Low‐energy electron ionization optimization for steroidomics analysis using high‐resolution mass spectrometry

Rationale Systematic electron ionization fragmentation studies of steroids have been performed to elucidate and trace their characteristic fragmentation patterns. However, the electron ionization source setting at 70 eV electron energy is much higher than the ionization potential (7–15 eV) of most o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2021-12, Vol.35 (23), p.e9196-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Leogrande, Patrizia, Jardines, Daniel, Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin, Torre, Xavier, Parr, Maria K., Botrè, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 23
container_start_page e9196
container_title Rapid communications in mass spectrometry
container_volume 35
creator Leogrande, Patrizia
Jardines, Daniel
Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin
Torre, Xavier
Parr, Maria K.
Botrè, Francesco
description Rationale Systematic electron ionization fragmentation studies of steroids have been performed to elucidate and trace their characteristic fragmentation patterns. However, the electron ionization source setting at 70 eV electron energy is much higher than the ionization potential (7–15 eV) of most organic compounds, leading to extensive fragmentation. We present a multifactorial study on optimizing a low‐energy electron ionization source to maximize molecular ion formation while minimizing the extent of fragmentation to improve the analytical sensitivity of steroids, especially the more thermolabile ones, while preserving the information that can be extracted from the data. Methods Twenty‐seven steroid reference materials, chosen to cover four main classes of urinary steroids, were considered; gas chromatography/quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) analyses were carried out using an Agilent Technologies model 8890 gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent Technologies model 7250 accurate‐mass quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) instrument. The effects of electron energy, emission current, and source temperature, as well as their potential interactions on steroid fragmentation pathways, have been assessed in full factorial experimental designs. Results Three parameters were specifically evaluated to improve the chromatographic/spectrometric response of the selected steroids: (i) degree of fragmentation; (ii) relative abundance of the molecular ion; and (iii) peak width. The first two were evaluated by screening designs that highlighted collision energy and source temperature as the most influential factors on the analytical responses of the considered steroids, while emission current always showed a non‐significant influence. Then, an optimization design was performed to select the final source setting by searching for the combination of factors that minimize peak tailing. Conclusions The proposed analytical approach permits a faster selection of optimal experimental conditions for steroidomics analysis using low‐energy electron ionization and high‐resolution mass spectrometry. The development of these designs of experiments (DoE) in full factorial design (FFD) allowed multiple inputs to be monitored at the same time, highlighting the possible interactions and estimating the effects of a factor in the different levels of the other factors considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rcm.9196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2571055463</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2571055463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2986-9dde8193193358e3941fe51312f22f5f0a20ee12ec15ed2b53f300042ca9c67f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbBR8jSTercmUzbWUrxDyqC6DqMkzvtSJJp5yaUuPIRfEafxLRVXAkXDhe-8y0OY-fAR8C5uIy2GmnQ4wM2AK4nKRcSDtmAawVpBnp6zE6I3jgHUIIP2HoeNl8fn1hjXHQJlmibGOrEh9q_m6aPJKwaX_0-LsSEGozBF6HylhJTm7IjT0lLvl4kS79Y9rqIFMp216gMUUKrnbfCJnan7MiZkvDsJ4fs5eb6eXaXzh9v72dX89QKPR2nuihwClr2J9UUpc7AoQIJwgnhlONGcEQQaEFhIV6VdJJznglrtB1PnByyi713FcO6RWryypPFsjQ1hpZyoSbAlcrG8g-1MRBFdPkq-srELgeeb1fN-1Xz7ao9mu7RjS-x-5fLn2YPO_4bMq59yw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571055463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low‐energy electron ionization optimization for steroidomics analysis using high‐resolution mass spectrometry</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Leogrande, Patrizia ; Jardines, Daniel ; Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin ; Torre, Xavier ; Parr, Maria K. ; Botrè, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Leogrande, Patrizia ; Jardines, Daniel ; Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin ; Torre, Xavier ; Parr, Maria K. ; Botrè, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale Systematic electron ionization fragmentation studies of steroids have been performed to elucidate and trace their characteristic fragmentation patterns. However, the electron ionization source setting at 70 eV electron energy is much higher than the ionization potential (7–15 eV) of most organic compounds, leading to extensive fragmentation. We present a multifactorial study on optimizing a low‐energy electron ionization source to maximize molecular ion formation while minimizing the extent of fragmentation to improve the analytical sensitivity of steroids, especially the more thermolabile ones, while preserving the information that can be extracted from the data. Methods Twenty‐seven steroid reference materials, chosen to cover four main classes of urinary steroids, were