Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study
Objectives To assess the osseointegration of calcium‐coated (CS) and chemically modified, sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (MS) dental implants with a lack of primary mechanical stability. Materials and Methods Eighteen implants in CS and MS groups each were loosely placed in the mandible of six...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2021-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1474-1483 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1483 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 1474 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Song, Young Woo Paeng, Kyoung‐Won Kim, Myong Ji Cha, Jae‐Kook Jung, Ui‐Won Jung, Ronald E. Thoma, Daniel S. |
| description | Objectives
To assess the osseointegration of calcium‐coated (CS) and chemically modified, sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (MS) dental implants with a lack of primary mechanical stability.
Materials and Methods
Eighteen implants in CS and MS groups each were loosely placed in the mandible of six mongrel dogs and allowed to heal for 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and implant stability test (IST) values recorded periodically and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and the number of Haversian canals per 1 mm2 measured histologically were statistically analysed (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.13848 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575376474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607975077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-6993476b1060b0db495699b540868d6968886ad750528f5253fd2ec417544e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uEzEQx1cIREvhwAsgS1xa0bT2rj92uUURX1IkJNr7ymvPJq6862B7W-XGI_CEHHgSJiTkgISEL7ZnfvOfkf8uipeMXjFc18bHK1bVvH5UnDJJ6YwKyh4Xp7ShYqaYZCfFs5TuKKWyqZunxUnFBVc1a06LHzdgwmh13JKUdee8y1uizdrBPVjiRmJhzNoTN2y8HnMiDy6viSZGe-Om4ee37ybojGjSo-28Tni-JF7HFWBuFV2-RDln8QLZrBE8v1nOL0iaYq8NEKzaqa1hcCjpt2QI1vUOOcSOFPY2GNr1DlMmA5i1HncFBMaVXsGAQ74lc7KJYLzbZ1Ke7PZ58aTXPsGLw35W3L5_d7v4OFt-_vBpMV_OTFXX9Uw2TcWV7BiVtKO2443AUCc4rWVtZSMRktoqQUVZ96IUVW9LMJwpwTmU1VlxvpfdxPB1gpTbwSUDHp8MwpTaUihRKckVR_T1X-hdmOKIw7WlpKrBHkohdbGnTAwpRejbTXQDutQy2u48b9Hz9rfnyL46KE7dAPZI_jEZgTd74AG60CfjYDRwxPBXKMooLQWeKEO6_n964bLOLoyLMI0ZS68Ppc7D9t8jt4vll_3svwBRb9sV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2607975077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Song, Young Woo ; Paeng, Kyoung‐Won ; Kim, Myong Ji ; Cha, Jae‐Kook ; Jung, Ui‐Won ; Jung, Ronald E. ; Thoma, Daniel S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, Young Woo ; Paeng, Kyoung‐Won ; Kim, Myong Ji ; Cha, Jae‐Kook ; Jung, Ui‐Won ; Jung, Ronald E. ; Thoma, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To assess the osseointegration of calcium‐coated (CS) and chemically modified, sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (MS) dental implants with a lack of primary mechanical stability.
Materials and Methods
Eighteen implants in CS and MS groups each were loosely placed in the mandible of six mongrel dogs and allowed to heal for 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and implant stability test (IST) values recorded periodically and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and the number of Haversian canals per 1 mm2 measured histologically were statistically analysed (p < .05).
Results
All CS and MS implants placed survived. Compared with immediately after installation, ISQ and IST values in both groups increased significantly to over 76 at 2 weeks (p < .0083) and remained stable thereafter. BIC was significantly greater at 8 weeks (61.3 ± 13.6% in CS group; 57.6 ± 5.9% in MS group) compared to 2 and 4 weeks in both groups (p < .017). There were no significant intergroup differences in ISQ, IST or BIC at different time points. Significantly more Haversian canals were observed in group CS (6.2 ± 1.0/mm2) compared with group MS at 4 weeks (3.7 ± 1.8 /mm2; p < .05), while intergroup difference was not significant at 8 weeks.
