Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy

Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in nee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of midwifery & women's health 2021-09, Vol.66 (5), p.604-623
Hauptverfasser: Effland, Kristin J., Hays, Karen, Zell, Britney A., Lawal, Tara K., Grantham, Rhonda L., Koontz, Megan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 623
container_issue 5
container_start_page 604
container_title Journal of midwifery & women's health
container_volume 66
creator Effland, Kristin J.
Hays, Karen
Zell, Britney A.
Lawal, Tara K.
Grantham, Rhonda L.
Koontz, Megan
description Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jmwh.13275
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566033942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2581774778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAiCl43PkHAjQjVnKRpp-6GcbwxInjBZUnTUydjp9GcjuPsfARXPqBPYuu4cmEIJJDv_BD-INgFfgjtOppM5-NDkCJRK8EGqEiEggOsdncRh6kScj3YJJpwDglP-UbweVEbj5ps_cj6xiARaxy7wsIa3VhXE9N1wU7w1bZvrHSeNWNkA-2RuZKN3Pzr_ePG0hMbjG1V5Kh9l3Sqp7aySMesX7dbVwuy1A0M3yw1nRjp-U_ybeN1g4_2N7xfvDqjzWI7WCt1Rbjze24F96fDu8F5OLo-uxj0R6GRMlKhUaoAhDhKYyPBGKVjadKSFwkqlYsISwl5pFKAKJd5D8s4zVOR5LJnINYql1vB_jL32buXGVKTTS0ZrCpdo5tRJlQccynTSLR07w-duJlv_9apHiRJlCS9Vh0slfGOyGOZPXs71X6RAc-6irKuouynohbDEs9thYt_ZHZ59XC-nPkGo4yU9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581774778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Effland, Kristin J. ; Hays, Karen ; Zell, Britney A. ; Lawal, Tara K. ; Grantham, Rhonda L. ; Koontz, Megan</creator><creatorcontrib>Effland, Kristin J. ; Hays, Karen ; Zell, Britney A. ; Lawal, Tara K. ; Grantham, Rhonda L. ; Koontz, Megan</creatorcontrib><description>Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Access ; Advocacy ; Authority ; birth centers ; Birthing centers ; Childbearing ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; contraception/family planning ; Health disparities ; health policy ; home birth ; Home births ; Integrated care ; Medical personnel ; Midwifery ; midwifery professional issues ; Midwives ; Nursing ; Perinatal care ; pharmacology ; Policy making ; Postpartum period ; Primary care ; Quality control ; Quality improvement ; Quality management ; Rural communities ; Underserved populations ; vulnerable populations</subject><ispartof>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health, 2021-09, Vol.66 (5), p.604-623</ispartof><rights>2021 by the American College of Nurse‐Midwives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3113-9745</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjmwh.13275$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjmwh.13275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Effland, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zell, Britney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawal, Tara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Rhonda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koontz, Megan</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</title><title>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health</title><description>Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>birth centers</subject><subject>Birthing centers</subject><subject>Childbearing</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>contraception/family planning</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>health policy</subject><subject>home birth</subject><subject>Home births</subject><subject>Integrated care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>midwifery professional issues</subject><subject>Midwives</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Perinatal care</subject><subject>pharmacology</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Underserved populations</subject><subject>vulnerable populations</subject><issn>1526-9523</issn><issn>1542-2011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAiCl43PkHAjQjVnKRpp-6GcbwxInjBZUnTUydjp9GcjuPsfARXPqBPYuu4cmEIJJDv_BD-INgFfgjtOppM5-NDkCJRK8EGqEiEggOsdncRh6kScj3YJJpwDglP-UbweVEbj5ps_cj6xiARaxy7wsIa3VhXE9N1wU7w1bZvrHSeNWNkA-2RuZKN3Pzr_ePG0hMbjG1V5Kh9l3Sqp7aySMesX7dbVwuy1A0M3yw1nRjp-U_ybeN1g4_2N7xfvDqjzWI7WCt1Rbjze24F96fDu8F5OLo-uxj0R6GRMlKhUaoAhDhKYyPBGKVjadKSFwkqlYsISwl5pFKAKJd5D8s4zVOR5LJnINYql1vB_jL32buXGVKTTS0ZrCpdo5tRJlQccynTSLR07w-duJlv_9apHiRJlCS9Vh0slfGOyGOZPXs71X6RAc-6irKuouynohbDEs9thYt_ZHZ59XC-nPkGo4yU9w</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Effland, Kristin J.</creator><creator>Hays, Karen</creator><creator>Zell, Britney A.</creator><creator>Lawal, Tara K.</creator><creator>Grantham, Rhonda L.