Dose-response relationship between spino-pelvic alignment determined by sagittal modifiers and back pain-specific quality of life

Purpose To determine whether abnormalities of the sagittal modifiers (SMs) of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification truly reflect back pain (BP)-specific quality of life (QOL), it is necessary to examine their dose–response relationships and to determine clinically impactful thr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2021-10, Vol.30 (10), p.3019-3027
Hauptverfasser: Tominaga, Ryoji, Kurita, Noriaki, Kokubun, Yoshiyuki, Nikaido, Takuya, Sekiguchi, Miho, Otani, Koji, Iwabuchi, Masumi, Shirado, Osamu, Fukuhara, Shunichi, Konno, Shin-ichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3027
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3019
container_title European spine journal
container_volume 30
creator Tominaga, Ryoji
Kurita, Noriaki
Kokubun, Yoshiyuki
Nikaido, Takuya
Sekiguchi, Miho
Otani, Koji
Iwabuchi, Masumi
Shirado, Osamu
Fukuhara, Shunichi
Konno, Shin-ichi
description Purpose To determine whether abnormalities of the sagittal modifiers (SMs) of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification truly reflect back pain (BP)-specific quality of life (QOL), it is necessary to examine their dose–response relationships and to determine clinically impactful thresholds for declines in BP-specific QOL. This study aimed to analyse the continuous dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Methods This cross-sectional study, using data from a Japanese population-based cohort study, included 519 community-dwelling residents aged ≥ 50 years who participated in the annual health examination. The participants completed the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) on BP-specific QOL. Spino-pelvic alignment based on SMs was assessed by whole-spine X-ray examinations. We fitted general linear models with or without nonlinear terms to estimate the dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Results Pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and sagittal vertical axis showed dose–response relationships with BP-specific QOL measured as the RDQ score. PI-LL was most likely to predict a minimally clinically important RDQ score when its value exceeded the 90th percentile. A nonlinear relationship between PI-LL and the BP-specific QOL score was found. RDQ increased when PI-LL exceeded 10°. Conclusion PI-LL might be the most sensitive of the three modifiers of the SRS-Schwab classification for determining BP-specific QOL. Moreover, BP-specific QOL worsens rapidly when the compensatory mechanism against malalignment exceeds a critical value. Therefore, we suggest that traditional classifications and surgical strategies should be re-examined regarding the dose-dependent abnormalities of the SMs to develop a more reliable classification strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00586-021-06965-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572525214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572525214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-43b4d69f375a9a4a3d8389d3302c14fd66f699c2275b4bf76cfd1a2360c831f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kT9rHDEQxUWIIZdzvkAqgRs3SvRvtavS2HEcMKSJa6HVji5ydqW1pEu40t88cs4QcGGmmIH5vccwD6GPjH5ilPafC6XdoAjljFClVUfEG7RhUnBCteBv0YZqSYnqmX6H3pdyTynrNFUb9HiVCpAMZU2xAM4w2xra-DOseIT6ByDisoaYyArz7-CwncMuLhArnqBCXkKECY8HXOwu1GpnvKQp-AC5YBvbxrpfeLUhkrKCawuHH_bNox5w8ngOHk7RibdzgQ_PfYvurr_8uLwht9-_fru8uCVOKl6JFKOclPai76y20oppEIOehKDcMeknpbzS2nHed6Mcfa-cn5jlQlE3COaV2KLzo--a08MeSjVLKA7m2UZI-2J41_OuVfvaFp29QO_TPsd23RPVKTkI0TeKHymXUykZvFlzWGw-GEbNUyrmmIppqZh_qRjRROIoKg2OO8j_rV9R_QWiBJGK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575648337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose-response relationship between spino-pelvic alignment determined by sagittal modifiers and back pain-specific quality of life</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Tominaga, Ryoji ; Kurita, Noriaki ; Kokubun, Yoshiyuki ; Nikaido, Takuya ; Sekiguchi, Miho ; Otani, Koji ; Iwabuchi, Masumi ; Shirado, Osamu ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Konno, Shin-ichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Ryoji ; Kurita, Noriaki ; Kokubun, Yoshiyuki ; Nikaido, Takuya ; Sekiguchi, Miho ; Otani, Koji ; Iwabuchi, Masumi ; Shirado, Osamu ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Konno, Shin-ichi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine whether abnormalities of the sagittal modifiers (SMs) of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification truly reflect back pain (BP)-specific quality of life (QOL), it is necessary to examine their dose–response relationships and to determine clinically impactful thresholds for declines in BP-specific QOL. This study aimed to analyse the continuous dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Methods This cross-sectional study, using data from a Japanese population-based cohort study, included 519 community-dwelling residents aged ≥ 50 years who participated in the annual health examination. The participants completed the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) on BP-specific