Total evidence and sensitivity phylogenetic analyses of egg‐brooding frogs (Anura: Hemiphractidae)

We study the phylogenetic relationships of egg‐brooding frogs, a group of 118 neotropical species, unique among anurans by having embryos with large bell‐shaped gills and females carrying their eggs on the dorsum, exposed or inside a pouch. We assembled a total evidence dataset of published and newl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cladistics 2021-08, Vol.37 (4), p.375-401
Hauptverfasser: Echevarría, Lourdes Y., De la Riva, Ignacio, Venegas, Pablo J., Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M., R. Dias, Iuri, Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 401
container_issue 4
container_start_page 375
container_title Cladistics
container_volume 37
creator Echevarría, Lourdes Y.
De la Riva, Ignacio
Venegas, Pablo J.
Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M.
R. Dias, Iuri
Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago
description We study the phylogenetic relationships of egg‐brooding frogs, a group of 118 neotropical species, unique among anurans by having embryos with large bell‐shaped gills and females carrying their eggs on the dorsum, exposed or inside a pouch. We assembled a total evidence dataset of published and newly generated data containing 51 phenotypic characters and DNA sequences of 20 loci for 143 hemiphractids and 127 outgroup terminals. We performed six analytical strategies combining different optimality criteria (parsimony and maximum likelihood), alignment methods (tree‐ and similarity‐alignment), and three different indel coding schemes (fifth character state, unknown nucleotide, and presence/absence characters matrix). Furthermore, we analyzed a subset of the total evidence dataset to evaluate the impact of phenotypic characters on hemiphractid phylogenetic relationships. Our main results include: (i) monophyly of Hemiphractidae and its six genera for all our analyses, novel relationships among hemiphractid genera, and non‐monophyly of Hemiphractinae according to our preferred phylogenetic hypothesis; (ii) non‐monophyly of current supraspecific taxonomies of Gastrotheca, an updated taxonomy is provided; (iii) previous differences among studies were mainly caused by differences in analytical factors, not by differences in character/taxon sampling; (iv) optimality criteria, alignment method, and indel coding caused differences among optimal topologies, in that order of degree; (v) in most cases, parsimony analyses are more sensitive to the addition of phenotypic data than maximum likelihood analyses; (vi) adding phenotypic data resulted in an increase of shared clades for most analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cla.12447
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2569383571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4886b7bae25fe2bfb9000e4890c5e4d7459713be6ec33706f1a23a287d0516e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUQIMoOo4u_AEJuNFFNY-2SdwNgy8YcKPrkqa3NdJpxqRVuvMT_Ea_xOioC8Fs7iKHw70HoQNKTml8Z6bVp5SlqdhAE0pUnhDC6SaaEJHKhBMidtBuCI-EEJYztY12eGQlVekEVXeu1y2GZ1tBZwDrrsIBumB7-2z7Ea8extY10EFvTfzU7RggYFdjaJr317fSO1fZrsG1d03Ax7Nu8PocX8PSrh68Nr2tNJzsoa1atwH2v-cU3V9e3M2vk8Xt1c18tkgMl1IkqZR5KUoNLKuBlXWp4saQSkVMBmkl0kwJykvIwXAuSF5TzbhmUlQkozkoPkXHa-_Ku6cBQl8sbTDQtroDN4SCZbnikmfRMkVHf9BHN_h43yeVMUpVlrNInawp410IHupi5e1S-7GgpPhMX8T0xVf6yB5-G4dyCdUv-dM6Amdr4MW2MP5vKuaL2Vr5AW5EjZI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552119562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total evidence and sensitivity phylogenetic analyses of egg‐brooding frogs (Anura: Hemiphractidae)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Echevarría, Lourdes Y. ; De la Riva, Ignacio ; Venegas, Pablo J. ; Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M. ; R. Dias, Iuri ; Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago</creator><creatorcontrib>Echevarría, Lourdes Y. ; De la Riva, Ignacio ; Venegas, Pablo J. ; Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M. ; R. Dias, Iuri ; Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago</creatorcontrib><description>We study the phylogenetic relationships of egg‐brooding frogs, a group of 118 neotropical species, unique among anurans by having embryos with large bell‐shaped gills and females carrying their eggs on the dorsum, exposed or inside a pouch. We assembled a total evidence dataset of published and newly generated data containing 51 phenotypic characters and DNA sequences of 20 loci for 143 hemiphractids and 127 outgroup terminals. We performed six analytical strategies combining different optimality criteria (parsimony and maximum likelihood), alignment methods (tree‐ and similarity‐alignment), and three different indel coding schemes (fifth character state, unknown nucleotide, and presence/absence characters matrix). Furthermore, we