Effect of Soil Type and Temperature on Persistence and Dissipation Kinetics of a New Readymix Formulation of Fomesafen + Quizalofop-ethyl
The research portrays the fate of a new herbicide mixture of fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl. The soil samples viz. red lateritic soil (A), coastal saline soil (B) and black soil (C) were fortified separately for fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl at 0.5 (T1) and 1.0 mg kg −1 (T2) doses and incubated at...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology 2021-11, Vol.107 (5), p.961-966 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 966 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 961 |
| container_title | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology |
| container_volume | 107 |
| creator | Das, Sushovan Singha, Debasish Kundu, Arnab Kundu, Abhishek Bhattacharyya, Arijita Nanda, Manoj Kumar Roy, Sankhajit |
| description | The research portrays the fate of a new herbicide mixture of fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl. The soil samples viz. red lateritic soil (A), coastal saline soil (B) and black soil (C) were fortified separately for fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl at 0.5 (T1) and 1.0 mg kg
−1
(T2) doses and incubated at 20, 30 and 40°C. A satisfactory mean recovery, precision and linearity proved that the methods were accurate. Both the herbicides followed first + first order kinetics. Higher persistence of fomesafen was observed in Soil C than Soil B and Soil A with 22.38–53.75 days half-life, whereas quizalofop-ethyl showed higher stability in Soil A than Soils B and C with half-life of 0.93–12.07 days. Both compounds showed faster rates of dissipation at increased temperature, irrespective of soil type. The current study will help to predict the effect of temperature on the dissipation of herbicides in different soil under real field scenario. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00128-021-03375-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572213389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572213389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2675-9a87b325f1bea673b2cecd94e5bcbcf4857eac426d7380cb25ac561d8e2334dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhS0EUm-hL9CVJTZIVYp_4th3iSiXVkUttLdry3HGYJTEwU5ELyu2LPqSfRIMQarUBYvRLM53jmZ0EHpPyUdKiDxMhFCmCsJoQTiXohBbaEFLzgqiCNlGC5KpolQVfYPepnSdcaEYW6A_J86BHXFw-GfwLV5vBsCmb_AaugGiGacIOPT4HGLyaYTezvInn5IfzOiz9tX3MHqbnkIM_ga3-AeYZtP533gVYje1M5bVVeggGQf93_uHD3kuJn9n2uDCUMB4tWn30I4zbYJ3L3sX_VqdrI8_F2ffT78cH50VllX5uaVRsuZMOFqDqSSvmQXbLEsQta2tK5WQYGzJqkZyRWzNhLGioo0CxnnZNHwXHcy5Qww3E6RRdz5ZaFvTQ5iSZkIyRjlXy4zu_4dehyn2-bpMKUWVrKTKFJspG0NKEZweou9M3GhK9FNDem5I54b0c0NaZBOfTSnD_SXEf9GvuB4BJACXKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2588187678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Soil Type and Temperature on Persistence and Dissipation Kinetics of a New Readymix Formulation of Fomesafen + Quizalofop-ethyl</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Das, Sushovan ; Singha, Debasish ; Kundu, Arnab ; Kundu, Abhishek ; Bhattacharyya, Arijita ; Nanda, Manoj Kumar ; Roy, Sankhajit</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Sushovan ; Singha, Debasish ; Kundu, Arnab ; Kundu, Abhishek ; Bhattacharyya, Arijita ; Nanda, Manoj Kumar ; Roy, Sankhajit</creatorcontrib><description>The research portrays the fate of a new herbicide mixture of fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl. The soil samples viz. red lateritic soil (A), coastal saline soil (B) and black soil (C) were fortified separately for fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl at 0.5 (T1) and 1.0 mg kg
−1
(T2) doses and incubated at 20, 30 and 40°C. A satisfactory mean recovery, precision and linearity proved that the methods were accurate. Both the herbicides followed first + first order kinetics. Higher persistence of fomesafen was observed in Soil C than Soil B and Soil A with 22.38–53.75 days half-life, whereas quizalofop-ethyl showed higher stability in Soil A than Soils B and C with half-life of 0.93–12.07 days. Both compounds showed faster rates of dissipation at increased temperature, irrespective of soil type. The current study will help to predict the effect of temperature on the dissipation of herbicides in different soil under real field scenario.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00128-021-03375-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Half-life ; Herbicides ; Kinetics ; Pollution ; Saline soils ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil stability ; Soil temperature ; Soil types ; Soils ; Temperature effects ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2021-11, Vol.107 (5), p.961-966</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2675-9a87b325f1bea673b2cecd94e5bcbcf4857eac426d7380cb25ac561d8e2334dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2675-9a87b325f1bea673b2cecd94e5bcbcf4857eac426d7380cb25ac561d8e2334dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00128-021-03375-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00128-021-03375-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Sushovan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singha, Debasish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Arnab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharyya, Arijita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanda, Manoj Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Sankhajit</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Soil Type and Temperature on Persistence and Dissipation Kinetics of a New Readymix Formulation of Fomesafen + Quizalofop-ethyl</title><title>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>The research portrays the fate of a new herbicide mixture of fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl. The soil samples viz. red lateritic soil (A), coastal saline soil (B) and black soil (C) were fortified separately for fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl at 0.5 (T1) and 1.0 mg kg