QOL. Spino-pelvic alignment based on SMs was assessed by whole-spine X-ray examinations. We fitted general linear models with or without nonlinear terms to estimate the dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Results Pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and sagittal vertical axis showed dose–response relationships with BP-specific QOL measured as the RDQ score. PI-LL was most likely to predict a minimally clinically important RDQ score when its value exceeded the 90th percentile. A nonlinear relationship between PI-LL and the BP-specific QOL score was found. RDQ increased when PI-LL exceeded 10°. Conclusion PI-LL might be the most sensitive of the three modifiers of the SRS-Schwab classification for determining BP-specific QOL. Moreover, BP-specific QOL worsens rapidly when the compensatory mechanism against malalignment exceeds a critical value. Therefore, we suggest that traditional classifications and surgical strategies should be re-examined regarding the dose-dependent abnormalities of the SMs to develop a more reliable classification strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06965-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Classification ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Pain ; Population studies ; Quality of life ; Scoliosis ; Spine (lumbar) ; Surgical Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>European spine journal, 2021-10, Vol.30 (10), p.3019-3027</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-43b4d69f375a9a4a3d8389d3302c14fd66f699c2275b4bf76cfd1a2360c831f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-43b4d69f375a9a4a3d8389d3302c14fd66f699c2275b4bf76cfd1a2360c831f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9851-5122</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00586-021-06965-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-021-06965-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurita, Noriaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokubun, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikaido, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwabuchi, Masumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirado, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konno, Shin-ichi</creatorcontrib><title>Dose-response relationship between spino-pelvic alignment determined by sagittal modifiers and back pain-specific quality of life</title><title>European spine journal</title><addtitle>Eur Spine J</addtitle><description>Purpose To determine whether abnormalities of the sagittal modifiers (SMs) of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification truly reflect back pain (BP)-specific quality of life (QOL), it is necessary to examine their dose–response relationships and to determine clinically impactful thresholds for declines in BP-specific QOL. This study aimed to analyse the continuous dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Methods This cross-sectional study, using data from a Japanese population-based cohort study, included 519 community-dwelling residents aged ≥ 50 years who participated in the annual health examination. The participants completed the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) on BP-specific QOL. Spino-pelvic alignment based on SMs was assessed by whole-spine X-ray examinations. We fitted general linear models with or without nonlinear terms to estimate the dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Results Pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and sagittal vertical axis showed dose–response relationships with BP-specific QOL measured as the RDQ score. PI-LL was most likely to predict a minimally clinically important RDQ score when its value exceeded the 90th percentile. A nonlinear relationship between PI-LL and the BP-specific QOL score was found. RDQ increased when PI-LL exceeded 10°. Conclusion PI-LL might be the most sensitive of the three modifiers of the SRS-Schwab classification for determining BP-specific QOL. Moreover, BP-specific QOL worsens rapidly when the compensatory mechanism against malalignment exceeds a critical value. Therefore, we suggest that traditional classifications and surgical strategies should be re-examined regarding the dose-dependent abnormalities of the SMs to develop a more reliable classification strategy.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Spine (lumbar)</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><issn>1432-0932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kT9rHDEQxUWIIZdzvkAqgRs3SvRvtavS2HEcMKSJa6HVji5ydqW1pEu40t88cs4QcGGmmIH5vccwD6GPjH5ilPafC6XdoAjljFClVUfEG7RhUnBCteBv0YZqSYnqmX6H3pdyTynrNFUb9HiVCpAMZU2xAM4w2xra-DOseIT6ByDisoaYyArz7-CwncMuLhArnqBCXkKECY8HXOwu1GpnvKQp-AC5YBvbxrpfeLUhkrKCawuHH_bNox5w8ngOHk7RibdzgQ_PfYvurr_8uLwht9-_fru8uCVOKl6JFKOclPai76y20oppEIOehKDcMeknpbzS2nHed6Mcfa-cn5jlQlE3COaV2KLzo--a08MeSjVLKA7m2UZI-2J41_OuVfvaFp29QO_TPsd23RPVKTkI0TeKHymXUykZvFlzWGw-GEbNUyrmmIppqZh_qRjRROIoKg2OO8j_rV9R_QWiBJGK</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Tominaga, Ryoji</creator><creator>Kurita, Noriaki</creator><creator>Kokubun, Yoshiyuki</creator><creator>Nikaido, Takuya</creator><creator>Sekiguchi, Miho</creator><creator>Otani, Koji</creator><creator>Iwabuchi, Masumi</creator><creator>Shirado, Osamu</creator><creator>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creator><creator>Konno, Shin-ichi</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-5122</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Dose-response