Application of a simple unstructured kinetic and cost of goods models to support T‐cell therapy manufacture

Manufacturing of cell therapy products requires sufficient understanding of the cell culture variables and associated mechanisms for adequate control and risk analysis. The aim of this study was to apply an unstructured ordinary differential equation‐based model for prediction of T‐cell bioprocess o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology progress 2021-11, Vol.37 (6), p.e3205-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Shariatzadeh, Maryam, Lopes, Adriana G., Glen, Katie E., Sinclair, Andrew, Thomas, Rob J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page e3205
container_title Biotechnology progress
container_volume 37
creator Shariatzadeh, Maryam
Lopes, Adriana G.
Glen, Katie E.
Sinclair, Andrew
Thomas, Rob J.
description Manufacturing of cell therapy products requires sufficient understanding of the cell culture variables and associated mechanisms for adequate control and risk analysis. The aim of this study was to apply an unstructured ordinary differential equation‐based model for prediction of T‐cell bioprocess outcomes as a function of process input parameters. A series of models were developed to represent the growth of T‐cells as a function of time, culture volumes, cell densities, and glucose concentration using data from the Ambr®15 stirred bioreactor system. The models were sufficiently representative of the process to predict the glucose and volume provision required to maintain cell growth rate and quantitatively defined the relationship between glucose concentration, cell growth rate, and glucose utilization rate. The models demonstrated that although glucose is a limiting factor in batch supplied medium, a delivery rate of glucose at significantly less than the maximal specific consumption rate (0.05 mg 1 × 106 cell h−1) will adequately sustain cell growth due to a lower glucose Monod constant determining glucose consumption rate relative to the glucose Monod constant determining cell growth rate. The resultant volume and exchange requirements were used as inputs to an operational BioSolve cost model to suggest a cost‐effective T‐cell manufacturing process with minimum cost of goods per million cells produced and optimal volumetric productivity in a manufacturing settings. These findings highlight the potential of a simple unstructured model of T‐cell growth in a stirred tank system to provide a framework for control and optimization of bioprocesses for manufacture.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/btpr.3205
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566265459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2611533884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-2681b266e14d512e962288b2f21c12905920d643bb30afcb67897c55a485297b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10c2O0zAUBWALDWJKYcELIEtsYJHWvo4dZ9kZ8SeNBEJlbTmOA-kkscc_Qt3xCDwjT0LSDiyQZnU3n46O7kHoBSUbSghsm-TDhgHhj9CKciCFIIxdoJWsuCiqmslL9DTGAyFEEgFP0CUrS84rUq3QuPN-6I1OvZuw67DGsR_9YHGeYgrZpBxsi2_7yabeYD212LiYFvnNuTbi0bV2iDg5HLP3LiS8__3zl7HDgNN3G7Q_4lFPudOnpGfocaeHaJ_f3zX6-u7t_vpDcfPp_cfr3U1hmJS8ACFpA0JYWracgq0FgJQNdEANhZrwGkgrStY0jOjONKKSdWU416XkUFcNW6PX51wf3F22Mamxj0spPVmXowIuBAhe8nqmr_6jB5fDNLdTICjlbG5UzurNWZngYgy2Uz70ow5HRYlaNlDLBmrZYLYv7xNzM9r2n_z79Blsz-BHP9jjw0nqav_5yynyD2HZkWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2611533884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of a simple unstructured kinetic and cost of goods models to support T‐cell therapy manufacture</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Shariatzadeh, Maryam ; Lopes, Adriana G. ; Glen, Katie E. ; Sinclair, Andrew ; Thomas, Rob J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shariatzadeh, Maryam ; Lopes, Adriana G. ; Glen, Katie E. ; Sinclair, Andrew ; Thomas, Rob J.</creatorcontrib><description>Manufacturing of cell therapy products requires sufficient understanding of the cell culture variables and associated mechanisms for adequate control and risk analysis. The aim of this study was to apply an unstructured ordinary differential equation‐based model for prediction of T‐cell bioprocess outcomes as a function of process input parameters. A series of models were developed to represent the growth of T‐cells as a function of time, culture volumes, cell densities, and glucose concentration using data from the Ambr®15 stirred bioreactor system. The models were sufficiently representative of the process to predict the glucose and volume provision required to maintain cell growth rate and quantitatively defined the relationship between glucose concentration, cell growth rate, and glucose utilization rate. The models demonstrated that although glucose is a limiting factor in batch supplied medium, a delivery rate of glucose at significantly less than the maximal specific consumption rate (0.05 mg 1 × 106 cell h−1) will adequately sustain cell growth due to a lower glucose Monod constant determining glucose consumption rate relative to the glucose Monod constant determining cell growth rate. The resultant volume and exchange requirements were used as inputs to an operational BioSolve cost model to suggest a cost‐effective T‐cell manufacturing process with minimum cost of goods per million cells produced and optimal volumetric productivity in a manufacturing settings. These