</creator><creator>Koontz, Megan</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-9745</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</title><author>Effland, Kristin J. ; Hays, Karen ; Zell, Britney A. ; Lawal, Tara K. ; Grantham, Rhonda L. ; Koontz, Megan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-c55d1e16496c31cc5a63c9f0d7e55b24ef31b459114b3b8ef69b927b38c16a5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>birth centers</topic><topic>Birthing centers</topic><topic>Childbearing</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>contraception/family planning</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>health policy</topic><topic>home birth</topic><topic>Home births</topic><topic>Integrated care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>midwifery professional issues</topic><topic>Midwives</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Perinatal care</topic><topic>pharmacology</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Underserved populations</topic><topic>vulnerable populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Effland, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zell, Britney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawal, Tara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grantham, Rhonda L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koontz, Megan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Effland, Kristin J.</au><au>Hays, Karen</au><au>Zell, Britney A.</au><au>Lawal, Tara K.</au><au>Grantham, Rhonda L.</au><au>Koontz, Megan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of midwifery &amp; women's health</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>623</epage><pages>604-623</pages><issn>1526-9523</issn><eissn>1542-2011</eissn><abstract>Limited access to medications and devices relevant to the care of low‐risk childbearing families acts as a barrier to the successful integration of high‐quality midwifery care into health care systems. Families who live in clinically underserved areas, whether urban or rural, are particularly in need of perinatal professionals who can provide comprehensive care. This article reviews existing US laws that impact whether families who choose community‐based care with direct entry midwives have access, through their chosen provider, to the medications and devices relevant to their normal perinatal and postpartum care. Scope of practice and practice authority are considered as they relate to access to medications and devices primarily for certified professional midwives and state‐licensed midwives. These professionals are the primary health care providers offering community‐based care and birth at home and in freestanding birth centers. Washington state laws are compared and contrasted with laws from other states and jurisdictions, with the aim of identifying ways to improve service delivery for families who choose community‐based midwifery care. Recent and historical efforts to expand Washington state's midwifery drugs and devices formulary are described. This discussion outlines the Washington context for direct entry community midwifery practice, highlights relevant legal examples, and describes current and future efforts around quality improvement. Information from a midwifery clinic serving some of Washington's most vulnerable pregnant and postpartum families allows for an exploration of the role that access to essential medications and devices might play in supporting midwives to address health inequities. Ideal statutory and regulatory language, lessons learned from an analysis of Washington's experience, and strategies to overcome barriers are described to aid and inspire midwifery advocates in other jurisdictions who want to increase access and enhance their ability to offer current evidence‐based care. Policy makers can improve health, health equity, consumer choice, and access to evidence‐based care by using ideal legal language for midwifery practice authority.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jmwh.13275</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-9745</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9523
ispartof Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2021-09, Vol.66 (5), p.604-623
issn 1526-9523
1542-2011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566033942
source Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Access
Advocacy
Authority
birth centers
Birthing centers
Childbearing
Childbirth & labor
contraception/family planning
Health disparities
health policy
home birth
Home births
Integrated care
Medical personnel
Midwifery
midwifery professional issues
Midwives
Nursing
Perinatal care
pharmacology
Policy making
Postpartum period
Primary care
Quality control
Quality improvement
Quality management
Rural communities
Underserved populations
vulnerable populations
title Increasing Access to Medications and Devices for the Care of Low‐Risk Childbearing Families: An Analysis of Existing Law and Strategies for Advocacy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A34%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20Access%20to%20Medications%20and%20Devices%20for%20the%20Care%20of%20Low%E2%80%90Risk%20Childbearing%20Families:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Existing%20Law%20and%20Strategies%20for%20Advocacy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20midwifery%20&%20women's%20health&rft.au=Effland,%20Kristin%20J.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=623&rft.pages=604-623&rft.issn=1526-9523&rft.eissn=1542-2011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jmwh.13275&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2581774778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581774778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true