The use of radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting distant metastases of rectal carcinoma following surgical resection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Aim Estimating prognosis in rectal carcinoma (RC) is challenging, with distant recurrence (DR) occurring in up to 30% of cases. Radiomics is a novel field using diagnostic imaging to investigate the tumour heterogeneity of cancers and may have the potential to predict DR. The aim of the study was to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Colorectal disease 2021-12, Vol.23 (12), p.3065-3072 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3072 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3065 |
container_title | Colorectal disease |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Davey, Martin S. Davey, Matthew G. Ryan, Éanna J. Hogan, Aisling M. Kerin, Michael J. Joyce, Myles |
description | Aim
Estimating prognosis in rectal carcinoma (RC) is challenging, with distant recurrence (DR) occurring in up to 30% of cases. Radiomics is a novel field using diagnostic imaging to investigate the tumour heterogeneity of cancers and may have the potential to predict DR. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature evaluating the use of radiomics in predicting DR in patients with resected RC.
Methods
A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines to identify studies reporting radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict DR in patients diagnosed with RC. Sensitivity and specificity of radiomic analyses were included for meta‐analysis.
Results
A total of seven studies including 1497 patients (998 males) were included, seven, five and one of whom reported radiomics, respectively. The overall pooled rate of DR from all included studies was 17.1% (256/1497), with 15.6% (236/1497), 1.3% (19/1497) and 0.2% (3/1497) of patients having hepatic, pulmonary and peritoneal metastases. Meta‐analysis demonstrated that radiomics correctly predicted DR with pooled sensitivities and specificities of MRI 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.78) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.88), respectively.
Conclusion
This systematic review suggests the benefit of radiomic analysis of preoperative MRI in identifying patients with resected RC at an increased risk of DR. Our findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies as modalities to predict DR is a significant unmet need in RC. Radiomics may allow for tailored therapeutic strategies for high‐risk groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/codi.15919 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574386457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574386457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-ada55dbe55482bce80d0a9638c589f1d1eecbbe61db7d34cf34248469ed3020a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqkmTbPIAEVI3VSWnYH6Ms4umf5EiZZOuLQzXEyIbJmBnNLs-Ql-mL9QnKR4nXWRRNlwO3z1ccRA6peSc5vXJBOvOqahp_QodUi5ZQRlVr_d1WaiakgP0LqV7QqisqHqLDhgXTNayPES_b-8ATwlw6HDU1oXBGay97nfJpVkc9NrDmMUIKXjtDWCXNefX2Hm8iWCdGeeTdWnUfsQDjDpXCfbtEcyoe2x0NM6HQeMu9H3Yzg1pimtn8mV2zpQL_gJf4rRLIwx6efHRwTZPY_emf37-eh7sGL3pdJ_g5Gk_Qj--frldfS-ub75drS6vC8NEVRfaaiFsC0JwVbYGFLFE15IpI1TdUUsBTNuCpLatLOOmY7zkissaLCMl0ewIfVh8NzE8TJDGZnDJQN9rD2FKTSkqzpTkosro-xfofZhinjdTMgfBGREqUx8XysSQUoSu2cT8nXHXUNLMYTZzmM0-zAyfPVlO7QD2H_qcXgboAmxdD7v_WDWrm89Xi-lfKYyvcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614643058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting distant metastases of rectal carcinoma following surgical resection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Davey, Martin S. ; Davey, Matthew G. ; Ryan, Éanna J. ; Hogan, Aisling M. ; Kerin, Michael J. ; Joyce, Myles</creator><creatorcontrib>Davey, Martin S. ; Davey, Matthew G. ; Ryan, Éanna J. ; Hogan, Aisling M. ; Kerin, Michael J. ; Joyce, Myles</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Estimating prognosis in rectal carcinoma (RC) is challenging, with distant recurrence (DR) occurring in up to 30% of cases. Radiomics is a novel field using diagnostic imaging to investigate the tumour heterogeneity of cancers and may have the potential to predict DR. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature evaluating the use of radiomics in predicting DR in patients with resected RC.
Methods
A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines to identify studies reporting radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict DR in patients diagnosed with RC. Sensitivity and specificity of radiomic analyses were included for meta‐analysis.
Results
A total of seven studies including 1497 patients (998 males) were included, seven, five and one of whom reported radiomics, respectively. The overall pooled rate of DR from all included studies was 17.1% (256/1497), with 15.6% (236/1497), 1.3% (19/1497) and 0.2% (3/1497) of patients having hepatic, pulmonary and peritoneal metastases. Meta‐analysis demonstrated that radiomics correctly predicted DR with pooled sensitivities and specificities of MRI 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.78) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.88), respectively.
Conclusion
This systematic review suggests the benefit of radiomic analysis of preoperative MRI in identifying patients with resected RC at an increased risk of DR. Our findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies as modalities to predict DR is a significant unmet need in RC. Radiomics may allow for tailored therapeutic strategies for high‐risk groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/codi.15919</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34536962</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>carcinoma ; Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma - surgery ; distant metastases ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; MRI ; Prospective Studies ; Radiomics ; rectal ; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectum ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk groups ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Systematic review ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2021-12, Vol.23 (12), p.3065-3072</ispartof><rights>2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><rights>2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-ada55dbe55482bce80d0a9638c589f1d1eecbbe61db7d34cf34248469ed3020a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-ada55dbe55482bce80d0a9638c589f1d1eecbbe61db7d34cf34248469ed3020a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3229-6032</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcodi.15919$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcodi.15919$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34536962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davey, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Éanna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Aisling M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerin, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Myles</creatorcontrib><title>The use of radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting distant metastases of rectal carcinoma following surgical resection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Aim
Estimating prognosis in rectal carcinoma (RC) is challenging, with distant recurrence (DR) occurring in up to 30% of cases. Radiomics is a novel field using diagnostic imaging to investigate the tumour heterogeneity of cancers and may have the potential to predict DR. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature evaluating the use of radiomics in predicting DR in patients with resected RC.
