Resorption in Patients Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study</title><title>The journal of contemporary dental practice</title><description>AIM AND OBJECTIVETo carry out comparison of apical root resorption (ARR) in the fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALSThe study was conducted on 576 roots in 110 patients. These patients were divided into two groups such that each group consisted of 55 patients. A total of 288 roots were analyzed in each group. One group consisted of patients treated with the conventional fixed orthodontic appliance. Another group consisted of patients treated with clear aligners. Radiographic images were collected with the help of CBCT for each patient. One image was collected before treatment while another image was collected after treatment. The length of the root of the anterior tooth was measured with the help of CBCT images. The ARR was calculated for each tooth by obtaining the difference between the length of the root measured before orthodontic treatment and after orthodontic treatment. The data were recorded, and statistical analysis was carried out with the help of the paired t test and Chi-square test to compare ARR between the two groups. RESULTSThe ARR was more in patients who were treated with fixed orthodontic treatment than in those patients who were treated with clear aligners. The mean value of ARR in fixed orthodontic appliances was 1.51 ± 1.34 mm, whereas the mean value of ARR in clear aligners was 1.12 ± 1.34 mm. The severity of ARR in the clear aligners group (on average) was significantly less than that in the fixed appliances group (on average). It was found that ARR in each individual's tooth included in the study was more in case of the fixed orthodontic appliance as compared with clear aligners (p &lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONFrom the present study, it can be concluded that the amount of resorption at the root apex is less among patients who undergo treatment using clear aligners as compared with those treated with conventional fixed orthodontics appliances. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEARR found in the orthodontic treatment is a process that causes loss of hard dental tissues such as dentine and cementum at the root apex. Fixed orthodontic appliances are most common method of orthodontic treatment. However, clear aligners are also used commonly for orthodontic treatment.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><issn>1526-3711</issn><issn>1526-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkVtLxDAQhYsoeP0Lkkdfqk3S9OLbUryBoOj6HNJ04mZpk5ik6P4O_7BZL-DTHJiPM5w5WXaKi3NWFOxi7fK1nb0RY8hxUZAypxi3O9kBZqTKaY3x7j-9nx2GsE4YJXVxkH12dnLC62ANsgotnJZiRE_WRvQEwXoXddpogx5F1GBiQEsPIsKA3nVcoWv9keSDjys7WBO1TA5u1MJIQMIMqBtBeLQY9asBHy7RAnXWQN6DmND28rx1WtrJvnrhVhv0HOdhc5ztqRQGTn7nUfZyfbXsbvP7h5u7bnGfS8JwmzdASS_btu8Zk6qiJcGkHkol6qZWCWhBNKwkqlIpaS8ow6yhQuJelQNUktKj7OzH13n7NkOIfNJBwjgKA3YOnLAm_YnVZZnQ6geV3obgQXHn9ST8huOCb1vga8f_WuDfLfBtC_QLKLuAbw</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>LNU, Jyotirmay</creator><creator>Gupta, Abhinov R</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Comparison of Apical Root Resorption in Patients Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study</title><author>LNU, Jyotirmay ; Gupta, Abhinov R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2519-8e32bc99bb55cf6342127d4fa787f5199ea8542f6f270ba351583ac1bf4de6c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LNU, Jyotirmay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Abhinov R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of contemporary dental practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LNU, Jyotirmay</au><au>Gupta, Abhinov R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Apical Root Resorption in Patients Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of contemporary dental practice</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>763</spage><epage>768</epage><pages>763-768</pages><issn>1526-3711</issn><eissn>1526-3711</eissn><abstract>AIM AND OBJECTIVETo carry out comparison of apical root resorption (ARR) in the fixed orthodontic appliance and clear aligners with the help of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALSThe study was conducted on 576 roots in 110 patients. These patients were divided into two groups such that each group consisted of 55 patients. A total of 288 roots were analyzed in each group. One group consisted of patients treated with the conventional fixed orthodontic appliance. Another group consisted of patients treated with clear aligners. Radiographic images were collected with the help of CBCT for each patient. One image was collected before treatment while another image was collected after treatment. The length of the root of the anterior tooth was measured with the help of CBCT images. The ARR was calculated for each tooth by obtaining the difference between the length of the root measured before orthodontic treatment and after orthodontic treatment. The data were recorded, and statistical analysis was carried out with the help of the paired t test and Chi-square test to compare ARR between the two groups. RESULTSThe ARR was more in patients who were treated with fixed orthodontic treatment than in those patients who were treated with clear aligners. The mean value of ARR in fixed orthodontic appliances was 1.51 ± 1.34 mm, whereas the mean value of ARR in clear aligners was 1.12 ± 1.34 mm. The severity of ARR in the clear aligners group (on average) was significantly less than that in the fixed appliances group (on average). It was found that ARR in each individual's tooth included in the study was more in case of the fixed orthodontic appliance as compared with clear aligners (p &lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONFrom the present study, it can be concluded that the amount of resorption at the root apex is less among patients who undergo treatment using clear aligners as compared with those treated with conventional fixed orthodontics appliances. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCEARR found in the orthodontic treatment is a process that causes loss of hard dental tissues such as dentine and cementum at the root apex. Fixed orthodontic appliances are most common method of orthodontic treatment. However, clear aligners are also used commonly for orthodontic treatment.</abstract><doi>10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3119</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-3711
ispartof The journal of contemporary dental practice, 2021-07, Vol.22 (7), p.763-768
issn 1526-3711
1526-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580025744
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Dentistry
title Comparison of Apical Root Resorption in Patients Treated with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance and Clear Aligners: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A00%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Apical%20Root%20Resorption%20in%20Patients%20Treated%20with%20Fixed%20Orthodontic%20Appliance%20and%20Clear%20Aligners:%20A%20Cone-beam%20Computed%20Tomography%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20contemporary%20dental%20practice&rft.au=LNU,%20Jyotirmay&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=763&rft.epage=768&rft.pages=763-768&rft.issn=1526-3711&rft.eissn=1526-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580025744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580025744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true