Non-invasive simulated electrical and measured mechanical indices predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in dyssynchronous heart failure patients is ineffective in 20–30% of cases. Sub-optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing location can lead to non-response, thus there is interest in LV lead location optimization. Invasive acute haemodynamic response (AHR) measurem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers in biology and medicine 2021-11, Vol.138, p.104872-104872, Article 104872 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104872 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104872 |
container_title | Computers in biology and medicine |
container_volume | 138 |
creator | Lee, Angela W.C. Razeghi, Orod Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso Strocchi, Marina Sidhu, Baldeep Gould, Justin Behar, Jonathan M. Elliott, Mark Mehta, Vishal Plank, Gernot Rinaldi, Christopher A. Niederer, Steven A. |
description | Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in dyssynchronous heart failure patients is ineffective in 20–30% of cases. Sub-optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing location can lead to non-response, thus there is interest in LV lead location optimization. Invasive acute haemodynamic response (AHR) measurements have been used to optimize the LV pacing location during CRT implantation. In this manuscript, we aim to predict the optimal lead location (AHR>10%) with non-invasive computed tomography (CT) based measures of cardiac anatomical and mechanical properties, and simulated electrical activation times.
Non-invasive measurements from CT images and ECG were acquired from 34 patients indicated for CRT upgrade. The LV lead was implanted and AHR was measured at different pacing sites. Computer models of the ventricles were used to simulate the electrical activation of the heart, track the mechanical motion throughout the cardiac cycle and measure the wall thickness of the LV on a patient specific basis.
We tested the ability of electrical, mechanical and anatomical indices to predict the optimal LV location. Electrical (RV-LV delay) and mechanical (time to peak contraction) indices were correlated with an improved AHR, while wall thickness was not predictive. A logistic regression model combining RV-LV delay and time to peak contraction was able to predict positive response with 70 ± 11% accuracy and AUROC curve of 0.73.
Non-invasive electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location. Prospective analysis of these indices could allow clinicians to test the AHR at fewer pacing sites and reduce time, costs and risks to patients.
[Display omitted]
•Non-invasive measurements were analyzed using patient-specific cardiac models.•Electrophysiology simulations were used to predict biventricular activation.•Cardiac meshes were used to track cardiac motion and measure wall thickness.•Machine learning models were used to assess feature importance for CRT response.•Electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104872 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2578774822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010482521006661</els_id><sourcerecordid>2578774822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b0b4714788937080bd202b38e31b566aec541d80df1e0b773dbf31520e51be533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVJoZu030GQSy7ejizbko9NSNpCSC7JWejPLKvFlhzJ3rL59NV2C4Fccprh8Zth5j1CKIM1A9Z9361tHCfj44huXUPNitxIUX8iKyZFX0HLmzOyAmBQNbJuv5DznHcA0ACHFfnzEEPlw15nv0ea_bgMekZHcUA7J2_1QHVwdESdl4THxm51-Kf74LzFTKeiezvThHmKISOdI7U6Oa_tUTsEu00x-Fc9-xjovMWkp8NX8nmjh4zf_tcL8nx3-3Tzq7p__Pn75sd9Zbno58qAaQRrhJQ9FyDBuPKi4RI5M23XabRtw5wEt2EIRgjuzIaztgZsmcGW8wtyddo7pfiyYJ7V6LPFYdAB45JV3QopRDGmLujlO3QXlxTKdYWSXS_6jrFCyRNlU8w54UZNyY86HRQDdUxE7dRbIuqYiDolUkavT6NYHt57TCpbj8EW-1JxW7noP17yF12um2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2586979611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-invasive simulated electrical and measured mechanical indices predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Lee, Angela W.C. ; Razeghi, Orod ; Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso ; Strocchi, Marina ; Sidhu, Baldeep ; Gould, Justin ; Behar, Jonathan M. ; Elliott, Mark ; Mehta, Vishal ; Plank, Gernot ; Rinaldi, Christopher A. ; Niederer, Steven A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Angela W.C. ; Razeghi, Orod ; Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso ; Strocchi, Marina ; Sidhu, Baldeep ; Gould, Justin ; Behar, Jonathan M. ; Elliott, Mark ; Mehta, Vishal ; Plank, Gernot ; Rinaldi, Christopher A. ; Niederer, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in dyssynchronous heart failure patients is ineffective in 20–30% of cases. Sub-optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing location can lead to non-response, thus there is interest in LV lead location optimization. Invasive acute haemodynamic response (AHR) measurements have been used to optimize the LV pacing location during CRT implantation. In this manuscript, we aim to predict the optimal lead location (AHR>10%) with non-invasive computed tomography (CT) based measures of cardiac anatomical and mechanical properties, and simulated electrical activation times.
