Algorithmic Approach Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improved Survival for Patients with Synchronous Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction

Background This study retrospectively analyzed the feasibility and surgical outcome of an algorithmic approach using negative pressure wound therapy for patients with synchronous hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Methods Pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2021-12, Vol.28 (13), p.8996-9007
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Chao-Chun, Tang, Wen-Ruei, Huang, Wei-Li, Chen, Ying-Yuan, Yen, Yi-Ting, Tseng, Yau-Lin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9007
container_issue 13
container_start_page 8996
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 28
creator Chang, Chao-Chun
Tang, Wen-Ruei
Huang, Wei-Li
Chen, Ying-Yuan
Yen, Yi-Ting
Tseng, Yau-Lin
description Background This study retrospectively analyzed the feasibility and surgical outcome of an algorithmic approach using negative pressure wound therapy for patients with synchronous hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Methods Patients undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for hypopharyngeal cancer between 2011 and 2019 were candidates for this study. Data were collected on patient demographics, comorbidities, performance status, cancer stage, treatment, complication, and survival. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for prognostic factors. Results The study enrolled 43 patients. Anastomotic leakage was found in 21 of the patients with a conventional surgical drain (61.9%) and in 10 of the 22 patients with negative pressure wound therapy (45.5%) ( p = 0.280). Nine patients in the conventional drain group (42.9%) and two patients in the negative pressure wound therapy group (9.1%) had leakage-associated complications ( p = 0.011). The incidence of pulmonary complications was higher in the conventional surgical drain group (9 vs 2; p = 0.011). The number of complications requiring surgery was higher in the conventional drain group (7 vs 0; p = 0.004). The overall survival in the negative pressure wound therapy group was better (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.76; p = 0.009). Negative pressure wound therapy was independently associated with overall survival (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.77; p = 0.011). Conclusions Negative pressure wound therapy with an algorithmic approach improved the overall survival for the patients undergoing gastric tube reconstruction after pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer by preventing deadly complications secondary to anastomotic leakage
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-021-10365-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2577729859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2577729859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97c673317521a9d11b8083efbe71010605c3decf5424922d093371d3e77b3feb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRSMEYh7wAyyQJTZsMvgRx8my1ZqXNIIW0y2WkeNU0hkldrCTRvlTPofqSQMSC1Zll0_dKteNoneMXjGeyE-B0UQkMeUsZlSkMs5eROdMYipJM_YSzzTN4pyn8iy6COGJUqYEla-jM5HITPJcnkc_V13jfDvu-9aQ1TB4p82e7EJrG_IZGj22ByAbDyFMHsg3N9mKbPfg9TCT-x7xA1TkcfKH9qA7UjtPNlgDdgzkB6qSx9mavXfWTYHczYMb9trPtgGENUpdh2Pm-brW1oAnO1uBb9yx_2ZhXbcEOLFmdP28qN_qMHocfDuVQL6CcRbvkxlbZ99Er2rdBXh7ipfR7uZ6u76LH77c3q9XD7ERSo5xrkyqhGBKcqbzirEyo5mAugTFKO6PSiMqMLVMeJJzXtFcCMUqAUqVooZSXEYfF13cxfcJwlj0bTDQddoCfrrgUinF80zmiH74B31yk7c4HVK5EmlCqUCKL5TxLgQPdTH4tscVFIwWR9-LxfcCfS-efS8yLHp_kp7KHqo_Jb-NRkAsQMAn3L__2_s_sr8AZeG-ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597364003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Algorithmic Approach Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improved Survival for Patients with Synchronous Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Chang, Chao-Chun ; Tang, Wen-Ruei ; Huang, Wei-Li ; Chen, Ying-Yuan ; Yen, Yi-Ting ; Tseng, Yau-Lin</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chao-Chun ; Tang, Wen-Ruei ; Huang, Wei-Li ; Chen, Ying-Yuan ; Yen, Yi-Ting ; Tseng, Yau-Lin</creatorcontrib><description>Background This study retrospectively analyzed the feasibility and surgical outcome of an algorithmic approach using negative pressure wound therapy for patients with synchronous hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Methods Patients undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for hypopharyngeal cancer between 2011 and 2019 were candidates for this study. Data were collected on patient demographics, comorbidities, performance status, cancer stage, treatment, complication, and survival. