PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas

Background The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas. Methods We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric and developmental pathology 2022-03, Vol.25 (2), p.134-140
Hauptverfasser: Warren, Mikako, Tiwari, Nishant, Sy, Sabrina, Raca, Gordana, Schmidt, Ryan J, Pawel, Bruce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 2
container_start_page 134
container_title Pediatric and developmental pathology
container_volume 25
creator Warren, Mikako
Tiwari, Nishant
Sy, Sabrina
Raca, Gordana
Schmidt, Ryan J
Pawel, Bruce
description Background The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas. Methods We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results. Results The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group. Conclusions Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10935266211043366
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579092255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10935266211043366</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2579092255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4c513fc10cf45e25d4769595f4f161afa8ecf40d6bbf89765436020ef007f3fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EolD4ASzII0uKv1OPVUVLpSKQChND5Lh265LExU4G_j2uUliQmN5XuudOugPgBqMRxnl-j5GknAhBMEaMUiFOwAUWmGc8Z-Q0_UnPDsAAXMa4QyiZBDoHA8oEwlKKC_D-spzMMVzUddf4rYut11tTO60quGqVa1yzgYsIFVx1IfiNag18UuHDBGh9gL151kXnmwhdA5du78tKpZhaxStwZlUVzfXxDsHb7OF1-pgtn-eL6WSZaSJJmzHNMbUaI20ZN4SvWS4kl9wym8ooq8YmKWgtytKOZS44owIRZCxCuaW2pENw1-fug__sTGyL2kVtqko1xnexIDyXSBLCeUJxj-rgYwzGFvvgahW-CoyKw6bFn02T5_YY35W1Wf86fkZMwKgHotqYYue70KS6_yR-A_HEfVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579092255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Warren, Mikako ; Tiwari, Nishant ; Sy, Sabrina ; Raca, Gordana ; Schmidt, Ryan J ; Pawel, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mikako ; Tiwari, Nishant ; Sy, Sabrina ; Raca, Gordana ; Schmidt, Ryan J ; Pawel, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>Background The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas. Methods We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results. Results The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group. Conclusions Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-5266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10935266211043366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34601996</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Child ; DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Gene Fusion ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Lipoblastoma - diagnosis ; Lipoblastoma - genetics ; Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><ispartof>Pediatric and developmental pathology, 2022-03, Vol.25 (2), p.134-140</ispartof><rights>2021, Society for Pediatric Pathology All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4c513fc10cf45e25d4769595f4f161afa8ecf40d6bbf89765436020ef007f3fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10935266211043366$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10935266211043366$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34601996$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Nishant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raca, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawel, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</title><title>Pediatric and developmental pathology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Dev Pathol</addtitle><description>Background The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas. Methods We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results. Results The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group. Conclusions Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Gene Fusion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Lipoblastoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lipoblastoma - genetics</subject><subject>Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><issn>1093-5266</issn><issn>1615-5742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EolD4ASzII0uKv1OPVUVLpSKQChND5Lh265LExU4G_j2uUliQmN5XuudOugPgBqMRxnl-j5GknAhBMEaMUiFOwAUWmGc8Z-Q0_UnPDsAAXMa4QyiZBDoHA8oEwlKKC_D-spzMMVzUddf4rYut11tTO60quGqVa1yzgYsIFVx1IfiNag18UuHDBGh9gL151kXnmwhdA5du78tKpZhaxStwZlUVzfXxDsHb7OF1-pgtn-eL6WSZaSJJmzHNMbUaI20ZN4SvWS4kl9wym8ooq8YmKWgtytKOZS44owIRZCxCuaW2pENw1-fug__sTGyL2kVtqko1xnexIDyXSBLCeUJxj-rgYwzGFvvgahW-CoyKw6bFn02T5_YY35W1Wf86fkZMwKgHotqYYue70KS6_yR-A_HEfVY</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Warren, Mikako</creator><creator>Tiwari, Nishant</creator><creator>Sy, Sabrina</creator><creator>Raca, Gordana</creator><creator>Schmidt, Ryan J</creator><creator>Pawel, Bruce</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</title><author>Warren, Mikako ; Tiwari, Nishant ; Sy, Sabrina ; Raca, Gordana ; Schmidt, Ryan J ; Pawel, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4c513fc10cf45e25d4769595f4f161afa8ecf40d6bbf89765436020ef007f3fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Gene Fusion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Lipoblastoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lipoblastoma - genetics</topic><topic>Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Nishant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raca, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawel, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric and developmental pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warren, Mikako</au><au>Tiwari, Nishant</au><au>Sy, Sabrina</au><au>Raca, Gordana</au><au>Schmidt, Ryan J</au><au>Pawel, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric and developmental pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Dev Pathol</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>134-140</pages><issn>1093-5266</issn><eissn>1615-5742</eissn><abstract>Background The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas. Methods We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results. Results The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group. Conclusions Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34601996</pmid><doi>10.1177/10935266211043366</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1093-5266
ispartof Pediatric and developmental pathology, 2022-03, Vol.25 (2), p.134-140
issn 1093-5266
1615-5742
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579092255
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Biomarkers
Child
DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics
Gene Fusion
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Lipoblastoma - diagnosis
Lipoblastoma - genetics
Transcription Factors - genetics
title PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PLAG1%20Immunohistochemical%20Staining%20Is%20a%20Surrogate%20Marker%20for%20PLAG1%20Fusions%20in%20Lipoblastomas&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20and%20developmental%20pathology&rft.au=Warren,%20Mikako&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=134-140&rft.issn=1093-5266&rft.eissn=1615-5742&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10935266211043366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579092255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579092255&rft_id=info:pmid/34601996&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10935266211043366&rfr_iscdi=true