Comparative evaluation of various herbal extracts on biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Scardovia wiggsiae: An in vitro study
Background Owing to their strong antimicrobial properties, Helichrysum arenarium (HA), Anzer thyme (AT), and Stevia rebaudiana (SR) have been commonly used in medicine. Aim This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial activities of HA, AT, and SR against S. mutans and S. wiggsiae in biofilms formed on...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of paediatric dentistry 2022-07, Vol.32 (4), p.514-526 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 526 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 514 |
| container_title | International journal of paediatric dentistry |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Demirez Bircan, Zeynep Aydinoglu, Sema Arslan, Ipek Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul Yurteri, Emine Bozdeveci, Arif |
| description | Background
Owing to their strong antimicrobial properties, Helichrysum arenarium (HA), Anzer thyme (AT), and Stevia rebaudiana (SR) have been commonly used in medicine.
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial activities of HA, AT, and SR against S. mutans and S. wiggsiae in biofilms formed on primary teeth.
Design
Fifty enamel samples were divided into two groups: mono‐species biofilm and two‐species biofilm. Each biofilm group was divided into five subgroups (n = 5): group 1, HA; group 2, AT; group 3, SR; group 4, CHX (positive control); and group 5, distilled water (negative control). Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration were determined. The number of viable microorganisms was counted. The presence of microorganisms was examined using a scanning electron microscope, and mineral analysis was performed using energy‐dispersive X‐ray analysis.
Results
In the mono‐species biofilm, CHX was significantly more effective against S. mutans than other groups (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ipd.12929 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576917327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2672616126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-c88b189735d087ecf154f76570eb8bdf62ab7cc8d2d81c2b1eafdd5abd56986f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9vFCEYBnBiNHZdPfgFDImXepgWmAEGb81qa5MmmlQTb4S_lWZmGIGZuie_utStHkzkAgm_POHlAeAlRie4rtMw2xNMBBGPwAa3jDaEtV8fgw0SDDW8a8UReJbzLUKYIoKegqO2o6wTmGzAz10cZ5VUCauDblXDUo9xgtHDVaUQlwy_uaTVAN2PkpQpGdZbHaIPw5jv2XVJbi7RRGMqHpeipgzVZOG1UcnGNSh4F25uclDuLTybYJjgGkqKMJfF7p-DJ14N2b142Lfgy_n7z7sPzdXHi8vd2VVj2q4Xjel7jXvBW2pRz53xmHaeM8qR0722nhGluTG9JbbHhmjslLeWKm0pEz3z7RYcH3LnFL8vLhc5hmzcMKjJ1SEloZwJzFvCK339D72NS5rq6yRhnDDMcP3fLXhzUCbFnJPzck5hVGkvMZL3rcjaivzdSrWvHhIXPTr7V_6poYLTA7gLg9v_P0lefnp3iPwFgomY6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672616126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative evaluation of various herbal extracts on biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Scardovia wiggsiae: An in vitro study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Demirez Bircan, Zeynep ; Aydinoglu, Sema ; Arslan, Ipek ; Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul ; Yurteri, Emine ; Bozdeveci, Arif</creator><creatorcontrib>Demirez Bircan, Zeynep ; Aydinoglu, Sema ; Arslan, Ipek ; Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul ; Yurteri, Emine ; Bozdeveci, Arif</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Owing to their strong antimicrobial properties, Helichrysum arenarium (HA), Anzer thyme (AT), and Stevia rebaudiana (SR) have been commonly used in medicine.
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial activities of HA, AT, and SR against S. mutans and S. wiggsiae in biofilms formed on primary teeth.
Design
Fifty enamel samples were divided into two groups: mono‐species biofilm and two‐species biofilm. Each biofilm group was divided into five subgroups (n = 5): group 1, HA; group 2, AT; group 3, SR; group 4, CHX (positive control); and group 5, distilled water (negative control). Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration were determined. The number of viable microorganisms was counted. The presence of microorganisms was examined using a scanning electron microscope, and mineral analysis was performed using energy‐dispersive X‐ray analysis.