Non-invasive measurements from CT images and ECG were acquired from 34 patients indicated for CRT upgrade. The LV lead was implanted and AHR was measured at different pacing sites. Computer models of the ventricles were used to simulate the electrical activation of the heart, track the mechanical motion throughout the cardiac cycle and measure the wall thickness of the LV on a patient specific basis.
We tested the ability of electrical, mechanical and anatomical indices to predict the optimal LV location. Electrical (RV-LV delay) and mechanical (time to peak contraction) indices were correlated with an improved AHR, while wall thickness was not predictive. A logistic regression model combining RV-LV delay and time to peak contraction was able to predict positive response with 70 ± 11% accuracy and AUROC curve of 0.73.
Non-invasive electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location. Prospective analysis of these indices could allow clinicians to test the AHR at fewer pacing sites and reduce time, costs and risks to patients.
[Display omitted]
•Non-invasive measurements were analyzed using patient-specific cardiac models.•Electrophysiology simulations were used to predict biventricular activation.•Cardiac meshes were used to track cardiac motion and measure wall thickness.•Machine learning models were used to assess feature importance for CRT response.•Electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cardiac resynchronization therapy ; Computed tomography ; Computer models ; Congestive heart failure ; Contraction ; EKG ; Heart failure ; Hemodynamic responses ; Image acquisition ; Lead optimization ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical properties ; Optimization ; Patients ; Regression models ; Response rates ; Scars ; Simulation ; Software ; Thickness ; Ventricle</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2021-11, Vol.138, p.104872-104872, Article 104872</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b0b4714788937080bd202b38e31b566aec541d80df1e0b773dbf31520e51be533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b0b4714788937080bd202b38e31b566aec541d80df1e0b773dbf31520e51be533</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4989-5565 ; 0000-0003-2805-3043 ; 0000-0003-2385-6875 ; 0000-0003-1312-251X ; 0000-0002-7380-6908 ; 0000-0002-3930-1957</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2586979611?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Angela W.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razeghi, Orod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strocchi, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Baldeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behar, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plank, Gernot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederer, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><title>Non-invasive simulated electrical and measured mechanical indices predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><description>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in dyssynchronous heart failure patients is ineffective in 20–30% of cases. Sub-optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing location can lead to non-response, thus there is interest in LV lead location optimization. Invasive acute haemodynamic response (AHR) measurements have been used to optimize the LV pacing location during CRT implantation. In this manuscript, we aim to predict the optimal lead location (AHR>10%) with non-invasive computed tomography (CT) based measures of cardiac anatomical and mechanical properties, and simulated electrical activation times.
Non-invasive measurements from CT images and ECG were acquired from 34 patients indicated for CRT upgrade. The LV lead was implanted and AHR was measured at different pacing sites. Computer models of the ventricles were used to simulate the electrical activation of the heart, track the mechanical motion throughout the cardiac cycle and measure the wall thickness of the LV on a patient specific basis.
We tested the ability of electrical, mechanical and anatomical indices to predict the optimal LV location. Electrical (RV-LV delay) and mechanical (time to peak contraction) indices were correlated with an improved AHR, while wall thickness was not predictive. A logistic regression model combining RV-LV delay and time to peak contraction was able to predict positive response with 70 ± 11% accuracy and AUROC curve of 0.73.
Non-invasive electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location. Prospective analysis of these indices could allow clinicians to test the AHR at fewer pacing sites and reduce time, costs and risks to patients.
