PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas
Background The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas. Methods We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric and developmental pathology 2022-03, Vol.25 (2), p.134-140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 134 |
container_title | Pediatric and developmental pathology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Warren, Mikako Tiwari, Nishant Sy, Sabrina Raca, Gordana Schmidt, Ryan J Pawel, Bruce |
description | Background
The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.
Methods
We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.
Results
The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.
Conclusions
Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10935266211043366 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579092255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10935266211043366</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2579092255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4c513fc10cf45e25d4769595f4f161afa8ecf40d6bbf89765436020ef007f3fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EolD4ASzII0uKv1OPVUVLpSKQChND5Lh265LExU4G_j2uUliQmN5XuudOugPgBqMRxnl-j5GknAhBMEaMUiFOwAUWmGc8Z-Q0_UnPDsAAXMa4QyiZBDoHA8oEwlKKC_D-spzMMVzUddf4rYut11tTO60quGqVa1yzgYsIFVx1IfiNag18UuHDBGh9gL151kXnmwhdA5du78tKpZhaxStwZlUVzfXxDsHb7OF1-pgtn-eL6WSZaSJJmzHNMbUaI20ZN4SvWS4kl9wym8ooq8YmKWgtytKOZS44owIRZCxCuaW2pENw1-fug__sTGyL2kVtqko1xnexIDyXSBLCeUJxj-rgYwzGFvvgahW-CoyKw6bFn02T5_YY35W1Wf86fkZMwKgHotqYYue70KS6_yR-A_HEfVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579092255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Warren, Mikako ; Tiwari, Nishant ; Sy, Sabrina ; Raca, Gordana ; Schmidt, Ryan J ; Pawel, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mikako ; Tiwari, Nishant ; Sy, Sabrina ; Raca, Gordana ; Schmidt, Ryan J ; Pawel, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.
Methods
We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.
Results
The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.
Conclusions
Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-5266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10935266211043366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34601996</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Child ; DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics ; Gene Fusion ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Lipoblastoma - diagnosis ; Lipoblastoma - genetics ; Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><ispartof>Pediatric and developmental pathology, 2022-03, Vol.25 (2), p.134-140</ispartof><rights>2021, Society for Pediatric Pathology All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4c513fc10cf45e25d4769595f4f161afa8ecf40d6bbf89765436020ef007f3fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10935266211043366$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10935266211043366$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34601996$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Nishant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raca, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawel, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</title><title>Pediatric and developmental pathology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Dev Pathol</addtitle><description>Background
The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.
Methods
We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.
Results
The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.
Conclusions
Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Gene Fusion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Lipoblastoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lipoblastoma - genetics</subject><subject>Transcription Factors - genetics</subject><issn>1093-5266</issn><issn>1615-5742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAYhC0EolD4ASzII0uKv1OPVUVLpSKQChND5Lh265LExU4G_j2uUliQmN5XuudOugPgBqMRxnl-j5GknAhBMEaMUiFOwAUWmGc8Z-Q0_UnPDsAAXMa4QyiZBDoHA8oEwlKKC_D-spzMMVzUddf4rYut11tTO60quGqVa1yzgYsIFVx1IfiNag18UuHDBGh9gL151kXnmwhdA5du78tKpZhaxStwZlUVzfXxDsHb7OF1-pgtn-eL6WSZaSJJmzHNMbUaI20ZN4SvWS4kl9wym8ooq8YmKWgtytKOZS44owIRZCxCuaW2pENw1-fug__sTGyL2kVtqko1xnexIDyXSBLCeUJxj-rgYwzGFvvgahW-CoyKw6bFn02T5_YY35W1Wf86fkZMwKgHotqYYue70KS6_yR-A_HEfVY</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Warren, Mikako</creator><creator>Tiwari, Nishant</creator><creator>Sy, Sabrina</creator><creator>Raca, Gordana</creator><creator>Schmidt, Ryan J</creator><creator>Pawel, Bruce</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</title><author>Warren, Mikako ; Tiwari, Nishant ; Sy, Sabrina ; Raca, Gordana ; Schmidt, Ryan J ; Pawel, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-4c513fc10cf45e25d4769595f4f161afa8ecf40d6bbf89765436020ef007f3fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Gene Fusion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Lipoblastoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lipoblastoma - genetics</topic><topic>Transcription Factors - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mikako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Nishant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raca, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Ryan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawel, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric and developmental pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warren, Mikako</au><au>Tiwari, Nishant</au><au>Sy, Sabrina</au><au>Raca, Gordana</au><au>Schmidt, Ryan J</au><au>Pawel, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric and developmental pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Dev Pathol</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>134-140</pages><issn>1093-5266</issn><eissn>1615-5742</eissn><abstract>Background
The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.
Methods
We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.
Results
The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as “Lipoblastoma 1” with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and “Lipoblastoma 2” with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the “gold standard” for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.
Conclusions
Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34601996</pmid><doi>10.1177/10935266211043366</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1093-5266 |
ispartof | Pediatric and developmental pathology, 2022-03, Vol.25 (2), p.134-140 |
issn | 1093-5266 1615-5742 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2579092255 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Biomarkers Child DNA-Binding Proteins - genetics Gene Fusion Humans In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Lipoblastoma - diagnosis Lipoblastoma - genetics Transcription Factors - genetics |
title | PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T21%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PLAG1%20Immunohistochemical%20Staining%20Is%20a%20Surrogate%20Marker%20for%20PLAG1%20Fusions%20in%20Lipoblastomas&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20and%20developmental%20pathology&rft.au=Warren,%20Mikako&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=134-140&rft.issn=1093-5266&rft.eissn=1615-5742&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10935266211043366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579092255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579092255&rft_id=info:pmid/34601996&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10935266211043366&rfr_iscdi=true |