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for prognostic factors. Results The study enrolled 43 patients. Anastomotic leakage was found in 21 of the patients with a conventional surgical drain (61.9%) and in 10 of the 22 patients with negative pressure wound therapy (45.5%) ( p = 0.280). Nine patients in the conventional drain group (42.9%) and two patients in the negative pressure wound therapy group (9.1%) had leakage-associated complications ( p = 0.011). The incidence of pulmonary complications was higher in the conventional surgical drain group (9 vs 2; p = 0.011). The number of complications requiring surgery was higher in the conventional drain group (7 vs 0; p = 0.004). The overall survival in the negative pressure wound therapy group was better (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.76; p = 0.009). Negative pressure wound therapy was independently associated with overall survival (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.77; p = 0.011). Conclusions Negative pressure wound therapy with an algorithmic approach improved the overall survival for the patients undergoing gastric tube reconstruction after pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer by preventing deadly complications secondary to anastomotic leakage</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10365-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34585295</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Anastomotic leak ; Cancer ; Demography ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - adverse effects ; Esophagus ; Feasibility studies ; Head and Neck Oncology ; Humans ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy ; Oncology ; Patients ; Pharyngectomy - adverse effects ; Pressure ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival ; Survival analysis ; Throat cancer ; Wound healing ; Wounds</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2021-12, Vol.28 (13), p.8996-9007</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021</rights><rights>2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97c673317521a9d11b8083efbe71010605c3decf5424922d093371d3e77b3feb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97c673317521a9d11b8083efbe71010605c3decf5424922d093371d3e77b3feb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-021-10365-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-021-10365-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34585295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chao-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Wen-Ruei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ying-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yen, Yi-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Yau-Lin</creatorcontrib><title>Algorithmic Approach Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improved Survival for Patients with Synchronous Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background This study retrospectively analyzed the feasibility and surgical outcome of an algorithmic approach using negative pressure wound therapy for patients with synchronous hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Methods Patients undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for hypopharyngeal cancer between 2011 and 2019 were candidates for this study. Data were collected on patient demographics, comorbidities, performance status, cancer stage, treatment, complication, and survival. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for prognostic factors. Results The study enrolled 43 patients. Anastomotic leakage was found in 21 of the patients with a conventional surgical drain (61.9%) and in 10 of the 22 patients with negative pressure wound therapy (45.5%) ( p = 0.280). Nine patients in the conventional drain group (42.9%) and two patients in the negative pressure wound therapy group (9.1%) had leakage-associated complications ( p = 0.011). The incidence of pulmonary complications was higher in the conventional surgical drain group (9 vs 2; p = 0.011). The number of complications requiring surgery was higher in the conventional drain group (7 vs 0; p = 0.004). The overall survival in the negative pressure wound therapy group was better (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.76; p = 0.009). Negative pressure wound therapy was independently associated with overall survival (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.77; p = 0.011). Conclusions Negative pressure wound therapy with an algorithmic approach improved the overall survival for the patients undergoing gastric tube reconstruction after pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer by preventing deadly complications secondary to anastomotic leakage</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anastomotic leak</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Head and Neck Oncology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharyngectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Throat cancer</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><subject>Wounds</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRSMEYh7wAyyQJTZsMvgRx8my1ZqXNIIW0y2WkeNU0hkldrCTRvlTPofqSQMSC1Zll0_dKteNoneMXjGeyE-B0UQkMeUsZlSkMs5eROdMYipJM_YSzzTN4pyn8iy6COGJUqYEla-jM5HITPJcnkc_V13jfDvu-9aQ1TB4p82e7EJrG_IZGj22ByAbDyFMHsg3N9mKbPfg9TCT-x7xA1TkcfKH9qA7UjtPNlgDdgzkB6qSx9mavXfWTYHczYMb9trPtgGENUpdh2Pm-brW1oAnO1uBb9yx_2ZhXbcEOLFmdP28qN_qMHocfDuVQL6CcRbvkxlbZ99Er2rdBXh7ipfR7uZ6u76LH77c3q9XD7ERSo5xrkyqhGBKcqbzirEyo5mAugTFKO6PSiMqMLVMeJJzXtFcCMUqAUqVooZSXEYfF13cxfcJwlj0bTDQddoCfrrgUinF80zmiH74B31yk7c4HVK5EmlCqUCKL5TxLgQPdTH4tscVFIwWR9-LxfcCfS-efS8yLHp_kp7KHqo_Jb-NRkAsQMAn3L__2_s_sr8AZeG-ig</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Chang, Chao-Chun</creator><creator>Tang, Wen-Ruei</creator><creator>Huang, Wei-Li</creator><creator>Chen, Ying-Yuan</creator><creator>Yen, Yi-Ting</creator><creator>Tseng, Yau-Lin</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Algorithmic