Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial

Background Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ANZ journal of surgery 2021-12, Vol.91 (12), p.2714-2719
Hauptverfasser: Ganguly, Timothy, Bierton, Christopher, Islam, Asif, Chan, Lily, Smithers, Lisa, Murphy, Elizabeth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2719
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2714
container_title ANZ journal of surgery
container_volume 91
creator Ganguly, Timothy
Bierton, Christopher
Islam, Asif
Chan, Lily
Smithers, Lisa
Murphy, Elizabeth
description Background Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (>20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups. Conclusion Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work. This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ans.17237
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2578774239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578774239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9de24f6f053713bfd52688ae87640a004a2dd33ceffe6c4d7e849342e521a553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1LBCEcBnCJovdDXyCELnXY1ndnui1LbxB1qLuYOmE4uukMsX36rN06BHnxL_x8EB8AjjA6x3VNdSznWBIqN8AuZoxPCG7l5nrGjNIdsFfKK0JYiJZvgx3KeMsbxHZBuAqjt1Db3kdfhqwHnyK0Y_bxBeY0Dj46aFJIMRWTFkvoC4xpgCZUb3QIS1j8S_RdPcThAmqYdbSp9x_O1ntxyCmEOg7Z63AAtjodijtc7_vg6eryaX4zuXu4vp3P7iaGYionrXWEdaJDnEpMnzvLiWga7RopGNIIMU2spdS4rnPCMCtdw1rKiOMEa87pPjhdxS5yehtdGVTvi3Eh6OjSWBThspGSEdpWevKHvqYxx_o4RQRGFHMhaFVnK2VyKiW7Ti2y73VeKozUVwOqNqC-G6j2eJ04PvfO_sqfL69gugLvPrjl_0lqdv-4ivwE0q6RCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610315663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ganguly, Timothy ; Bierton, Christopher ; Islam, Asif ; Chan, Lily ; Smithers, Lisa ; Murphy, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Timothy ; Bierton, Christopher ; Islam, Asif ; Chan, Lily ; Smithers, Lisa ; Murphy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Background Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (&gt;20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups. Conclusion Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work. This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.17237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34595804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Blood pressure ; bowel screening ; Clinical significance ; Colon ; Colonoscopy ; Electrolytes ; endoscopy ; Equivalence ; Fluids ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hypotension ; Intravenous administration ; IV fluids ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2021-12, Vol.91 (12), p.2714-2719</ispartof><rights>2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9de24f6f053713bfd52688ae87640a004a2dd33ceffe6c4d7e849342e521a553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4254-1895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fans.17237$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fans.17237$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34595804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierton, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smithers, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (&gt;20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups. Conclusion Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work. This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area.</description><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>bowel screening</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>endoscopy</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotension</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>IV fluids</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1LBCEcBnCJovdDXyCELnXY1ndnui1LbxB1qLuYOmE4uukMsX36rN06BHnxL_x8EB8AjjA6x3VNdSznWBIqN8AuZoxPCG7l5nrGjNIdsFfKK0JYiJZvgx3KeMsbxHZBuAqjt1Db3kdfhqwHnyK0Y_bxBeY0Dj46aFJIMRWTFkvoC4xpgCZUb3QIS1j8S_RdPcThAmqYdbSp9x_O1ntxyCmEOg7Z63AAtjodijtc7_vg6eryaX4zuXu4vp3P7iaGYionrXWEdaJDnEpMnzvLiWga7RopGNIIMU2spdS4rnPCMCtdw1rKiOMEa87pPjhdxS5yehtdGVTvi3Eh6OjSWBThspGSEdpWevKHvqYxx_o4RQRGFHMhaFVnK2VyKiW7Ti2y73VeKozUVwOqNqC-G6j2eJ04PvfO_sqfL69gugLvPrjl_0lqdv-4ivwE0q6RCQ</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Ganguly, Timothy</creator><creator>Bierton, Christopher</creator><creator>Islam, Asif</creator><creator>Chan, Lily</creator><creator>Smithers, Lisa</creator><creator>Murphy, Elizabeth</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-1895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Ganguly, Timothy ; Bierton, Christopher ; Islam, Asif ; Chan, Lily ; Smithers, Lisa ; Murphy, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-9de24f6f053713bfd52688ae87640a004a2dd33ceffe6c4d7e849342e521a553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>bowel screening</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>endoscopy</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotension</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>IV fluids</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bierton, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Lily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smithers, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ganguly, Timothy</au><au>Bierton, Christopher</au><au>Islam, Asif</au><au>Chan, Lily</au><au>Smithers, Lisa</au><au>Murphy, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2714</spage><epage>2719</epage><pages>2714-2719</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background Retrospective studies have questioned the benefits of intravenous (IV) fluids during routine colonoscopies given they are performed on well patients who experience limited fluid loss, consume clear fluids up until 2 h prior and low IV volumes typically infused. This trial aims to assess the impact of IV fluid on hypotension and electrolyte changes amongst patients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods Participants undergoing colonoscopies were randomized (single blinded) to IV fluid or no IV fluid. Primary outcomes were equivalence of intraoperative hypotensive episodes (&gt;20% drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP)) and changes in serum electrolytes post procedure. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results Of the 470 participants enrolled, 84/235 (35.7%) from the IV fluids group and 88/230 (38.3%) from the no IV fluids group experienced a hypotensive event (difference in prevalence −2.5, 95% CI −11.3, 6.3). Fourteen participants in each group required clinical intervention to provide haemodynamic support (difference in prevalence −0.1, 95% CI −4.4, 4.2). Postoperative electrolytes changes and PROMs were similar for both groups. Conclusion Whilst definitive recommendations for IV fluid use during routine colonoscopy are not possible as this trial was underpowered to show equivalence between the groups for hypotensive events, there was no clinically meaningful difference between the groups. These findings provide important data for meta‐synthesis and for planning future work. This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine equivalence between those undergoing colonoscopy both with and without IV fluids. Whilst the study was underpowered to detect a difference no clinically significant difference was detected between our two cohorts. This study provides important data for further work in this area.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>34595804</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.17237</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-1895</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1445-1433
ispartof ANZ journal of surgery, 2021-12, Vol.91 (12), p.2714-2719
issn 1445-1433
1445-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2578774239
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Blood pressure
bowel screening
Clinical significance
Colon
Colonoscopy
Electrolytes
endoscopy
Equivalence
Fluids
Hemodynamics
Humans
Hypotension
Intravenous administration
IV fluids
Patients
Retrospective Studies
title Fluid administration during routine colonoscopy is not clinically significant: a randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A54%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluid%20administration%20during%20routine%20colonoscopy%20is%20not%20clinically%20significant:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Ganguly,%20Timothy&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2714&rft.epage=2719&rft.pages=2714-2719&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.17237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578774239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610315663&rft_id=info:pmid/34595804&rfr_iscdi=true