Equity and the funding of Primary Care Networks
There is a 19-year difference in healthy life expectancy between deprived and more affluent populations in England. These health inequities have multiple direct impacts, such as increased disease burden and reduced economic activity. Their reduction is an important goal of the NHS Long Term Plan (LT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of general practice 2021-09, Vol.71 (710), p.422-424 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 424 |
---|---|
container_issue | 710 |
container_start_page | 422 |
container_title | British journal of general practice |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Hutchinson, Joseph Hammond, Jonathan Sutton, Matthew Checkland, Katherine |
description | There is a 19-year difference in healthy life expectancy between deprived and more affluent populations in England. These health inequities have multiple direct impacts, such as increased disease burden and reduced economic activity. Their reduction is an important goal of the NHS Long Term Plan (LTP). High-quality and accessible primary care is recognized internationally as an important component of an equitable health system, yet there are 15% fewer GPs per capita in deprived areas of England. The proportion of the NHS budget spent on primary care has decreased in recent years. The LTP promised increased funding to address this. Currently, general practice funding in England goes directly to individual practices, according to formulae that include some adjustments to account for workload variation. Rather than directing additional resources into primary care via these existing funding streams, the LTP proposed the creation of new Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These are voluntary groups of practices contracted to work together to deliver additional services for additional funding (technically called a Directed Enhanced Service). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3399/bjgp21X717029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566044669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2566044669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-a73d1bd1b44ccaa53f6bfae722ce77c17727834ff3b0cd111a3148473805f8bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4Mobk6PXqXgxUtdXpI27UWQMX_AUA8K3kKaJltn12xJq-y_N7I5nPCFd3gfvrzv9yF0Dvia0jwfFvPpksA7B45JfoD6wHgWJ4SRQ9THeYpjSBntoRPv5xgTkgI-Rj3KGEsZ8D4ajldd1a4j2ZRRO9OR6ZqyaqaRNdGLqxbSraORdDp60u2XdR_-FB0ZWXt9tp0D9HY3fh09xJPn-8fR7SRWDJI2lpyWUAQxppSUCTVpYaTmhCjNuQLOCc8oM4YWWJUAICmwjHGa4cRkRUEH6Gbju-yKhS6Vblona7Hc3CSsrMT-pqlmYmo_RUZ5lgTvAbraGji76rRvxaLySte1bLTtvCBJmuLQQpoH9PIfOreda0K8QHEAyoMCFW8o5az3TpvdMYDFzyvE3isCf_E3wY7-7Z5-A6NhhDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571137137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equity and the funding of Primary Care Networks</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hutchinson, Joseph ; Hammond, Jonathan ; Sutton, Matthew ; Checkland, Katherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Joseph ; Hammond, Jonathan ; Sutton, Matthew ; Checkland, Katherine</creatorcontrib><description>There is a 19-year difference in healthy life expectancy between deprived and more affluent populations in England. These health inequities have multiple direct impacts, such as increased disease burden and reduced economic activity. Their reduction is an important goal of the NHS Long Term Plan (LTP). High-quality and accessible primary care is recognized internationally as an important component of an equitable health system, yet there are 15% fewer GPs per capita in deprived areas of England. The proportion of the NHS budget spent on primary care has decreased in recent years. The LTP promised increased funding to address this. Currently, general practice funding in England goes directly to individual practices, according to formulae that include some adjustments to account for workload variation. Rather than directing additional resources into primary care via these existing funding streams, the LTP proposed the creation of new Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These are voluntary groups of practices contracted to work together to deliver additional services for additional funding (technically called a Directed Enhanced Service).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-5242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21X717029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34446417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal College of General Practitioners</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Family physicians ; Funding ; Humans ; Life expectancy ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care</subject><ispartof>British journal of general practice, 2021-09, Vol.71 (710), p.422-424</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal College of General Practitioners Sep 2021</rights><rights>British Journal of General Practice 2021 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-a73d1bd1b44ccaa53f6bfae722ce77c17727834ff3b0cd111a3148473805f8bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-a73d1bd1b44ccaa53f6bfae722ce77c17727834ff3b0cd111a3148473805f8bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378578/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378578/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checkland, Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Equity