Usefulness of structured‐cadaveric training for trans‐anal pelvic exenteration

Purpose Structured training using cadaveric simulation is useful for trans‐anal surgery; however, no studies have examined the effectiveness of cadaveric training for advanced trans‐anal surgery including pelvic exenteration (PE). Methods Twelve colorectal surgeons attended a total of 10 cadaveric s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian journal of endoscopic surgery 2022-04, Vol.15 (2), p.299-305
Hauptverfasser: Tominaga, Tetsuro, Nonaka, Takashi, Fukuda, Akiko, Moriyama, Masaaki, Oyama, Shosaburo, Ishii, Mitsutoshi, Takamura, Keiko, Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki, Sawai, Terumitsu, Nagayasu, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue 2
container_start_page 299
container_title Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
container_volume 15
creator Tominaga, Tetsuro
Nonaka, Takashi
Fukuda, Akiko
Moriyama, Masaaki
Oyama, Shosaburo
Ishii, Mitsutoshi
Takamura, Keiko
Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki
Sawai, Terumitsu
Nagayasu, Takeshi
description Purpose Structured training using cadaveric simulation is useful for trans‐anal surgery; however, no studies have examined the effectiveness of cadaveric training for advanced trans‐anal surgery including pelvic exenteration (PE). Methods Twelve colorectal surgeons attended a total of 10 cadaveric simulation training courses between 2016 and 2021 and completed a questionnaire at the end of the program. We divided 14 consecutive patients who underwent trans‐anal PE between 2015 and 2021 into two groups: pre‐training group and post‐training group, and compared the clinico‐pathological features between the groups. Results The median length of clinical experience of the surgeons was 12 years. There was high score agreement among the surgeons that the course was useful for recognition of anatomical and layer structure, training for trans‐anal total mesorectal excision and trans‐anal PE, and reducing complications specific to the trans‐anal approach. Compared with the pre‐training group, patients in the post‐training group had a higher rate of two‐team surgery (77.8% vs 0%, P = .021), and shorter time to specimen removal (273 vs 423 min, P = .045). Conclusions Structured‐cadaveric training has potential use as a technical step‐up in advanced trans‐anal surgery that might contribute to better short‐term outcomes in the clinical setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ases.12998
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580025044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2646469871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-3c674e22f9e41465bdc152055465d2a5f3039392b44b4660f04e6b4d0e3a349e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gA25EmJrrXJal1AsUBGvXIZM5I1OmmZrMVLvzEXxGn8TUqV24MFnkhHz8hB-hc4KHxK8b5cANCU3T5AD1SSySUKQEH-5nTHvoxLkFxlFMODtGPcYjErOU9dHT3EHRVgacC-oicI1tddNayL8-PrXK1RpsqYPGqtKU5iUoaru9GOeflVFVsIJq7QG8g2nAqqaszSk6KlTl4Gx3DtD8dvI8vg-nj3cP49E01JyyJGQ6ijlQWqTACY9ElmsiKBbCzzlVomDY_zClGecZjyJcYA5RxnMMTDGeAhugqy53ZevXFlwjl6XTUFXKQN06SUWCMRWYc08v_9BF3Vr_f68i7neaxMSr605pWztnoZArWy6V3UiC5bZpuW1a_jTt8cUuss2WkO_pb7UekA68lRVs_omSo9lk1oV-A5X5iik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2646469871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of structured‐cadaveric training for trans‐anal pelvic exenteration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tominaga, Tetsuro ; Nonaka, Takashi ; Fukuda, Akiko ; Moriyama, Masaaki ; Oyama, Shosaburo ; Ishii, Mitsutoshi ; Takamura, Keiko ; Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki ; Sawai, Terumitsu ; Nagayasu, Takeshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Tetsuro ; Nonaka, Takashi ; Fukuda, Akiko ; Moriyama, Masaaki ; Oyama, Shosaburo ; Ishii, Mitsutoshi ; Takamura, Keiko ; Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki ; Sawai, Terumitsu ; Nagayasu, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Structured training using cadaveric simulation is useful for trans‐anal surgery; however, no studies have examined the effectiveness of cadaveric training for advanced trans‐anal surgery including pelvic exenteration (PE). Methods Twelve colorectal surgeons attended a total of 10 cadaveric simulation training courses between 2016 and 2021 and completed a questionnaire at the end of the program. We divided 14 consecutive patients who underwent trans‐anal PE between 2015 and 2021 into two groups: pre‐training group and post‐training group, and compared the clinico‐pathological features between the groups. Results The median length of clinical experience of the surgeons was 12 years. There was high score agreement among the surgeons