Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a real-world population from Victoria, Australia. A retrospective analysis of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current problems in cancer 2022-04, Vol.46 (2), p.100793-100793, Article 100793
Hauptverfasser: Jalali, A, Gard, G, Banks, S, Dunn, C, Wong, HL, Wong, R, Lee, M, Gately, L, Loft, M, Shapiro, JD, Kosmider, S, Tie, J, Ananda, S, Yeung, J M, Jennens, R, Lee, B, McKendrick, J, Lim, L, Khattak, A, Gibbs, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100793
container_issue 2
container_start_page 100793
container_title Current problems in cancer
container_volume 46
creator Jalali, A
Gard, G
Banks, S
Dunn, C
Wong, HL
Wong, R
Lee, M
Gately, L
Loft, M
Shapiro, JD
Kosmider, S
Tie, J
Ananda, S
Yeung, J M
Jennens, R
Lee, B
McKendrick, J
Lim, L
Khattak, A
Gibbs, P
description For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a real-world population from Victoria, Australia. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102. The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102-treated and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 36% vs 49% were RAS wild-type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months compared to 2 months in RECOURSE, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths, where TAS-102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion.TRACC registry patients treated with TAS-102 were younger than those from the RECOURSE trial, with similar overall survival observed. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100793
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576917016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147027221001100</els_id><sourcerecordid>2576917016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-517ac519826067313687959e4bbc7d5fbe1f4f5a67d5e0a5f3f9ab9acd20229d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1P7CAUhom5RsePv2DYmNxNR6ADyMLFZOJXYuJCXRNKTzNM2lKBep1_L2PVxV25IuQ87_l4EDqnZE4JFRebuR1DGIKvWmt6C2HOCKO5RqQq99CM8pIXolzwP2hG6EIWhEl2iI5i3BBCmaL8AB3msuCC0BlK971LzrQY3gcIDnJH7Bv8vHwqKGHYrqHzaQ3BDFvserwcYwqmdabHg0kZTxH_c2mNVzuwCNAEY5MPW9xBMjFlxmLrWx_ApjxlWvkE7TemjXD69R6jl5vr59Vd8fB4e79aPhS2ZCoVnEpjOVWXTBAhS1qKS6m4gkVVWVnzpgLaLBpuRP4AMbwpG2UqZWydlTBVl8fo79Q363odISbduWihbU0PfoyacSkUlVlrRq8m1AYfY75DD8F1Jmw1JXonXm_0f-L1TryexOf82deoseqg_kl_m87A7QRAPvjN5Xi0n7prt3Oja-9-OeoDxtSfqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576917016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Jalali, A ; Gard, G ; Banks, S ; Dunn, C ; Wong, HL ; Wong, R ; Lee, M ; Gately, L ; Loft, M ; Shapiro, JD ; Kosmider, S ; Tie, J ; Ananda, S ; Yeung, J M ; Jennens, R ; Lee, B ; McKendrick, J ; Lim, L ; Khattak, A ; Gibbs, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Jalali, A ; Gard, G ; Banks, S ; Dunn, C ; Wong, HL ; Wong, R ; Lee, M ; Gately, L ; Loft, M ; Shapiro, JD ; Kosmider, S ; Tie, J ; Ananda, S ; Yeung, J M ; Jennens, R ; Lee, B ; McKendrick, J ; Lim, L ; Khattak, A ; Gibbs, P</creatorcontrib><description>For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a real-world population from Victoria, Australia. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102. The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102-treated and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 36% vs 49% were RAS wild-type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months compared to 2 months in RECOURSE, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths, where TAS-102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion.TRACC registry patients treated with TAS-102 were younger than those from the RECOURSE trial, with similar overall survival observed. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-0272</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-6345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100793</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34565601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Australia ; Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Drug Combinations ; Humans ; Metastatic ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy ; Pyrrolidines ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Retrospective Studies ; TAS-102 ; Thymine - therapeutic use ; Trifluridine - therapeutic use ; Trifluridine/Tipiracil ; Uracil - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Current problems in cancer, 2022-04, Vol.46 (2), p.100793-100793, Article 100793</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-517ac519826067313687959e4bbc7d5fbe1f4f5a67d5e0a5f3f9ab9acd20229d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9872-997X ; 0000-0003-3803-2107 ; 0000-0002-3663-4406 ; 0000-0002-0947-9834 ; 0000-0002-4926-5689 ; 0000-0002-6267-7880 ; 0000-0003-3267-4520</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100793$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34565601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jalali, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gard, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, HL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gately, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loft, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, JD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmider, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ananda, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennens, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKendrick, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khattak, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, P</creatorcontrib><title>Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer</title><title>Current problems in cancer</title><addtitle>Curr Probl Cancer</addtitle><description>For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a real-world population from Victoria, Australia. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102. The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102-treated and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 36% vs 49% were RAS wild-type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months compared to 2 months in RECOURSE, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths, where TAS-102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion.TRACC registry patients treated with TAS-102 were younger than those from the RECOURSE trial, with similar overall survival observed. