Interaction of bacterial communities and indicators of water quality in shoreline sand, sediment, and water of Lake Michigan

Shoreline sand harbors high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) that may be resuspended into the water column through washing and resuspension. Studies have explored coastal processes that influence this sand-water flux for FIB, but little is known about how microbial markers of contami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2020-07, Vol.178, p.115671-115671, Article 115671
Hauptverfasser: Nevers, Meredith B., Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N., Nakatsu, Cindy H., Kinzelman, Julie L., Phanikumar, Mantha S., Shively, Dawn A., Spoljaric, Ashley M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115671
container_issue
container_start_page 115671
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 178
creator Nevers, Meredith B.
Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N.
Nakatsu, Cindy H.
Kinzelman, Julie L.
Phanikumar, Mantha S.
Shively, Dawn A.
Spoljaric, Ashley M.
description Shoreline sand harbors high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) that may be resuspended into the water column through washing and resuspension. Studies have explored coastal processes that influence this sand-water flux for FIB, but little is known about how microbial markers of contamination or the bacterial community interact in the sand-water interface. In this study, we take a three-tiered approach to explore the relationship between bacteria in sand, sediment, and overlying water at three shoreline sites and two associated rivers along an extended freshwater shoreline. Samples were collected over two years and analyzed for FIB, two microbial source tracking (MST) markers (Catellicoccus marimammalium, Gull2; Bacteroides HF183), and targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis. FIB was much higher in sand than in water at all three sites. Gull2 marker was abundant in shoreline sand and water while HF183 marker was mostly present in rivers. Overall bacterial communities were dissimilar between sand/sediment and water, indicating little interaction. Sediment composition was generally unfavorable to bacterial resuspension. Results show that FIB and MST markers were effective estimates of short-term conditions at these locations, and bacterial communities in sand and sediment reflected longer-term conditions. Findings are useful for locating contamination sources and targeting restoration by evaluating scope of shoreline degradation. [Display omitted] •E. coli and gull microbial markers were higher in sand than in water.•Bacterial communities in sand and sediment had limited overlap.•Diversity of bacterial communities fluctuated in water more than in sediment.•E. coli and microbial markers are dynamic and indicative of short-term conditions.•Sand bacterial communities indicate long-term shoreline conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115671
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574336595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135420302074</els_id><sourcerecordid>2400552191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c9c2bd9fbf81477eb8ab03213936354db180e2822fbc8e470780abfea14f504f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9PHCEYh0lTU7fab9A0HHtwtvybHeZiYoy2Jmu86JkA81LZzoAC08bED1_WsT22Jwg8P37hfRD6SMmaErr5slv_0iVBXjPC6hFtNx19g1ZUdn3DhJBv0YoQwRvKW3GI3ue8I4Qwxvt36JAzLgnrxQo9X4UCSdviY8DRYVO3kLwesY3TNAdfPGSsw4B9GLzVJaa852o3JPw469GXp3qH831MMPoAOFf6BGcY_AShnLyEF7zmtvoH4Gtv7_13HY7RgdNjhg-v6xG6u7y4Pf_WbG--Xp2fbRsrBC2N7S0zQ--Mk1R0HRipDeGM8p5v6ucGQyUBJhlzxkoQHekk0caBpsK1RDh-hD4v7z6k-DhDLmry2cI46gBxzoq1neB80_bt_1FBSNsy2tOKigW1KeacwKmH5CednhQlaq9I7dSiSO0VqUVRjX16bZjNBMPf0B8nFThdAKgj-ekhqWw9BFsHmsAWNUT_74bfm8ylHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2400552191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interaction of bacterial communities and indicators of water quality in shoreline sand, sediment, and water of Lake Michigan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nevers, Meredith B. ; Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N. ; Nakatsu, Cindy H. ; Kinzelman, Julie L. ; Phanikumar, Mantha S. ; Shively, Dawn A. ; Spoljaric, Ashley M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nevers, Meredith B. ; Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N. ; Nakatsu, Cindy H. ; Kinzelman, Julie L. ; Phanikumar, Mantha S. ; Shively, Dawn A. ; Spoljaric, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><description>Shoreline sand harbors high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) that may be resuspended into the water column through washing and resuspension. Studies have explored coastal processes that influence this sand-water flux for FIB, but little is known about how microbial markers of contamination or the bacterial community interact in the sand-water interface. In this study, we take a three-tiered approach to explore the relationship between bacteria in sand, sediment, and overlying water at three shoreline sites and two associated rivers along an extended freshwater shoreline. Samples were collected over two years and analyzed for FIB, two microbial source tracking (MST) markers (Catellicoccus marimammalium, Gull2; Bacteroides HF183), and targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis. FIB was much higher in sand than in water at all three sites. Gull2 marker was abundant in shoreline sand and water while HF183 marker was mostly present in rivers. Overall bacterial communities were dissimilar between sand/sediment and water, indicating little interaction. Sediment composition was generally unfavorable to bacterial resuspension. Results show that FIB and MST markers were effective estimates of short-term conditions at these locations, and bacterial communities in sand and sediment reflected longer-term conditions. Findings are useful for locating contamination sources and targeting restoration by evaluating scope of shoreline degradation. [Display omitted] •E. coli and gull microbial markers were higher in sand than in water.