PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach
Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1553-1563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1563 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1553 |
container_title | The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Beagan, Jamie J. Drees, Esther E.E. Stathi, Phylicia Eijk, Paul P. Meulenbroeks, Laura Kessler, Floortje Middeldorp, Jaap M. Pegtel, D. Michiel Zijlstra, Josée M. Sie, Daoud Heideman, Daniëlle A.M. Thunnissen, Erik Smit, Linda de Jong, Daphne Mouliere, Florent Ylstra, Bauke Roemer, Margaretha G.M. van Dijk, Erik |
description | Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566028094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1525157821002646</els_id><sourcerecordid>2566028094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAUtBCIloU_QMhHLgl2bCfuBWkJbalU0VUp4mg5zjPJyrG3dnahf8Un1tEWjpxsvZk3Y88g9JaSkhJaf9iW2ym4_ndZkYqWRJaEyGfolJ5xVjSS0uf5LipRUNHIE_QqpS0hlPO6eolOGOeCU8pP0Z9Ne1tcRAD8bdDOhV_4xxAc4EvwYcpDuN-DN6P_iW2IuB1imEIKk3a4DbsH_HU_dRDxZ5jBzGPw2GYC3jidJo2Dxa32JuMbPY_g54SvEtYen1s7mmWA126G6DN6ADwHPA-Qdf0hQ1ksmyyv-6QT9Hi928WgzfAavbDaJXjzdK7Q94vzu_ZLcX1zedWurwvDiZyLijJqaiYE15ayvu6MOas7aAgRwKCDTsqeGEatkKJhRkvJGw6stoaIqmKWrdD7o262zRmkWU1jMuCc9hD2SVWirkklSY57hfiRamJIKYJVuzhOOj4oStTSldqqY1dq6UoRqXJXee3dk8O-m6D_t_S3nEz4eCRA_udhhKjSkpqBfow5btWH8f8OjwH9qPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2566028094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Beagan, Jamie J. ; Drees, Esther E.E. ; Stathi, Phylicia ; Eijk, Paul P. ; Meulenbroeks, Laura ; Kessler, Floortje ; Middeldorp, Jaap M. ; Pegtel, D. Michiel ; Zijlstra, Josée M. ; Sie, Daoud ; Heideman, Daniëlle A.M. ; Thunnissen, Erik ; Smit, Linda ; de Jong, Daphne ; Mouliere, Florent ; Ylstra, Bauke ; Roemer, Margaretha G.M. ; van Dijk, Erik</creator><creatorcontrib>Beagan, Jamie J. ; Drees, Esther E.E. ; Stathi, Phylicia ; Eijk, Paul P. ; Meulenbroeks, Laura ; Kessler, Floortje ; Middeldorp, Jaap M. ; Pegtel, D. Michiel ; Zijlstra, Josée M. ; Sie, Daoud ; Heideman, Daniëlle A.M. ; Thunnissen, Erik ; Smit, Linda ; de Jong, Daphne ; Mouliere, Florent ; Ylstra, Bauke ; Roemer, Margaretha G.M. ; van Dijk, Erik</creatorcontrib><description>Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-1578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7811</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34454114</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Blood Specimen Collection - methods ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics ; Case-Control Studies ; Circulating Tumor DNA - blood ; Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics ; DNA Copy Number Variations ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics ; Limit of Detection ; Liquid Biopsy ; Longitudinal Studies ; Lung Neoplasms - blood ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - genetics ; Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood ; Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis ; Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; Whole Genome Sequencing - methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1553-1563</ispartof><rights>2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6272-2039 ; 0000-0003-3551-0038 ; 0000-0003-1124-1953 ; 0000-0001-6762-2582 ; 0000-0001-7043-0514 ; 0000-0002-6778-9291 ; 0000-0002-0765-4125 ; 0000-0002-0106-9187 ; 0000-0001-9479-3010</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34454114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beagan, Jamie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drees, Esther E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stathi, Phylicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijk, Paul P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meulenbroeks, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Floortje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegtel, D. Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, Josée M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sie, Daoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thunnissen, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouliere, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ylstra, Bauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Erik</creatorcontrib><title>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</title><title>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</title><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><description>Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients.</description><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Circulating Tumor DNA - blood</subject><subject>Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics</subject><subject>DNA Copy Number Variations</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Liquid Biopsy</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood</subject><subject>Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>Whole Genome Sequencing - methods</subject><issn>1525-1578</issn><issn>1943-7811</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAUtBCIloU_QMhHLgl2bCfuBWkJbalU0VUp4mg5zjPJyrG3dnahf8Un1tEWjpxsvZk3Y88g9JaSkhJaf9iW2ym4_ndZkYqWRJaEyGfolJ5xVjSS0uf5LipRUNHIE_QqpS0hlPO6eolOGOeCU8pP0Z9Ne1tcRAD8bdDOhV_4xxAc4EvwYcpDuN-DN6P_iW2IuB1imEIKk3a4DbsH_HU_dRDxZ5jBzGPw2GYC3jidJo2Dxa32JuMbPY_g54SvEtYen1s7mmWA126G6DN6ADwHPA-Qdf0hQ1ksmyyv-6QT9Hi928WgzfAavbDaJXjzdK7Q94vzu_ZLcX1zedWurwvDiZyLijJqaiYE15ayvu6MOas7aAgRwKCDTsqeGEatkKJhRkvJGw6stoaIqmKWrdD7o262zRmkWU1jMuCc9hD2SVWirkklSY57hfiRamJIKYJVuzhOOj4oStTSldqqY1dq6UoRqXJXee3dk8O-m6D_t_S3nEz4eCRA_udhhKjSkpqBfow5btWH8f8OjwH9qPQ</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Beagan, Jamie J.</creator><creator>Drees, Esther E.E.</creator><creator>Stathi, Phylicia</creator><creator>Eijk, Paul P.</creator><creator>Meulenbroeks, Laura</creator><creator>Kessler, Floortje</creator><creator>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</creator><creator>Pegtel, D. Michiel</creator><creator>Zijlstra, Josée M.