Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group

Purpose Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding. Method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2021-12, Vol.30 (12), p.3428-3441
Hauptverfasser: Hodges, Paul W., Bailey, Jeannie F., Fortin, Maryse, Battié, Michele C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3441
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3428
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 30
creator Hodges, Paul W.
Bailey, Jeannie F.
Fortin, Maryse
Battié, Michele C.
description Purpose Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding. Methods Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research. Results Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research. Conclusion Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574736616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574736616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAYhS0EokPhBVggS2zYBHyLL-xQxaXSSCBNWUee-E-aKrGD_6Sor8OT1u1MQWLRlRfnO8eWP0Jec_aeM2Y-IGO11RUTvGLaOVaJJ2TDlRQVc1I8JRvmFKu04e6EvEC8YozXjunn5ESqWgltxIb8-eGzx3mIfqTTiu0IdJh8P8SeTuBxzTBBXJB2KdM2TVOK9EiHAVMOkPEjzXA9wG_qYyhMRIi4YrX3CKFEdy2IwS9DiWiX00SXS6Dnu912RwP0ECGX8BoehudLiGm5mQFpn9M6vyTPOj8ivDqep-Tnl88XZ9-q7fev52eftlUrTb1U3mkNrWVagnKdDEF0ynbealCtVYoZb2pv97V0QfMgudS8rT1YG6y1UtbylLw77M45_VoBl2YasIVx9BHSio2ojTJSa64L-vY_9CqtuTy-UJopZ6UQplDiQLU5IWbomjmXz803DWfNncHmYLApBpt7g40opTfH6XU_QfhbeVBWAHkAsESxh_zv7kdmbwEASKng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604983227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hodges, Paul W. ; Bailey, Jeannie F. ; Fortin, Maryse ; Battié, Michele C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W. ; Bailey, Jeannie F. ; Fortin, Maryse ; Battié, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding. Methods Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research. Results Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research. Conclusion Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34542672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone surgery ; Consensus ; Degenerative disc disease ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Measurement techniques ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Muscles ; Neurosurgery ; Pain ; Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Pathophysiology ; Phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Phenotyping ; Physical activity ; Physiology ; Review Article ; Reviews ; Spine ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2021-12, Vol.30 (12), p.3428-3441</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1206-9107 ; 0000-0003-4618-7512 ; 0000-0002-1189-3591 ; 0000-0001-8499-2040</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34542672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Jeannie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortin, Maryse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battié, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><title>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding. Methods Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research. Results Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research. Conclusion Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Degenerative disc disease</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pathophysiology</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAYhS0EokPhBVggS2zYBHyLL-xQxaXSSCBNWUee-E-aKrGD_6Sor8OT1u1MQWLRlRfnO8eWP0Jec_aeM2Y-IGO11RUTvGLaOVaJJ2TDlRQVc1I8JRvmFKu04e6EvEC8YozXjunn5ESqWgltxIb8-eGzx3mIfqTTiu0IdJh8P8SeTuBxzTBBXJB2KdM2TVOK9EiHAVMOkPEjzXA9wG_qYyhMRIi4YrX3CKFEdy2IwS9DiWiX00SXS6Dnu912RwP0ECGX8BoehudLiGm5mQFpn9M6vyTPOj8ivDqep-Tnl88XZ9-q7fev52eftlUrTb1U3mkNrWVagnKdDEF0ynbealCtVYoZb2pv97V0QfMgudS8rT1YG6y1UtbylLw77M45_VoBl2YasIVx9BHSio2ojTJSa64L-vY_9CqtuTy-UJopZ6UQplDiQLU5IWbomjmXz803DWfNncHmYLApBpt7g40opTfH6XU_QfhbeVBWAHkAsESxh_zv7kdmbwEASKng</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Hodges, Paul W.</creator><creator>Bailey, Jeannie F.</creator><creator>Fortin, Maryse</creator><creator>Battié, Michele C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4618-7512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-2040</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</title><author>Hodges, Paul W. ; Bailey, Jeannie F. ; Fortin, Maryse ; Battié, Michele C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Degenerative disc disease</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pathophysiology</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Jeannie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortin, Maryse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battié, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodges, Paul W.</au><au>Bailey, Jeannie F.</au><au>Fortin, Maryse</au><au>Battié, Michele C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3428</spage><epage>3441</epage><pages>3428-3441</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding. Methods Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research. Results Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research. Conclusion Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34542672</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4618-7512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-2040</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2021-12, Vol.30 (12), p.3428-3441
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574736616
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animals
Bone surgery
Consensus
Degenerative disc disease
Lumbar Vertebrae
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Measurement techniques
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Muscles
Neurosurgery
Pain
Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging
Pathophysiology
Phenotype
Phenotypes
Phenotyping
Physical activity
Physiology
Review Article
Reviews
Spine
Surgical Orthopedics
title Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A02%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paraspinal%20muscle%20imaging%20measurements%20for%20common%20spinal%20disorders:%20review%20and%20consensus-based%20recommendations%20from%20the%20ISSLS%20degenerative%20spinal%20phenotypes%20group&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Hodges,%20Paul%20W.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3428&rft.epage=3441&rft.pages=3428-3441&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574736616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604983227&rft_id=info:pmid/34542672&rfr_iscdi=true