Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era
Background Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2022-01, Vol.128 (1), p.139-149 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 149 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Kennedy, Vanessa E. Keegan, Theresa H. M. Li, Qian Maguire, Frances B. Muffly, Lori S. |
description | Background
Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort.
Methods
This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival.
Results
In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival.
Conclusions
Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML.
Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.33873 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564947745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610469950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhkNR2mt10x9QAm6KMG0ySSYz7srFaqFYEAV3Q25ybps2k4z5oNxdt-76G_tLTL3VhQtXhxee88DLi9ABJceUkPZEex2PGesl20ELSgbZEMrbF2hBCOkbwdn3PfQqpZsaZSvYLtpjnLNO9u0C_TyLwWdnPeAcQeUJfMazyhmiT1h5g0PJOkxQwxT8FQ7OQMTKFJcTvrP5GitdMuBpAy5Ygx2UW5iseo9P8Rzm4lS2wT_eP6xUAlONym2STdh6nK_rW6g6jyGq1-jlWrkEb57vPvp29uHr8lNzcfnxfHl60Wg2MNbAoFdE0Faa1lDdq66XqzUw6HrBayXRAxtAyo4NojeCGqFabuhaGKNVp8CwfXS09c4x_CiQ8jjZpME55SGUNLai4wOXkouKvv0HvQkl1gaV6ijh3TAIUql3W0rHkFKE9ThHO6m4GSkZnwYanwYafw9U4cNnZVlNYP6ifxapAN0Cd9bB5j-qcfl5-WUr_QXTYp5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610469950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kennedy, Vanessa E. ; Keegan, Theresa H. M. ; Li, Qian ; Maguire, Frances B. ; Muffly, Lori S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Vanessa E. ; Keegan, Theresa H. M. ; Li, Qian ; Maguire, Frances B. ; Muffly, Lori S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort.
Methods
This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival.
Results
In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival.
Conclusions
Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML.
Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33873</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34436782</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Cohort Studies ; Humans ; Leukemia ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy ; Middle Aged ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Myeloid leukemia ; National Cancer Institute (U.S.) ; older adults ; Older people ; Oncology ; Patients ; patterns of care ; Population ; Population studies ; Public health ; Remission Induction ; Survival ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2022-01, Vol.128 (1), p.139-149</ispartof><rights>2021 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2021 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2022 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1912-4076 ; 0000-0002-1961-4008 ; 0000-0001-8490-6229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33873$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33873$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34436782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Frances B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muffly, Lori S.</creatorcontrib><title>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort.
Methods
This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival.
Results
In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival.
Conclusions
Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML.
Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care.</description><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</subject><subject>older adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>patterns of care</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhkNR2mt10x9QAm6KMG0ySSYz7srFaqFYEAV3Q25ybps2k4z5oNxdt-76G_tLTL3VhQtXhxee88DLi9ABJceUkPZEex2PGesl20ELSgbZEMrbF2hBCOkbwdn3PfQqpZsaZSvYLtpjnLNO9u0C_TyLwWdnPeAcQeUJfMazyhmiT1h5g0PJOkxQwxT8FQ7OQMTKFJcTvrP5GitdMuBpAy5Ygx2UW5iseo9P8Rzm4lS2wT_eP6xUAlONym2STdh6nK_rW6g6jyGq1-jlWrkEb57vPvp29uHr8lNzcfnxfHl60Wg2MNbAoFdE0Faa1lDdq66XqzUw6HrBayXRAxtAyo4NojeCGqFabuhaGKNVp8CwfXS09c4x_CiQ8jjZpME55SGUNLai4wOXkouKvv0HvQkl1gaV6ijh3TAIUql3W0rHkFKE9ThHO6m4GSkZnwYanwYafw9U4cNnZVlNYP6ifxapAN0Cd9bB5j-qcfl5-WUr_QXTYp5g</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</creator><creator>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</creator><creator>Li, Qian</creator><creator>Maguire, Frances B.</creator><creator>Muffly, Lori S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1912-4076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-4008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-6229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</title><author>Kennedy, Vanessa E. ; Keegan, Theresa H. M. ; Li, Qian ; Maguire, Frances B. ; Muffly, Lori S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-e9cb05127d2d1c8a687bfe3e685467858e39e7763958d51d5a24d1f5ddca6aed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acute myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>National Cancer Institute (U.S.)</topic><topic>older adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>patterns of care</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Frances B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muffly, Lori S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kennedy, Vanessa E.</au><au>Keegan, Theresa H. M.</au><au>Li, Qian</au><au>Maguire, Frances B.</au><au>Muffly, Lori S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>139-149</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background
Traditionally, conventional induction chemotherapy has been the primary frontline treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, older adults are often poor chemotherapy candidates. Recently, several nonconventional frontline AML regimens, including hypomethylating agents, the BCL‐2 inhibitor venetoclax, and targeted therapies, have emerged, and they may offer new options for older adults. This study was aimed at describing treatment patterns and outcomes of older adult AML in a modern population‐based cohort.
Methods
This study evaluated patients aged ≥60 years with a first primary diagnosis of AML (2014‐2017) in the California Cancer Registry linked to inpatient hospitalizations. Multivariable regression examined factors associated with the frontline treatment regimen and survival.
Results
In all, 3068 patients were included; 36% received frontline therapy with a conventional chemotherapy backbone, 42% received nonconventional therapy, and 22% received no treatment. The use of nonconventional therapy increased over time from 38% of patients in 2014 to 47% in 2017 (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, receipt of treatment was associated with an age younger than 80 years, fewer than 2 comorbidities, and care at a National Cancer Institute–designated cancer center (NCI‐CC). Compared with conventional chemotherapy, nonconventional therapy was associated with Black race/ethnicity, public health insurance, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer inpatient days. Receiving frontline therapy at an NCI‐CC was independently associated with superior overall survival.
Conclusions
Using a population‐based approach, this study has demonstrated that patterns of care for frontline AML treatment in older adults are changing, with increasing use of nonconventional therapies. A significant proportion of older adults remain untreated. At the population level, there remain opportunities to increase therapy access for older adults with AML.
Using a population‐based approach, this study demonstrates that frontline treatment patterns for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia are changing, with an increasing proportion of patients receiving treatment with newer, nontraditional agents. Despite these changes, a significant proportion of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia remain untreated, with the receipt of treatment associated with the location of frontline care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34436782</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33873</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1912-4076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-4008</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8490-6229</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2022-01, Vol.128 (1), p.139-149 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2564947745 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acute myeloid leukemia Adults Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Cancer Cancer therapies Chemotherapy Cohort Studies Humans Leukemia Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - drug therapy Middle Aged Minority & ethnic groups Myeloid leukemia National Cancer Institute (U.S.) older adults Older people Oncology Patients patterns of care Population Population studies Public health Remission Induction Survival United States - epidemiology |
title | Frontline treatment patterns and outcomes among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A population‐based analysis in the modern era |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A54%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frontline%20treatment%20patterns%20and%20outcomes%20among%20older%20adults%20with%20acute%20myeloid%20leukemia:%20A%20population%E2%80%90based%20analysis%20in%20the%20modern%20era&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Kennedy,%20Vanessa%20E.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=139-149&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33873&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610469950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610469950&rft_id=info:pmid/34436782&rfr_iscdi=true |