Double-Pulley Remplissage in Active-Duty Military Population With Off-Track Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Improved Outcomes and Low Recurrence at Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up

To report mid-term outcomes of active-duty patients with anterior shoulder instability following our technique for double-pulley remplissage (DPR) with concomitant anterior labral repair. All consecutive patients from 1/2010 through 12/2016 that underwent DPR by the senior surgeon with complete outc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2022-03, Vol.38 (3), p.743-749
Hauptverfasser: Scanaliato, John P., Dunn, John C., Fitzpatrick, Kelly V., Czajkowski, Hunter, Parnes, Nata
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 749
container_issue 3
container_start_page 743
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 38
creator Scanaliato, John P.
Dunn, John C.
Fitzpatrick, Kelly V.
Czajkowski, Hunter
Parnes, Nata
description To report mid-term outcomes of active-duty patients with anterior shoulder instability following our technique for double-pulley remplissage (DPR) with concomitant anterior labral repair. All consecutive patients from 1/2010 through 12/2016 that underwent DPR by the senior surgeon with complete outcome scores were identified. All patients had experienced a shoulder dislocation following a traumatic event, and had subsequent instability recalcitrant to conservative management. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up (3) of if they underwent stabilization procedures other than DPR (148). Outcome measures were completed by patients within 1 week prior to surgery and at latest follow-up. Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, and all were active-duty military at the time of surgery. 20/24 (83.3%) patients met the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), while 21/24 (87.5%) achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and 22/24 (91.7%) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for their operative shoulder, as determined by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. 21/24 (87.5%) patients met the PASS, while 19/24 (79.2%) achieved SCB and 20/24 (83.3%) exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE). In addition, 23/24 (95.8%) patients exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the Rowe Instability score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion did not vary significantly. All patients had decreased pain postoperatively (P < .0001); 22/24 (91.67%) of patients remained on active-duty status. Failure rate, defined as recurrent subluxation or dislocation, was 4.2%. Mid-term outcomes in this population of active-duty patients undergoing DPR for shoulder instability without glenoid bone loss demonstrate a statistically and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, a significant decrease of pain and an overall return to active-duty rate of 91.67%. IV, therapeutic case series.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574404677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749806321008173</els_id><sourcerecordid>2574404677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e59b6b0ad8117cfc7876e33d3261f5c4ab106541879da5bd121f41d97690d023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi0EoiHwBgh5ycbBHs91gxS1lEYKSgWtECvLY58hDp7x4EuqPBjv1xmlsGTlzXf-__h8CL1ldMUoKz8cVtLHvXerjGZsRZsVpfwZWrAiKwnPOHuOFrTKG1LTkl-gVyEc6ETwmr9EFzwvOGW0XqA_Vy61FshtshZO-Cv0ozUhyJ-AzYDXKpojkKsUT_iLsSZKf8K3bkxWRuMG_N3EPd51HbnzUv3C6yGCN87jb3uXrAaPN0OIsp0n5-yQbAxz7qYfvTuCxrsUleshYDlovHUPE6SS9zAowDJOnYPpU49z8gOkx9fOWvdA7sfX6EUnbYA3T-8S3V9_uru8Idvd583leksUL7NIOBRNW7ZU6pqxSnWqqqsSONc8K1lXqFy2jJZFzuqq0bJoNctYlzPdVGVDNc34Er0_507r_k4QouhNUGCtHMClILKiynOal1U1ofkZVd6F4KETozf9dC_BqJiFiYM4CxOzMEEbMetYondPDantQf8b-mtoAj6eAZj-eTTgRVBmvo82HlQU2pn_NzwCZd-rgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574404677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Double-Pulley Remplissage in Active-Duty Military Population With Off-Track Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Improved Outcomes and Low Recurrence at Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Scanaliato, John P. ; Dunn, John C. ; Fitzpatrick, Kelly V. ; Czajkowski, Hunter ; Parnes, Nata</creator><creatorcontrib>Scanaliato, John P. ; Dunn, John C. ; Fitzpatrick, Kelly V. ; Czajkowski, Hunter ; Parnes, Nata</creatorcontrib><description>To report mid-term outcomes of active-duty patients with anterior shoulder instability following our technique for double-pulley remplissage (DPR) with concomitant anterior labral repair. All consecutive patients from 1/2010 through 12/2016 that underwent DPR by the senior surgeon with complete outcome scores were identified. All patients had experienced a shoulder dislocation following a traumatic event, and had subsequent instability recalcitrant to conservative management. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up (3) of if they underwent stabilization procedures other than DPR (148). Outcome measures were completed by patients within 1 week prior to surgery and at latest follow-up. Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, and all were active-duty military at the time of surgery. 20/24 (83.3%) patients met the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), while 21/24 (87.5%) achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and 22/24 (91.7%) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for their operative shoulder, as determined by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. 21/24 (87.5%) patients met the PASS, while 19/24 (79.2%) achieved SCB and 20/24 (83.3%) exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE). In addition, 23/24 (95.8%) patients exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the Rowe Instability score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion did not vary significantly. All patients had decreased pain postoperatively (P &lt; .0001); 22/24 (91.67%) of patients remained on active-duty status. Failure rate, defined as recurrent subluxation or dislocation, was 4.2%. Mid-term outcomes in this population of active-duty patients undergoing DPR for shoulder instability without glenoid bone loss demonstrate a statistically and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, a significant decrease of pain and an overall return to active-duty rate of 91.67%. IV, therapeutic case series.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34530108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthroscopy - methods ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joint Instability - surgery ; Military Personnel ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Dislocation - surgery ; Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2022-03, Vol.38 (3), p.743-749</ispartof><rights>2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e59b6b0ad8117cfc7876e33d3261f5c4ab106541879da5bd121f41d97690d023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e59b6b0ad8117cfc7876e33d3261f5c4ab106541879da5bd121f41d97690d023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34530108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scanaliato, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Kelly V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czajkowski, Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnes, Nata</creatorcontrib><title>Double-Pulley Remplissage in Active-Duty Military Population With Off-Track Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Improved Outcomes and Low Recurrence at Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>To report mid-term outcomes of active-duty patients with anterior shoulder instability following our technique for double-pulley remplissage (DPR) with concomitant anterior labral repair. All consecutive patients from 1/2010 through 12/2016 that underwent DPR by the senior surgeon with complete outcome scores were identified. All patients had experienced a shoulder dislocation following a traumatic event, and had subsequent instability recalcitrant to conservative management. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up (3) of if they underwent stabilization procedures other than DPR (148). Outcome measures were completed by patients within 1 week prior to surgery and at latest follow-up. Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, and all were active-duty military at the time of surgery. 20/24 (83.3%) patients met the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), while 21/24 (87.5%) achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and 22/24 (91.7%) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for their operative shoulder, as determined by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. 21/24 (87.5%) patients met the PASS, while 19/24 (79.2%) achieved SCB and 20/24 (83.3%) exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE). In addition, 23/24 (95.8%) patients exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the Rowe Instability score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion did not vary significantly. All patients had decreased pain postoperatively (P &lt; .0001); 22/24 (91.67%) of patients remained on active-duty status. Failure rate, defined as recurrent subluxation or dislocation, was 4.2%. Mid-term outcomes in this population of active-duty patients undergoing DPR for shoulder instability without glenoid bone loss demonstrate a statistically and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, a significant decrease of pain and an overall return to active-duty rate of 91.67%. IV, therapeutic case series.</description><subject>Arthroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - surgery</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Dislocation - surgery</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi0EoiHwBgh5ycbBHs91gxS1lEYKSgWtECvLY58hDp7x4EuqPBjv1xmlsGTlzXf-__h8CL1ldMUoKz8cVtLHvXerjGZsRZsVpfwZWrAiKwnPOHuOFrTKG1LTkl-gVyEc6ETwmr9EFzwvOGW0XqA_Vy61FshtshZO-Cv0ozUhyJ-AzYDXKpojkKsUT_iLsSZKf8K3bkxWRuMG_N3EPd51HbnzUv3C6yGCN87jb3uXrAaPN0OIsp0n5-yQbAxz7qYfvTuCxrsUleshYDlovHUPE6SS9zAowDJOnYPpU49z8gOkx9fOWvdA7sfX6EUnbYA3T-8S3V9_uru8Idvd583leksUL7NIOBRNW7ZU6pqxSnWqqqsSONc8K1lXqFy2jJZFzuqq0bJoNctYlzPdVGVDNc34Er0_507r_k4QouhNUGCtHMClILKiynOal1U1ofkZVd6F4KETozf9dC_BqJiFiYM4CxOzMEEbMetYondPDantQf8b-mtoAj6eAZj-eTTgRVBmvo82HlQU2pn_NzwCZd-rgA</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Scanaliato, John P.