Long‐term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: A longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow‐up

Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the long‐term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add‐on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsia (Copenhagen) 2021-12, Vol.62 (12), p.2994-3004
Hauptverfasser: Strzelczyk, Adam, Zaveta, Clara, Podewils, Felix, Möddel, Gabriel, Langenbruch, Lisa, Kovac, Stjepana, Mann, Catrin, Willems, Laurent M., Schulz, Juliane, Fiedler, Barbara, Kurlemann, Gerhard, Schubert‐Bast, Susanne, Rosenow, Felix, Beuchat, Isabelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3004
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2994
container_title Epilepsia (Copenhagen)
container_volume 62
creator Strzelczyk, Adam
Zaveta, Clara
Podewils, Felix
Möddel, Gabriel
Langenbruch, Lisa
Kovac, Stjepana
Mann, Catrin
Willems, Laurent M.
Schulz, Juliane
Fiedler, Barbara
Kurlemann, Gerhard
Schubert‐Bast, Susanne
Rosenow, Felix
Beuchat, Isabelle
description Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the long‐term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add‐on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021. Results Long‐term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5–81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost‐to‐follow‐up), including 10.9% reported as seizure‐free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow‐up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25–400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short‐term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long‐term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons. Significance BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of >50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short‐term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long‐term outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/epi.17087
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579380324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579380324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-8a245b843700b48bdf7aacd503a0a2d66cd15fd7d74265f2a743197651a47a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9u1DAUhy0EosPAggsgS2xAIq0dJ7aHXVUVqDQSLLqPXvwHXDlxsJ2OsuMIHKCLnoWjcBJcUlgg4Y1l-9P3nt8PoeeUHNOyTszkjqkgUjxAG9rWsqKUi4doQwhl1a6V5Ag9SemKECK4YI_REWs4kbyWG3SzD-Pnn9--ZxMHbKx1CtTyBufgTYTeeZfLCUaNo8lmzC6MOFjcR3cNEZTJMGA34tKAN1NacI4G8lDAt_gU-6J2edZuBI-H2WenyouJOJXLBR9c_oLnqdTC7Y_bxUBMd24bvA-H0tI8PUWPLPhknt3vW3T57vzy7EO1__j-4ux0Xykmpagk1E3by4YJQvpG9toKAKVbwoBArTlXmrZWCy2amre2BtEwuhO8pdAIqNkWvVq1UwxfZ5NyN7ikjPcwmjCnrm7FjknC6qagL_9Br8Icy_8KxUnDV3CLXq-UiiGlaGw3RTdAXDpKurvEujKw7ndihX1xb5z7wei_5J-ICnCyAocy4-X_pu7808Wq_AWcjKRn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604679380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long‐term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: A longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow‐up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Strzelczyk, Adam ; Zaveta, Clara ; Podewils, Felix ; Möddel, Gabriel ; Langenbruch, Lisa ; Kovac, Stjepana ; Mann, Catrin ; Willems, Laurent M. ; Schulz, Juliane ; Fiedler, Barbara ; Kurlemann, Gerhard ; Schubert‐Bast, Susanne ; Rosenow, Felix ; Beuchat, Isabelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Strzelczyk, Adam ; Zaveta, Clara ; Podewils, Felix ; Möddel, Gabriel ; Langenbruch, Lisa ; Kovac, Stjepana ; Mann, Catrin ; Willems, Laurent M. ; Schulz, Juliane ; Fiedler, Barbara ; Kurlemann, Gerhard ; Schubert‐Bast, Susanne ; Rosenow, Felix ; Beuchat, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><description>Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the long‐term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add‐on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021. Results Long‐term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5–81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost‐to‐follow‐up), including 10.9% reported as seizure‐free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow‐up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25–400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short‐term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long‐term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons. Significance BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of &gt;50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short‐term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long‐term outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9580</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/epi.17087</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34608628</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adverse events ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anticonvulsants - adverse effects ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Drug dosages ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - chemically induced ; Epilepsy - drug therapy ; Etiracetam ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; levetiracetam ; Levetiracetam - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Pyrrolidinones - adverse effects ; refractory ; Retention ; Retrospective Studies ; seizure ; Seizures ; SV2A ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Epilepsia (Copenhagen), 2021-12, Vol.62 (12), p.2994-3004</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-8a245b843700b48bdf7aacd503a0a2d66cd15fd7d74265f2a743197651a47a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-8a245b843700b48bdf7aacd503a0a2d66cd15fd7d74265f2a743197651a47a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9745-7258 ; 0000-0002-9300-4443 ; 0000-0001-6288-9915 ; 0000-0003-1545-7364 ; 0000-0002-3989-7471 ; 0000-0001-8226-1674 ; 0000-0001-6663-2631</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fepi.17087$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fepi.17087$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strzelczyk, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaveta, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podewils, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möddel, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenbruch, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovac, Stjepana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Catrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Laurent M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurlemann, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert‐Bast, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenow, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuchat, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><title>Long‐term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: A longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow‐up</title><title>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</title><addtitle>Epilepsia</addtitle><description>Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the long‐term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add‐on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021. Results Long‐term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5–81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost‐to‐follow‐up), including 10.9% reported as seizure‐free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow‐up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25–400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short‐term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long‐term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons. Significance BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of &gt;50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short‐term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long‐term outcomes.