considered; gas chromatography/quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) analyses were carried out using an Agilent Technologies model 8890 gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent Technologies model 7250 accurate‐mass quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) instrument. The effects of electron energy, emission current, and source temperature, as well as their potential interactions on steroid fragmentation pathways, have been assessed in full factorial experimental designs. Results Three parameters were specifically evaluated to improve the chromatographic/spectrometric response of the selected steroids: (i) degree of fragmentation; (ii) relative abundance of the molecular ion; and (iii) peak width. The first two were evaluated by screening designs that highlighted collision energy and source temperature as the most influential factors on the analytical responses of the considered steroids, while emission current always showed a non‐significant influence. Then, an optimization design was performed to select the final source setting by searching for the combination of factors that minimize peak tailing. Conclusions The proposed analytical approach permits a faster selection of optimal experimental conditions for steroidomics analysis using low‐energy electron ionization and high‐resolution mass spectrometry. The development of these designs of experiments (DoE) in full factorial design (FFD) allowed multiple inputs to be monitored at the same time, highlighting the possible interactions and estimating the effects of a factor in the different levels of the other factors considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcm.9196</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2021-12, Vol.35 (23), p.e9196-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2986-9dde8193193358e3941fe51312f22f5f0a20ee12ec15ed2b53f300042ca9c67f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2986-9dde8193193358e3941fe51312f22f5f0a20ee12ec15ed2b53f300042ca9c67f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8329-6596 ; 0000-0001-8037-6750 ; 0000-0002-7066-4916 ; 0000-0001-7407-8300 ; 0000-0001-5296-8126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcm.9196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcm.9196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leogrande, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardines, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Maria K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botrè, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Low‐energy electron ionization optimization for steroidomics analysis using high‐resolution mass spectrometry</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><description>Rationale Systematic electron ionization fragmentation studies of steroids have been performed to elucidate and trace their characteristic fragmentation patterns. However, the electron ionization source setting at 70 eV electron energy is much higher than the ionization potential (7–15 eV) of most organic compounds, leading to extensive fragmentation. We present a multifactorial study on optimizing a low‐energy electron ionization source to maximize molecular ion formation while minimizing the extent of fragmentation to improve the analytical sensitivity of steroids, especially the more thermolabile ones, while preserving the information that can be extracted from the data. Methods Twenty‐seven steroid reference materials, chosen to cover four main classes of urinary steroids, were considered; gas chromatography/quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) analyses were carried out using an Agilent Technologies model 8890 gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent Technologies model 7250 accurate‐mass quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) instrument. The effects of electron energy, emission current, and source temperature, as well as their potential interactions on steroid fragmentation pathways, have been assessed in full factorial experimental designs. Results Three parameters were specifically evaluated to improve the chromatographic/spectrometric response of the selected steroids: (i) degree of fragmentation; (ii) relative abundance of the molecular ion; and (iii) peak width. The first two were evaluated by screening designs that highlighted collision energy and source temperature as the most influential factors on the analytical responses of the considered steroids, while emission current always showed a non‐significant influence. Then, an optimization design was performed to select the final source setting by searching for the combination of factors that minimize peak tailing. Conclusions The proposed analytical approach permits a faster selection of optimal experimental conditions for steroidomics analysis using low‐energy electron ionization and high‐resolution mass spectrometry. The development of these designs of experiments (DoE) in full factorial design (FFD) allowed multiple inputs to be monitored at the same time, highlighting the possible interactions and estimating the effects of a factor in the different levels of the other factors considered.</description><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFbBR8jSTercmUzbWUrxDyqC6DqMkzvtSJJp5yaUuPIRfEafxLRVXAkXDhe-8y0OY-fAR8C5uIy2GmnQ4wM2AK4nKRcSDtmAawVpBnp6zE6I3jgHUIIP2HoeNl8fn1hjXHQJlmibGOrEh9q_m6aPJKwaX_0-LsSEGozBF6HylhJTm7IjT0lLvl4kS79Y9rqIFMp216gMUUKrnbfCJnan7MiZkvDsJ4fs5eb6eXaXzh9v72dX89QKPR2nuihwClr2J9UUpc7AoQIJwgnhlONGcEQQaEFhIV6VdJJznglrtB1PnByyi713FcO6RWryypPFsjQ1hpZyoSbAlcrG8g-1MRBFdPkq-srELgeeb1fN-1Xz7ao9mu7RjS-x-5fLn2YPO_4bMq59yw</recordid><startdate>20211215</startdate><enddate>20211215</enddate><creator>Leogrande, Patrizia</creator><creator>Jardines, Daniel</creator><creator>Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin</creator><creator>Torre, Xavier</creator><creator>Parr, Maria K.