Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy
Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in nee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of midwifery & women's health 2021-09, Vol.66 (5), p.604-623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 604 |
container_title | Journal of midwifery & women's health |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Effland, Kristin J. Hays, Karen Zell, Britney A. Lawal, Tara K. Grantham, Rhonda L. Koontz, Megan |
description | Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jmwh.13275 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566033942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2581774778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAiCl43PkHAjQjVnKRpp-6GcbwxInjBZUnTUydjp9GcjuPsfARXPqBPYuu4cmEIJJDv_BD-INgFfgjtOppM5-NDkCJRK8EGqEiEggOsdncRh6kScj3YJJpwDglP-UbweVEbj5ps_cj6xiARaxy7wsIa3VhXE9N1wU7w1bZvrHSeNWNkA-2RuZKN3Pzr_ePG0hMbjG1V5Kh9l3Sqp7aySMesX7dbVwuy1A0M3yw1nRjp-U_ybeN1g4_2N7xfvDqjzWI7WCt1Rbjze24F96fDu8F5OLo-uxj0R6GRMlKhUaoAhDhKYyPBGKVjadKSFwkqlYsISwl5pFKAKJd5D8s4zVOR5LJnINYql1vB_jL32buXGVKTTS0ZrCpdo5tRJlQccynTSLR07w-duJlv_9apHiRJlCS9Vh0slfGOyGOZPXs71X6RAc-6irKuouynohbDEs9thYt_ZHZ59XC-nPkGo4yU9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581774778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Effland, Kristin J. ; Hays, Karen ; Zell, Britney A. ; Lawal, Tara K. ; Grantham, Rhonda L. ; Koontz, Megan</creator><creatorcontrib>Effland, Kristin J. ; Hays, Karen ; Zell, Britney A. ; Lawal, Tara K. ; Grantham, Rhonda L. ; Koontz, Megan</creatorcontrib><description>Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Access ; Advocacy ; Authority ; birth centers ; Birthing centers ; Childbearing ; Childbirth & labor ; contraception/family planning ; Health disparities ; health policy ; home birth ; Home births ; Integrated care ; Medical personnel ; Midwifery ; midwifery professional issues ; Midwives ; Nursing ; Perinatal care ; pharmacology ; Policy making ; Postpartum period ; Primary care ; Quality control ; Quality improvement ; Quality management ; Rural communities ; Underserved populations ; vulnerable populations</subject><ispartof>Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2021-09, Vol.66 (5), p.604-623</ispartof><rights>2021 by the American College of Nurse‐Midwives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3113-9745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjmwh.13275$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjmwh.13275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Effland, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zell, Britney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawal, Tara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Rhonda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koontz, Megan</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</title><title>Journal of midwifery & women's health</title><description>Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>birth centers</subject><subject>Birthing centers</subject><subject>Childbearing</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>contraception/family planning</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>health policy</subject><subject>home birth</subject><subject>Home births</subject><subject>Integrated care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>midwifery professional issues</subject><subject>Midwives</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Perinatal care</subject><subject>pharmacology</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Underserved populations</subject><subject>vulnerable populations</subject><issn>1526-9523</issn><issn>1542-2011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAiCl43PkHAjQjVnKRpp-6GcbwxInjBZUnTUydjp9GcjuPsfARXPqBPYuu4cmEIJJDv_BD-INgFfgjtOppM5-NDkCJRK8EGqEiEggOsdncRh6kScj3YJJpwDglP-UbweVEbj5ps_cj6xiARaxy7wsIa3VhXE9N1wU7w1bZvrHSeNWNkA-2RuZKN3Pzr_ePG0hMbjG1V5Kh9l3Sqp7aySMesX7dbVwuy1A0M3yw1nRjp-U_ybeN1g4_2N7xfvDqjzWI7WCt1Rbjze24F96fDu8F5OLo-uxj0R6GRMlKhUaoAhDhKYyPBGKVjadKSFwkqlYsISwl5pFKAKJd5D8s4zVOR5LJnINYql1vB_jL32buXGVKTTS0ZrCpdo5tRJlQccynTSLR07w-duJlv_9apHiRJlCS9Vh0slfGOyGOZPXs71X6RAc-6irKuouynohbDEs9thYt_ZHZ59XC-nPkGo4yU9w</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Effland, Kristin J.</creator><creator>Hays, Karen</creator><creator>Zell, Britney A.</creator><creator>Lawal, Tara K.</creator><creator>Grantham, Rhonda L.</creator><creator>Koontz, Megan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-9745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</title><author>Effland, Kristin J. ; Hays, Karen ; Zell, Britney A. ; Lawal, Tara K. ; Grantham, Rhonda L. ; Koontz, Megan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>birth centers</topic><topic>Birthing centers</topic><topic>Childbearing</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>contraception/family planning</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>health policy</topic><topic>home birth</topic><topic>Home births</topic><topic>Integrated care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>midwifery professional issues</topic><topic>Midwives</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Perinatal care</topic><topic>pharmacology</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Underserved populations</topic><topic>vulnerable populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Effland, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zell, Britney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawal, Tara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Rhonda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koontz, Megan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of midwifery & women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Effland, Kristin J.</au><au>Hays, Karen</au><au>Zell, Britney A.</au><au>Lawal, Tara K.</au><au>Grantham, Rhonda L.</au><au>Koontz, Megan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of midwifery & women's health</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>604-623</pages><issn>1526-9523</issn><eissn>1542-2011</eissn><abstract>Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jmwh.13275</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-9745</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9523 |
ispartof | Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2021-09, Vol.66 (5), p.604-623 |
issn | 1526-9523 1542-2011 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566033942 |
source | Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Access Advocacy Authority birth centers Birthing centers Childbearing Childbirth & labor contraception/family planning Health disparities health policy home birth Home births Integrated care Medical personnel Midwifery midwifery professional issues Midwives Nursing Perinatal care pharmacology Policy making Postpartum period Primary care Quality control Quality improvement Quality management Rural communities Underserved populations vulnerable populations |
title | Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A34%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20Access%20to%20Medications%20and%20Devices%20for%20the%20Care%20of%20Low%E2%80%90Risk%20Childbearing%20Families:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Existing%20Law%20and%20Strategies%20for%20Advocacy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20midwifery%20&%20women's%20health&rft.au=Effland,%20Kristin%20J.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=604-623&rft.issn=1526-9523&rft.eissn=1542-2011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jmwh.13275&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581774778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581774778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |