Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era

Background Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2022-01, Vol.128 (1), p.139-149
Hauptverfasser: Kennedy, Vanessa E., Keegan, Theresa H. M., Li, Qian, Maguire, Frances B., Muffly, Lori S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 1
container_start_page 139
container_title Cancer
container_volume 128
creator Kennedy, Vanessa E.
Keegan, Theresa H. M.
Li, Qian
Maguire, Frances B.
Muffly, Lori S.
description Background Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort. Methods This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival. Results In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival. Conclusions Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML. Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.33873
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564947745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610469950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhkNR2mt10x9QAm6KMG0ySSYz7srFaqFYEAV3Q25ybps2k4z5oNxdt-76G_tLTL3VhQtXhxee88DLi9ABJceUkPZEex2PGesl20ELSgbZEMrbF2hBCOkbwdn3PfQqpZsaZSvYLtpjnLNO9u0C_TyLwWdnPeAcQeUJfMazyhmiT1h5g0PJOkxQwxT8FQ7OQMTKFJcTvrP5GitdMuBpAy5Ygx2UW5iseo9P8Rzm4lS2wT_eP6xUAlONym2STdh6nK_rW6g6jyGq1-jlWrkEb57vPvp29uHr8lNzcfnxfHl60Wg2MNbAoFdE0Faa1lDdq66XqzUw6HrBayXRAxtAyo4NojeCGqFabuhaGKNVp8CwfXS09c4x_CiQ8jjZpME55SGUNLai4wOXkouKvv0HvQkl1gaV6ijh3TAIUql3W0rHkFKE9ThHO6m4GSkZnwYanwYafw9U4cNnZVlNYP6ifxapAN0Cd9bB5j-qcfl5-WUr_QXTYp5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610469950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kennedy, Vanessa E. ; Keegan, Theresa H. M. ; Li, Qian ; Maguire, Frances B. ; Muffly, Lori S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Vanessa E. ; Keegan, Theresa H. M. ; Li, Qian ; Maguire, Frances B. ; Muffly, Lori S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort. Methods This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival. Results In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P &lt; .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival. Conclusions Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML. Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33873</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34436782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Cohort Studies ; Humans ; Leukemia ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy ; Middle Aged ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Myeloid leukemia ; National Cancer Institute (U.S.) ; older adults ; Older people ; Oncology ; Patients ; patterns of care ; Population ; Population studies ; Public health ; Remission Induction ; Survival ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2022-01, Vol.128 (1), p.139-149</ispartof><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2022 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1912-4076 ; 0000-0002-1961-4008 ; 0000-0001-8490-6229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33873$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33873$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Frances B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muffly, Lori S.</creatorcontrib><title>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort. Methods This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival. Results In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P &lt; .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival. Conclusions Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML. Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care.</description><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</subject><subject>older adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>patterns of care</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhkNR2mt10x9QAm6KMG0ySSYz7srFaqFYEAV3Q25ybps2k4z5oNxdt-76G_tLTL3VhQtXhxee88DLi9ABJceUkPZEex2PGesl20ELSgbZEMrbF2hBCOkbwdn3PfQqpZsaZSvYLtpjnLNO9u0C_TyLwWdnPeAcQeUJfMazyhmiT1h5g0PJOkxQwxT8FQ7OQMTKFJcTvrP5GitdMuBpAy5Ygx2UW5iseo9P8Rzm4lS2wT_eP6xUAlONym2STdh6nK_rW6g6jyGq1-jlWrkEb57vPvp29uHr8lNzcfnxfHl60Wg2MNbAoFdE0Faa1lDdq66XqzUw6HrBayXRAxtAyo4NojeCGqFabuhaGKNVp8CwfXS09c4x_CiQ8jjZpME55SGUNLai4wOXkouKvv0HvQkl1gaV6ijh3TAIUql3W0rHkFKE9ThHO6m4GSkZnwYanwYafw9U4cNnZVlNYP6ifxapAN0Cd9bB5j-qcfl5-WUr_QXTYp5g</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</creator><creator>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</creator><creator>Li, Qian</creator><creator>Maguire, Frances B.</creator><creator>Muffly, Lori S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1912-4076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-4008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-6229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</title><author>Kennedy, Vanessa E. ; Keegan, Theresa H. M. ; Li, Qian ; Maguire, Frances B. ; Muffly, Lori S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acute myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</topic><topic>older adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>patterns of care</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Frances B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muffly, Lori S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</au><au>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</au><au>Li, Qian</au><au>Maguire, Frances B.</au><au>Muffly, Lori S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>139-149</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort. Methods This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival. Results In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P &lt; .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival. Conclusions Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML. Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34436782</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33873</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1912-4076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-4008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-6229</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2022-01, Vol.128 (1), p.139-149
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564947745
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acute myeloid leukemia
Adults
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
Cohort Studies
Humans
Leukemia
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy
Middle Aged
Minority & ethnic groups
Myeloid leukemia
National Cancer Institute (U.S.)
older adults
Older people
Oncology
Patients
patterns of care
Population
Population studies
Public health
Remission Induction
Survival
United States - epidemiology
title Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frontline%20treatment%20patterns%20and%20outcomes%20among%20older%20adults%20with%20acute%20myeloid%20leukemia:%20A%20population%E2%80%90based%20analysis%20in%20the%20modern%20era&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Kennedy,%20Vanessa%20E.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=139-149&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33873&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610469950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610469950&rft_id=info:pmid/34436782&rfr_iscdi=true