Selective LC–MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations
Two methods using LC–MS/MS were validated to quantify citalopram (CTP) racemate [(R/S)‐CTP] and the enantiomers (R)‐CTP and (S)‐CTP in human plasma, respectively. Paroxetine hydrochloride was used as the internal standard, and samples were extracted by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biomedical chromatography 2022-01, Vol.36 (1), p.e5237-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e5237 |
container_title | Biomedical chromatography |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti Sousa, Giovana Damasceno Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório Leal, Leila Bastos Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo Castro, Whocely Victor Santana, Davi Pereira |
description | Two methods using LC–MS/MS were validated to quantify citalopram (CTP) racemate [(R/S)‐CTP] and the enantiomers (R)‐CTP and (S)‐CTP in human plasma, respectively. Paroxetine hydrochloride was used as the internal standard, and samples were extracted by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The non‐enantioselective method was conducted using a C18 column, and the mobile phase consisted of water for solvent A and acetonitrile for solvent B, both with 0.1% formic acid. For the chiral method, an analytical column Lux Cellulose‐1 was used. Mobile phase A was composed of water with 0.025% of formic acid and 0.05% of diethylamine, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile:2‐propanol (95:5, v/v). No significant matrix effects were observed at the retention times of analytes and internal standard. The mean recovery was 89%, and the assays were linear in the concentration range of 1–50 and 5–30 ng/mL for the non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods, respectively. The intra‐ and inter‐day precisions of both methods were less than 12.30%, and the accuracies were less than 12.13%. The validated methods were successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which 20‐mg CTP tablets were administered to healthy volunteers, and their plasma levels were monitored over time in a bioequivalence study.
Highlights
Simple and rapid LC–MS/MS method for the quantification of citalopram and its enantiomers in human plasma.
Both methods were demonstrated to be selective, reliable, and sensitive.
Both methods have sufficient sensitivity to quantify the steady state through concentrations already reported for citalopram and escitalopram.
Validated method presented in this study can be suitably applied to pharmacokinetic studies involving citalopram and escitalopram.
Bland–Altman analysis suggested that non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods can be applied in pharmacokinetic studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bmc.5237 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2568609174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2568609174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2827-1c8bac5b24df0d61f2139e5910244277fc8d2cc9b9507ebe1524b43ccd90824d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1EAQRVsoiAwBiS-IepmNk-r2s5cwCg9pRiwG1la7XE6a9MN024my4xvgD_kSPJkQVqxKKp17VKrL2BsB5wJAXnQOz0uZ18_YSoBSGTQgjtgKZKWyvKnVMXuZ0jcAUJWsX7DjvCgqVYFYsZ87soSTuSW-Wf_-8Wu7u9jueE8TRWe8nkzwPAwczaRtGKN2nLz2y9pRTFz7nutxtAYP5BS45uO1jk5juDGeJoOcbrWdn0xX5Cku23000kCRPBIfQnSzfYDSK_Z80DbR68d5wr6-v_yy_phtPn_4tH67yVA2ss4ENp3GspNFP0BfiUGKXFGpBMiikHU9YNNLRNWpEmrqSJSy6IocsVfQLKH8hJ0dvGMM32dKU-tMQrJWewpzamVZNRUoURf_UIwhpeXsdozG6XjfCmj3DbRLA-2-gQU9fbTOnaP-Cfz78gXIDsCdsXT_X1H7brt-EP4B4lqTCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568609174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective LC–MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda ; Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti ; Sousa, Giovana Damasceno ; Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório ; Leal, Leila Bastos ; Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo ; Castro, Whocely Victor ; Santana, Davi Pereira</creator><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda ; Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti ; Sousa, Giovana Damasceno ; Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório ; Leal, Leila Bastos ; Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo ; Castro, Whocely Victor ; Santana, Davi Pereira</creatorcontrib><description>Two methods using LC–MS/MS were validated to quantify citalopram (CTP) racemate [(R/S)‐CTP] and the enantiomers (R)‐CTP and (S)‐CTP in human plasma, respectively. Paroxetine hydrochloride was used as the internal standard, and samples were extracted by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The non‐enantioselective method was conducted using a C18 column, and the mobile phase consisted of water for solvent A and acetonitrile for solvent B, both with 0.1% formic acid. For the chiral method, an analytical column Lux Cellulose‐1 was used. Mobile phase A was composed of water with 0.025% of formic acid and 0.05% of diethylamine, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile:2‐propanol (95:5, v/v). No significant matrix effects were observed at the retention times of analytes and internal standard. The mean recovery was 89%, and the assays were linear in the concentration range of 1–50 and 5–30 ng/mL for the non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods, respectively. The intra‐ and inter‐day precisions of both methods were less than 12.30%, and the accuracies were less than 12.13%. The validated methods were successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which 20‐mg CTP tablets were administered to healthy volunteers, and their plasma levels were monitored over time in a bioequivalence study.
