Nutrient capture in an Iowa farm pond: Insights from high-frequency observations

Shallow constructed ponds are abundant landscape features in the midwestern United States, suggested as an edge of field best management practice (BMP) in voluntary nutrient reduction strategies. The efficacy of such features is highly uncertain, however, and previous studies have lacked sufficient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2021-12, Vol.299, p.113647-113647, Article 113647
Hauptverfasser: Brunet, Christopher E., Gemrich, Eva R.C., Biedermann, Savanna, Jacobson, Peter J., Schilling, Keith E., Jones, Christopher S., Graham, Andrew M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113647
container_issue
container_start_page 113647
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 299
creator Brunet, Christopher E.
Gemrich, Eva R.C.
Biedermann, Savanna
Jacobson, Peter J.
Schilling, Keith E.
Jones, Christopher S.
Graham, Andrew M.
description Shallow constructed ponds are abundant landscape features in the midwestern United States, suggested as an edge of field best management practice (BMP) in voluntary nutrient reduction strategies. The efficacy of such features is highly uncertain, however, and previous studies have lacked sufficient temporal resolution to determine N and P removals during critical periods of transport. We utilized high-frequency in-situ measurements and flow-weighted grab sampling to determine water and nutrient budgets for a typical constructed “farm pond” in central Iowa situated within the Iowa Southern Drift Plain. Our monitoring approach yielded insight into in-stream nitrogen processing and the relative importance of transport-vs. supply-limited N delivery. Diel patterns in NO3–N observed during early Spring, prior to canopy closure, revealed that in-stream primary production and NO3–N assimilation can influence downstream N delivery in a stream with nitrate pollution (mean annual NO3–N of nearly 5 mg/L). Analysis of discharge-concentration hysteresis for NO3–N showed a shift from transport to supply limitation for NO3–N delivery over the growing season, influenced by antecedent moisture, with wet antecedent conditions leading to supply limitation. Significant NO3–N removal (64% of 19.8 kg/ha inputs) occurred within the 4.2 ha pond (230 ha watershed), but total N removal was much lower (36% removal of 22.3 kg/ha inputs). The lower total N removal highlights the importance of both particulate N and dissolved organic N and ammonia export to the N budgets of hypereutrophic small ponds. Total P removal in the pond was only 8% of 2.3 kg/ha inputs, likely due to internal loading of recent and legacy sedimentary P within the pond. High-flow events dominated N and P inputs, during which removal efficacy of the pond was significantly diminished. Poor process performance during critical moments may partially explain lower than expected water quality improvements post-BMP implementation. Accordingly, shifting hydroclimatic regimes (e.g., frequency of intense rainfall events) will impact the efficacy of small ponds and other edge of field BMPs for nutrient reduction. •High resolution determination of nutrient budgets for typical farm pond in central Iowa.•Significant nitrogen removal (36%) but lower phosphorous removal (8%).•Farm ponds export significant non-nitrate nitrogen.•Seasonal shift from transport to supply limitation for N delivery.•Poor nutrient removal during extreme e
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113647
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572938301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479721017096</els_id><sourcerecordid>2572938301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-160fd9e2dc0c2420e3440571e8a4353db49cf6b5091ec23efbf65e1eebbd9d673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi0EoqHwE5B8REKbjj92neWCUFQgUgUc4Gx5vWPqKGsH25uq_x63G3Etp5nD-8y8egh5y2DNgHVX-_Uew2kyYc2BszVjopPqGVkx6Ntm0wl4TlYggDVS9eqCvMp5DwCCM_WSXAjZctEKtSI_vs0leQyFWnMsc0LqAzWB7uKdoc6kiR5jGD_QXcj-923J1KU40du6Ny7hnxmDvadxyJhOpvgY8mvywplDxjfneUl-fb7-uf3a3Hz_stt-ummskLw0rAM39shHC5ZLDiikhFYx3BhZm42D7K3rhhZ6hpYLdIPrWmSIwzD2Y6fEJXm33D2mWGvkoiefLR4OJmCcs-at4r3YVAM12i5Rm2LOCZ0-Jj-ZdK8Z6AeZeq_PMvWDTL3IrNz7hbvDIbpsqyaL_9hqU4FUnVJ1e_yy-f_01pdHXds4h1LRjwuKVdjJY9JnfPQJbdFj9E9U_QsHwZ-Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572938301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrient capture in an Iowa farm pond: Insights from high-frequency observations</title><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Brunet, Christopher E. ; Gemrich, Eva R.C. ; Biedermann, Savanna ; Jacobson, Peter J. ; Schilling, Keith E. ; Jones, Christopher S. ; Graham, Andrew M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Christopher E. ; Gemrich, Eva R.C. ; Biedermann, Savanna ; Jacobson, Peter J. ; Schilling, Keith E. ; Jones, Christopher S. ; Graham, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><description>Shallow constructed ponds are abundant landscape features in the midwestern United States, suggested as an edge of field best management practice (BMP) in voluntary nutrient reduction strategies. The efficacy of such features is highly uncertain, however, and previous studies have lacked sufficient temporal resolution to determine N and P removals during critical periods of transport. We utilized high-frequency in-situ measurements and flow-weighted grab sampling to determine water and nutrient budgets for a typical constructed “farm pond” in central Iowa situated within the Iowa Southern Drift Plain. Our monitoring approach yielded insight into in-stream nitrogen processing and the relative importance of transport-vs. supply-limited N delivery. Diel patterns in NO3–N observed during early Spring, prior to canopy closure, revealed that in-stream primary production and NO3–N assimilation can influence downstream N delivery in a stream with nitrate pollution (mean annual NO3–N of nearly 5 mg/L). Analysis of discharge-concentration