relationship between spino-pelvic alignment determined by sagittal modifiers and back pain-specific quality of life</title><author>Tominaga, Ryoji ; Kurita, Noriaki ; Kokubun, Yoshiyuki ; Nikaido, Takuya ; Sekiguchi, Miho ; Otani, Koji ; Iwabuchi, Masumi ; Shirado, Osamu ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Konno, Shin-ichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-43b4d69f375a9a4a3d8389d3302c14fd66f699c2275b4bf76cfd1a2360c831f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Spine (lumbar)</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Ryoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurita, Noriaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokubun, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikaido, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwabuchi, Masumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirado, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konno, Shin-ichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tominaga, Ryoji</au><au>Kurita, Noriaki</au><au>Kokubun, Yoshiyuki</au><au>Nikaido, Takuya</au><au>Sekiguchi, Miho</au><au>Otani, Koji</au><au>Iwabuchi, Masumi</au><au>Shirado, Osamu</au><au>Fukuhara, Shunichi</au><au>Konno, Shin-ichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose-response relationship between spino-pelvic alignment determined by sagittal modifiers and back pain-specific quality of life</atitle><jtitle>European spine journal</jtitle><stitle>Eur Spine J</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3019</spage><epage>3027</epage><pages>3019-3027</pages><issn>0940-6719</issn><eissn>1432-0932</eissn><abstract>Purpose To determine whether abnormalities of the sagittal modifiers (SMs) of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification truly reflect back pain (BP)-specific quality of life (QOL), it is necessary to examine their dose–response relationships and to determine clinically impactful thresholds for declines in BP-specific QOL. This study aimed to analyse the continuous dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Methods This cross-sectional study, using data from a Japanese population-based cohort study, included 519 community-dwelling residents aged ≥ 50 years who participated in the annual health examination. The participants completed the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) on BP-specific QOL. Spino-pelvic alignment based on SMs was assessed by whole-spine X-ray examinations. We fitted general linear models with or without nonlinear terms to estimate the dose–response relationship between each SM and BP-specific QOL. Results Pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and sagittal vertical axis showed dose–response relationships with BP-specific QOL measured as the RDQ score. PI-LL was most likely to predict a minimally clinically important RDQ score when its value exceeded the 90th percentile. A nonlinear relationship between PI-LL and the BP-specific QOL score was found. RDQ increased when PI-LL exceeded 10°. Conclusion PI-LL might be the most sensitive of the three modifiers of the SRS-Schwab classification for determining BP-specific QOL. Moreover, BP-specific QOL worsens rapidly when the compensatory mechanism against malalignment exceeds a critical value. Therefore, we suggest that traditional classifications and surgical strategies should be re-examined regarding the dose-dependent abnormalities of the SMs to develop a more reliable classification strategy.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00586-021-06965-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-5122</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-6719
ispartof European spine journal, 2021-10, Vol.30 (10), p.3019-3027
issn 0940-6719
1432-0932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572525214
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Back pain
Classification
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Original Article
Pain
Population studies
Quality of life
Scoliosis
Spine (lumbar)
Surgical Orthopedics
title Dose-response relationship between spino-pelvic alignment determined by sagittal modifiers and back pain-specific quality of life
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T09%3A22%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose-response%20relationship%20between%20spino-pelvic%20alignment%20determined%20by%20sagittal%20modifiers%20and%20back%20pain-specific%20quality%20of%20life&rft.jtitle=European%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Tominaga,%20Ryoji&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3019&rft.epage=3027&rft.pages=3019-3027&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft.eissn=1432-0932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00586-021-06965-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572525214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575648337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true