Fcc vs. hcp competition in colloidal hard-sphere nucleation: on their relative stability, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate

Hard-sphere crystallization has been widely investigated over the last six decades by means of colloidal suspensions and numerical methods. However, some aspects of its nucleation behaviour are still under debate. Here, we provide a detailed computational characterisation of the polymorphic nucleati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP 2021-09, Vol.23 (35), p.19611-19626
Hauptverfasser: Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio, Sanz, Eduardo, Vega, Carlos, Espinosa, Jorge R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19626
container_issue 35
container_start_page 19611
container_title Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP
container_volume 23
creator Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio
Sanz, Eduardo
Vega, Carlos
Espinosa, Jorge R.
description Hard-sphere crystallization has been widely investigated over the last six decades by means of colloidal suspensions and numerical methods. However, some aspects of its nucleation behaviour are still under debate. Here, we provide a detailed computational characterisation of the polymorphic nucleation competition between the face-centered cubic (fcc) and the hexagonal-close packed (hcp) hard-sphere crystal phases. By means of several state-of-the-art simulation techniques, we evaluate the melting pressure, chemical potential difference, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate of these two polymorphs, as well as of a random stacking mixture of both crystals. Our results highlight that, despite the fact that both polymorphs have very similar stability, the interfacial free energy of the hcp phase could be marginally higher than that of the fcc solid, which in consequence, mildly decreases its propensity to nucleate from the liquid compared to the fcc phase. Moreover, we analyse the abundance of each polymorph in grown crystals from different types of inserted nuclei: fcc, hcp and stacking disordered fcc/hcp seeds, as well as from those spontaneously emerged from brute force simulations. We find that post-critical crystals fundamentally grow maintaining the polymorphic structure of the critical nucleus, at least until moderately large sizes, since the only crystallographic orientation that allows stacking close-packed disorder is the fcc (111) plane, or equivalently the hcp (0001) one. Taken together, our results contribute with one more piece to the intricate puzzle of colloidal hard-sphere crystallization.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d1cp01784e
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572932444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572932444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-aa31a097f03c754447fb337bc20fd04c12865cca820517381dc02935895dd15c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0UFLwzAUwPEiCs7pxU8Q8CJiZ9I0TetN5qbCQA96Ltnrq83I2pqkg30Av7eZExFPSR4__gReFJ0zOmGUFzcVg54ymad4EI1YmvG4oHl6-HuX2XF04tyKUsoE46Pocw5ANm5CGugJdOsevfa6a4luw9OYTlfKkEbZKnZ9gxZJO4BBtTO3JDjfoLbEogmjDRLn1VIb7bfXoeDR1gp0CNQWkWCL9n1LVFv9iRCrPJ5GR7UyDs9-znH0Np-9Th_jxfPD0_RuEUNSFD5WijNFC1lTDlKkaSrrJedyCQmtK5oCS_JMAKg8oYJJnrMKaFJwkReiqpgAPo4u993edh8DOl-utQM0RrXYDa5MhAw-CeVAL_7RVTfYNvzuW8lCSp4FdbVXYDvnLNZlb_Va2W3JaLnbSHnPpi_fG5nxL4GEfrs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572797736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fcc vs. hcp competition in colloidal hard-sphere nucleation: on their relative stability, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio ; Sanz, Eduardo ; Vega, Carlos ; Espinosa, Jorge R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio ; Sanz, Eduardo ; Vega, Carlos ; Espinosa, Jorge R.</creatorcontrib><description>Hard-sphere crystallization has been widely investigated over the last six decades by means of colloidal suspensions and numerical methods. However, some aspects of its nucleation behaviour are still under debate. Here, we provide a detailed computational characterisation of the polymorphic nucleation competition between the face-centered cubic (fcc) and the hexagonal-close packed (hcp) hard-sphere crystal phases. By means of several state-of-the-art simulation techniques, we evaluate the melting pressure, chemical potential difference, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate of these two polymorphs, as well as of a random stacking mixture of both crystals. Our results highlight that, despite the fact that both polymorphs have very similar stability, the interfacial free energy of the hcp phase could be marginally higher than that of the fcc solid, which in consequence, mildly decreases its propensity to nucleate from the liquid compared to the fcc phase. Moreover, we analyse the abundance of each polymorph in grown crystals from