hysteresis for NO3–N showed a shift from transport to supply limitation for NO3–N delivery over the growing season, influenced by antecedent moisture, with wet antecedent conditions leading to supply limitation. Significant NO3–N removal (64% of 19.8 kg/ha inputs) occurred within the 4.2 ha pond (230 ha watershed), but total N removal was much lower (36% removal of 22.3 kg/ha inputs). The lower total N removal highlights the importance of both particulate N and dissolved organic N and ammonia export to the N budgets of hypereutrophic small ponds. Total P removal in the pond was only 8% of 2.3 kg/ha inputs, likely due to internal loading of recent and legacy sedimentary P within the pond. High-flow events dominated N and P inputs, during which removal efficacy of the pond was significantly diminished. Poor process performance during critical moments may partially explain lower than expected water quality improvements post-BMP implementation. Accordingly, shifting hydroclimatic regimes (e.g., frequency of intense rainfall events) will impact the efficacy of small ponds and other edge of field BMPs for nutrient reduction. •High resolution determination of nutrient budgets for typical farm pond in central Iowa.•Significant nitrogen removal (36%) but lower phosphorous removal (8%).•Farm ponds export significant non-nitrate nitrogen.•Seasonal shift from transport to supply limitation for N delivery.•Poor nutrient removal during extreme events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113647</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34523537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LONDON: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Best management practices ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Nitrate ; Nutrients ; Phosphorus ponds ; Science &amp; Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2021-12, Vol.299, p.113647-113647, Article 113647</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>5</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000704767700001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-160fd9e2dc0c2420e3440571e8a4353db49cf6b5091ec23efbf65e1eebbd9d673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-160fd9e2dc0c2420e3440571e8a4353db49cf6b5091ec23efbf65e1eebbd9d673</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0255-7075</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113647$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,39262,45999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemrich, Eva R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biedermann, Savanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Keith E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrient capture in an Iowa farm pond: Insights from high-frequency observations</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J ENVIRON MANAGE</addtitle><description>Shallow constructed ponds are abundant landscape features in the midwestern United States, suggested as an edge of field best management practice (BMP) in voluntary nutrient reduction strategies. The efficacy of such features is highly uncertain, however, and previous studies have lacked sufficient temporal resolution to determine N and P removals during critical periods of transport. We utilized high-frequency in-situ measurements and flow-weighted grab sampling to determine water and nutrient budgets for a typical constructed “farm pond” in central Iowa situated within the Iowa Southern Drift Plain. Our monitoring approach yielded insight into in-stream nitrogen processing and the relative importance of transport-vs. supply-limited N delivery. Diel patterns in NO3–N observed during early Spring, prior to canopy closure, revealed that in-stream primary production and NO3–N assimilation can influence downstream N delivery in a stream with nitrate pollution (mean annual NO3–N of nearly 5 mg/L). Analysis of discharge-concentration hysteresis for NO3–N showed a shift from transport to supply limitation for NO3–N delivery over the growing season, influenced by antecedent moisture, with wet antecedent conditions leading to supply limitation. Significant NO3–N removal (64% of 19.8 kg/ha inputs) occurred within the 4.2 ha pond (230 ha watershed), but total N removal was much lower (36% removal of 22.3 kg/ha inputs). The lower total N removal highlights the importance of both particulate N and dissolved organic N and ammonia export to the N budgets of hypereutrophic small ponds. Total P removal in the pond was only 8% of 2.3 kg/ha inputs, likely due to internal loading of recent and legacy sedimentary P within the pond. High-flow events dominated N and P inputs, during which removal efficacy of the pond was significantly diminished. Poor process performance during critical moments may partially explain lower than expected water quality improvements post-BMP implementation. Accordingly, shifting hydroclimatic regimes (e.g., frequency of intense rainfall events) will impact the efficacy of small ponds and other edge of field BMPs for nutrient reduction. •High resolution determination of nutrient budgets for typical farm pond in central Iowa.•Significant nitrogen removal (36%) but lower phosphorous removal (8%).•Farm ponds export significant non-nitrate nitrogen.•Seasonal shift from transport to supply limitation for N delivery.•Poor nutrient removal during extreme events.</description><subject>Best management practices</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Nitrate</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Phosphorus ponds</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1vEzEQhi0EoqHwE5B8REKbjj92neWCUFQgUgUc4Gx5vWPqKGsH25uq_x63G3Etp5nD-8y8egh5y2DNgHVX-_Uew2kyYc2BszVjopPqGVkx6Ntm0wl4TlYggDVS9eqCvMp5DwCCM_WSXAjZctEKtSI_vs0leQyFWnMsc0LqAzWB7uKdoc6kiR5jGD_QXcj-923J1KU40du6Ny7hnxmDvadxyJhOpvgY8mvywplDxjfneUl-fb7-uf3a3Hz_stt-ummskLw0rAM39shHC5ZLDiikhFYx3BhZm42D7K3rhhZ6hpYLdIPrWmSIwzD2Y6fEJXm33D2mWGvkoiefLR4OJmCcs-at4r3YVAM12i5Rm2LOCZ0-Jj-ZdK8Z6AeZeq_PMvWDTL3IrNz7hbvDIbpsqyaL_9hqU4FUnVJ1e_yy-f_01pdHXds4h1LRjwuKVdjJY9JnfPQJbdFj9E9U_QsHwZ-Z</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Brunet, Christopher E.