</creator><creator>Sie, Daoud</creator><creator>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</creator><creator>Thunnissen, Erik</creator><creator>Smit, Linda</creator><creator>de Jong, Daphne</creator><creator>Mouliere, Florent</creator><creator>Ylstra, Bauke</creator><creator>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</creator><creator>van Dijk, Erik</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-2039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3551-0038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-1953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-2582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-0514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-9291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-4125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-9187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-3010</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</title><author>Beagan, Jamie J. ; Drees, Esther E.E. ; Stathi, Phylicia ; Eijk, Paul P. ; Meulenbroeks, Laura ; Kessler, Floortje ; Middeldorp, Jaap M. ; Pegtel, D. Michiel ; Zijlstra, Josée M. ; Sie, Daoud ; Heideman, Daniëlle A.M. ; Thunnissen, Erik ; Smit, Linda ; de Jong, Daphne ; Mouliere, Florent ; Ylstra, Bauke ; Roemer, Margaretha G.M. ; van Dijk, Erik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-2131c63554af13d6bcc96be7005e3ebeb88d0c31f58573ca88474e36fc05223f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Blood Specimen Collection - methods</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Circulating Tumor DNA - blood</topic><topic>Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics</topic><topic>DNA Copy Number Variations</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Liquid Biopsy</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood</topic><topic>Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>Whole Genome Sequencing - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beagan, Jamie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drees, Esther E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stathi, Phylicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijk, Paul P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meulenbroeks, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Floortje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegtel, D. Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, Josée M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sie, Daoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thunnissen, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Daphne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouliere, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ylstra, Bauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Erik</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beagan, Jamie J.</au><au>Drees, Esther E.E.</au><au>Stathi, Phylicia</au><au>Eijk, Paul P.</au><au>Meulenbroeks, Laura</au><au>Kessler, Floortje</au><au>Middeldorp, Jaap M.</au><au>Pegtel, D. Michiel</au><au>Zijlstra, Josée M.</au><au>Sie, Daoud</au><au>Heideman, Daniëlle A.M.</au><au>Thunnissen, Erik</au><au>Smit, Linda</au><au>de Jong, Daphne</au><au>Mouliere, Florent</au><au>Ylstra, Bauke</au><au>Roemer, Margaretha G.M.</au><au>van Dijk, Erik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Diagn</addtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1553</spage><epage>1563</epage><pages>1553-1563</pages><issn>1525-1578</issn><eissn>1943-7811</eissn><abstract>Somatic copy number alterations can be detected in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS). PCR is typically included in library preparations, but a PCR-free method could serve as a high-throughput alternative. To evaluate a PCR-free method for research and diagnostics, archival peripheral blood or bone marrow plasma samples, collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes, were collected from patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (n = 10 longitudinal samples; 4 patients), B-cell lymphoma (n = 31), and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 15), or from healthy donors (n = 14). sWGS was performed on PCR-free and PCR library preparations, and the mapping quality, percentage of unique reads, genome coverage, fragment lengths, and copy number profiles were compared. The percentage of unique reads was significantly higher for PCR-free method compared with PCR method, independent of the type of collection tube: EDTA PCR-free method, 96.4% (n = 35); EDTA PCR method, 85.1% (n = 32); heparin PCR-free method, 94.5% (n = 25); and heparin PCR method, 89.4% (n = 10). All other evaluated metrics were highly comparable for PCR-free and PCR library preparations. These results demonstrate the feasibility of somatic copy number alteration detection by PCR-free sWGS using cfDNA from plasma collected in EDTA- or lithium-heparin–containing tubes and pave the way for an automated cfDNA analysis workflow for samples from cancer patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34454114</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-2039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3551-0038</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-1953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-2582</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-0514</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6778-9291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-4125</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-9187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-3010</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-1578 |
ispartof | The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.1553-1563 |
issn | 1525-1578 1943-7811 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2566028094 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biomarkers, Tumor - blood Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics Blood Specimen Collection - methods Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - genetics Case-Control Studies Circulating Tumor DNA - blood Circulating Tumor DNA - genetics DNA Copy Number Variations Feasibility Studies Humans Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - blood Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics Limit of Detection Liquid Biopsy Longitudinal Studies Lung Neoplasms - blood Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis Lung Neoplasms - genetics Lymphoma, B-Cell - blood Lymphoma, B-Cell - diagnosis Lymphoma, B-Cell - genetics Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods Whole Genome Sequencing - methods |
title | PCR-Free Shallow Whole Genome Sequencing for Chromosomal Copy Number Detection from Plasma of Cancer Patients Is an Efficient Alternative to the Conventional PCR-Based Approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T08%3A20%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PCR-Free%20Shallow%20Whole%20Genome%20Sequencing%20for%20Chromosomal%20Copy%20Number%20Detection%20from%20Plasma%20of%20Cancer%20Patients%20Is%20an%20Efficient%20Alternative%20to%20the%20Conventional%20PCR-Based%20Approach&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20molecular%20diagnostics%20:%20JMD&rft.au=Beagan,%20Jamie%20J.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1553&rft.epage=1563&rft.pages=1553-1563&rft.issn=1525-1578&rft.eissn=1943-7811&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2566028094%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2566028094&rft_id=info:pmid/34454114&rft_els_id=S1525157821002646&rfr_iscdi=true |