that the course was useful for recognition of anatomical and layer structure, training for trans‐anal total mesorectal excision and trans‐anal PE, and reducing complications specific to the trans‐anal approach. Compared with the pre‐training group, patients in the post‐training group had a higher rate of two‐team surgery (77.8% vs 0%, P = .021), and shorter time to specimen removal (273 vs 423 min, P = .045). Conclusions Structured‐cadaveric training has potential use as a technical step‐up in advanced trans‐anal surgery that might contribute to better short‐term outcomes in the clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-5902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ases.12998</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34617393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kyoto, Japan: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Anal Canal - surgery ; Cadaver ; cadaveric training ; Humans ; Pelvic Exenteration ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; total pelvic exenteration ; trans‐anal approach</subject><ispartof>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2022-04, Vol.15 (2), p.299-305</ispartof><rights>2021 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-3c674e22f9e41465bdc152055465d2a5f3039392b44b4660f04e6b4d0e3a349e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-3c674e22f9e41465bdc152055465d2a5f3039392b44b4660f04e6b4d0e3a349e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fases.12998$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fases.12998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Tetsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonaka, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriyama, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Shosaburo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishii, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamura, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawai, Terumitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagayasu, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of structured‐cadaveric training for trans‐anal pelvic exenteration</title><title>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Structured training using cadaveric simulation is useful for trans‐anal surgery; however, no studies have examined the effectiveness of cadaveric training for advanced trans‐anal surgery including pelvic exenteration (PE). Methods Twelve colorectal surgeons attended a total of 10 cadaveric simulation training courses between 2016 and 2021 and completed a questionnaire at the end of the program. We divided 14 consecutive patients who underwent trans‐anal PE between 2015 and 2021 into two groups: pre‐training group and post‐training group, and compared the clinico‐pathological features between the groups. Results The median length of clinical experience of the surgeons was 12 years. There was high score agreement among the surgeons that the course was useful for recognition of anatomical and layer structure, training for trans‐anal total mesorectal excision and trans‐anal PE, and reducing complications specific to the trans‐anal approach. Compared with the pre‐training group, patients in the post‐training group had a higher rate of two‐team surgery (77.8% vs 0%, P = .021), and shorter time to specimen removal (273 vs 423 min, P = .045). Conclusions Structured‐cadaveric training has potential use as a technical step‐up in advanced trans‐anal surgery that might contribute to better short‐term outcomes in the clinical setting.</description><subject>Anal Canal - surgery</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>cadaveric training</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pelvic Exenteration</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>total pelvic exenteration</subject><subject>trans‐anal approach</subject><issn>1758-5902</issn><issn>1758-5910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VjQ8gA25EmJrrXJal1AsUBGvXIZM5I1OmmZrMVLvzEXxGn8TUqV24MFnkhHz8hB-hc4KHxK8b5cANCU3T5AD1SSySUKQEH-5nTHvoxLkFxlFMODtGPcYjErOU9dHT3EHRVgacC-oicI1tddNayL8-PrXK1RpsqYPGqtKU5iUoaru9GOeflVFVsIJq7QG8g2nAqqaszSk6KlTl4Gx3DtD8dvI8vg-nj3cP49E01JyyJGQ6ijlQWqTACY9ElmsiKBbCzzlVomDY_zClGecZjyJcYA5RxnMMTDGeAhugqy53ZevXFlwjl6XTUFXKQN06SUWCMRWYc08v_9BF3Vr_f68i7neaxMSr605pWztnoZArWy6V3UiC5bZpuW1a_jTt8cUuss2WkO_pb7UekA68lRVs_omSo9lk1oV-A5X5iik</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Tominaga, Tetsuro</creator><creator>Nonaka, Takashi</creator><creator>Fukuda, Akiko</creator><creator>Moriyama, Masaaki</creator><creator>Oyama, Shosaburo</creator><creator>Ishii, Mitsutoshi</creator><creator>Takamura, Keiko</creator><creator>Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki</creator><creator>Sawai, Terumitsu</creator><creator>Nagayasu, Takeshi</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Usefulness