−1
(T2) doses and incubated at 20, 30 and 40°C. A satisfactory mean recovery, precision and linearity proved that the methods were accurate. Both the herbicides followed first + first order kinetics. Higher persistence of fomesafen was observed in Soil C than Soil B and Soil A with 22.38–53.75 days half-life, whereas quizalofop-ethyl showed higher stability in Soil A than Soils B and C with half-life of 0.93–12.07 days. Both compounds showed faster rates of dissipation at increased temperature, irrespective of soil type. The current study will help to predict the effect of temperature on the dissipation of herbicides in different soil under real field scenario.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Half-life</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Saline soils</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Soil temperature</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0007-4861</issn><issn>1432-0800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhS0EUm-hL9CVJTZIVYp_4th3iSiXVkUttLdry3HGYJTEwU5ELyu2LPqSfRIMQarUBYvRLM53jmZ0EHpPyUdKiDxMhFCmCsJoQTiXohBbaEFLzgqiCNlGC5KpolQVfYPepnSdcaEYW6A_J86BHXFw-GfwLV5vBsCmb_AaugGiGacIOPT4HGLyaYTezvInn5IfzOiz9tX3MHqbnkIM_ga3-AeYZtP533gVYje1M5bVVeggGQf93_uHD3kuJn9n2uDCUMB4tWn30I4zbYJ3L3sX_VqdrI8_F2ffT78cH50VllX5uaVRsuZMOFqDqSSvmQXbLEsQta2tK5WQYGzJqkZyRWzNhLGioo0CxnnZNHwXHcy5Qww3E6RRdz5ZaFvTQ5iSZkIyRjlXy4zu_4dehyn2-bpMKUWVrKTKFJspG0NKEZweou9M3GhK9FNDem5I54b0c0NaZBOfTSnD_SXEf9GvuB4BJACXKg</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Das, Sushovan</creator><creator>Singha, Debasish</creator><creator>Kundu, Arnab</creator><creator>Kundu, Abhishek</creator><creator>Bhattacharyya, Arijita</creator><creator>Nanda, Manoj Kumar</creator><creator>Roy, Sankhajit</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Effect of Soil Type and Temperature on Persistence and Dissipation Kinetics of a New Readymix Formulation of Fomesafen + Quizalofop-ethyl</title><author>Das, Sushovan ; Singha, Debasish ; Kundu, Arnab ; Kundu, Abhishek ; Bhattacharyya, Arijita ; Nanda, Manoj Kumar ; Roy, Sankhajit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2675-9a87b325f1bea673b2cecd94e5bcbcf4857eac426d7380cb25ac561d8e2334dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Half-life</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Saline soils</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Soil temperature</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Sushovan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singha, Debasish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Arnab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kundu, Abhishek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharyya, Arijita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanda, Manoj Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Sankhajit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Sushovan</au><au>Singha, Debasish</au><au>Kundu, Arnab</au><au>Kundu, Abhishek</au><au>Bhattacharyya, Arijita</au><au>Nanda, Manoj Kumar</au><au>Roy, Sankhajit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Soil Type and Temperature on Persistence and Dissipation Kinetics of a New Readymix Formulation of Fomesafen + Quizalofop-ethyl</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><stitle>Bull Environ Contam Toxicol</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>961</spage><epage>966</epage><pages>961-966</pages><issn>0007-4861</issn><eissn>1432-0800</eissn><abstract>The research portrays the fate of a new herbicide mixture of fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl. The soil samples viz. red lateritic soil (A), coastal saline soil (B) and black soil (C) were fortified separately for fomesafen and quizalofop-ethyl at 0.5 (T1) and 1.0 mg kg
−1
(T2) doses and incubated at 20, 30 and 40°C. A satisfactory mean recovery, precision and linearity proved that the methods were accurate. Both the herbicides followed first + first order kinetics. Higher persistence of fomesafen was observed in Soil C than Soil B and Soil A with 22.38–53.75 days half-life, whereas quizalofop-ethyl showed higher stability in Soil A than Soils B and C with half-life of 0.93–12.07 days. Both compounds showed faster rates of dissipation at increased temperature, irrespective of soil type. The current study will help to predict the effect of temperature on the dissipation of herbicides in different soil under real field scenario.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s00128-021-03375-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0007-4861 |
| ispartof | Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2021-11, Vol.107 (5), p.961-966 |
| issn | 0007-4861 1432-0800 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2572213389 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Aquatic Pollution Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Half-life Herbicides Kinetics Pollution Saline soils Soil Science & Conservation Soil stability Soil temperature Soil types Soils Temperature effects Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
| title | Effect of Soil Type and Temperature on Persistence and Dissipation Kinetics of a New Readymix Formulation of Fomesafen + Quizalofop-ethyl |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Soil%20Type%20and%20Temperature%20on%20Persistence%20and%20Dissipation%20Kinetics%20of%20a%20New%20Readymix%20Formulation%20of%20Fomesafen%E2%80%89+%E2%80%89Quizalofop-ethyl&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=Das,%20Sushovan&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=961&rft.epage=966&rft.pages=961-966&rft.issn=0007-4861&rft.eissn=1432-0800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00128-021-03375-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572213389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2588187678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |