Turkish validation of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐benefit scale
Background There are no validated tools to examine the risk and benefits of family presence and nurses' self‐confidence during resuscitation in Turkey. Aim This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the family presence risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence sc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nursing in critical care 2022-05, Vol.27 (3), p.440-449 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 449 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 440 |
| container_title | Nursing in critical care |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Öztürk, Esma Ayşe Koç, Zeliha |
| description | Background
There are no validated tools to examine the risk and benefits of family presence and nurses' self‐confidence during resuscitation in Turkey.
Aim
This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the family presence risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale in Turkish as well as its psychometric characteristics.
Methods
The sample of the study consisted of 427 nurses. The forward‐backward translation method was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the scales. In order to evaluate the time invariances of the scales, the relationship between the scores obtained from the first and second applications was examined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results
The Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO) value of the family presence risk‐benefit scale was found to be 0.876 while the KMO value of the family presence self‐confidence scale was found to be 0.927. Positive linear correlations with high levels of significance and respective values of 82.5% and 93.5% were found between the total scores of the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales and their retest scores.
Conclusion
The Turkish versions of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale were found to be valid and reliable tools that could be used to determine the perceptions of nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation.
Relevance to clinical practice
Using the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales, both of which have been tested for validity and reliability in Turkish, the perceptions of intensive care nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation can be determined as well as their self‐confidence on the subject, making the development of policies on the subject possible. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nicc.12721 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580024627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2660497708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-7a8f31027161fbbd8ab907f65ce72bb2b534a82de06f77106c7498a631445edb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFO3DAQBmCrKgJKufAAKFIvqFKox47t7BGtoKyEyqH0bNnOuBiyyWInoL3xCDwjT1IvWXroob7Ylj79mvkJOQJ6Cvl864Jzp8AUgw9kHypVlwIE_5jfXLISKKg98imlO0oZFYLvkj1eSVBc1vvk580Y70O6LR5NGxozhL4rel8Mt1h4swztulhFTNg5LJoxhu53kb9jcmGYbAzp_vX5xWKHPgxFcqbFz2THmzbh4fY-IL8uzm_ml-XV9ffF_OyqdFwoKJWpPQfKFEjw1ja1sTOqvBQOFbOWWcErU7MGqfRKAZVOVbPaSA5VJbCx_ICcTLmr2D-MmAa9DMlh25oO-zFpJuq8ciWZyvTLP_SuH2OXp9NMSlrNlKJ1Vl8n5WKfUkSvVzEsTVxroHpTtd5Urd-qzvh4GznaJTZ_6Xu3GcAEnkKL6_9E6R-L-XwK_QOh44lt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2660497708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Turkish validation of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐benefit scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Öztürk, Esma Ayşe ; Koç, Zeliha</creator><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Esma Ayşe ; Koç, Zeliha</creatorcontrib><description>Background
There are no validated tools to examine the risk and benefits of family presence and nurses' self‐confidence during resuscitation in Turkey.
Aim
This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the family presence risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale in Turkish as well as its psychometric characteristics.
Methods
The sample of the study consisted of 427 nurses. The forward‐backward translation method was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the scales. In order to evaluate the time invariances of the scales, the relationship between the scores obtained from the first and second applications was examined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results
The Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO) value of the family presence risk‐benefit scale was found to be 0.876 while the KMO value of the family presence self‐confidence scale was found to be 0.927. Positive linear correlations with high levels of significance and respective values of 82.5% and 93.5% were found between the total scores of the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales and their retest scores.
Conclusion
The Turkish versions of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale were found to be valid and reliable tools that could be used to determine the perceptions of nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation.
Relevance to clinical practice
Using the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales, both of which have been tested for validity and reliability in Turkish, the perceptions of intensive care nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation can be determined as well as their self‐confidence on the subject, making the development of policies on the subject possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-1017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-5153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12721</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34617368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; CPR ; Critical care ; Families & family life ; Family ; Humans ; Medical ethics ; Nurses ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; relatives‐presence during resuscitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; resuscitation ; Risk Assessment ; role of health care professionals ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translations ; Turkey ; Validity ; witnessed resuscitation</subject><ispartof>Nursing in critical care, 2022-05, Vol.27 (3), p.440-449</ispartof><rights>2021 British Association of Critical Care Nurses.</rights><rights>2022 British Association of Critical Care Nurses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-7a8f31027161fbbd8ab907f65ce72bb2b534a82de06f77106c7498a631445edb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-7a8f31027161fbbd8ab907f65ce72bb2b534a82de06f77106c7498a631445edb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8702-5360</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnicc.12721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnicc.12721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34617368$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Esma Ayşe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koç, Zeliha</creatorcontrib><title>Turkish validation of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐benefit scale</title><title>Nursing in critical care</title><addtitle>Nurs Crit Care</addtitle><description>Background
There are no validated tools to examine the risk and benefits of family presence and nurses' self‐confidence during resuscitation in Turkey.
Aim
This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the family presence risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale in Turkish as well as its psychometric characteristics.