Conclusion
Both CS and MS implants inserted without primary stability obtained osseointegration within 2 weeks, and lamellar bone adjacent to the implants was first observed at 8 weeks. The formation of primary osteons was more active at 4 weeks in group CS than in group MS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.13848</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34547819</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>acid‐etched dental implant ; animal study ; Animals ; Biomedical materials ; Bone implants ; Calcium ; calcium‐coated dental implant ; Canals ; Canals (anatomy) ; chemically modified sandblasted ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dental Implants ; Dental materials ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental prosthetics ; Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine ; Dogs ; Engineering ; Engineering, Biomedical ; histology ; Lamellar bone ; large‐grit ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Mandible ; Mandible - surgery ; Osseointegration ; Osteons ; Quotients ; Science & Technology ; Stability tests ; Surface Properties ; Technology ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2021-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1474-1483</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>7</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000701002500001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-6993476b1060b0db495699b540868d6968886ad750528f5253fd2ec417544e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-6993476b1060b0db495699b540868d6968886ad750528f5253fd2ec417544e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6371-4172 ; 0000-0003-1835-5646 ; 0000-0003-2055-1320 ; 0000-0002-6906-7209 ; 0000-0002-1764-7447</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.13848$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.13848$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,39263,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34547819$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, Young Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paeng, Kyoung‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myong Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Jae‐Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ui‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><title>Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
To assess the osseointegration of calcium‐coated (CS) and chemically modified, sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (MS) dental implants with a lack of primary mechanical stability.
Materials and Methods
Eighteen implants in CS and MS groups each were loosely placed in the mandible of six mongrel dogs and allowed to heal for 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and implant stability test (IST) values recorded periodically and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and the number of Haversian canals per 1 mm2 measured histologically were statistically analysed (p < .05).
Results
All CS and MS implants placed survived. Compared with immediately after installation, ISQ and IST values in both groups increased significantly to over 76 at 2 weeks (p < .0083) and remained stable thereafter. BIC was significantly greater at 8 weeks (61.3 ± 13.6% in CS group; 57.6 ± 5.9% in MS group) compared to 2 and 4 weeks in both groups (p < .017). There were no significant intergroup differences in ISQ, IST or BIC at different time points. Significantly more Haversian canals were observed in group CS (6.2 ± 1.0/mm2) compared with group MS at 4 weeks (3.7 ± 1.8 /mm2; p < .05), while intergroup difference was not significant at 8 weeks.
Conclusion
Both CS and MS implants inserted without primary stability obtained osseointegration within 2 weeks, and lamellar bone adjacent to the implants was first observed at 8 weeks. The formation of primary osteons was more active at 4 weeks in group CS than in group MS.</description><subject>acid‐etched dental implant</subject><subject>animal study</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>calcium‐coated dental implant</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Canals (anatomy)</subject><subject>chemically modified sandblasted</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Biomedical</subject><subject>histology</subject><subject>Lamellar bone</subject><subject>large‐grit</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Osteons</subject><subject>Quotients</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Stability tests</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1uEzEQx1cIREvhwAsgS1xa0bT2rj92uUURX1IkJNr7ymvPJq6862B7W-XGI_CEHHgSJiTkgISEL7ZnfvOfkf8uipeMXjFc18bHK1bVvH5UnDJJ6YwKyh4Xp7ShYqaYZCfFs5TuKKWyqZunxUnFBVc1a06LHzdgwmh13JKUdee8y1uizdrBPVjiRmJhzNoTN2y8HnMiDy6viSZGe-Om4ee37ybojGjSo-28Tni-JF7HFWBuFV2-RDln8QLZrBE8v1nOL0iaYq8NEKzaqa1hcCjpt2QI1vUOOcSOFPY2GNr1DlMmA5i1HncFBMaVXsGAQ74lc7KJYLzbZ1Ke7PZ58aTXPsGLw35W3L5_d7v4OFt-_vBpMV_OTFXX9Uw2TcWV7BiVtKO2443AUCc4rWVtZSMRktoqQUVZ96IUVW9LMJwpwTmU1VlxvpfdxPB1gpTbwSUDHp8MwpTaUihRKckVR_T1X-hdmOKIw7WlpKrBHkohdbGnTAwpRejbTXQDutQy2u48b9Hz9rfnyL46KE7dAPZI_jEZgTd74AG60CfjYDRwxPBXKMooLQWeKEO6_n964bLOLoyLMI0ZS68Ppc7D9t8jt4vll_3svwBRb9sV</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Song, Young Woo</creator><creator>Paeng, Kyoung‐Won</creator><creator>Kim, Myong Ji</creator><creator>Cha, Jae‐Kook</creator><creator>Jung, Ui‐Won</creator><creator>Jung, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Thoma, Daniel S.