and the funding of Primary Care Networks</title><title>British journal of general practice</title><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><description>There is a 19-year difference in healthy life expectancy between deprived and more affluent populations in England. These health inequities have multiple direct impacts, such as increased disease burden and reduced economic activity. Their reduction is an important goal of the NHS Long Term Plan (LTP). High-quality and accessible primary care is recognized internationally as an important component of an equitable health system, yet there are 15% fewer GPs per capita in deprived areas of England. The proportion of the NHS budget spent on primary care has decreased in recent years. The LTP promised increased funding to address this. Currently, general practice funding in England goes directly to individual practices, according to formulae that include some adjustments to account for workload variation. Rather than directing additional resources into primary care via these existing funding streams, the LTP proposed the creation of new Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These are voluntary groups of practices contracted to work together to deliver additional services for additional funding (technically called a Directed Enhanced Service).</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><issn>0960-1643</issn><issn>1478-5242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4Mobk6PXqXgxUtdXpI27UWQMX_AUA8K3kKaJltn12xJq-y_N7I5nPCFd3gfvrzv9yF0Dvia0jwfFvPpksA7B45JfoD6wHgWJ4SRQ9THeYpjSBntoRPv5xgTkgI-Rj3KGEsZ8D4ajldd1a4j2ZRRO9OR6ZqyaqaRNdGLqxbSraORdDp60u2XdR_-FB0ZWXt9tp0D9HY3fh09xJPn-8fR7SRWDJI2lpyWUAQxppSUCTVpYaTmhCjNuQLOCc8oM4YWWJUAICmwjHGa4cRkRUEH6Gbju-yKhS6Vblona7Hc3CSsrMT-pqlmYmo_RUZ5lgTvAbraGji76rRvxaLySte1bLTtvCBJmuLQQpoH9PIfOreda0K8QHEAyoMCFW8o5az3TpvdMYDFzyvE3isCf_E3wY7-7Z5-A6NhhDw</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Hutchinson, Joseph</creator><creator>Hammond, Jonathan</creator><creator>Sutton, Matthew</creator><creator>Checkland, Katherine</creator><general>Royal College of General Practitioners</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Equity and the funding of Primary Care Networks</title><author>Hutchinson, Joseph ; Hammond, Jonathan ; Sutton, Matthew ; Checkland, Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-a73d1bd1b44ccaa53f6bfae722ce77c17727834ff3b0cd111a3148473805f8bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Checkland, Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutchinson, Joseph</au><au>Hammond, Jonathan</au><au>Sutton, Matthew</au><au>Checkland, Katherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equity and the funding of Primary Care Networks</atitle><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>710</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>424</epage><pages>422-424</pages><issn>0960-1643</issn><eissn>1478-5242</eissn><abstract>There is a 19-year difference in healthy life expectancy between deprived and more affluent populations in England. These health inequities have multiple direct impacts, such as increased disease burden and reduced economic activity. Their reduction is an important goal of the NHS Long Term Plan (LTP). High-quality and accessible primary care is recognized internationally as an important component of an equitable health system, yet there are 15% fewer GPs per capita in deprived areas of England. The proportion of the NHS budget spent on primary care has decreased in recent years. The LTP promised increased funding to address this. Currently, general practice funding in England goes directly to individual practices, according to formulae that include some adjustments to account for workload variation. Rather than directing additional resources into primary care via these existing funding streams, the LTP proposed the creation of new Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These are voluntary groups of practices contracted to work together to deliver additional services for additional funding (technically called a Directed Enhanced Service).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal College of General Practitioners</pub><pmid>34446417</pmid><doi>10.3399/bjgp21X717029</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-1643 |
ispartof | British journal of general practice, 2021-09, Vol.71 (710), p.422-424 |
issn | 0960-1643 1478-5242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566044669 |
source | PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis Family physicians Funding Humans Life expectancy Primary care Primary Health Care |
title | Equity and the funding of Primary Care Networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T16%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equity%20and%20the%20funding%20of%20Primary%20Care%20Networks&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20general%20practice&rft.au=Hutchinson,%20Joseph&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=710&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=424&rft.pages=422-424&rft.issn=0960-1643&rft.eissn=1478-5242&rft_id=info:doi/10.3399/bjgp21X717029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2566044669%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571137137&rft_id=info:pmid/34446417&rfr_iscdi=true |