Methods
The sample of the study consisted of 427 nurses. The forward‐backward translation method was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the scales. In order to evaluate the time invariances of the scales, the relationship between the scores obtained from the first and second applications was examined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results
The Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO) value of the family presence risk‐benefit scale was found to be 0.876 while the KMO value of the family presence self‐confidence scale was found to be 0.927. Positive linear correlations with high levels of significance and respective values of 82.5% and 93.5% were found between the total scores of the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales and their retest scores.
Conclusion
The Turkish versions of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale were found to be valid and reliable tools that could be used to determine the perceptions of nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation.
Relevance to clinical practice
Using the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales, both of which have been tested for validity and reliability in Turkish, the perceptions of intensive care nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation can be determined as well as their self‐confidence on the subject, making the development of policies on the subject possible.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>CPR</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>relatives‐presence during resuscitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>resuscitation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>role of health care professionals</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translations</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>witnessed resuscitation</subject><issn>1362-1017</issn><issn>1478-5153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MFO3DAQBmCrKgJKufAAKFIvqFKox47t7BGtoKyEyqH0bNnOuBiyyWInoL3xCDwjT1IvWXroob7Ylj79mvkJOQJ6Cvl864Jzp8AUgw9kHypVlwIE_5jfXLISKKg98imlO0oZFYLvkj1eSVBc1vvk580Y70O6LR5NGxozhL4rel8Mt1h4swztulhFTNg5LJoxhu53kb9jcmGYbAzp_vX5xWKHPgxFcqbFz2THmzbh4fY-IL8uzm_ml-XV9ffF_OyqdFwoKJWpPQfKFEjw1ja1sTOqvBQOFbOWWcErU7MGqfRKAZVOVbPaSA5VJbCx_ICcTLmr2D-MmAa9DMlh25oO-zFpJuq8ciWZyvTLP_SuH2OXp9NMSlrNlKJ1Vl8n5WKfUkSvVzEsTVxroHpTtd5Urd-qzvh4GznaJTZ_6Xu3GcAEnkKL6_9E6R-L-XwK_QOh44lt</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Öztürk, Esma Ayşe</creator><creator>Koç, Zeliha</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8702-5360</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Turkish validation of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐benefit scale</title><author>Öztürk, Esma Ayşe ; Koç, Zeliha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3571-7a8f31027161fbbd8ab907f65ce72bb2b534a82de06f77106c7498a631445edb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>CPR</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>relatives‐presence during resuscitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>resuscitation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>role of health care professionals</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translations</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>witnessed resuscitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Öztürk, Esma Ayşe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koç, Zeliha</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nursing in critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Öztürk, Esma Ayşe</au><au>Koç, Zeliha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Turkish validation of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐benefit scale</atitle><jtitle>Nursing in critical care</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Crit Care</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>440</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>440-449</pages><issn>1362-1017</issn><eissn>1478-5153</eissn><abstract>Background
There are no validated tools to examine the risk and benefits of family presence and nurses' self‐confidence during resuscitation in Turkey.
Aim
This study aimed to test the validity and reliability of the family presence risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale in Turkish as well as its psychometric characteristics.
Methods
The sample of the study consisted of 427 nurses. The forward‐backward translation method was used. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the scales. In order to evaluate the time invariances of the scales, the relationship between the scores obtained from the first and second applications was examined using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results
The Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO) value of the family presence risk‐benefit scale was found to be 0.876 while the KMO value of the family presence self‐confidence scale was found to be 0.927. Positive linear correlations with high levels of significance and respective values of 82.5% and 93.5% were found between the total scores of the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales and their retest scores.
Conclusion
The Turkish versions of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐ benefit scale and the family presence self‐confidence scale were found to be valid and reliable tools that could be used to determine the perceptions of nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation.
Relevance to clinical practice
Using the family presence risk–benefit and family presence self‐confidence scales, both of which have been tested for validity and reliability in Turkish, the perceptions of intensive care nurses regarding the risks and benefits of family presence during resuscitation can be determined as well as their self‐confidence on the subject, making the development of policies on the subject possible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34617368</pmid><doi>10.1111/nicc.12721</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8702-5360</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1362-1017 |
| ispartof | Nursing in critical care, 2022-05, Vol.27 (3), p.440-449 |
| issn | 1362-1017 1478-5153 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2580024627 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Cardiopulmonary resuscitation CPR Critical care Families & family life Family Humans Medical ethics Nurses Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Questionnaires relatives‐presence during resuscitation Reproducibility of Results resuscitation Risk Assessment role of health care professionals Surveys and Questionnaires Translations Turkey Validity witnessed resuscitation |
| title | Turkish validation of the family presence during resuscitation risk‐benefit scale |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T00%3A33%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Turkish%20validation%20of%20the%20family%20presence%20during%20resuscitation%20risk%E2%80%90benefit%20scale&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20in%20critical%20care&rft.au=%C3%96zt%C3%BCrk,%20Esma%20Ay%C5%9Fe&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=440&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=440-449&rft.issn=1362-1017&rft.eissn=1478-5153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nicc.12721&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2660497708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2660497708&rft_id=info:pmid/34617368&rfr_iscdi=true |