Highlights
Simple and rapid LC–MS/MS method for the quantification of citalopram and its enantiomers in human plasma.
Both methods were demonstrated to be selective, reliable, and sensitive.
Both methods have sufficient sensitivity to quantify the steady state through concentrations already reported for citalopram and escitalopram.
Validated method presented in this study can be suitably applied to pharmacokinetic studies involving citalopram and escitalopram.
Bland–Altman analysis suggested that non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods can be applied in pharmacokinetic studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-3879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5237</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34469601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; bioequivalence ; Chromatography, Liquid - methods ; citalopram ; Citalopram - blood ; Citalopram - chemistry ; Citalopram - pharmacokinetics ; Dosage Forms ; enantiomers ; escitalopram ; Humans ; LC–MS/MS ; Linear Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; pharmacokinetic ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stereoisomerism ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Biomedical chromatography, 2022-01, Vol.36 (1), p.e5237-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2827-1c8bac5b24df0d61f2139e5910244277fc8d2cc9b9507ebe1524b43ccd90824d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8354-1843 ; 0000-0002-3901-9126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbmc.5237$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbmc.5237$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34469601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Giovana Damasceno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leal, Leila Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Whocely Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Davi Pereira</creatorcontrib><title>Selective LC–MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations</title><title>Biomedical chromatography</title><addtitle>Biomed Chromatogr</addtitle><description>Two methods using LC–MS/MS were validated to quantify citalopram (CTP) racemate [(R/S)‐CTP] and the enantiomers (R)‐CTP and (S)‐CTP in human plasma, respectively. Paroxetine hydrochloride was used as the internal standard, and samples were extracted by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The non‐enantioselective method was conducted using a C18 column, and the mobile phase consisted of water for solvent A and acetonitrile for solvent B, both with 0.1% formic acid. For the chiral method, an analytical column Lux Cellulose‐1 was used. Mobile phase A was composed of water with 0.025% of formic acid and 0.05% of diethylamine, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile:2‐propanol (95:5, v/v). No significant matrix effects were observed at the retention times of analytes and internal standard. The mean recovery was 89%, and the assays were linear in the concentration range of 1–50 and 5–30 ng/mL for the non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods, respectively. The intra‐ and inter‐day precisions of both methods were less than 12.30%, and the accuracies were less than 12.13%. The validated methods were successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which 20‐mg CTP tablets were administered to healthy volunteers, and their plasma levels were monitored over time in a bioequivalence study.
Highlights
Simple and rapid LC–MS/MS method for the quantification of citalopram and its enantiomers in human plasma.
Both methods were demonstrated to be selective, reliable, and sensitive.
Both methods have sufficient sensitivity to quantify the steady state through concentrations already reported for citalopram and escitalopram.
Validated method presented in this study can be suitably applied to pharmacokinetic studies involving citalopram and escitalopram.
Bland–Altman analysis suggested that non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods can be applied in pharmacokinetic studies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>bioequivalence</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</subject><subject>citalopram</subject><subject>Citalopram - blood</subject><subject>Citalopram - chemistry</subject><subject>Citalopram - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Dosage Forms</subject><subject>enantiomers</subject><subject>escitalopram</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LC–MS/MS</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>pharmacokinetic</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stereoisomerism</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0269-3879</issn><issn>1099-0801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1EAQRVsoiAwBiS-IepmNk-r2s5cwCg9pRiwG1la7XE6a9MN024my4xvgD_kSPJkQVqxKKp17VKrL2BsB5wJAXnQOz0uZ18_YSoBSGTQgjtgKZKWyvKnVMXuZ0jcAUJWsX7DjvCgqVYFYsZ87soSTuSW-Wf_-8Wu7u9jueE8TRWe8nkzwPAwczaRtGKN2nLz2y9pRTFz7nutxtAYP5BS45uO1jk5juDGeJoOcbrWdn0xX5Cku23000kCRPBIfQnSzfYDSK_Z80DbR68d5wr6-v_yy_phtPn_4tH67yVA2ss4ENp3GspNFP0BfiUGKXFGpBMiikHU9YNNLRNWpEmrqSJSy6IocsVfQLKH8hJ0dvGMM32dKU-tMQrJWewpzamVZNRUoURf_UIwhpeXsdozG6XjfCmj3DbRLA-2-gQU9fbTOnaP-Cfz78gXIDsCdsXT_X1H7brt-EP4B4lqTCQ</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda</creator><creator>Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti</creator><creator>Sousa, Giovana Damasceno</creator><creator>Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório</creator><creator>Leal, Leila Bastos</creator><creator>Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo</creator><creator>Castro, Whocely Victor</creator><creator>Santana, Davi Pereira</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-1843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-9126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Selective