Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques

The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus . In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary research communications 2022-02, Vol.46 (1), p.109-120
Hauptverfasser: Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo, Viol, Milena Araúz, Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix, Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda, Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki, da Costa, Alvimar José, Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira, Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 1
container_start_page 109
container_title Veterinary research communications
container_volume 46
creator Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo
Viol, Milena Araúz
Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix
Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda
Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki
da Costa, Alvimar José
Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira
Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva
description The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus . In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus , which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus , thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575837232</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575837232</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6feed575c1e6b42be50432ffff33aa14cf53ab02ebe502a567d55a9b165f31a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVoid00fyCHsNBLL5vqe-3cikmbQKBQ2rOYlWdjmV3tRuM1-N9XG-cDeoguQjPPvDOjl7ELwa8E59U3EkKaZcmlKPlyoXR5OGFzYSpVVlrbD2zOhTVlpRZ8xj4RbTnPGFenbKa0MVpZPWfdCmKIWOwDeUzQFi0G2nQ5CBSogLgufm_CEDwOG2hHKgjiw5grRroucJ9DsAt9fAJ93w2QAuVn3xS-BaLgs-QO_SaGxxHpM_vYQEt4_nyfsb8_bv6sbsv7Xz_vVt_vS6-k3ZW2QVybyniBttayRsO1kk0-SgEI7RujoOYSp4wEY6u1MbCs87qNEmDVGft61B1SP_XduW7ar20hYj-Sk1l8oSqpZEa__Idu-zHFPJ2TVsqF5abimZJHyqeeKGHjhhQ6SAcnuJvMcEczXDbDPZnhDrno8ll6rDtcv5a8_H4G1BGgnIoPmN56vyP7D2lzl6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622860570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo ; Viol, Milena Araúz ; Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix ; Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda ; Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki ; da Costa, Alvimar José ; Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira ; Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo ; Viol, Milena Araúz ; Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix ; Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda ; Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki ; da Costa, Alvimar José ; Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira ; Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus . In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus , which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus , thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34554364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biopsy ; Bone marrow ; Diagnostic tests ; Dog Diseases - diagnosis ; Dogs ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Immunohistochemistry ; Intestine ; Laboratories ; Leishmania ; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis ; Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary ; Life Sciences ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Original Article ; Parasitic diseases ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary ; Rhipicephalus sanguineus ; Salivary gland ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Visceral leishmaniasis ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Veterinary research communications, 2022-02, Vol.46 (1), p.109-120</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6feed575c1e6b42be50432ffff33aa14cf53ab02ebe502a567d55a9b165f31a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viol, Milena Araúz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Alvimar José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creatorcontrib><title>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</title><title>Veterinary research communications</title><addtitle>Vet Res Commun</addtitle><addtitle>Vet Res Commun</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus . In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus , which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus , thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leishmania</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</subject><subject>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</subject><subject>Salivary gland</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Visceral leishmaniasis</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0165-7380</issn><issn>1573-7446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVoid00fyCHsNBLL5vqe-3cikmbQKBQ2rOYlWdjmV3tRuM1-N9XG-cDeoguQjPPvDOjl7ELwa8E59U3EkKaZcmlKPlyoXR5OGFzYSpVVlrbD2zOhTVlpRZ8xj4RbTnPGFenbKa0MVpZPWfdCmKIWOwDeUzQFi0G2nQ5CBSogLgufm_CEDwOG2hHKgjiw5grRroucJ9DsAt9fAJ93w2QAuVn3xS-BaLgs-QO_SaGxxHpM_vYQEt4_nyfsb8_bv6sbsv7Xz_vVt_vS6-k3ZW2QVybyniBttayRsO1kk0-SgEI7RujoOYSp4wEY6u1MbCs87qNEmDVGft61B1SP_XduW7ar20hYj-Sk1l8oSqpZEa__Idu-zHFPJ2TVsqF5abimZJHyqeeKGHjhhQ6SAcnuJvMcEczXDbDPZnhDrno8ll6rDtcv5a8_H4G1BGgnIoPmN56vyP7D2lzl6c</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</creator><creator>Viol, Milena Araúz</creator><creator>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</creator><creator>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</creator><creator>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</creator><creator>da Costa, Alvimar José</creator><creator>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</creator><creator>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</title><author>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo ; Viol, Milena Araúz ; Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix ; Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda ; Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki ; da Costa, Alvimar José ; Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira ; Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6feed575c1e6b42be50432ffff33aa14cf53ab02ebe502a567d55a9b165f31a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leishmania</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary</topic><topic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</topic><topic>Salivary gland</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Visceral leishmaniasis</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viol, Milena Araúz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa, Alvimar José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary research communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos-Doni, Thaís Rabelo</au><au>Viol, Milena Araúz</au><au>Lima, Valéria Marçal Felix</au><au>Oliveira, Bruno César Miranda</au><au>Matos, Lucas Vinicius Shigaki</au><au>da Costa, Alvimar José</au><au>Gomes, Jancarlo Ferreira</au><au>Bresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary research communications</jtitle><stitle>Vet Res Commun</stitle><addtitle>Vet Res Commun</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>109-120</pages><issn>0165-7380</issn><eissn>1573-7446</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was evaluating the association and correlation between the diagnostics tests used for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs and ticks. We evaluated 99 dogs and 990 Rhipicephalus sanguineus . In dogs, we used bone marrow aspirates and lymph node fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for direct parasitological examinations and real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and collected blood samples for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). In ticks, two laboratory techniques [immunohistochemistry to lipophosphoglycan (IHC) and RT-PCR] were performed in the intestine, ovaries and salivary glands. With respect to the measurement of diagnostic performance in dogs, lymph node RT-PCR proved to be the best test followed by ELISA and bone marrow RT-PCR. In ticks, intestine IHC were considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of leishmaniasis with intestinal RT-PCR being the best diagnostic test. To arrive at the correlation between laboratory techniques for dogs and their ticks, we evaluated the diagnostic test used for dogs with tests performed in R. sanguineus , which used lymph node FNAB as the gold standard. The intestine IHC technique showed strongest association. We demonstrated that the best tissue for Leishmania spp. detection in dogs was the lymph node and the intestine in case of ticks. As for laboratory techniques, the isolated analysis of each species presented a strong agreement between immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR when compared to its gold standard. In addition, we concluded that the immunohistochemistry of ticks’ intestines was a better technique for diagnosing Leishmania spp. in R. sanguineus , thereby showing almost perfect correlation with the lymph node FNAB.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>34554364</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-7380
ispartof Veterinary research communications, 2022-02, Vol.46 (1), p.109-120
issn 0165-7380
1573-7446
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575837232
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biopsy
Bone marrow
Diagnostic tests
Dog Diseases - diagnosis
Dogs
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Immunohistochemistry
Intestine
Laboratories
Leishmania
Leishmaniasis, Visceral - diagnosis
Leishmaniasis, Visceral - veterinary
Life Sciences
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Original Article
Parasitic diseases
Polymerase chain reaction
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - veterinary
Rhipicephalus sanguineus
Salivary gland
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
Visceral leishmaniasis
Zoology
title Canine visceral leishmaniasis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: evaluation and comparison of classical techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canine%20visceral%20leishmaniasis%20and%20Rhipicephalus%20sanguineus:%20evaluation%20and%20comparison%20of%20classical%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20research%20communications&rft.au=Santos-Doni,%20Tha%C3%ADs%20Rabelo&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=109-120&rft.issn=0165-7380&rft.eissn=1573-7446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11259-021-09834-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575837232%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622860570&rft_id=info:pmid/34554364&rfr_iscdi=true