</creator><creator>Botrè, Francesco</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-6596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-6750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-8300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-8126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211215</creationdate><title>Low‐energy electron ionization optimization for steroidomics analysis using high‐resolution mass spectrometry</title><author>Leogrande, Patrizia ; Jardines, Daniel ; Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin ; Torre, Xavier ; Parr, Maria K. ; Botrè, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2986-9dde8193193358e3941fe51312f22f5f0a20ee12ec15ed2b53f300042ca9c67f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leogrande, Patrizia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardines, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Maria K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botrè, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leogrande, Patrizia</au><au>Jardines, Daniel</au><au>Martinez‐Brito, Dayamin</au><au>Torre, Xavier</au><au>Parr, Maria K.</au><au>Botrè, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low‐energy electron ionization optimization for steroidomics analysis using high‐resolution mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><date>2021-12-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>e9196</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e9196-n/a</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Rationale Systematic electron ionization fragmentation studies of steroids have been performed to elucidate and trace their characteristic fragmentation patterns. However, the electron ionization source setting at 70 eV electron energy is much higher than the ionization potential (7–15 eV) of most organic compounds, leading to extensive fragmentation. We present a multifactorial study on optimizing a low‐energy electron ionization source to maximize molecular ion formation while minimizing the extent of fragmentation to improve the analytical sensitivity of steroids, especially the more thermolabile ones, while preserving the information that can be extracted from the data. Methods Twenty‐seven steroid reference materials, chosen to cover four main classes of urinary steroids, were considered; gas chromatography/quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) analyses were carried out using an Agilent Technologies model 8890 gas chromatograph coupled to an Agilent Technologies model 7250 accurate‐mass quadrupole time‐of‐flight (GC/qTOF) instrument. The effects of electron energy, emission current, and source temperature, as well as their potential interactions on steroid fragmentation pathways, have been assessed in full factorial experimental designs. Results Three parameters were specifically evaluated to improve the chromatographic/spectrometric response of the selected steroids: (i) degree of fragmentation; (ii) relative abundance of the molecular ion; and (iii) peak width. The first two were evaluated by screening designs that highlighted collision energy and source temperature as the most influential factors on the analytical responses of the considered steroids, while emission current always showed a non‐significant influence. Then, an optimization design was performed to select the final source setting by searching for the combination of factors that minimize peak tailing. Conclusions The proposed analytical approach permits a faster selection of optimal experimental conditions for steroidomics analysis using low‐energy electron ionization and high‐resolution mass spectrometry. The development of these designs of experiments (DoE) in full factorial design (FFD) allowed multiple inputs to be monitored at the same time, highlighting the possible interactions and estimating the effects of a factor in the different levels of the other factors considered.</abstract><doi>10.1002/rcm.9196</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-6596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-6750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-4916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-8300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5296-8126</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-4198
ispartof Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2021-12, Vol.35 (23), p.e9196-n/a
issn 0951-4198
1097-0231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2571055463
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Low‐energy electron ionization optimization for steroidomics analysis using high‐resolution mass spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%E2%80%90energy%20electron%20ionization%20optimization%20for%20steroidomics%20analysis%20using%20high%E2%80%90resolution%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Leogrande,%20Patrizia&rft.date=2021-12-15&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=e9196&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e9196-n/a&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcm.9196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2571055463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571055463&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true