[Display omitted]
•Non-invasive measurements were analyzed using patient-specific cardiac models.•Electrophysiology simulations were used to predict biventricular activation.•Cardiac meshes were used to track cardiac motion and measure wall thickness.•Machine learning models were used to assess feature importance for CRT response.•Electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location.</description><subject>Cardiac resynchronization therapy</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer models</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Contraction</subject><subject>EKG</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Hemodynamic responses</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Lead optimization</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Scars</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVJoZu030GQSy7ejizbko9NSNpCSC7JWejPLKvFlhzJ3rL59NV2C4Fccprh8Zth5j1CKIM1A9Z9361tHCfj44huXUPNitxIUX8iKyZFX0HLmzOyAmBQNbJuv5DznHcA0ACHFfnzEEPlw15nv0ea_bgMekZHcUA7J2_1QHVwdESdl4THxm51-Kf74LzFTKeiezvThHmKISOdI7U6Oa_tUTsEu00x-Fc9-xjovMWkp8NX8nmjh4zf_tcL8nx3-3Tzq7p__Pn75sd9Zbno58qAaQRrhJQ9FyDBuPKi4RI5M23XabRtw5wEt2EIRgjuzIaztgZsmcGW8wtyddo7pfiyYJ7V6LPFYdAB45JV3QopRDGmLujlO3QXlxTKdYWSXS_6jrFCyRNlU8w54UZNyY86HRQDdUxE7dRbIuqYiDolUkavT6NYHt57TCpbj8EW-1JxW7noP17yF12um2g</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Lee, Angela W.C.</creator><creator>Razeghi, Orod</creator><creator>Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso</creator><creator>Strocchi, Marina</creator><creator>Sidhu, Baldeep</creator><creator>Gould, Justin</creator><creator>Behar, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Elliott, Mark</creator><creator>Mehta, Vishal</creator><creator>Plank, Gernot</creator><creator>Rinaldi, Christopher A.</creator><creator>Niederer, Steven A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-5565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2805-3043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-6875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1312-251X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7380-6908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3930-1957</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Non-invasive simulated electrical and measured mechanical indices predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><author>Lee, Angela W.C. ; Razeghi, Orod ; Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso ; Strocchi, Marina ; Sidhu, Baldeep ; Gould, Justin ; Behar, Jonathan M. ; Elliott, Mark ; Mehta, Vishal ; Plank, Gernot ; Rinaldi, Christopher A. ; Niederer, Steven A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-b0b4714788937080bd202b38e31b566aec541d80df1e0b773dbf31520e51be533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiac resynchronization therapy</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer models</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Contraction</topic><topic>EKG</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Hemodynamic responses</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Lead optimization</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Scars</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Angela W.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razeghi, Orod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strocchi, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Baldeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gould, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behar, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plank, Gernot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niederer, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Angela W.C.</au><au>Razeghi, Orod</au><au>Solis-Lemus, Jose Alonso</au><au>Strocchi, Marina</au><au>Sidhu, Baldeep</au><au>Gould, Justin</au><au>Behar, Jonathan M.</au><au>Elliott, Mark</au><au>Mehta, Vishal</au><au>Plank, Gernot</au><au>Rinaldi, Christopher A.</au><au>Niederer, Steven A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-invasive simulated electrical and measured mechanical indices predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>104872</spage><epage>104872</epage><pages>104872-104872</pages><artnum>104872</artnum><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><abstract>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in dyssynchronous heart failure patients is ineffective in 20–30% of cases. Sub-optimal left ventricular (LV) pacing location can lead to non-response, thus there is interest in LV lead location optimization. Invasive acute haemodynamic response (AHR) measurements have been used to optimize the LV pacing location during CRT implantation. In this manuscript, we aim to predict the optimal lead location (AHR>10%) with non-invasive computed tomography (CT) based measures of cardiac anatomical and mechanical properties, and simulated electrical activation times.
Non-invasive measurements from CT images and ECG were acquired from 34 patients indicated for CRT upgrade. The LV lead was implanted and AHR was measured at different pacing sites. Computer models of the ventricles were used to simulate the electrical activation of the heart, track the mechanical motion throughout the cardiac cycle and measure the wall thickness of the LV on a patient specific basis.
We tested the ability of electrical, mechanical and anatomical indices to predict the optimal LV location. Electrical (RV-LV delay) and mechanical (time to peak contraction) indices were correlated with an improved AHR, while wall thickness was not predictive. A logistic regression model combining RV-LV delay and time to peak contraction was able to predict positive response with 70 ± 11% accuracy and AUROC curve of 0.73.
Non-invasive electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location. Prospective analysis of these indices could allow clinicians to test the AHR at fewer pacing sites and reduce time, costs and risks to patients.
[Display omitted]
•Non-invasive measurements were analyzed using patient-specific cardiac models.•Electrophysiology simulations were used to predict biventricular activation.•Cardiac meshes were used to track cardiac motion and measure wall thickness.•Machine learning models were used to assess feature importance for CRT response.•Electrical and mechanical indices can predict optimal epicardial lead location.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104872</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-5565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2805-3043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-6875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1312-251X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7380-6908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3930-1957</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4825 |
ispartof | Computers in biology and medicine, 2021-11, Vol.138, p.104872-104872, Article 104872 |
issn | 0010-4825 1879-0534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2578774822 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Cardiac resynchronization therapy Computed tomography Computer models Congestive heart failure Contraction EKG Heart failure Hemodynamic responses Image acquisition Lead optimization Machine learning Mathematical models Mechanical properties Optimization Patients Regression models Response rates Scars Simulation Software Thickness Ventricle |
title | Non-invasive simulated electrical and measured mechanical indices predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-invasive%20simulated%20electrical%20and%20measured%20mechanical%20indices%20predict%20response%20to%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Lee,%20Angela%20W.C.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=104872&rft.epage=104872&rft.pages=104872-104872&rft.artnum=104872&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104872&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578774822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2586979611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0010482521006661&rfr_iscdi=true |