Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection

Electrocautery is a common surgical technique and is often used during shoulder arthroplasty to elevate or transect the subscapularis tendon. The relative amount of tissue damage caused by cautery as opposed to sharp transection is not currently known. The purpose of this study was to examine local...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.832-838
Hauptverfasser: Dandu, Navya, Nelson, Brad B., Easley, Jeremiah T., Huddleston, Hailey P., DeFroda, Steven F., Bisazza, Katie T., Garrigues, Grant E., Yanke, Adam B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 838
container_issue 4
container_start_page 832
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 31
creator Dandu, Navya
Nelson, Brad B.
Easley, Jeremiah T.
Huddleston, Hailey P.
DeFroda, Steven F.
Bisazza, Katie T.
Garrigues, Grant E.
Yanke, Adam B.
description Electrocautery is a common surgical technique and is often used during shoulder arthroplasty to elevate or transect the subscapularis tendon. The relative amount of tissue damage caused by cautery as opposed to sharp transection is not currently known. The purpose of this study was to examine local tissue damage resulting from electrocautery vs. sharp transection with a scalpel. We hypothesized that the electrosurgical unit would cause higher collateral tissue damage and cell death compared with sharp transection. Twelve cadaveric ovine shoulders were randomized to either the electrosurgical or sharp transection group. The infraspinatus tendon was isolated, and a partial-thickness transection was made using either a monopolar electrosurgical device (Bovie) or No. 10 scalpel blade. Tendon explants were then visualized with confocal microscopy to evaluate tissue architecture. A live/dead assay was performed using microscopy imaging analysis software. Comparisons between Bovie and scalpel transection were made using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the cell death percentage at standardized distances from the transection site was compared between groups using a mixed-model analysis. Significance was defined at P < .05. The cellular and tendon fibril architecture was well maintained beyond the scalpel transection site, whereas Bovie transection disrupted the architecture beyond its transection path. The percentage of dead cells in the Bovie group (74.9% ± 31.2%) was significantly higher than that in the scalpel group (27.6% ± 29.9%, P = .0004). Compared with the transection site, the cell death percentage after Bovie transection significantly declined at 2.5 mm whereas that after scalpel transection significantly declined at 1 mm from the transection site. There was a significantly higher dead cell percentage in the Bovie transection group, indicating extensive damage beyond the local incision site, compared with sharp transection. Electrosurgical transection of the ovine infraspinatus tendon ex vivo caused higher cell death and greater tissue architecture disruption compared with sharp scalpel transection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2577733461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274621006923</els_id><sourcerecordid>2577733461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a421ec961b8b936be4c73eebdae124fe5be252a488394bd98816d4d9a5f99cc23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoSNIkP6CX4mMvdvVpS_RUliQtLJRAchayNN7I2NJWsgv776PNpj32NMPwzMvMg9AnghuCSft1bMYMDcWUNFg2mOIzdEUEo3UrMP5QeixkTTveXqKPOY8YY8UxvUCXjAtJlaJX6PFxNWHxw8GHXbW8QDWbXfDL6qCKQzVFa6ZqgeBiqHwY13SohhTnCiawS4p5TTv_hiQTchn5GG7Q-WCmDLfv9Ro93989bX7U218PPzfft7Vlgi214ZSAVS3pZa9Y2wO3HQPonQFC-QCiByqo4VIyxXunpCSt404ZMShlLWXX6Mspd5_i7xXyomefLUyTCRDXrKnouo4x3pKCkhNqy8k5waD3yc8mHTTB-mhSj7qY1EeTGktdTJadz-_xaz-D-7fxV10Bvp0AKE_-8ZB0th6CBedTMaFd9P-JfwUeOYVz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2577733461</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Dandu, Navya ; Nelson, Brad B. ; Easley, Jeremiah T. ; Huddleston, Hailey P. ; DeFroda, Steven F. ; Bisazza, Katie T. ; Garrigues, Grant E. ; Yanke, Adam B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dandu, Navya ; Nelson, Brad B. ; Easley, Jeremiah T. ; Huddleston, Hailey P. ; DeFroda, Steven F. ; Bisazza, Katie T. ; Garrigues, Grant E. ; Yanke, Adam B.</creatorcontrib><description>Electrocautery is a common surgical technique and is often used during shoulder arthroplasty to elevate or transect the subscapularis tendon. The relative amount of tissue damage caused by cautery as opposed to sharp transection is not currently known. The purpose of this study was to examine local tissue damage resulting from electrocautery vs. sharp transection with a scalpel. We hypothesized that the electrosurgical unit would cause higher collateral tissue damage and cell death compared with sharp transection. Twelve cadaveric ovine shoulders were randomized to either the electrosurgical or sharp transection group. The infraspinatus tendon was isolated, and a partial-thickness transection was made using either a monopolar electrosurgical device (Bovie) or No. 10 scalpel blade. Tendon explants were then visualized with confocal microscopy to evaluate tissue architecture. A