analyzed a subset of the total evidence dataset to evaluate the impact of phenotypic characters on hemiphractid phylogenetic relationships. Our main results include: (i) monophyly of Hemiphractidae and its six genera for all our analyses, novel relationships among hemiphractid genera, and non‐monophyly of Hemiphractinae according to our preferred phylogenetic hypothesis; (ii) non‐monophyly of current supraspecific taxonomies of Gastrotheca, an updated taxonomy is provided; (iii) previous differences among studies were mainly caused by differences in analytical factors, not by differences in character/taxon sampling; (iv) optimality criteria, alignment method, and indel coding caused differences among optimal topologies, in that order of degree; (v) in most cases, parsimony analyses are more sensitive to the addition of phenotypic data than maximum likelihood analyses; (vi) adding phenotypic data resulted in an increase of shared clades for most analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cla.12447</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34478194</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anura - classification ; Anura - genetics ; Anura - physiology ; DNA - analysis ; DNA - genetics ; Embryos ; Evolution, Molecular ; Female ; Genera ; Gills ; Nucleotide sequence ; Phenotype ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</subject><ispartof>Cladistics, 2021-08, Vol.37 (4), p.375-401</ispartof><rights>The Willi Hennig Society 2020</rights><rights>The Willi Hennig Society 2020.</rights><rights>2021 The Willi Hennig Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4886b7bae25fe2bfb9000e4890c5e4d7459713be6ec33706f1a23a287d0516e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4886b7bae25fe2bfb9000e4890c5e4d7459713be6ec33706f1a23a287d0516e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcla.12447$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcla.12447$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34478194$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Echevarría, Lourdes Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Riva, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venegas, Pablo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R. Dias, Iuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago</creatorcontrib><title>Total evidence and sensitivity phylogenetic analyses of egg‐brooding frogs (Anura: Hemiphractidae)</title><title>Cladistics</title><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><description>We study the phylogenetic relationships of egg‐brooding frogs, a group of 118 neotropical species, unique among anurans by having embryos with large bell‐shaped gills and females carrying their eggs on the dorsum, exposed or inside a pouch. We assembled a total evidence dataset of published and newly generated data containing 51 phenotypic characters and DNA sequences of 20 loci for 143 hemiphractids and 127 outgroup terminals. We performed six analytical strategies combining different optimality criteria (parsimony and maximum likelihood), alignment methods (tree‐ and similarity‐alignment), and three different indel coding schemes (fifth character state, unknown nucleotide, and presence/absence characters matrix). Furthermore, we analyzed a subset of the total evidence dataset to evaluate the impact of phenotypic characters on hemiphractid phylogenetic relationships. Our main results include: (i) monophyly of Hemiphractidae and its six genera for all our analyses, novel relationships among hemiphractid genera, and non‐monophyly of Hemiphractinae according to our preferred phylogenetic hypothesis; (ii) non‐monophyly of current supraspecific taxonomies of Gastrotheca, an updated taxonomy is provided; (iii) previous differences among studies were mainly caused by differences in analytical factors, not by differences in character/taxon sampling; (iv) optimality criteria, alignment method, and indel coding caused differences among optimal topologies, in that order of degree; (v) in most cases, parsimony analyses are more sensitive to the addition of phenotypic data than maximum likelihood analyses; (vi) adding phenotypic data resulted in an increase of shared clades for most analyses.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura - classification</subject><subject>Anura - genetics</subject><subject>Anura - physiology</subject><subject>DNA - analysis</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Gills</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</subject><issn>0748-3007</issn><issn>1096-0031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUQIMoOo4u_AEJuNFFNY-2SdwNgy8YcKPrkqa3NdJpxqRVuvMT_Ea_xOioC8Fs7iKHw70HoQNKTml8Z6bVp5SlqdhAE0pUnhDC6SaaEJHKhBMidtBuCI-EEJYztY12eGQlVekEVXeu1y2GZ1tBZwDrrsIBumB7-2z7Ea8extY10EFvTfzU7RggYFdjaJr317fSO1fZrsG1d03Ax7Nu8PocX8PSrh68Nr2tNJzsoa1atwH2v-cU3V9e3M2vk8Xt1c18tkgMl1IkqZR5KUoNLKuBlXWp4saQSkVMBmkl0kwJykvIwXAuSF5TzbhmUlQkozkoPkXHa-_Ku6cBQl8sbTDQtroDN4SCZbnikmfRMkVHf9BHN_h43yeVMUpVlrNInawp410IHupi5e1S-7GgpPhMX8T0xVf6yB5-G4dyCdUv-dM6Amdr4MW2MP5vKuaL2Vr5AW5EjZI</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Echevarría, Lourdes Y.