Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus . In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary research communications 2022-02, Vol.46 (1), p.109-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 120 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Veterinary research communications |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo Viol, Milena Araúz Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki da Costa, Alvimar José Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva |
description | The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in
R. sanguineus
, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing
Leishmania
spp. in
R. sanguineus
, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575837232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575837232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6feed575c1e6b42be50432ffff33aa14cf53ab02ebe502a567d55a9b165f31a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVoid00fyCHsNBLL5vqe-3cikmbQKBQ2rOYlWdjmV3tRuM1-N9XG-cDeoguQjPPvDOjl7ELwa8E59U3EkKaZcmlKPlyoXR5OGFzYSpVVlrbD2zOhTVlpRZ8xj4RbTnPGFenbKa0MVpZPWfdCmKIWOwDeUzQFi0G2nQ5CBSogLgufm_CEDwOG2hHKgjiw5grRroucJ9DsAt9fAJ93w2QAuVn3xS-BaLgs-QO_SaGxxHpM_vYQEt4_nyfsb8_bv6sbsv7Xz_vVt_vS6-k3ZW2QVybyniBttayRsO1kk0-SgEI7RujoOYSp4wEY6u1MbCs87qNEmDVGft61B1SP_XduW7ar20hYj-Sk1l8oSqpZEa__Idu-zHFPJ2TVsqF5abimZJHyqeeKGHjhhQ6SAcnuJvMcEczXDbDPZnhDrno8ll6rDtcv5a8_H4G1BGgnIoPmN56vyP7D2lzl6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622860570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo ; Viol, Milena Araúz ; Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix ; Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda ; Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki ; da Costa, Alvimar José ; Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira ; Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo ; Viol, Milena Araúz ; Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix ; Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda ; Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki ; da Costa, Alvimar José ; Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira ; Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in
R. sanguineus
, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing
Leishmania
spp. in
R. sanguineus
, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34554364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biopsy ; Bone marrow ; Diagnostic tests ; Dog Diseases - diagnosis ; Dogs ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Immunohistochemistry ; Intestine ; Laboratories ; Leishmania ; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis ; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary ; Life Sciences ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Original Article ; Parasitic diseases ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary ; Rhipicephalus sanguineus ; Salivary gland ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Visceral leishmaniasis ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Veterinary research communications, 2022-02, Vol.46 (1), p.109-120</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6feed575c1e6b42be50432ffff33aa14cf53ab02ebe502a567d55a9b165f31a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viol, Milena Araúz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Alvimar José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creatorcontrib><title>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</title><title>Veterinary research communications</title><addtitle>Vet Res Commun</addtitle><addtitle>Vet Res Commun</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in
R. sanguineus
, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing
Leishmania
spp. in
R. sanguineus
, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leishmania</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</subject><subject>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</subject><subject>Salivary gland</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Visceral leishmaniasis</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0165-7380</issn><issn>1573-7446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVoid00fyCHsNBLL5vqe-3cikmbQKBQ2rOYlWdjmV3tRuM1-N9XG-cDeoguQjPPvDOjl7ELwa8E59U3EkKaZcmlKPlyoXR5OGFzYSpVVlrbD2zOhTVlpRZ8xj4RbTnPGFenbKa0MVpZPWfdCmKIWOwDeUzQFi0G2nQ5CBSogLgufm_CEDwOG2hHKgjiw5grRroucJ9DsAt9fAJ93w2QAuVn3xS-BaLgs-QO_SaGxxHpM_vYQEt4_nyfsb8_bv6sbsv7Xz_vVt_vS6-k3ZW2QVybyniBttayRsO1kk0-SgEI7RujoOYSp4wEY6u1MbCs87qNEmDVGft61B1SP_XduW7ar20hYj-Sk1l8oSqpZEa__Idu-zHFPJ2TVsqF5abimZJHyqeeKGHjhhQ6SAcnuJvMcEczXDbDPZnhDrno8ll6rDtcv5a8_H4G1BGgnIoPmN56vyP7D2lzl6c</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</creator><creator>Viol, Milena Araúz</creator><creator>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</creator><creator>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</creator><creator>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</creator><creator>da Costa, Alvimar José</creator><creator>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</creator><creator>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</title><author>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo ; Viol, Milena Araúz ; Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix ; Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda ; Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki ; da Costa, Alvimar José ; Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira ; Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6feed575c1e6b42be50432ffff33aa14cf53ab02ebe502a567d55a9b165f31a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leishmania</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</topic><topic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</topic><topic>Salivary gland</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Visceral leishmaniasis</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viol, Milena Araúz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Alvimar José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary research communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</au><au>Viol, Milena Araúz</au><au>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</au><au>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</au><au>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</au><au>da Costa, Alvimar José</au><au>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</au><au>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary research communications</jtitle><stitle>Vet Res Commun</stitle><addtitle>Vet Res Commun</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>109-120</pages><issn>0165-7380</issn><eissn>1573-7446</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
. In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in
R. sanguineus
, which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for
Leishmania
spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing
Leishmania
spp. in
R. sanguineus
, thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>34554364</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-7380 |
ispartof | Veterinary research communications, 2022-02, Vol.46 (1), p.109-120 |
issn | 0165-7380 1573-7446 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575837232 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Biopsy Bone marrow Diagnostic tests Dog Diseases - diagnosis Dogs Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Immunohistochemistry Intestine Laboratories Leishmania Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary Life Sciences Lymph nodes Lymphatic system Original Article Parasitic diseases Polymerase chain reaction Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary Rhipicephalus sanguineus Salivary gland Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science Visceral leishmaniasis Zoology |
title | Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canine%20visceral%20leishmaniasis%20and%20Rhipicephalus%20sanguineus:%20evaluation%20and%20comparison%20of%20classical%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20research%20communications&rft.au=Santos-Doni,%20Tha%C3%ADs%20Rabelo&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=109-120&rft.issn=0165-7380&rft.eissn=1573-7446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575837232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622860570&rft_id=info:pmid/34554364&rfr_iscdi=true |