live/dead assay was performed using microscopy imaging analysis software. Comparisons between Bovie and scalpel transection were made using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the cell death percentage at standardized distances from the transection site was compared between groups using a mixed-model analysis. Significance was defined at P &lt; .05. The cellular and tendon fibril architecture was well maintained beyond the scalpel transection site, whereas Bovie transection disrupted the architecture beyond its transection path. The percentage of dead cells in the Bovie group (74.9% ± 31.2%) was significantly higher than that in the scalpel group (27.6% ± 29.9%, P = .0004). Compared with the transection site, the cell death percentage after Bovie transection significantly declined at 2.5 mm whereas that after scalpel transection significantly declined at 1 mm from the transection site. There was a significantly higher dead cell percentage in the Bovie transection group, indicating extensive damage beyond the local incision site, compared with sharp transection. Electrosurgical transection of the ovine infraspinatus tendon ex vivo caused higher cell death and greater tissue architecture disruption compared with sharp scalpel transection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34582992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Electrocautery ; live/dead ; ovine ; rotator cuff ; tendon ; tenocyte viability</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.832-838</ispartof><rights>2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a421ec961b8b936be4c73eebdae124fe5be252a488394bd98816d4d9a5f99cc23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a421ec961b8b936be4c73eebdae124fe5be252a488394bd98816d4d9a5f99cc23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2350-8187 ; 0000-0002-0205-418X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34582992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dandu, Navya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Jeremiah T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huddleston, Hailey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeFroda, Steven F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisazza, Katie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrigues, Grant E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanke, Adam B.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Electrocautery is a common surgical technique and is often used during shoulder arthroplasty to elevate or transect the subscapularis tendon. The relative amount of tissue damage caused by cautery as opposed to sharp transection is not currently known. The purpose of this study was to examine local tissue damage resulting from electrocautery vs. sharp transection with a scalpel. We hypothesized that the electrosurgical unit would cause higher collateral tissue damage and cell death compared with sharp transection. Twelve cadaveric ovine shoulders were randomized to either the electrosurgical or sharp transection group. The infraspinatus tendon was isolated, and a partial-thickness transection was made using either a monopolar electrosurgical device (Bovie) or No. 10 scalpel blade. Tendon explants were then visualized with confocal microscopy to evaluate tissue architecture. A live/dead assay was performed using microscopy imaging analysis software. Comparisons between Bovie and scalpel transection were made using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the cell death percentage at standardized distances from the transection site was compared between groups using a mixed-model analysis. Significance was defined at P &lt; .05. The cellular and tendon fibril architecture was well maintained beyond the scalpel transection site, whereas Bovie transection disrupted the architecture beyond its transection path. The percentage of dead cells in the Bovie group (74.9% ± 31.2%) was significantly higher than that in the scalpel group (27.6% ± 29.9%, P = .0004). Compared with the transection site, the cell death percentage after Bovie transection significantly declined at 2.5 mm whereas that after scalpel transection significantly declined at 1 mm from the transection site. There was a significantly higher dead cell percentage in the Bovie transection group, indicating extensive damage beyond the local incision site, compared with sharp transection. Electrosurgical transection of the ovine infraspinatus tendon ex vivo caused higher cell death and greater tissue architecture disruption compared with sharp scalpel transection.</description><subject>Electrocautery</subject><subject>live/dead</subject><subject>ovine</subject><subject>rotator cuff</subject><subject>tendon</subject><subject>tenocyte viability</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoSNIkP6CX4mMvdvVpS_RUliQtLJRAchayNN7I2NJWsgv776PNpj32NMPwzMvMg9AnghuCSft1bMYMDcWUNFg2mOIzdEUEo3UrMP5QeixkTTveXqKPOY8YY8UxvUCXjAtJlaJX6PFxNWHxw8GHXbW8QDWbXfDL6qCKQzVFa6ZqgeBiqHwY13SohhTnCiawS4p5TTv_hiQTchn5GG7Q-WCmDLfv9Ro93989bX7U218PPzfft7Vlgi214ZSAVS3pZa9Y2wO3HQPonQFC-QCiByqo4VIyxXunpCSt404ZMShlLWXX6Mspd5_i7xXyomefLUyTCRDXrKnouo4x3pKCkhNqy8k5waD3yc8mHTTB-mhSj7qY1EeTGktdTJadz-_xaz-D-7fxV10Bvp0AKE_-8ZB0th6CBedTMaFd9P-JfwUeOYVz</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Dandu, Navya</creator><creator>Nelson, Brad B.