Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial
Background Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ANZ journal of surgery 2021-12, Vol.91 (12), p.2714-2719 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2719 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2714 |
container_title | ANZ journal of surgery |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Ganguly, Timothy Bierton, Christopher Islam, Asif Chan, Lily Smithers, Lisa Murphy, Elizabeth |
description | Background
Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Methods
Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (>20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Results
Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups.
Conclusion
Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ans.17237 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2578774239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578774239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9de24f6f053713bfd52688ae87640a004a2dd33ceffe6c4d7e849342e521a553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1LBCEcBnCJovdDXyCELnXY1ndnui1LbxB1qLuYOmE4uukMsX36rN06BHnxL_x8EB8AjjA6x3VNdSznWBIqN8AuZoxPCG7l5nrGjNIdsFfKK0JYiJZvgx3KeMsbxHZBuAqjt1Db3kdfhqwHnyK0Y_bxBeY0Dj46aFJIMRWTFkvoC4xpgCZUb3QIS1j8S_RdPcThAmqYdbSp9x_O1ntxyCmEOg7Z63AAtjodijtc7_vg6eryaX4zuXu4vp3P7iaGYionrXWEdaJDnEpMnzvLiWga7RopGNIIMU2spdS4rnPCMCtdw1rKiOMEa87pPjhdxS5yehtdGVTvi3Eh6OjSWBThspGSEdpWevKHvqYxx_o4RQRGFHMhaFVnK2VyKiW7Ti2y73VeKozUVwOqNqC-G6j2eJ04PvfO_sqfL69gugLvPrjl_0lqdv-4ivwE0q6RCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610315663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ganguly, Timothy ; Bierton, Christopher ; Islam, Asif ; Chan, Lily ; Smithers, Lisa ; Murphy, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Timothy ; Bierton, Christopher ; Islam, Asif ; Chan, Lily ; Smithers, Lisa ; Murphy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Methods
Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (>20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Results
Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups.
Conclusion
Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.17237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34595804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood pressure ; bowel screening ; Clinical significance ; Colon ; Colonoscopy ; Electrolytes ; endoscopy ; Equivalence ; Fluids ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Intravenous administration ; IV fluids ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2021-12, Vol.91 (12), p.2714-2719</ispartof><rights>2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9de24f6f053713bfd52688ae87640a004a2dd33ceffe6c4d7e849342e521a553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4254-1895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fans.17237$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fans.17237$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierton, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smithers, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Methods
Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (>20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Results
Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups.
Conclusion
Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area.</description><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>bowel screening</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>endoscopy</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>IV fluids</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1LBCEcBnCJovdDXyCELnXY1ndnui1LbxB1qLuYOmE4uukMsX36rN06BHnxL_x8EB8AjjA6x3VNdSznWBIqN8AuZoxPCG7l5nrGjNIdsFfKK0JYiJZvgx3KeMsbxHZBuAqjt1Db3kdfhqwHnyK0Y_bxBeY0Dj46aFJIMRWTFkvoC4xpgCZUb3QIS1j8S_RdPcThAmqYdbSp9x_O1ntxyCmEOg7Z63AAtjodijtc7_vg6eryaX4zuXu4vp3P7iaGYionrXWEdaJDnEpMnzvLiWga7RopGNIIMU2spdS4rnPCMCtdw1rKiOMEa87pPjhdxS5yehtdGVTvi3Eh6OjSWBThspGSEdpWevKHvqYxx_o4RQRGFHMhaFVnK2VyKiW7Ti2y73VeKozUVwOqNqC-G6j2eJ04PvfO_sqfL69gugLvPrjl_0lqdv-4ivwE0q6RCQ</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Ganguly, Timothy</creator><creator>Bierton, Christopher</creator><creator>Islam, Asif</creator><creator>Chan, Lily</creator><creator>Smithers, Lisa</creator><creator>Murphy, Elizabeth</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-1895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Ganguly, Timothy ; Bierton, Christopher ; Islam, Asif ; Chan, Lily ; Smithers, Lisa ; Murphy, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9de24f6f053713bfd52688ae87640a004a2dd33ceffe6c4d7e849342e521a553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>bowel screening</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>endoscopy</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>IV fluids</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierton, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smithers, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganguly, Timothy</au><au>Bierton, Christopher</au><au>Islam, Asif</au><au>Chan, Lily</au><au>Smithers, Lisa</au><au>Murphy, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2714</spage><epage>2719</epage><pages>2714-2719</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background
Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Methods
Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (>20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Results
Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups.
Conclusion
Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work.
This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>34595804</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.17237</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-1895</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1445-1433 |
ispartof | ANZ journal of surgery, 2021-12, Vol.91 (12), p.2714-2719 |
issn | 1445-1433 1445-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2578774239 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Blood pressure bowel screening Clinical significance Colon Colonoscopy Electrolytes endoscopy Equivalence Fluids Hemodynamics Humans Hypotension Intravenous administration IV fluids Patients Retrospective Studies |
title | Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluid%20administration%20during%20routine%20colonoscopy%20is%20not%20clinically%20significant:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Ganguly,%20Timothy&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2714&rft.epage=2719&rft.pages=2714-2719&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.17237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578774239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610315663&rft_id=info:pmid/34595804&rfr_iscdi=true |