of structured‐cadaveric training for trans‐anal pelvic exenteration</title><author>Tominaga, Tetsuro ; Nonaka, Takashi ; Fukuda, Akiko ; Moriyama, Masaaki ; Oyama, Shosaburo ; Ishii, Mitsutoshi ; Takamura, Keiko ; Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki ; Sawai, Terumitsu ; Nagayasu, Takeshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-3c674e22f9e41465bdc152055465d2a5f3039392b44b4660f04e6b4d0e3a349e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anal Canal - surgery</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>cadaveric training</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pelvic Exenteration</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>total pelvic exenteration</topic><topic>trans‐anal approach</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Tetsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonaka, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moriyama, Masaaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Shosaburo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishii, Mitsutoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamura, Keiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawai, Terumitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagayasu, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tominaga, Tetsuro</au><au>Nonaka, Takashi</au><au>Fukuda, Akiko</au><au>Moriyama, Masaaki</au><au>Oyama, Shosaburo</au><au>Ishii, Mitsutoshi</au><au>Takamura, Keiko</au><au>Tsurumoto, Toshiyuki</au><au>Sawai, Terumitsu</au><au>Nagayasu, Takeshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of structured‐cadaveric training for trans‐anal pelvic exenteration</atitle><jtitle>Asian journal of endoscopic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Asian J Endosc Surg</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>299-305</pages><issn>1758-5902</issn><eissn>1758-5910</eissn><abstract>Purpose Structured training using cadaveric simulation is useful for trans‐anal surgery; however, no studies have examined the effectiveness of cadaveric training for advanced trans‐anal surgery including pelvic exenteration (PE). Methods Twelve colorectal surgeons attended a total of 10 cadaveric simulation training courses between 2016 and 2021 and completed a questionnaire at the end of the program. We divided 14 consecutive patients who underwent trans‐anal PE between 2015 and 2021 into two groups: pre‐training group and post‐training group, and compared the clinico‐pathological features between the groups. Results The median length of clinical experience of the surgeons was 12 years. There was high score agreement among the surgeons that the course was useful for recognition of anatomical and layer structure, training for trans‐anal total mesorectal excision and trans‐anal PE, and reducing complications specific to the trans‐anal approach. Compared with the pre‐training group, patients in the post‐training group had a higher rate of two‐team surgery (77.8% vs 0%, P = .021), and shorter time to specimen removal (273 vs 423 min, P = .045). Conclusions Structured‐cadaveric training has potential use as a technical step‐up in advanced trans‐anal surgery that might contribute to better short‐term outcomes in the clinical setting.</abstract><cop>Kyoto, Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>34617393</pmid><doi>10.1111/ases.12998</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-5902
ispartof Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2022-04, Vol.15 (2), p.299-305
issn 1758-5902
1758-5910
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580025044
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anal Canal - surgery
Cadaver
cadaveric training
Humans
Pelvic Exenteration
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgeons
Surgery
total pelvic exenteration
trans‐anal approach
title Usefulness of structured‐cadaveric training for trans‐anal pelvic exenteration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A09%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20structured%E2%80%90cadaveric%20training%20for%20trans%E2%80%90anal%20pelvic%20exenteration&rft.jtitle=Asian%20journal%20of%20endoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Tominaga,%20Tetsuro&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=299-305&rft.issn=1758-5902&rft.eissn=1758-5910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ases.12998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2646469871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2646469871&rft_id=info:pmid/34617393&rfr_iscdi=true