</creator><creator>Dunn, John C.</creator><creator>Fitzpatrick, Kelly V.</creator><creator>Czajkowski, Hunter</creator><creator>Parnes, Nata</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Double-Pulley Remplissage in Active-Duty Military Population With Off-Track Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Improved Outcomes and Low Recurrence at Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up</title><author>Scanaliato, John P. ; Dunn, John C. ; Fitzpatrick, Kelly V. ; Czajkowski, Hunter ; Parnes, Nata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-3e59b6b0ad8117cfc7876e33d3261f5c4ab106541879da5bd121f41d97690d023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arthroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - surgery</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Dislocation - surgery</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scanaliato, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Kelly V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Czajkowski, Hunter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parnes, Nata</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scanaliato, John P.</au><au>Dunn, John C.</au><au>Fitzpatrick, Kelly V.</au><au>Czajkowski, Hunter</au><au>Parnes, Nata</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Double-Pulley Remplissage in Active-Duty Military Population With Off-Track Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Improved Outcomes and Low Recurrence at Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>743-749</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>To report mid-term outcomes of active-duty patients with anterior shoulder instability following our technique for double-pulley remplissage (DPR) with concomitant anterior labral repair. All consecutive patients from 1/2010 through 12/2016 that underwent DPR by the senior surgeon with complete outcome scores were identified. All patients had experienced a shoulder dislocation following a traumatic event, and had subsequent instability recalcitrant to conservative management. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up (3) of if they underwent stabilization procedures other than DPR (148). Outcome measures were completed by patients within 1 week prior to surgery and at latest follow-up. Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria for the study, and all were active-duty military at the time of surgery. 20/24 (83.3%) patients met the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), while 21/24 (87.5%) achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB) and 22/24 (91.7%) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for their operative shoulder, as determined by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. 21/24 (87.5%) patients met the PASS, while 19/24 (79.2%) achieved SCB and 20/24 (83.3%) exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE). In addition, 23/24 (95.8%) patients exceeded the MCID for their operative shoulder, as determined by the Rowe Instability score. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion did not vary significantly. All patients had decreased pain postoperatively (P &lt; .0001); 22/24 (91.67%) of patients remained on active-duty status. Failure rate, defined as recurrent subluxation or dislocation, was 4.2%. Mid-term outcomes in this population of active-duty patients undergoing DPR for shoulder instability without glenoid bone loss demonstrate a statistically and clinically significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes, a significant decrease of pain and an overall return to active-duty rate of 91.67%. IV, therapeutic case series.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34530108</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2022-03, Vol.38 (3), p.743-749
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574404677
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Arthroscopy - methods
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Joint Instability - surgery
Military Personnel
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Shoulder
Shoulder Dislocation - surgery
Shoulder Joint - surgery
title Double-Pulley Remplissage in Active-Duty Military Population With Off-Track Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Improved Outcomes and Low Recurrence at Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A20%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Double-Pulley%20Remplissage%20in%20Active-Duty%20Military%20Population%20With%20Off-Track%20Anterior%20Shoulder%20Instability%20Results%20in%20Improved%20Outcomes%20and%20Low%20Recurrence%20at%20Minimum%204-Year%20Follow-Up&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Scanaliato,%20John%20P.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=743-749&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574404677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574404677&rft_id=info:pmid/34530108&rft_els_id=S0749806321008173&rfr_iscdi=true