PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach

Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1553-1563
Hauptverfasser: Beagan, Jamie J., Drees, Esther E.E., Stathi, Phylicia, Eijk, Paul P., Meulenbroeks, Laura, Kessler, Floortje, Middeldorp, Jaap M., Pegtel, D. Michiel, Zijlstra, Josée M., Sie, Daoud, Heideman, Daniëlle A.M., Thunnissen, Erik, Smit, Linda, de Jong, Daphne, Mouliere, Florent, Ylstra, Bauke, Roemer, Margaretha G.M., van Dijk, Erik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1563
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1553
container_title The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD
container_volume 23
creator Beagan, Jamie J.
Drees, Esther E.E.
Stathi, Phylicia
Eijk, Paul P.
Meulenbroeks, Laura
Kessler, Floortje
Middeldorp, Jaap M.
Pegtel, D. Michiel
Zijlstra, Josée M.
Sie, Daoud
Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.
Thunnissen, Erik
Smit, Linda
de Jong, Daphne
Mouliere, Florent
Ylstra, Bauke
Roemer, Margaretha G.M.
van Dijk, Erik
description Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566028094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525157821002646</els_id><sourcerecordid>2566028094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAUtBCIloU_QMhHLgl2bCfuBWkJbalU0VUp4mg5zjPJyrG3dnahf8Un1tEWjpxsvZk3Y88g9JaSkhJaf9iW2ym4_ndZkYqWRJaEyGfolJ5xVjSS0uf5LipRUNHIE_QqpS0hlPO6eolOGOeCU8pP0Z9Ne1tcRAD8bdDOhV_4xxAc4EvwYcpDuN-DN6P_iW2IuB1imEIKk3a4DbsH_HU_dRDxZ5jBzGPw2GYC3jidJo2Dxa32JuMbPY_g54SvEtYen1s7mmWA126G6DN6ADwHPA-Qdf0hQ1ksmyyv-6QT9Hi928WgzfAavbDaJXjzdK7Q94vzu_ZLcX1zedWurwvDiZyLijJqaiYE15ayvu6MOas7aAgRwKCDTsqeGEatkKJhRkvJGw6stoaIqmKWrdD7o262zRmkWU1jMuCc9hD2SVWirkklSY57hfiRamJIKYJVuzhOOj4oStTSldqqY1dq6UoRqXJXee3dk8O-m6D_t_S3nEz4eCRA_udhhKjSkpqBfow5btWH8f8OjwH9qPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2566028094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Beagan, Jamie J. ; Drees, Esther E.E. ; Stathi, Phylicia ; Eijk, Paul P. ; Meulenbroeks, Laura ; Kessler, Floortje ; Middeldorp, Jaap M. ; Pegtel, D. Michiel ; Zijlstra, Josée M. ; Sie, Daoud ; Heideman, Daniëlle A.M. ; Thunnissen, Erik ; Smit, Linda ; de Jong, Daphne ; Mouliere, Florent ; Ylstra, Bauke ; Roemer, Margaretha G.M. ; van Dijk, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Beagan, Jamie J. ; Drees, Esther E.E. ; Stathi, Phylicia ; Eijk, Paul P. ; Meulenbroeks, Laura ; Kessler, Floortje ; Middeldorp, Jaap M. ; Pegtel, D. Michiel ; Zijlstra, Josée M. ; Sie, Daoud ; Heideman, Daniëlle A.M. ; Thunnissen, Erik ; Smit, Linda ; de Jong, Daphne ; Mouliere, Florent ; Ylstra, Bauke ; Roemer, Margaretha G.M. ; van Dijk, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-1578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34454114</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Blood Specimen Collection - methods ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics ; Case-Control Studies ; Circulating Tumor DNA - blood ; Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics ; Limit of Detection ; Liquid Biopsy ; Longitudinal Studies ; Lung Neoplasms - blood ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - genetics ; Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood ; Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis ; Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Whole Genome Sequencing - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1553-1563</ispartof><rights>2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6272-2039 ; 0000-0003-3551-0038 ; 0000-0003-1124-1953 ; 0000-0001-6762-2582 ; 0000-0001-7043-0514 ; 0000-0002-6778-9291 ; 0000-0002-0765-4125 ; 0000-0002-0106-9187 ; 0000-0001-9479-3010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beagan, Jamie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drees, Esther E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stathi, Phylicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijk, Paul P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meulenbroeks, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Floortje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegtel, D. Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, Josée M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sie, Daoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thunnissen, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouliere, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ylstra, Bauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</title><title>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</title><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><description>Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients.</description><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Circulating Tumor DNA - blood</subject><subject>Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Copy Number Variations</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Liquid Biopsy</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood</subject><subject>Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Whole Genome Sequencing - methods</subject><issn>1525-1578</issn><issn>1943-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAUtBCIloU_QMhHLgl2bCfuBWkJbalU0VUp4mg5zjPJyrG3dnahf8Un1tEWjpxsvZk3Y88g9JaSkhJaf9iW2ym4_ndZkYqWRJaEyGfolJ5xVjSS0uf5LipRUNHIE_QqpS0hlPO6eolOGOeCU8pP0Z9Ne1tcRAD8bdDOhV_4xxAc4EvwYcpDuN-DN6P_iW2IuB1imEIKk3a4DbsH_HU_dRDxZ5jBzGPw2GYC3jidJo2Dxa32JuMbPY_g54SvEtYen1s7mmWA126G6DN6ADwHPA-Qdf0hQ1ksmyyv-6QT9Hi928WgzfAavbDaJXjzdK7Q94vzu_ZLcX1zedWurwvDiZyLijJqaiYE15ayvu6MOas7aAgRwKCDTsqeGEatkKJhRkvJGw6stoaIqmKWrdD7o262zRmkWU1jMuCc9hD2SVWirkklSY57hfiRamJIKYJVuzhOOj4oStTSldqqY1dq6UoRqXJXee3dk8O-m6D_t_S3nEz4eCRA_udhhKjSkpqBfow5btWH8f8OjwH9qPQ</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Beagan, Jamie J.</creator><creator>Drees, Esther E.E.