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anticonvulsants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - chemically induced</subject><subject>Epilepsy - drug therapy</subject><subject>Etiracetam</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>levetiracetam</subject><subject>Levetiracetam - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pyrrolidinones - adverse effects</subject><subject>refractory</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>seizure</subject><subject>Seizures</subject><subject>SV2A</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0013-9580</issn><issn>1528-1167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9u1DAUhy0EosPAggsgS2xAIq0dJ7aHXVUVqDQSLLqPXvwHXDlxsJ2OsuMIHKCLnoWjcBJcUlgg4Y1l-9P3nt8PoeeUHNOyTszkjqkgUjxAG9rWsqKUi4doQwhl1a6V5Ag9SemKECK4YI_REWs4kbyWG3SzD-Pnn9--ZxMHbKx1CtTyBufgTYTeeZfLCUaNo8lmzC6MOFjcR3cNEZTJMGA34tKAN1NacI4G8lDAt_gU-6J2edZuBI-H2WenyouJOJXLBR9c_oLnqdTC7Y_bxUBMd24bvA-H0tI8PUWPLPhknt3vW3T57vzy7EO1__j-4ux0Xykmpagk1E3by4YJQvpG9toKAKVbwoBArTlXmrZWCy2amre2BtEwuhO8pdAIqNkWvVq1UwxfZ5NyN7ikjPcwmjCnrm7FjknC6qagL_9Br8Icy_8KxUnDV3CLXq-UiiGlaGw3RTdAXDpKurvEujKw7ndihX1xb5z7wei_5J-ICnCyAocy4-X_pu7808Wq_AWcjKRn</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Strzelczyk, Adam</creator><creator>Zaveta, Clara</creator><creator>Podewils, Felix</creator><creator>Möddel, Gabriel</creator><creator>Langenbruch, Lisa</creator><creator>Kovac, Stjepana</creator><creator>Mann, Catrin</creator><creator>Willems, Laurent M.</creator><creator>Schulz, Juliane</creator><creator>Fiedler, Barbara</creator><creator>Kurlemann, Gerhard</creator><creator>Schubert‐Bast, Susanne</creator><creator>Rosenow, Felix</creator><creator>Beuchat, Isabelle</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9745-7258</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-4443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-9915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-7364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-7471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-1674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6663-2631</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Long‐term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: A longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow‐up</title><author>Strzelczyk, Adam ; Zaveta, Clara ; Podewils, Felix ; Möddel, Gabriel ; Langenbruch, Lisa ; Kovac, Stjepana ; Mann, Catrin ; Willems, Laurent M. ; Schulz, Juliane ; Fiedler, Barbara ; Kurlemann, Gerhard ; Schubert‐Bast, Susanne ; Rosenow, Felix ; Beuchat, Isabelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-8a245b843700b48bdf7aacd503a0a2d66cd15fd7d74265f2a743197651a47a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anticonvulsants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - chemically induced</topic><topic>Epilepsy - drug therapy</topic><topic>Etiracetam</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>levetiracetam</topic><topic>Levetiracetam - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pyrrolidinones - adverse effects</topic><topic>refractory</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>seizure</topic><topic>Seizures</topic><topic>SV2A</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strzelczyk, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaveta, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podewils, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möddel, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenbruch, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovac, Stjepana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mann, Catrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Laurent M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiedler, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurlemann, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert‐Bast, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenow, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuchat, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strzelczyk, Adam</au><au>Zaveta, Clara</au><au>Podewils, Felix</au><au>Möddel, Gabriel</au><au>Langenbruch, Lisa</au><au>Kovac, Stjepana</au><au>Mann, Catrin</au><au>Willems, Laurent M.</au><au>Schulz, Juliane</au><au>Fiedler, Barbara</au><au>Kurlemann, Gerhard</au><au>Schubert‐Bast, Susanne</au><au>Rosenow, Felix</au><au>Beuchat, Isabelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long‐term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: A longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow‐up</atitle><jtitle>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</jtitle><addtitle>Epilepsia</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2994</spage><epage>3004</epage><pages>2994-3004</pages><issn>0013-9580</issn><eissn>1528-1167</eissn><abstract>Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the long‐term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add‐on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021. Results Long‐term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5–81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost‐to‐follow‐up), including 10.9% reported as seizure‐free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow‐up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25–400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short‐term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long‐term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons. Significance BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of &gt;50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short‐term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long‐term outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34608628</pmid><doi>10.1111/epi.17087</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9745-7258</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-4443</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-9915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-7364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-7471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-1674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6663-2631</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-9580
ispartof Epilepsia (Copenhagen), 2021-12, Vol.62 (12), p.2994-3004
issn 0013-9580
1528-1167
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579380324
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Adverse events
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticonvulsants - adverse effects
Child
Child, Preschool
Drug dosages
Drug Therapy, Combination
Epilepsy
Epilepsy - chemically induced
Epilepsy - drug therapy
Etiracetam
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
levetiracetam
Levetiracetam - therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Patients
Pyrrolidinones - adverse effects
refractory
Retention
Retrospective Studies
seizure
Seizures
SV2A
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Long‐term efficacy, tolerability, and retention of brivaracetam in epilepsy treatment: A longitudinal multicenter study with up to 5 years of follow‐up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long%E2%80%90term%20efficacy,%20tolerability,%20and%20retention%20of%20brivaracetam%20in%20epilepsy%20treatment:%20A%20longitudinal%20multicenter%20study%20with%20up%20to%205%C2%A0years%20of%20follow%E2%80%90up&rft.jtitle=Epilepsia%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Strzelczyk,%20Adam&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2994&rft.epage=3004&rft.pages=2994-3004&rft.issn=0013-9580&rft.eissn=1528-1167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/epi.17087&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579380324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604679380&rft_id=info:pmid/34608628&rfr_iscdi=true