Results
In the mono‐species biofilm, CHX was significantly more effective against S. mutans than other groups (p < .001). Furthermore, HA, AT, and SR groups showed significantly lower colony counts of S. mutans than distilled water (p < .05). In the two‐species biofilm group, AT, SR, and CHX were significantly more effective against S. wiggsiae than distilled water (p < .05).
Conclusions
HA, AT, and SR have been suggested as effective natural alternatives to CHX against cariogenic bacteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-263X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ipd.12929</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34564912</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biofilms ; Dental enamel ; Helichrysum arenarium ; Microorganisms ; Minimum inhibitory concentration ; Plant extracts ; S. mutans ; S. wiggsiae ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Species ; stevia ; Streptococcus ; Streptococcus infections ; thyme</subject><ispartof>International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.32 (4), p.514-526</ispartof><rights>2021 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 BSPD, IAPD and John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-c88b189735d087ecf154f76570eb8bdf62ab7cc8d2d81c2b1eafdd5abd56986f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3770-2714 ; 0000-0002-8648-3554 ; 0000-0003-1490-8645 ; 0000-0003-1047-8350 ; 0000-0002-0729-9143 ; 0000-0003-1614-1425</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fipd.12929$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fipd.12929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34564912$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demirez Bircan, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydinoglu, Sema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Ipek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurteri, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozdeveci, Arif</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative evaluation of various herbal extracts on biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Scardovia wiggsiae: An in vitro study</title><title>International journal of paediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><description>Background
Owing to their strong antimicrobial properties, Helichrysum arenarium (HA), Anzer thyme (AT), and Stevia rebaudiana (SR) have been commonly used in medicine.
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial activities of HA, AT, and SR against S. mutans and S. wiggsiae in biofilms formed on primary teeth.
Design
Fifty enamel samples were divided into two groups: mono‐species biofilm and two‐species biofilm. Each biofilm group was divided into five subgroups (n = 5): group 1, HA; group 2, AT; group 3, SR; group 4, CHX (positive control); and group 5, distilled water (negative control). Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration were determined. The number of viable microorganisms was counted. The presence of microorganisms was examined using a scanning electron microscope, and mineral analysis was performed using energy‐dispersive X‐ray analysis.
Results
In the mono‐species biofilm, CHX was significantly more effective against S. mutans than other groups (p < .001). Furthermore, HA, AT, and SR groups showed significantly lower colony counts of S. mutans than distilled water (p < .05). In the two‐species biofilm group, AT, SR, and CHX were significantly more effective against S. wiggsiae than distilled water (p < .05).
Conclusions
HA, AT, and SR have been suggested as effective natural alternatives to CHX against cariogenic bacteria.</description><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Helichrysum arenarium</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Minimum inhibitory concentration</subject><subject>Plant extracts</subject><subject>S. mutans</subject><subject>S. wiggsiae</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>stevia</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>thyme</subject><issn>0960-7439</issn><issn>1365-263X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10U9vFCEYBnBiNHZdPfgFDImXepgWmAEGb81qa5MmmlQTb4S_lWZmGIGZuie_utStHkzkAgm_POHlAeAlRie4rtMw2xNMBBGPwAa3jDaEtV8fgw0SDDW8a8UReJbzLUKYIoKegqO2o6wTmGzAz10cZ5VUCauDblXDUo9xgtHDVaUQlwy_uaTVAN2PkpQpGdZbHaIPw5jv2XVJbi7RRGMqHpeipgzVZOG1UcnGNSh4F25uclDuLTybYJjgGkqKMJfF7p-DJ14N2b142Lfgy_n7z7sPzdXHi8vd2VVj2q4Xjel7jXvBW2pRz53xmHaeM8qR0722nhGluTG9JbbHhmjslLeWKm0pEz3z7RYcH3LnFL8vLhc5hmzcMKjJ1SEloZwJzFvCK339D72NS5rq6yRhnDDMcP3fLXhzUCbFnJPzck5hVGkvMZL3rcjaivzdSrWvHhIXPTr7V_6poYLTA7gLg9v_P0lefnp3iPwFgomY6A</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Demirez Bircan, Zeynep</creator><creator>Aydinoglu, Sema</creator><creator>Arslan, Ipek</creator><creator>Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul</creator><creator>Yurteri, Emine</creator><creator>Bozdeveci, Arif</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-2714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8648-3554</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-8645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-8350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0729-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1614-1425</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Comparative