</creator><creator>Stathi, Phylicia</creator><creator>Eijk, Paul P.</creator><creator>Meulenbroeks, Laura</creator><creator>Kessler, Floortje</creator><creator>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</creator><creator>Pegtel, D. Michiel</creator><creator>Zijlstra, Josée M.</creator><creator>Sie, Daoud</creator><creator>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</creator><creator>Thunnissen, Erik</creator><creator>Smit, Linda</creator><creator>de Jong, Daphne</creator><creator>Mouliere, Florent</creator><creator>Ylstra, Bauke</creator><creator>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</creator><creator>van Dijk, Erik</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-2039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3551-0038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-1953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-2582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-0514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-9291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-4125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-9187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-3010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</title><author>Beagan, Jamie J. ; Drees, Esther E.E. ; Stathi, Phylicia ; Eijk, Paul P. ; Meulenbroeks, Laura ; Kessler, Floortje ; Middeldorp, Jaap M. ; Pegtel, D. Michiel ; Zijlstra, Josée M. ; Sie, Daoud ; Heideman, Daniëlle A.M. ; Thunnissen, Erik ; Smit, Linda ; de Jong, Daphne ; Mouliere, Florent ; Ylstra, Bauke ; Roemer, Margaretha G.M. ; van Dijk, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Circulating Tumor DNA - blood</topic><topic>Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Copy Number Variations</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Liquid Biopsy</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood</topic><topic>Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Whole Genome Sequencing - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beagan, Jamie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drees, Esther E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stathi, Phylicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijk, Paul P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meulenbroeks, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Floortje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegtel, D. Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, Josée M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sie, Daoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thunnissen, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouliere, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ylstra, Bauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beagan, Jamie J.</au><au>Drees, Esther E.E.</au><au>Stathi, Phylicia</au><au>Eijk, Paul P.</au><au>Meulenbroeks, Laura</au><au>Kessler, Floortje</au><au>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</au><au>Pegtel, D. Michiel</au><au>Zijlstra, Josée M.</au><au>Sie, Daoud</au><au>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</au><au>Thunnissen, Erik</au><au>Smit, Linda</au><au>de Jong, Daphne</au><au>Mouliere, Florent</au><au>Ylstra, Bauke</au><au>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</au><au>van Dijk, Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1563</epage><pages>1553-1563</pages><issn>1525-1578</issn><eissn>1943-7811</eissn><abstract>Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34454114</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-2039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3551-0038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-1953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-2582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-0514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-9291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-4125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-9187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-3010</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-1578
ispartof The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1553-1563
issn 1525-1578
1943-7811
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566028094
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biomarkers, Tumor - blood
Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics
Blood Specimen Collection - methods
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics
Case-Control Studies
Circulating Tumor DNA - blood
Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics
DNA Copy Number Variations
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics
Limit of Detection
Liquid Biopsy
Longitudinal Studies
Lung Neoplasms - blood
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms - genetics
Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood
Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis
Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics
Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods
Whole Genome Sequencing - methods
title PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T08%3A20%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PCR-Free%20Shallow%20Whole%20Genome%20Sequencing%20for%20Chromosomal%20Copy%20Number%20Detection%20from%20Plasma%20of%20Cancer%20Patients%20Is%20an%20Efficient%20Alternative%20to%20the%20Conventional%20PCR-Based%20Approach&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20molecular%20diagnostics%20:%20JMD&rft.au=Beagan,%20Jamie%20J.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1563&rft.pages=1553-1563&rft.issn=1525-1578&rft.eissn=1943-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2566028094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2566028094&rft_id=info:pmid/34454114&rft_els_id=S1525157821002646&rfr_iscdi=true