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-5646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-7209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-7447</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study</title><author>Song, Young Woo ; Paeng, Kyoung‐Won ; Kim, Myong Ji ; Cha, Jae‐Kook ; Jung, Ui‐Won ; Jung, Ronald E. ; Thoma, Daniel S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-6993476b1060b0db495699b540868d6968886ad750528f5253fd2ec417544e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>acid‐etched dental implant</topic><topic>animal study</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>calcium‐coated dental implant</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Canals (anatomy)</topic><topic>chemically modified sandblasted</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Biomedical</topic><topic>histology</topic><topic>Lamellar bone</topic><topic>large‐grit</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Osteons</topic><topic>Quotients</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Stability tests</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, Young Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paeng, Kyoung‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Myong Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Jae‐Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ui‐Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thoma, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, Young Woo</au><au>Paeng, Kyoung‐Won</au><au>Kim, Myong Ji</au><au>Cha, Jae‐Kook</au><au>Jung, Ui‐Won</au><au>Jung, Ronald E.</au><au>Thoma, Daniel S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><stitle>CLIN ORAL IMPLAN RES</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1474</spage><epage>1483</epage><pages>1474-1483</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To assess the osseointegration of calcium‐coated (CS) and chemically modified, sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (MS) dental implants with a lack of primary mechanical stability.
Materials and Methods
Eighteen implants in CS and MS groups each were loosely placed in the mandible of six mongrel dogs and allowed to heal for 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) and implant stability test (IST) values recorded periodically and bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) and the number of Haversian canals per 1 mm2 measured histologically were statistically analysed (p < .05).
Results
All CS and MS implants placed survived. Compared with immediately after installation, ISQ and IST values in both groups increased significantly to over 76 at 2 weeks (p < .0083) and remained stable thereafter. BIC was significantly greater at 8 weeks (61.3 ± 13.6% in CS group; 57.6 ± 5.9% in MS group) compared to 2 and 4 weeks in both groups (p < .017). There were no significant intergroup differences in ISQ, IST or BIC at different time points. Significantly more Haversian canals were observed in group CS (6.2 ± 1.0/mm2) compared with group MS at 4 weeks (3.7 ± 1.8 /mm2; p < .05), while intergroup difference was not significant at 8 weeks.
Conclusion
Both CS and MS implants inserted without primary stability obtained osseointegration within 2 weeks, and lamellar bone adjacent to the implants was first observed at 8 weeks. The formation of primary osteons was more active at 4 weeks in group CS than in group MS.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>34547819</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.13848</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-5646</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2055-1320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6906-7209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1764-7447</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2021-12, Vol.32 (12), p.1474-1483 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575376474 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
| subjects | acid‐etched dental implant animal study Animals Biomedical materials Bone implants Calcium calcium‐coated dental implant Canals Canals (anatomy) chemically modified sandblasted Dental Implantation, Endosseous Dental Implants Dental materials Dental Prosthesis Design Dental prosthetics Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine Dogs Engineering Engineering, Biomedical histology Lamellar bone large‐grit Life Sciences & Biomedicine Mandible Mandible - surgery Osseointegration Osteons Quotients Science & Technology Stability tests Surface Properties Technology Titanium |
| title | Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T06%3A58%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondary%20stability%20achieved%20in%20dental%20implants%20with%20a%20calcium%E2%80%90coated%20sandblasted,%20large%E2%80%90grit,%20acid%E2%80%90etched%20(SLA)%20surface%20and%20a%20chemically%20modified%20SLA%20surface%20placed%20without%20mechanical%20engagement:%20A%20preclinical%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Song,%20Young%20Woo&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1474&rft.epage=1483&rft.pages=1474-1483&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.13848&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2607975077%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2607975077&rft_id=info:pmid/34547819&rfr_iscdi=true |