different types of inserted nuclei: fcc, hcp and stacking disordered fcc/hcp seeds, as well as from those spontaneously emerged from brute force simulations. We find that post-critical crystals fundamentally grow maintaining the polymorphic structure of the critical nucleus, at least until moderately large sizes, since the only crystallographic orientation that allows stacking close-packed disorder is the fcc (111) plane, or equivalently the hcp (0001) one. Taken together, our results contribute with one more piece to the intricate puzzle of colloidal hard-sphere crystallization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-9076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-9084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d1cp01784e</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Chemical potential ; Colloids ; Competition ; Crystal growth ; Crystal structure ; Crystallization ; Crystallography ; Crystals ; Free energy ; Interface stability ; Nucleation ; Numerical methods ; Stacking</subject><ispartof>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2021-09, Vol.23 (35), p.19611-19626</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-aa31a097f03c754447fb337bc20fd04c12865cca820517381dc02935895dd15c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-aa31a097f03c754447fb337bc20fd04c12865cca820517381dc02935895dd15c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6474-5835 ; 0000-0001-9530-2658 ; 0000-0002-1160-3945 ; 0000-0002-2417-9645</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinosa, Jorge R.</creatorcontrib><title>Fcc vs. hcp competition in colloidal hard-sphere nucleation: on their relative stability, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate</title><title>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP</title><description>Hard-sphere crystallization has been widely investigated over the last six decades by means of colloidal suspensions and numerical methods. However, some aspects of its nucleation behaviour are still under debate. Here, we provide a detailed computational characterisation of the polymorphic nucleation competition between the face-centered cubic (fcc) and the hexagonal-close packed (hcp) hard-sphere crystal phases. By means of several state-of-the-art simulation techniques, we evaluate the melting pressure, chemical potential difference, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate of these two polymorphs, as well as of a random stacking mixture of both crystals. Our results highlight that, despite the fact that both polymorphs have very similar stability, the interfacial free energy of the hcp phase could be marginally higher than that of the fcc solid, which in consequence, mildly decreases its propensity to nucleate from the liquid compared to the fcc phase. Moreover, we analyse the abundance of each polymorph in grown crystals from different types of inserted nuclei: fcc, hcp and stacking disordered fcc/hcp seeds, as well as from those spontaneously emerged from brute force simulations. We find that post-critical crystals fundamentally grow maintaining the polymorphic structure of the critical nucleus, at least until moderately large sizes, since the only crystallographic orientation that allows stacking close-packed disorder is the fcc (111) plane, or equivalently the hcp (0001) one. Taken together, our results contribute with one more piece to the intricate puzzle of colloidal hard-sphere crystallization.</description><subject>Chemical potential</subject><subject>Colloids</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Crystal growth</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Crystallography</subject><subject>Crystals</subject><subject>Free energy</subject><subject>Interface stability</subject><subject>Nucleation</subject><subject>Numerical methods</subject><subject>Stacking</subject><issn>1463-9076</issn><issn>1463-9084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0UFLwzAUwPEiCs7pxU8Q8CJiZ9I0TetN5qbCQA96Ltnrq83I2pqkg30Av7eZExFPSR4__gReFJ0zOmGUFzcVg54ymad4EI1YmvG4oHl6-HuX2XF04tyKUsoE46Pocw5ANm5CGugJdOsevfa6a4luw9OYTlfKkEbZKnZ9gxZJO4BBtTO3JDjfoLbEogmjDRLn1VIb7bfXoeDR1gp0CNQWkWCL9n1LVFv9iRCrPJ5GR7UyDs9-znH0Np-9Th_jxfPD0_RuEUNSFD5WijNFC1lTDlKkaSrrJedyCQmtK5oCS_JMAKg8oYJJnrMKaFJwkReiqpgAPo4u993edh8DOl-utQM0RrXYDa5MhAw-CeVAL_7RVTfYNvzuW8lCSp4FdbVXYDvnLNZlb_Va2W3JaLnbSHnPpi_fG5nxL4GEfrs</recordid><startdate>20210915</startdate><enddate>20210915</enddate><creator>Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio</creator><creator>Sanz, Eduardo</creator><creator>Vega, Carlos</creator><creator>Espinosa, Jorge R.