Approach Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improved Survival for Patients with Synchronous Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction</title><author>Chang, Chao-Chun ; Tang, Wen-Ruei ; Huang, Wei-Li ; Chen, Ying-Yuan ; Yen, Yi-Ting ; Tseng, Yau-Lin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-97c673317521a9d11b8083efbe71010605c3decf5424922d093371d3e77b3feb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anastomotic leak</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Head and Neck Oncology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharyngectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Throat cancer</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><topic>Wounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Chao-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Wen-Ruei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wei-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ying-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yen, Yi-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Yau-Lin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Chao-Chun</au><au>Tang, Wen-Ruei</au><au>Huang, Wei-Li</au><au>Chen, Ying-Yuan</au><au>Yen, Yi-Ting</au><au>Tseng, Yau-Lin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Algorithmic Approach Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improved Survival for Patients with Synchronous Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>8996</spage><epage>9007</epage><pages>8996-9007</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background This study retrospectively analyzed the feasibility and surgical outcome of an algorithmic approach using negative pressure wound therapy for patients with synchronous hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. Methods Patients undergoing pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for hypopharyngeal cancer between 2011 and 2019 were candidates for this study. Data were collected on patient demographics, comorbidities, performance status, cancer stage, treatment, complication, and survival. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for prognostic factors. Results The study enrolled 43 patients. Anastomotic leakage was found in 21 of the patients with a conventional surgical drain (61.9%) and in 10 of the 22 patients with negative pressure wound therapy (45.5%) ( p = 0.280). Nine patients in the conventional drain group (42.9%) and two patients in the negative pressure wound therapy group (9.1%) had leakage-associated complications ( p = 0.011). The incidence of pulmonary complications was higher in the conventional surgical drain group (9 vs 2; p = 0.011). The number of complications requiring surgery was higher in the conventional drain group (7 vs 0; p = 0.004). The overall survival in the negative pressure wound therapy group was better (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.76; p = 0.009). Negative pressure wound therapy was independently associated with overall survival (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.77; p = 0.011). Conclusions Negative pressure wound therapy with an algorithmic approach improved the overall survival for the patients undergoing gastric tube reconstruction after pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for hypopharyngeal and esophageal cancer by preventing deadly complications secondary to anastomotic leakage</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>34585295</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-021-10365-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2021-12, Vol.28 (13), p.8996-9007
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2577729859
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Algorithms
Anastomotic leak
Cancer
Demography
Esophageal cancer
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - adverse effects
Esophagus
Feasibility studies
Head and Neck Oncology
Humans
Medical prognosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
Oncology
Patients
Pharyngectomy - adverse effects
Pressure
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Survival
Survival analysis
Throat cancer
Wound healing
Wounds
title Algorithmic Approach Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improved Survival for Patients with Synchronous Hypopharyngeal and Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Algorithmic%20Approach%20Using%20Negative%20Pressure%20Wound%20Therapy%20Improved%20Survival%20for%20Patients%20with%20Synchronous%20Hypopharyngeal%20and%20Esophageal%20Cancer%20Undergoing%20Pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy%20with%20Gastric%20Tube%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Chang,%20Chao-Chun&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=8996&rft.epage=9007&rft.pages=8996-9007&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-021-10365-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2577729859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597364003&rft_id=info:pmid/34585295&rfr_iscdi=true