Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group
Purpose Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding. Method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European spine journal 2021-12, Vol.30 (12), p.3428-3441 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3441 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3428 |
container_title | European spine journal |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Hodges, Paul W. Bailey, Jeannie F. Fortin, Maryse Battié, Michele C. |
description | Purpose
Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding.
Methods
Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research.
Results
Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research.
Conclusion
Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574736616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574736616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAYhS0EokPhBVggS2zYBHyLL-xQxaXSSCBNWUee-E-aKrGD_6Sor8OT1u1MQWLRlRfnO8eWP0Jec_aeM2Y-IGO11RUTvGLaOVaJJ2TDlRQVc1I8JRvmFKu04e6EvEC8YozXjunn5ESqWgltxIb8-eGzx3mIfqTTiu0IdJh8P8SeTuBxzTBBXJB2KdM2TVOK9EiHAVMOkPEjzXA9wG_qYyhMRIi4YrX3CKFEdy2IwS9DiWiX00SXS6Dnu912RwP0ECGX8BoehudLiGm5mQFpn9M6vyTPOj8ivDqep-Tnl88XZ9-q7fev52eftlUrTb1U3mkNrWVagnKdDEF0ynbealCtVYoZb2pv97V0QfMgudS8rT1YG6y1UtbylLw77M45_VoBl2YasIVx9BHSio2ojTJSa64L-vY_9CqtuTy-UJopZ6UQplDiQLU5IWbomjmXz803DWfNncHmYLApBpt7g40opTfH6XU_QfhbeVBWAHkAsESxh_zv7kdmbwEASKng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604983227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hodges, Paul W. ; Bailey, Jeannie F. ; Fortin, Maryse ; Battié, Michele C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W. ; Bailey, Jeannie F. ; Fortin, Maryse ; Battié, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding.
Methods
Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research.
Results
Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research.
Conclusion
Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34542672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone surgery ; Consensus ; Degenerative disc disease ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Measurement techniques ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Muscles ; Neurosurgery ; Pain ; Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging ; Pathophysiology ; Phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Phenotyping ; Physical activity ; Physiology ; Review Article ; Reviews ; Spine ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2021-12, Vol.30 (12), p.3428-3441</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1206-9107 ; 0000-0003-4618-7512 ; 0000-0002-1189-3591 ; 0000-0001-8499-2040</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34542672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Jeannie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortin, Maryse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battié, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><title>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose
Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding.
Methods
Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research.
Results
Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research.
Conclusion
Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Degenerative disc disease</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pathophysiology</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Phenotyping</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAYhS0EokPhBVggS2zYBHyLL-xQxaXSSCBNWUee-E-aKrGD_6Sor8OT1u1MQWLRlRfnO8eWP0Jec_aeM2Y-IGO11RUTvGLaOVaJJ2TDlRQVc1I8JRvmFKu04e6EvEC8YozXjunn5ESqWgltxIb8-eGzx3mIfqTTiu0IdJh8P8SeTuBxzTBBXJB2KdM2TVOK9EiHAVMOkPEjzXA9wG_qYyhMRIi4YrX3CKFEdy2IwS9DiWiX00SXS6Dnu912RwP0ECGX8BoehudLiGm5mQFpn9M6vyTPOj8ivDqep-Tnl88XZ9-q7fev52eftlUrTb1U3mkNrWVagnKdDEF0ynbealCtVYoZb2pv97V0QfMgudS8rT1YG6y1UtbylLw77M45_VoBl2YasIVx9BHSio2ojTJSa64L-vY_9CqtuTy-UJopZ6UQplDiQLU5IWbomjmXz803DWfNncHmYLApBpt7g40opTfH6XU_QfhbeVBWAHkAsESxh_zv7kdmbwEASKng</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Hodges, Paul W.</creator><creator>Bailey, Jeannie F.</creator><creator>Fortin, Maryse</creator><creator>Battié, Michele C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4618-7512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-2040</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</title><author>Hodges, Paul W. ; Bailey, Jeannie F. ; Fortin, Maryse ; Battié, Michele C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-a966ec8063e49f3dd2f48fa86e4c84407a75a8b539d61d31361c5ae88d8883353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Degenerative disc disease</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pathophysiology</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Phenotyping</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Jeannie F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortin, Maryse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Battié, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hodges, Paul W.</au><au>Bailey, Jeannie F.</au><au>Fortin, Maryse</au><au>Battié, Michele C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3428</spage><epage>3441</epage><pages>3428-3441</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Paraspinal muscle imaging is of growing interest related to improved phenotyping, prognosis, and treatment of common spinal disorders. We reviewed issues related to paraspinal muscle imaging measurement that contribute to inconsistent findings between studies and impede understanding.
Methods
Three key contributors to inconsistencies among studies of paraspinal muscle imaging measurements were reviewed: failure to consider possible mechanisms underlying changes in paraspinal muscles, lack of control of confounding factors, and variations in spinal muscle imaging modalities and measurement protocols. Recommendations are provided to address these issues to improve the quality and coherence of future research.
Results
Possible pathophysiological responses of paraspinal muscle to various common spinal disorders in acute or chronic phases are often overlooked, yet have important implications for the timing, distribution, and nature of changes in paraspinal muscle. These considerations, as well as adjustment for possible confounding factors, such as sex, age, and physical activity must be considered when planning and interpreting paraspinal muscle measurements in studies of spinal conditions. Adoption of standardised imaging measurement protocols for paraspinal muscle morphology and composition, considering the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities, is critically important to interpretation and synthesis of research.
Conclusion
Study designs that consider physiological and pathophysiological responses of muscle, adjust for possible confounding factors, and use common, standardised measures are needed to advance knowledge of the determinants of variations or changes in paraspinal muscle and their influence on spinal health.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34542672</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-9107</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4618-7512</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1189-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8499-2040</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
ispartof | European spine journal, 2021-12, Vol.30 (12), p.3428-3441 |
issn | 0940-6719 1432-0932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574736616 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animals Bone surgery Consensus Degenerative disc disease Lumbar Vertebrae Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement techniques Medicine Medicine & Public Health Muscles Neurosurgery Pain Paraspinal Muscles - diagnostic imaging Pathophysiology Phenotype Phenotypes Phenotyping Physical activity Physiology Review Article Reviews Spine Surgical Orthopedics |
title | Paraspinal muscle imaging measurements for common spinal disorders: review and consensus-based recommendations from the ISSLS degenerative spinal phenotypes group |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A02%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paraspinal%20muscle%20imaging%20measurements%20for%20common%20spinal%20disorders:%20review%20and%20consensus-based%20recommendations%20from%20the%20ISSLS%20degenerative%20spinal%20phenotypes%20group&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Hodges,%20Paul%20W.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3428&rft.epage=3441&rft.pages=3428-3441&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-021-06990-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574736616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604983227&rft_id=info:pmid/34542672&rfr_iscdi=true |