findings highlight the potential of a simple unstructured model of T‐cell growth in a stirred tank system to provide a framework for control and optimization of bioprocesses for manufacture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-7938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6033</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3205</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34455707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bioreactors ; Cell Count ; Cell culture ; Cell Culture Techniques - methods ; Cell growth ; Cell Proliferation ; Cell therapy ; Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy ; Cells, Cultured ; Consumption ; cost analysis ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Differential equations ; Glucose ; Glucose metabolism ; Growth rate ; Humans ; Kinetics ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Minimum cost ; modeling framework ; Optimization ; process optimization ; Process parameters ; Risk analysis ; Risk management ; scalable T‐cell manufacturing ; T-Lymphocytes - cytology ; T‐cell processing</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology progress, 2021-11, Vol.37 (6), p.e3205-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Biotechnology Progress published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-2681b266e14d512e962288b2f21c12905920d643bb30afcb67897c55a485297b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-2681b266e14d512e962288b2f21c12905920d643bb30afcb67897c55a485297b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0098-6338</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbtpr.3205$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbtpr.3205$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34455707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shariatzadeh, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Adriana G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glen, Katie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Rob J.</creatorcontrib><title>Application of a simple unstructured kinetic and cost of goods models to support T‐cell therapy manufacture</title><title>Biotechnology progress</title><addtitle>Biotechnol Prog</addtitle><description>Manufacturing of cell therapy products requires sufficient understanding of the cell culture variables and associated mechanisms for adequate control and risk analysis. The aim of this study was to apply an unstructured ordinary differential equation‐based model for prediction of T‐cell bioprocess outcomes as a function of process input parameters. A series of models were developed to represent the growth of T‐cells as a function of time, culture volumes, cell densities, and glucose concentration using data from the Ambr®15 stirred bioreactor system. The models were sufficiently representative of the process to predict the glucose and volume provision required to maintain cell growth rate and quantitatively defined the relationship between glucose concentration, cell growth rate, and glucose utilization rate. The models demonstrated that although glucose is a limiting factor in batch supplied medium, a delivery rate of glucose at significantly less than the maximal specific consumption rate (0.05 mg 1 × 106 cell h−1) will adequately sustain cell growth due to a lower glucose Monod constant determining glucose consumption rate relative to the glucose Monod constant determining cell growth rate. The resultant volume and exchange requirements were used as inputs to an operational BioSolve cost model to suggest a cost‐effective T‐cell manufacturing process with minimum cost of goods per million cells produced and optimal volumetric productivity in a manufacturing settings. These findings highlight the potential of a simple unstructured model of T‐cell growth in a stirred tank system to provide a framework for control and optimization of bioprocesses for manufacture.</description><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cell therapy</subject><subject>Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>cost analysis</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Differential equations</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose metabolism</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Minimum cost</subject><subject>modeling framework</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>process optimization</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>scalable T‐cell manufacturing</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - cytology</subject><subject>T‐cell processing</subject><issn>8756-7938</issn><issn>1520-6033</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10c2O0zAUBWALDWJKYcELIEtsYJHWvo4dZ9kZ8SeNBEJlbTmOA-kkscc_Qt3xCDwjT0LSDiyQZnU3n46O7kHoBSUbSghsm-TDhgHhj9CKciCFIIxdoJWsuCiqmslL9DTGAyFEEgFP0CUrS84rUq3QuPN-6I1OvZuw67DGsR_9YHGeYgrZpBxsi2_7yabeYD212LiYFvnNuTbi0bV2iDg5HLP3LiS8__3zl7HDgNN3G7Q_4lFPudOnpGfocaeHaJ_f3zX6-u7t_vpDcfPp_cfr3U1hmJS8ACFpA0JYWracgq0FgJQNdEANhZrwGkgrStY0jOjONKKSdWU416XkUFcNW6PX51wf3F22Mamxj0spPVmXowIuBAhe8nqmr_6jB5fDNLdTICjlbG5UzurNWZngYgy2Uz70ow5HRYlaNlDLBmrZYLYv7xNzM9r2n_z79Blsz-BHP9jjw0nqav_5yynyD2HZkWs</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Shariatzadeh, Maryam</creator><creator>Lopes, Adriana G.</creator><creator>Glen, Katie E.