Methods
A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines to identify studies reporting radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict DR in patients diagnosed with RC. Sensitivity and specificity of radiomic analyses were included for meta‐analysis.
Results
A total of seven studies including 1497 patients (998 males) were included, seven, five and one of whom reported radiomics, respectively. The overall pooled rate of DR from all included studies was 17.1% (256/1497), with 15.6% (236/1497), 1.3% (19/1497) and 0.2% (3/1497) of patients having hepatic, pulmonary and peritoneal metastases. Meta‐analysis demonstrated that radiomics correctly predicted DR with pooled sensitivities and specificities of MRI 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.78) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.88), respectively.
Conclusion
This systematic review suggests the benefit of radiomic analysis of preoperative MRI in identifying patients with resected RC at an increased risk of DR. Our findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies as modalities to predict DR is a significant unmet need in RC. Radiomics may allow for tailored therapeutic strategies for high‐risk groups.</description><subject>carcinoma</subject><subject>Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>distant metastases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>rectal</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqkmTbPIAEVI3VSWnYH6Ms4umf5EiZZOuLQzXEyIbJmBnNLs-Ql-mL9QnKR4nXWRRNlwO3z1ccRA6peSc5vXJBOvOqahp_QodUi5ZQRlVr_d1WaiakgP0LqV7QqisqHqLDhgXTNayPES_b-8ATwlw6HDU1oXBGay97nfJpVkc9NrDmMUIKXjtDWCXNefX2Hm8iWCdGeeTdWnUfsQDjDpXCfbtEcyoe2x0NM6HQeMu9H3Yzg1pimtn8mV2zpQL_gJf4rRLIwx6efHRwTZPY_emf37-eh7sGL3pdJ_g5Gk_Qj--frldfS-ub75drS6vC8NEVRfaaiFsC0JwVbYGFLFE15IpI1TdUUsBTNuCpLatLOOmY7zkissaLCMl0ewIfVh8NzE8TJDGZnDJQN9rD2FKTSkqzpTkosro-xfofZhinjdTMgfBGREqUx8XysSQUoSu2cT8nXHXUNLMYTZzmM0-zAyfPVlO7QD2H_qcXgboAmxdD7v_WDWrm89Xi-lfKYyvcg</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Davey, Martin S.</creator><creator>Davey, Matthew G.</creator><creator>Ryan, Éanna J.</creator><creator>Hogan, Aisling M.</creator><creator>Kerin, Michael J.</creator><creator>Joyce, Myles</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-6032</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>The use of radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting distant metastases of rectal carcinoma following surgical resection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Davey, Martin S. ; Davey, Matthew G. ; Ryan, Éanna J. ; Hogan, Aisling M. ; Kerin, Michael J. ; Joyce, Myles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-ada55dbe55482bce80d0a9638c589f1d1eecbbe61db7d34cf34248469ed3020a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>carcinoma</topic><topic>Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>distant metastases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>rectal</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davey, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davey, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Éanna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Aisling M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerin, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Myles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davey, Martin S.</au><au>Davey, Matthew G.</au><au>Ryan, Éanna J.</au><au>Hogan, Aisling M.</au><au>Kerin, Michael J.</au><au>Joyce, Myles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting distant metastases of rectal carcinoma following surgical resection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3065</spage><epage>3072</epage><pages>3065-3072</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Aim
Estimating prognosis in rectal carcinoma (RC) is challenging, with distant recurrence (DR) occurring in up to 30% of cases. Radiomics is a novel field using diagnostic imaging to investigate the tumour heterogeneity of cancers and may have the potential to predict DR. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature evaluating the use of radiomics in predicting DR in patients with resected RC.
Methods
A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines to identify studies reporting radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict DR in patients diagnosed with RC. Sensitivity and specificity of radiomic analyses were included for meta‐analysis.
Results
A total of seven studies including 1497 patients (998 males) were included, seven, five and one of whom reported radiomics, respectively. The overall pooled rate of DR from all included studies was 17.1% (256/1497), with 15.6% (236/1497), 1.3% (19/1497) and 0.2% (3/1497) of patients having hepatic, pulmonary and peritoneal metastases. Meta‐analysis demonstrated that radiomics correctly predicted DR with pooled sensitivities and specificities of MRI 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.78) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.88), respectively.
Conclusion
This systematic review suggests the benefit of radiomic analysis of preoperative MRI in identifying patients with resected RC at an increased risk of DR. Our findings warrant validation in larger prospective studies as modalities to predict DR is a significant unmet need in RC. Radiomics may allow for tailored therapeutic strategies for high‐risk groups.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34536962</pmid><doi>10.1111/codi.15919</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3229-6032</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-8910 |
ispartof | Colorectal disease, 2021-12, Vol.23 (12), p.3065-3072 |
issn | 1462-8910 1463-1318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574386457 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | carcinoma Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma - surgery distant metastases Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Meta-analysis Metastases Metastasis MRI Prospective Studies Radiomics rectal Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Rectum Retrospective Studies Risk groups Sensitivity and Specificity Systematic review Tumors |
title | The use of radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting distant metastases of rectal carcinoma following surgical resection: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T21%3A59%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20radiomic%20analysis%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20predicting%20distant%20metastases%20of%20rectal%20carcinoma%20following%20surgical%20resection:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Davey,%20Martin%20S.&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3065&rft.epage=3072&rft.pages=3065-3072&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/codi.15919&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574386457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614643058&rft_id=info:pmid/34536962&rfr_iscdi=true |