</creator><creator>De la Riva, Ignacio</creator><creator>Venegas, Pablo J.</creator><creator>Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M.</creator><creator>R. Dias, Iuri</creator><creator>Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Total evidence and sensitivity phylogenetic analyses of egg‐brooding frogs (Anura: Hemiphractidae)</title><author>Echevarría, Lourdes Y. ; De la Riva, Ignacio ; Venegas, Pablo J. ; Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M. ; R. Dias, Iuri ; Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-4886b7bae25fe2bfb9000e4890c5e4d7459713be6ec33706f1a23a287d0516e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura - classification</topic><topic>Anura - genetics</topic><topic>Anura - physiology</topic><topic>DNA - analysis</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Gills</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Echevarría, Lourdes Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De la Riva, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venegas, Pablo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R. Dias, Iuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Echevarría, Lourdes Y.</au><au>De la Riva, Ignacio</au><au>Venegas, Pablo J.</au><au>Rojas‐Runjaic, Fernando J.M.</au><au>R. Dias, Iuri</au><au>Castroviejo‐Fisher, Santiago</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total evidence and sensitivity phylogenetic analyses of egg‐brooding frogs (Anura: Hemiphractidae)</atitle><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>375-401</pages><issn>0748-3007</issn><eissn>1096-0031</eissn><abstract>We study the phylogenetic relationships of egg‐brooding frogs, a group of 118 neotropical species, unique among anurans by having embryos with large bell‐shaped gills and females carrying their eggs on the dorsum, exposed or inside a pouch. We assembled a total evidence dataset of published and newly generated data containing 51 phenotypic characters and DNA sequences of 20 loci for 143 hemiphractids and 127 outgroup terminals. We performed six analytical strategies combining different optimality criteria (parsimony and maximum likelihood), alignment methods (tree‐ and similarity‐alignment), and three different indel coding schemes (fifth character state, unknown nucleotide, and presence/absence characters matrix). Furthermore, we analyzed a subset of the total evidence dataset to evaluate the impact of phenotypic characters on hemiphractid phylogenetic relationships. Our main results include: (i) monophyly of Hemiphractidae and its six genera for all our analyses, novel relationships among hemiphractid genera, and non‐monophyly of Hemiphractinae according to our preferred phylogenetic hypothesis; (ii) non‐monophyly of current supraspecific taxonomies of Gastrotheca, an updated taxonomy is provided; (iii) previous differences among studies were mainly caused by differences in analytical factors, not by differences in character/taxon sampling; (iv) optimality criteria, alignment method, and indel coding caused differences among optimal topologies, in that order of degree; (v) in most cases, parsimony analyses are more sensitive to the addition of phenotypic data than maximum likelihood analyses; (vi) adding phenotypic data resulted in an increase of shared clades for most analyses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34478194</pmid><doi>10.1111/cla.12447</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-3007
ispartof Cladistics, 2021-08, Vol.37 (4), p.375-401
issn 0748-3007
1096-0031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2569383571
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Anura - classification
Anura - genetics
Anura - physiology
DNA - analysis
DNA - genetics
Embryos
Evolution, Molecular
Female
Genera
Gills
Nucleotide sequence
Phenotype
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods
title Total evidence and sensitivity phylogenetic analyses of egg‐brooding frogs (Anura: Hemiphractidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A35%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total%20evidence%20and%20sensitivity%20phylogenetic%20analyses%20of%20egg%E2%80%90brooding%20frogs%20(Anura:%20Hemiphractidae)&rft.jtitle=Cladistics&rft.au=Echevarr%C3%ADa,%20Lourdes%20Y.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=375-401&rft.issn=0748-3007&rft.eissn=1096-0031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cla.12447&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2569383571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552119562&rft_id=info:pmid/34478194&rfr_iscdi=true