LC–MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations</title><author>Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda ; Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti ; Sousa, Giovana Damasceno ; Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório ; Leal, Leila Bastos ; Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo ; Castro, Whocely Victor ; Santana, Davi Pereira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2827-1c8bac5b24df0d61f2139e5910244277fc8d2cc9b9507ebe1524b43ccd90824d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>bioequivalence</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid - methods</topic><topic>citalopram</topic><topic>Citalopram - blood</topic><topic>Citalopram - chemistry</topic><topic>Citalopram - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Dosage Forms</topic><topic>enantiomers</topic><topic>escitalopram</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LC–MS/MS</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>pharmacokinetic</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stereoisomerism</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Giovana Damasceno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leal, Leila Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Whocely Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Davi Pereira</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomedical chromatography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sousa, Carlos Eduardo Miranda</au><au>Bedor, Noely Camila Tavares Cavalcanti</au><au>Sousa, Giovana Damasceno</au><au>Oliveira, Guilherme Henrique Onório</au><au>Leal, Leila Bastos</au><au>Bedor, Danilo Cesar Galindo</au><au>Castro, Whocely Victor</au><au>Santana, Davi Pereira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective LC–MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical chromatography</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Chromatogr</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e5237</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e5237-n/a</pages><issn>0269-3879</issn><eissn>1099-0801</eissn><abstract>Two methods using LC–MS/MS were validated to quantify citalopram (CTP) racemate [(R/S)‐CTP] and the enantiomers (R)‐CTP and (S)‐CTP in human plasma, respectively. Paroxetine hydrochloride was used as the internal standard, and samples were extracted by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The non‐enantioselective method was conducted using a C18 column, and the mobile phase consisted of water for solvent A and acetonitrile for solvent B, both with 0.1% formic acid. For the chiral method, an analytical column Lux Cellulose‐1 was used. Mobile phase A was composed of water with 0.025% of formic acid and 0.05% of diethylamine, and mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile:2‐propanol (95:5, v/v). No significant matrix effects were observed at the retention times of analytes and internal standard. The mean recovery was 89%, and the assays were linear in the concentration range of 1–50 and 5–30 ng/mL for the non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods, respectively. The intra‐ and inter‐day precisions of both methods were less than 12.30%, and the accuracies were less than 12.13%. The validated methods were successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in which 20‐mg CTP tablets were administered to healthy volunteers, and their plasma levels were monitored over time in a bioequivalence study.
Highlights
Simple and rapid LC–MS/MS method for the quantification of citalopram and its enantiomers in human plasma.
Both methods were demonstrated to be selective, reliable, and sensitive.
Both methods have sufficient sensitivity to quantify the steady state through concentrations already reported for citalopram and escitalopram.
Validated method presented in this study can be suitably applied to pharmacokinetic studies involving citalopram and escitalopram.
Bland–Altman analysis suggested that non‐enantioselective and enantioselective methods can be applied in pharmacokinetic studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>34469601</pmid><doi>10.1002/bmc.5237</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-1843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-9126</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-3879 |
ispartof | Biomedical chromatography, 2022-01, Vol.36 (1), p.e5237-n/a |
issn | 0269-3879 1099-0801 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2568609174 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult bioequivalence Chromatography, Liquid - methods citalopram Citalopram - blood Citalopram - chemistry Citalopram - pharmacokinetics Dosage Forms enantiomers escitalopram Humans LC–MS/MS Linear Models Male Middle Aged pharmacokinetic Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Stereoisomerism Tandem Mass Spectrometry - methods Young Adult |
title | Selective LC–MS/MS determination of citalopram enantiomers and application to a pharmacokinetic evaluation of generic and reference formulations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T13%3A27%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20LC%E2%80%93MS/MS%20determination%20of%20citalopram%20enantiomers%20and%20application%20to%20a%20pharmacokinetic%20evaluation%20of%20generic%20and%20reference%20formulations&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20chromatography&rft.au=Sousa,%20Carlos%20Eduardo%20Miranda&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e5237&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e5237-n/a&rft.issn=0269-3879&rft.eissn=1099-0801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bmc.5237&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2568609174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568609174&rft_id=info:pmid/34469601&rfr_iscdi=true |