•Bacterial communities in sand and sediment had limited overlap.•Diversity of bacterial communities fluctuated in water more than in sediment.•E. coli and microbial markers are dynamic and indicative of short-term conditions.•Sand bacterial communities indicate long-term shoreline conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115671</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32380294</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; bacterial communities ; Bacteroides ; Feces ; freshwater ; genes ; Great Lakes ; Indicator bacteria ; Lake Michigan ; Lakes ; metagenomics ; Michigan ; Microbial source tracking ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S ; Sand ; shorelines ; Targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis ; Water ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollution ; Water Quality</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.178, p.115671-115671, Article 115671</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c9c2bd9fbf81477eb8ab03213936354db180e2822fbc8e470780abfea14f504f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c9c2bd9fbf81477eb8ab03213936354db180e2822fbc8e470780abfea14f504f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135420302074$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32380294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nevers, Meredith B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakatsu, Cindy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzelman, Julie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phanikumar, Mantha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shively, Dawn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoljaric, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><title>Interaction of bacterial communities and indicators of water quality in shoreline sand, sediment, and water of Lake Michigan</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Shoreline sand harbors high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) that may be resuspended into the water column through washing and resuspension. Studies have explored coastal processes that influence this sand-water flux for FIB, but little is known about how microbial markers of contamination or the bacterial community interact in the sand-water interface. In this study, we take a three-tiered approach to explore the relationship between bacteria in sand, sediment, and overlying water at three shoreline sites and two associated rivers along an extended freshwater shoreline. Samples were collected over two years and analyzed for FIB, two microbial source tracking (MST) markers (Catellicoccus marimammalium, Gull2; Bacteroides HF183), and targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis. FIB was much higher in sand than in water at all three sites. Gull2 marker was abundant in shoreline sand and water while HF183 marker was mostly present in rivers. Overall bacterial communities were dissimilar between sand/sediment and water, indicating little interaction. Sediment composition was generally unfavorable to bacterial resuspension. Results show that FIB and MST markers were effective estimates of short-term conditions at these locations, and bacterial communities in sand and sediment reflected longer-term conditions. Findings are useful for locating contamination sources and targeting restoration by evaluating scope of shoreline degradation. [Display omitted] •E. coli and gull microbial markers were higher in sand than in water.•Bacterial communities in sand and sediment had limited overlap.•Diversity of bacterial communities fluctuated in water more than in sediment.•E. coli and microbial markers are dynamic and indicative of short-term conditions.•Sand bacterial communities indicate long-term shoreline conditions.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial communities</subject><subject>Bacteroides</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>Great Lakes</subject><subject>Indicator bacteria</subject><subject>Lake Michigan</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>metagenomics</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Microbial source tracking</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>shorelines</subject><subject>Targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollution</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9PHCEYh0lTU7fab9A0HHtwtvybHeZiYoy2Jmu86JkA81LZzoAC08bED1_WsT22Jwg8P37hfRD6SMmaErr5slv_0iVBXjPC6hFtNx19g1ZUdn3DhJBv0YoQwRvKW3GI3ue8I4Qwxvt36JAzLgnrxQo9X4UCSdviY8DRYVO3kLwesY3TNAdfPGSsw4B9GLzVJaa852o3JPw469GXp3qH831MMPoAOFf6BGcY_AShnLyEF7zmtvoH4Gtv7_13HY7RgdNjhg-v6xG6u7y4Pf_WbG--Xp2fbRsrBC2N7S0zQ--Mk1R0HRipDeGM8p5v6ucGQyUBJhlzxkoQHekk0caBpsK1RDh-hD4v7z6k-DhDLmry2cI46gBxzoq1neB80_bt_1FBSNsy2tOKigW1KeacwKmH5CednhQlaq9I7dSiSO0VqUVRjX16bZjNBMPf0B8nFThdAKgj-ekhqWw9BFsHmsAWNUT_74bfm8ylHg</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Nevers, Meredith B.</creator><creator>Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N.</creator><creator>Nakatsu, Cindy H.