</creator><creator>Sinclair, Andrew</creator><creator>Thomas, Rob J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-6338</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Application of a simple unstructured kinetic and cost of goods models to support T‐cell therapy manufacture</title><author>Shariatzadeh, Maryam ; Lopes, Adriana G. ; Glen, Katie E. ; Sinclair, Andrew ; Thomas, Rob J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-2681b266e14d512e962288b2f21c12905920d643bb30afcb67897c55a485297b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cell therapy</topic><topic>Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>cost analysis</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Differential equations</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose metabolism</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Minimum cost</topic><topic>modeling framework</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>process optimization</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>scalable T‐cell manufacturing</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - cytology</topic><topic>T‐cell processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shariatzadeh, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Adriana G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glen, Katie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Rob J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shariatzadeh, Maryam</au><au>Lopes, Adriana G.</au><au>Glen, Katie E.</au><au>Sinclair, Andrew</au><au>Thomas, Rob J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of a simple unstructured kinetic and cost of goods models to support T‐cell therapy manufacture</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology progress</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol Prog</addtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e3205</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e3205-n/a</pages><issn>8756-7938</issn><eissn>1520-6033</eissn><abstract>Manufacturing of cell therapy products requires sufficient understanding of the cell culture variables and associated mechanisms for adequate control and risk analysis. The aim of this study was to apply an unstructured ordinary differential equation‐based model for prediction of T‐cell bioprocess outcomes as a function of process input parameters. A series of models were developed to represent the growth of T‐cells as a function of time, culture volumes, cell densities, and glucose concentration using data from the Ambr®15 stirred bioreactor system. The models were sufficiently representative of the process to predict the glucose and volume provision required to maintain cell growth rate and quantitatively defined the relationship between glucose concentration, cell growth rate, and glucose utilization rate. The models demonstrated that although glucose is a limiting factor in batch supplied medium, a delivery rate of glucose at significantly less than the maximal specific consumption rate (0.05 mg 1 × 106 cell h−1) will adequately sustain cell growth due to a lower glucose Monod constant determining glucose consumption rate relative to the glucose Monod constant determining cell growth rate. The resultant volume and exchange requirements were used as inputs to an operational BioSolve cost model to suggest a cost‐effective T‐cell manufacturing process with minimum cost of goods per million cells produced and optimal volumetric productivity in a manufacturing settings. These findings highlight the potential of a simple unstructured model of T‐cell growth in a stirred tank system to provide a framework for control and optimization of bioprocesses for manufacture.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34455707</pmid><doi>10.1002/btpr.3205</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-6338</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-7938
ispartof Biotechnology progress, 2021-11, Vol.37 (6), p.e3205-n/a
issn 8756-7938
1520-6033
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566265459
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Bioreactors
Cell Count
Cell culture
Cell Culture Techniques - methods
Cell growth
Cell Proliferation
Cell therapy
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
Cells, Cultured
Consumption
cost analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Differential equations
Glucose
Glucose metabolism
Growth rate
Humans
Kinetics
Manufacturing
Manufacturing industry
Minimum cost
modeling framework
Optimization
process optimization
Process parameters
Risk analysis
Risk management
scalable T‐cell manufacturing
T-Lymphocytes - cytology
T‐cell processing
title Application of a simple unstructured kinetic and cost of goods models to support T‐cell therapy manufacture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20a%20simple%20unstructured%20kinetic%20and%20cost%20of%20goods%20models%20to%20support%20T%E2%80%90cell%20therapy%20manufacture&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20progress&rft.au=Shariatzadeh,%20Maryam&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e3205&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e3205-n/a&rft.issn=8756-7938&rft.eissn=1520-6033&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/btpr.3205&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2611533884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2611533884&rft_id=info:pmid/34455707&rfr_iscdi=true