</creator><creator>Gemrich, Eva R.C.</creator><creator>Biedermann, Savanna</creator><creator>Jacobson, Peter J.</creator><creator>Schilling, Keith E.</creator><creator>Jones, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Graham, Andrew M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0255-7075</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Nutrient capture in an Iowa farm pond: Insights from high-frequency observations</title><author>Brunet, Christopher E. ; Gemrich, Eva R.C. ; Biedermann, Savanna ; Jacobson, Peter J. ; Schilling, Keith E. ; Jones, Christopher S. ; Graham, Andrew M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-160fd9e2dc0c2420e3440571e8a4353db49cf6b5091ec23efbf65e1eebbd9d673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Best management practices</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences &amp; Ecology</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Nitrate</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Phosphorus ponds</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Christopher E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemrich, Eva R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biedermann, Savanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Keith E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Andrew M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brunet, Christopher E.</au><au>Gemrich, Eva R.C.</au><au>Biedermann, Savanna</au><au>Jacobson, Peter J.</au><au>Schilling, Keith E.</au><au>Jones, Christopher S.</au><au>Graham, Andrew M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrient capture in an Iowa farm pond: Insights from high-frequency observations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><stitle>J ENVIRON MANAGE</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>299</volume><spage>113647</spage><epage>113647</epage><pages>113647-113647</pages><artnum>113647</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Shallow constructed ponds are abundant landscape features in the midwestern United States, suggested as an edge of field best management practice (BMP) in voluntary nutrient reduction strategies. The efficacy of such features is highly uncertain, however, and previous studies have lacked sufficient temporal resolution to determine N and P removals during critical periods of transport. We utilized high-frequency in-situ measurements and flow-weighted grab sampling to determine water and nutrient budgets for a typical constructed “farm pond” in central Iowa situated within the Iowa Southern Drift Plain. Our monitoring approach yielded insight into in-stream nitrogen processing and the relative importance of transport-vs. supply-limited N delivery. Diel patterns in NO3–N observed during early Spring, prior to canopy closure, revealed that in-stream primary production and NO3–N assimilation can influence downstream N delivery in a stream with nitrate pollution (mean annual NO3–N of nearly 5 mg/L). Analysis of discharge-concentration hysteresis for NO3–N showed a shift from transport to supply limitation for NO3–N delivery over the growing season, influenced by antecedent moisture, with wet antecedent conditions leading to supply limitation. Significant NO3–N removal (64% of 19.8 kg/ha inputs) occurred within the 4.2 ha pond (230 ha watershed), but total N removal was much lower (36% removal of 22.3 kg/ha inputs). The lower total N removal highlights the importance of both particulate N and dissolved organic N and ammonia export to the N budgets of hypereutrophic small ponds. Total P removal in the pond was only 8% of 2.3 kg/ha inputs, likely due to internal loading of recent and legacy sedimentary P within the pond. High-flow events dominated N and P inputs, during which removal efficacy of the pond was significantly diminished. Poor process performance during critical moments may partially explain lower than expected water quality improvements post-BMP implementation. Accordingly, shifting hydroclimatic regimes (e.g., frequency of intense rainfall events) will impact the efficacy of small ponds and other edge of field BMPs for nutrient reduction. •High resolution determination of nutrient budgets for typical farm pond in central Iowa.•Significant nitrogen removal (36%) but lower phosphorous removal (8%).•Farm ponds export significant non-nitrate nitrogen.•Seasonal shift from transport to supply limitation for N delivery.•Poor nutrient removal during extreme events.</abstract><cop>LONDON</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34523537</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113647</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0255-7075</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2021-12, Vol.299, p.113647-113647, Article 113647
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572938301
source Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Best management practices
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Nitrate
Nutrients
Phosphorus ponds
Science & Technology
title Nutrient capture in an Iowa farm pond: Insights from high-frequency observations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T19%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient%20capture%20in%20an%20Iowa%20farm%20pond:%20Insights%20from%20high-frequency%20observations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Brunet,%20Christopher%20E.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=299&rft.spage=113647&rft.epage=113647&rft.pages=113647-113647&rft.artnum=113647&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113647&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572938301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572938301&rft_id=info:pmid/34523537&rft_els_id=S0301479721017096&rfr_iscdi=true