evaluation of various herbal extracts on biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Scardovia wiggsiae: An in vitro study</title><author>Demirez Bircan, Zeynep ; Aydinoglu, Sema ; Arslan, Ipek ; Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul ; Yurteri, Emine ; Bozdeveci, Arif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-c88b189735d087ecf154f76570eb8bdf62ab7cc8d2d81c2b1eafdd5abd56986f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Helichrysum arenarium</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Minimum inhibitory concentration</topic><topic>Plant extracts</topic><topic>S. mutans</topic><topic>S. wiggsiae</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>stevia</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>thyme</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demirez Bircan, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydinoglu, Sema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Ipek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yurteri, Emine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozdeveci, Arif</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demirez Bircan, Zeynep</au><au>Aydinoglu, Sema</au><au>Arslan, Ipek</au><au>Alpay Karaoglu, Sengul</au><au>Yurteri, Emine</au><au>Bozdeveci, Arif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative evaluation of various herbal extracts on biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Scardovia wiggsiae: An in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>526</epage><pages>514-526</pages><issn>0960-7439</issn><eissn>1365-263X</eissn><abstract>Background
Owing to their strong antimicrobial properties, Helichrysum arenarium (HA), Anzer thyme (AT), and Stevia rebaudiana (SR) have been commonly used in medicine.
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial activities of HA, AT, and SR against S. mutans and S. wiggsiae in biofilms formed on primary teeth.
Design
Fifty enamel samples were divided into two groups: mono‐species biofilm and two‐species biofilm. Each biofilm group was divided into five subgroups (n = 5): group 1, HA; group 2, AT; group 3, SR; group 4, CHX (positive control); and group 5, distilled water (negative control). Minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration were determined. The number of viable microorganisms was counted. The presence of microorganisms was examined using a scanning electron microscope, and mineral analysis was performed using energy‐dispersive X‐ray analysis.
Results
In the mono‐species biofilm, CHX was significantly more effective against S. mutans than other groups (p < .001). Furthermore, HA, AT, and SR groups showed significantly lower colony counts of S. mutans than distilled water (p < .05). In the two‐species biofilm group, AT, SR, and CHX were significantly more effective against S. wiggsiae than distilled water (p < .05).
Conclusions
HA, AT, and SR have been suggested as effective natural alternatives to CHX against cariogenic bacteria.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34564912</pmid><doi>10.1111/ipd.12929</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-2714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8648-3554</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-8645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-8350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0729-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1614-1425</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-7439 |
| ispartof | International journal of paediatric dentistry, 2022-07, Vol.32 (4), p.514-526 |
| issn | 0960-7439 1365-263X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576917327 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Biofilms Dental enamel Helichrysum arenarium Microorganisms Minimum inhibitory concentration Plant extracts S. mutans S. wiggsiae Scanning electron microscopy Species stevia Streptococcus Streptococcus infections thyme |
| title | Comparative evaluation of various herbal extracts on biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Scardovia wiggsiae: An in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T02%3A51%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20evaluation%20of%20various%20herbal%20extracts%20on%20biofilms%20of%20Streptococcus%20mutans%20and%20Scardovia%20wiggsiae:%20An%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20paediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=Demirez%20Bircan,%20Zeynep&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=526&rft.pages=514-526&rft.issn=0960-7439&rft.eissn=1365-263X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ipd.12929&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672616126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672616126&rft_id=info:pmid/34564912&rfr_iscdi=true |