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metastatic</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pyrrolidines</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>TAS-102</subject><subject>Thymine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Trifluridine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Trifluridine/Tipiracil</subject><subject>Uracil - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0147-0272</issn><issn>1535-6345</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1P7CAUhom5RsePv2DYmNxNR6ADyMLFZOJXYuJCXRNKTzNM2lKBep1_L2PVxV25IuQ87_l4EDqnZE4JFRebuR1DGIKvWmt6C2HOCKO5RqQq99CM8pIXolzwP2hG6EIWhEl2iI5i3BBCmaL8AB3msuCC0BlK971LzrQY3gcIDnJH7Bv8vHwqKGHYrqHzaQ3BDFvserwcYwqmdabHg0kZTxH_c2mNVzuwCNAEY5MPW9xBMjFlxmLrWx_ApjxlWvkE7TemjXD69R6jl5vr59Vd8fB4e79aPhS2ZCoVnEpjOVWXTBAhS1qKS6m4gkVVWVnzpgLaLBpuRP4AMbwpG2UqZWydlTBVl8fo79Q363odISbduWihbU0PfoyacSkUlVlrRq8m1AYfY75DD8F1Jmw1JXonXm_0f-L1TryexOf82deoseqg_kl_m87A7QRAPvjN5Xi0n7prt3Oja-9-OeoDxtSfqg</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Jalali, A</creator><creator>Gard, G</creator><creator>Banks, S</creator><creator>Dunn, C</creator><creator>Wong, HL</creator><creator>Wong, R</creator><creator>Lee, M</creator><creator>Gately, L</creator><creator>Loft, M</creator><creator>Shapiro, JD</creator><creator>Kosmider, S</creator><creator>Tie, J</creator><creator>Ananda, S</creator><creator>Yeung, J M</creator><creator>Jennens, R</creator><creator>Lee, B</creator><creator>McKendrick, J</creator><creator>Lim, L</creator><creator>Khattak, A</creator><creator>Gibbs, P</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-997X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-2107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3663-4406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0947-9834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-5689</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-7880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-4520</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer</title><author>Jalali, A ; Gard, G ; Banks, S ; Dunn, C ; Wong, HL ; Wong, R ; Lee, M ; Gately, L ; Loft, M ; Shapiro, JD ; Kosmider, S ; Tie, J ; Ananda, S ; Yeung, J M ; Jennens, R ; Lee, B ; McKendrick, J ; Lim, L ; Khattak, A ; Gibbs, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-517ac519826067313687959e4bbc7d5fbe1f4f5a67d5e0a5f3f9ab9acd20229d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metastatic</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pyrrolidines</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>TAS-102</topic><topic>Thymine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Trifluridine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Trifluridine/Tipiracil</topic><topic>Uracil - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jalali, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gard, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banks, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, HL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gately, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loft, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, JD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmider, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ananda, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jennens, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKendrick, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khattak, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbs, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current problems in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jalali, A</au><au>Gard, G</au><au>Banks, S</au><au>Dunn, C</au><au>Wong, HL</au><au>Wong, R</au><au>Lee, M</au><au>Gately, L</au><au>Loft, M</au><au>Shapiro, JD</au><au>Kosmider, S</au><au>Tie, J</au><au>Ananda, S</au><au>Yeung, J M</au><au>Jennens, R</au><au>Lee, B</au><au>McKendrick, J</au><au>Lim, L</au><au>Khattak, A</au><au>Gibbs, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>Current problems in cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Probl Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>100793</spage><epage>100793</epage><pages>100793-100793</pages><artnum>100793</artnum><issn>0147-0272</issn><eissn>1535-6345</eissn><abstract>For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in a real-world population from Victoria, Australia. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102. The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102-treated and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 36% vs 49% were RAS wild-type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months compared to 2 months in RECOURSE, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths, where TAS-102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion.TRACC registry patients treated with TAS-102 were younger than those from the RECOURSE trial, with similar overall survival observed. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34565601</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100793</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-997X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-2107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3663-4406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0947-9834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-5689</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-7880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-4520</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-0272
ispartof Current problems in cancer, 2022-04, Vol.46 (2), p.100793-100793, Article 100793
issn 0147-0272
1535-6345
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2576917016
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Australia
Colonic Neoplasms - drug therapy
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Drug Combinations
Humans
Metastatic
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - drug therapy
Pyrrolidines
Rectal Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
TAS-102
Thymine - therapeutic use
Trifluridine - therapeutic use
Trifluridine/Tipiracil
Uracil - therapeutic use
title Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with Chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T09%3A06%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20experience%20of%20TAS-102%20chemotherapy%20in%20Australian%20patients%20with%20Chemo-refractory%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Current%20problems%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Jalali,%20A&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=100793&rft.epage=100793&rft.pages=100793-100793&rft.artnum=100793&rft.issn=0147-0272&rft.eissn=1535-6345&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100793&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2576917016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576917016&rft_id=info:pmid/34565601&rft_els_id=S0147027221001100&rfr_iscdi=true