</creator><creator>Easley, Jeremiah T.</creator><creator>Huddleston, Hailey P.</creator><creator>DeFroda, Steven F.</creator><creator>Bisazza, Katie T.</creator><creator>Garrigues, Grant E.</creator><creator>Yanke, Adam B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2350-8187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-418X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection</title><author>Dandu, Navya ; Nelson, Brad B. ; Easley, Jeremiah T. ; Huddleston, Hailey P. ; DeFroda, Steven F. ; Bisazza, Katie T. ; Garrigues, Grant E. ; Yanke, Adam B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a421ec961b8b936be4c73eebdae124fe5be252a488394bd98816d4d9a5f99cc23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Electrocautery</topic><topic>live/dead</topic><topic>ovine</topic><topic>rotator cuff</topic><topic>tendon</topic><topic>tenocyte viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dandu, Navya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Brad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easley, Jeremiah T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huddleston, Hailey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeFroda, Steven F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisazza, Katie T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrigues, Grant E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanke, Adam B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dandu, Navya</au><au>Nelson, Brad B.</au><au>Easley, Jeremiah T.</au><au>Huddleston, Hailey P.</au><au>DeFroda, Steven F.</au><au>Bisazza, Katie T.</au><au>Garrigues, Grant E.</au><au>Yanke, Adam B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>832</spage><epage>838</epage><pages>832-838</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Electrocautery is a common surgical technique and is often used during shoulder arthroplasty to elevate or transect the subscapularis tendon. The relative amount of tissue damage caused by cautery as opposed to sharp transection is not currently known. The purpose of this study was to examine local tissue damage resulting from electrocautery vs. sharp transection with a scalpel. We hypothesized that the electrosurgical unit would cause higher collateral tissue damage and cell death compared with sharp transection. Twelve cadaveric ovine shoulders were randomized to either the electrosurgical or sharp transection group. The infraspinatus tendon was isolated, and a partial-thickness transection was made using either a monopolar electrosurgical device (Bovie) or No. 10 scalpel blade. Tendon explants were then visualized with confocal microscopy to evaluate tissue architecture. A live/dead assay was performed using microscopy imaging analysis software. Comparisons between Bovie and scalpel transection were made using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the cell death percentage at standardized distances from the transection site was compared between groups using a mixed-model analysis. Significance was defined at P &lt; .05. The cellular and tendon fibril architecture was well maintained beyond the scalpel transection site, whereas Bovie transection disrupted the architecture beyond its transection path. The percentage of dead cells in the Bovie group (74.9% ± 31.2%) was significantly higher than that in the scalpel group (27.6% ± 29.9%, P = .0004). Compared with the transection site, the cell death percentage after Bovie transection significantly declined at 2.5 mm whereas that after scalpel transection significantly declined at 1 mm from the transection site. There was a significantly higher dead cell percentage in the Bovie transection group, indicating extensive damage beyond the local incision site, compared with sharp transection. Electrosurgical transection of the ovine infraspinatus tendon ex vivo caused higher cell death and greater tissue architecture disruption compared with sharp scalpel transection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34582992</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.020</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2350-8187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-418X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.832-838
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2577733461
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Electrocautery
live/dead
ovine
rotator cuff
tendon
tenocyte viability
title Quantifying the magnitude of local tendon injury from electrosurgical transection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A17%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20the%20magnitude%20of%20local%20tendon%20injury%20from%20electrosurgical%20transection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Dandu,%20Navya&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=832&rft.epage=838&rft.pages=832-838&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2577733461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2577733461&rft_id=info:pmid/34582992&rft_els_id=S1058274621006923&rfr_iscdi=true