</creator><creator>Kinzelman, Julie L.</creator><creator>Phanikumar, Mantha S.</creator><creator>Shively, Dawn A.</creator><creator>Spoljaric, Ashley M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Interaction of bacterial communities and indicators of water quality in shoreline sand, sediment, and water of Lake Michigan</title><author>Nevers, Meredith B. ; Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N. ; Nakatsu, Cindy H. ; Kinzelman, Julie L. ; Phanikumar, Mantha S. ; Shively, Dawn A. ; Spoljaric, Ashley M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-c9c2bd9fbf81477eb8ab03213936354db180e2822fbc8e470780abfea14f504f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial communities</topic><topic>Bacteroides</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>Great Lakes</topic><topic>Indicator bacteria</topic><topic>Lake Michigan</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>metagenomics</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Microbial source tracking</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>shorelines</topic><topic>Targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollution</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nevers, Meredith B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakatsu, Cindy H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzelman, Julie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phanikumar, Mantha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shively, Dawn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoljaric, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nevers, Meredith B.</au><au>Byappanahalli, Muruleedhara N.</au><au>Nakatsu, Cindy H.</au><au>Kinzelman, Julie L.</au><au>Phanikumar, Mantha S.</au><au>Shively, Dawn A.</au><au>Spoljaric, Ashley M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interaction of bacterial communities and indicators of water quality in shoreline sand, sediment, and water of Lake Michigan</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>178</volume><spage>115671</spage><epage>115671</epage><pages>115671-115671</pages><artnum>115671</artnum><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>Shoreline sand harbors high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) that may be resuspended into the water column through washing and resuspension. Studies have explored coastal processes that influence this sand-water flux for FIB, but little is known about how microbial markers of contamination or the bacterial community interact in the sand-water interface. In this study, we take a three-tiered approach to explore the relationship between bacteria in sand, sediment, and overlying water at three shoreline sites and two associated rivers along an extended freshwater shoreline. Samples were collected over two years and analyzed for FIB, two microbial source tracking (MST) markers (Catellicoccus marimammalium, Gull2; Bacteroides HF183), and targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis. FIB was much higher in sand than in water at all three sites. Gull2 marker was abundant in shoreline sand and water while HF183 marker was mostly present in rivers. Overall bacterial communities were dissimilar between sand/sediment and water, indicating little interaction. Sediment composition was generally unfavorable to bacterial resuspension. Results show that FIB and MST markers were effective estimates of short-term conditions at these locations, and bacterial communities in sand and sediment reflected longer-term conditions. Findings are useful for locating contamination sources and targeting restoration by evaluating scope of shoreline degradation. [Display omitted] •E. coli and gull microbial markers were higher in sand than in water.•Bacterial communities in sand and sediment had limited overlap.•Diversity of bacterial communities fluctuated in water more than in sediment.•E. coli and microbial markers are dynamic and indicative of short-term conditions.•Sand bacterial communities indicate long-term shoreline conditions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32380294</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2020.115671</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2020-07, Vol.178, p.115671-115671, Article 115671
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2574336595
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bacteria
bacterial communities
Bacteroides
Feces
freshwater
genes
Great Lakes
Indicator bacteria
Lake Michigan
Lakes
metagenomics
Michigan
Microbial source tracking
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Sand
shorelines
Targeted metagenomic 16S rRNA gene analysis
Water
Water Microbiology
Water Pollution
Water Quality
title Interaction of bacterial communities and indicators of water quality in shoreline sand, sediment, and water of Lake Michigan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T18%3A24%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interaction%20of%20bacterial%20communities%20and%20indicators%20of%20water%20quality%20in%20shoreline%20sand,%20sediment,%20and%20water%20of%20Lake%20Michigan&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Nevers,%20Meredith%20B.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=178&rft.spage=115671&rft.epage=115671&rft.pages=115671-115671&rft.artnum=115671&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115671&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2400552191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2400552191&rft_id=info:pmid/32380294&rft_els_id=S0043135420302074&rfr_iscdi=true