</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6474-5835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9530-2658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-3945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-9645</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210915</creationdate><title>Fcc vs. hcp competition in colloidal hard-sphere nucleation: on their relative stability, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate</title><author>Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio ; Sanz, Eduardo ; Vega, Carlos ; Espinosa, Jorge R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-aa31a097f03c754447fb337bc20fd04c12865cca820517381dc02935895dd15c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chemical potential</topic><topic>Colloids</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Crystal growth</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Crystallography</topic><topic>Crystals</topic><topic>Free energy</topic><topic>Interface stability</topic><topic>Nucleation</topic><topic>Numerical methods</topic><topic>Stacking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vega, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinosa, Jorge R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio</au><au>Sanz, Eduardo</au><au>Vega, Carlos</au><au>Espinosa, Jorge R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fcc vs. hcp competition in colloidal hard-sphere nucleation: on their relative stability, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate</atitle><jtitle>Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP</jtitle><date>2021-09-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>35</issue><spage>19611</spage><epage>19626</epage><pages>19611-19626</pages><issn>1463-9076</issn><eissn>1463-9084</eissn><abstract>Hard-sphere crystallization has been widely investigated over the last six decades by means of colloidal suspensions and numerical methods. However, some aspects of its nucleation behaviour are still under debate. Here, we provide a detailed computational characterisation of the polymorphic nucleation competition between the face-centered cubic (fcc) and the hexagonal-close packed (hcp) hard-sphere crystal phases. By means of several state-of-the-art simulation techniques, we evaluate the melting pressure, chemical potential difference, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate of these two polymorphs, as well as of a random stacking mixture of both crystals. Our results highlight that, despite the fact that both polymorphs have very similar stability, the interfacial free energy of the hcp phase could be marginally higher than that of the fcc solid, which in consequence, mildly decreases its propensity to nucleate from the liquid compared to the fcc phase. Moreover, we analyse the abundance of each polymorph in grown crystals from different types of inserted nuclei: fcc, hcp and stacking disordered fcc/hcp seeds, as well as from those spontaneously emerged from brute force simulations. We find that post-critical crystals fundamentally grow maintaining the polymorphic structure of the critical nucleus, at least until moderately large sizes, since the only crystallographic orientation that allows stacking close-packed disorder is the fcc (111) plane, or equivalently the hcp (0001) one. Taken together, our results contribute with one more piece to the intricate puzzle of colloidal hard-sphere crystallization.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d1cp01784e</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6474-5835</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9530-2658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1160-3945</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-9645</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1463-9076
ispartof Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2021-09, Vol.23 (35), p.19611-19626
issn 1463-9076
1463-9084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572932444
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Chemical potential
Colloids
Competition
Crystal growth
Crystal structure
Crystallization
Crystallography
Crystals
Free energy
Interface stability
Nucleation
Numerical methods
Stacking
title Fcc vs. hcp competition in colloidal hard-sphere nucleation: on their relative stability, interfacial free energy and nucleation rate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A23%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fcc%20vs.%20hcp%20competition%20in%20colloidal%20hard-sphere%20nucleation:%20on%20their%20relative%20stability,%20interfacial%20free%20energy%20and%20nucleation%20rate&rft.jtitle=Physical%20chemistry%20chemical%20physics%20:%20PCCP&rft.au=Sanchez-Burgos,%20Ignacio&rft.date=2021-09-15&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=35&rft.spage=19611&rft.epage=19626&rft.pages=19611-19626&rft.issn=1463-9076&rft.eissn=1463-9084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d1cp01784e&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572932444%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572797736&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true